ML18074A361
| ML18074A361 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 10/15/2017 |
| From: | Peter Presby Operations Branch I |
| To: | Dominion Energy Nuclear Connecticut |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17094A469 | List: |
| References | |
| CAC U01946, ES-301, ES-301-7 | |
| Download: ML18074A361 (14) | |
Text
ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 Facility: Millstone Unit 3 Exam Date: December 4, 2017 1
2 3
4 5
6 ADMIN Topic LOO Attributes Job Content Admin JPMs (1-U/E/S Explanation and K/A
- 5) 1/C Critical Scope Perf.
Job Cues Overlap Key Minutia Link Focus Steps (N/B)
Std.
-~-*-.
=
Made Steps 9, 12, and 19 critical RO A.1.1: Determine RCS Leakrate and coo steps.
Determine if the Leakrate is within Limits G2.1.7 3
..j E
Deleted reference to tech spec -
Candidate is not being given the Tech Soec Deleted the cue from step 11 and 12 to provide the Monthly Reactivity Data Sheet. Removed the Monthly Reactivity Data Sheet from the list of required materials. Added a cue to RO A.1.2: Calculate a Dilution with the coo 3
./
E step 12 to tell the candidate that the PPC G2.1.43 Monthly Reactivity Data Sheet shows an auto makeup reactivity correction factor of 1.0, if asked. Added a comment to step 12 that the auto makeup reactivity correction factor was given in the initial conditions.
In step 9 standard, removed the reference to the 'turnover sheet'. No turnover sheet is associated with this JPM. Added to initial conditions a bullet specifying that All MOVs listed for the associated equipment check for the 'A' EOG are OPERABLE (the candidate was supposed to refer to the turnover sheet to make this determination). Added a cue to step 9 that, all MOVs listed for the associated equipment check for the 'A' EDG are RO A.2: Perform AC Electrical Source EC 3
./
E OPERABLE, if asked by the lnoperability G2.2.12 candidate. Also:
Referenced revision to form, SP 3646A.7-002, Rev 008. This did not alter JPM content.
JPM Step 6: Removed cue and added clarification on what examinee should observe (under "Standard").
JPM Step 7: Changed part of cue from "Continue with procedure" to '"A' EDG is operable".
JPM Steps 8 & 10:
Chanoed Cue and Comments to
ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7 reflect possibility of stopping JPM earlv.
Initial Condition / Cue section (pgs 4 & 10): Changed initial condition 17:00 statement to remove the sentence "It is expected that your dose as a result of this action may exceed 6 REM". Changed initiating cue to include applicable procedures needed. Added word Maximum to table (far right hand column).
RO A.3: Determine Dose Limits Under Rad 2
.j
.j E
Initiating Cue section (pgs 4 Changing Plant Conditions G2.3.4
& 10): Removed "Using RP-AA-105...
and MP-26-EPI-FAP09... " as it was considered leading. Changed references to allow use of the CR -
DSEO Book (would be available in the Control Room and it contains 1 of 2 references -
MP-26-EPI-FAP09).
JPM Step 6 & 8: Added cue
/2) to clarifv current TEDE.
Initiating Cue Section (pgs 4
& 13): Removed 2nd cue for 08:00 &
10:00 which read "Any actions, if any, required to be taken with reactor power prior to taking the instrument SRO A.1.1: Determine Effects on out of service." This was found to be Calorimetric of Removing Instruments coo 2
./
.j E
confusing during validation.
from Service, and Determine Required G2.1.7 JPM Step 2: Removed cue Actions "If examinee starts addressing... state "All three 'A' SG pressure channels are indicating the same value".
JPM Step 8: Changed to Non - Critical step.
Initiating Cue Section (pgs 4
& 14): Removed the following two bullets: 'Which LCO ACTION(S), if any, which is/are required to be entered." 'What specific action(s), if any, other than stopping fuel SRO A.1.2: Check Refueling Admin coo E
movement is/are required to be taken 4
.j based on any LCO ACTIONs that Requirements G2.1.40 have been entered." Re-worked cue to read, in part, "Record any Tech Spec Actions required (if any) or reporting requirements (if any) as a result of your review at the bottom/back of this oaae."
Due to OU-M3-201 being SRO A.2: Complete a Shutdown Safety EC 4
.j
./
E revised, made minor changes to step Assessment Checklist G2.2.18 numbers. Also, had to create JPM
ES-301 SRO A.3: Evaluation of an Unplanned Gaseous Release SRO A.4: Emergency Plan Classification and PAR Simulator/In-Plant JPMs
- a. S1: Initiate Immediate Boration
004.A2.14 2
W/E05.EK2.2 Operating Test Review Worksheet 4
.j
.j 3
v' 3
.j 3
E E
E s
Form ES-301-7 Step 6 for new step that relates to Security. As such, a bullet was added to the cue stating: "Security requirements for crediting the Terry Turbine as operable are met."
Initial Conditions Section (pgs 4 & 17): Added the following bullet: "Pressurizer Level is 65% with a Pressurizer bubble established Initiating Cue Section (pg 17): Changed cue to match pg 4 cue sheet.
Initial Conditions Section (pgs 4 & 21 ): Changed cue 1. From "About 30 minutes ago... " to "Ten minutes ago... ".
Initiating Cues Conditions Section (pgs 4 & 21 ): Simplified cue statement.
Moved the following cue from the comments section of JPM step 3, to the cue section of step 3: If the Examinee correctly classifies the event as a General Emergency -
ALPHA, then CUE the Examinee "Determine Protective Action Recommendations and record recommendation on page 2 of the Examinee handout." Added a comment to JPM step 2.d that shows the major and minor headings of the classification.
In Reference Section (pg 3): Added the Status Tree Book as a second reference & bolded CR DSEO Book.
In Sim Reqt Section (pg 4):
Added note: 'Will be run in parallel with 2017 NRC S.8."
JPM Step 6: Changed comment section to clarify the candidate "should" stop (vice "may")
the Boric Acid Transfer Pump. Added clarification on non-critical nature of this step.
ES-301 Operating Test Review Worksheet Form ES-301-7
- c. S3: Depressurize the RCS During a 3
3 SG Tube Ruoture EPE.038.EA 1.04 s
On page 4: Added NOTE to allow for task preview. In Simulator Requirements Section, added / re-configured detail to ensure stable IC.
- d. S4: Shifting the RHR System During 4 primary 3
./
E JPM Step 5: Added Single Loop Operation 005.A4.01 comment on the possibility of a RHR Pp low flow alarm to annunciate.
JPM Steps 10,11 & 16:
Bolded instructions for examiner/
booth ooerator.
Control Valves 059.A4.03 s
- f. S6: Manual CIA 5
3 103.A2.03 s
On page 4: In Simulator Requirements Section, added / re-configured detail to allow running JPM
- g. S7: Test Start the 'B' EDG from MB8 6
3 in parallel with S.4. Also, provided 064.A4.06
./
./
E note to allow task preview.
JPM Step 40: Added clarification in Comment section that examinee should apply note and incrementallv adjust EDG loading.
Initiating Cue Section Section (pgs 4 & 12): Added the following cue: "All pre-requisites of OP 3314F have been completed."
- h. S8: Starting Control Building 9
In Sim Requirement Section Ventilation on Filtered Outside Air 071.A2.09 2
./
E (pg 4): Added note: 'Will be run in parallel with 2017 NRC S.1." Also, changed IC to match S.1 (IC 44).
On page 10: Added STEP 13 (non-critical procedure step that was missina from orevious revision).
- i. P1: Establishing Charging Pump 4 secondary 3
./
Changed description of valve Cooling 076.A2.01 E
manipulations in STEPS 4 & 6 to reflect ball valve {vice gate valve).
STEPS 9 and 13:
- j. P2: Energizing MCC 32-3T following 6
3 Enhanced cues for expectant tripped CDA 062.A2.01
./
E open breakers Corrected typo on STEP 11 l"breake" to "breaker").
- k. P3: Align 'C' CCW Pump and Heat 8
3 Exchanaer to the 'A' Train 008.A2.01 s
ES-301 5
Form ES-301-7 Instructions for Completing This Table:
Check or mark any item(s) requiring a comment and explain the issue in the space provided using the guide below.
- 1.
Check each JPM for appropriate administrative topic requirements (COO, EC, Rad, and EP) or safety function requirements and corresponding K/A. Mark in column 1.
(ES-301, D.3 and D.4)
- 2.
Determine the level of difficulty (LOD) using an established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent an inappropriate {low or high) discriminatory level for the license that is being tested. Mark in column 2 (Appendix D, C.1.f)
- 3.
In column 3, "Attributes," check the appropriate box when an attribute is not met:
I The initial conditions and/or initiating cue is clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin. (Appendix C, 8.4)
The JPM contains appropriate cues that clearly indicate when they should be provided to the examinee. Cues are objective and not leading. (Appendix C, D.1)
[
All critical steps (elements) are properly identified.
The scope of the task is not too narrow (N) or too broad (8).
Excessive overlap does not occur with other parts of the operating test or written examination. (ES-301, D.1.a, and ES-301, D.2.a)
The task performance standard clearly describes the expected outcome (i.e., end state). Each performance step identifies a standard for successful completion of the step.
A valid marked up key was provided (e.g., graph interpretation, initialed steps for handouts).
- 4.
For column 4, "Job Content," check the appropriate box if the job content flaw does not meet the following elements:
r Topics are linked to the job content (e.g., not a disguised task, task required in real job).
l The JPM has meaningful performance requirements that will provide a legitimate basis for evaluating the applicant's understanding and ability to safely operate the plant. (ES-301, D.2.c)
- 5.
Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)nhancement, or (S)atisfactory? Mark the answer in column 5.
- 6.
In column 6, provide a brief description of any (U)nacceptable or (E)nhancement rating from column 5.
Save initial review comments and detail subsequent comment resolution so that each exam-bound JPM is marked by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form.
ES-301 6
Form ES-301-7 Facility:
Millstone Unit 3 Scenario:
2K17 NRC-01 Exam Date: December 4, 2017 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Event Realism/Cred.
Required Verifiable LOD TS CTs Seen.
U/E/S Explanation Actions actions Overlap The following changes were made following NRC validation:
- 1. On Exam Overview (pgs 4-5): Removed Event 3 ('A' Charging Pump Trip) and Event 5 (PZR level failure as is). Also, removed reference to specific Tech Specs, added Critical Task for RCP Trip Criteria, and made tripping bistables discretionary in Event 1.
- 2. On Input Summary (pgs 7-8): Removed associated scheduie inputs for Events 3 & 5 (triggers 5, 8, & 9).
- 4. In the scenario time line section, made the following changes:
Corrected Tech Spec/ TRM entries.
On page 15, made tripping bistables discretionary for Event 1.
On pages 21-22, changed expected flowpath thru AOP 3571. Also, corrected typo on pg. 22 (move onto event 3 vice 2).
Removed Event 3, 'A' Charging Pump Trip.
On page 24, modified RCP upper seal failure so that it starts to slowly degrade from onset of trigger 7.
On page 29, modified expectant flowpath for AOP 3575 (given a RE Rx Plan exists for power reduction).
Removed Event 5, Controlling PZR Level Fails AS-IS 1 thru 10 E
On page 37, added Critical Task to trip RCP's.
On page 43, removed floor instructor note regarding possible transition to FR-Z.1 (unlikely to have met transition at this point).
On page 44, moved transition to LGBLOCA (Event 8) earlier in E-1.
- 5. On page 49, Exam Guide Summary, clarified CT-3 description (bounded condition to 520k RWST} and added a fourth critical task (CT-16).
- 6. On page 50, revised ES-D-1 form to match above changes.
- 7. Added procedure tracking form (last attachment) to aid in training staff in replacing procedures.
The following changes were made following a second NRC validation:
On page 7, modified severity of CV14C (& ramp) to achieve Rx Trip criterion being met On page 24, made corresponding change to CV14C in body of guide On page 31, slightly modified desired MVAR On page 34 slightly increased severity of CV13C malfunction from 10.5 to 12 (to achieve Rx Trip criterion being met) AND provided a second ARP that may be used to direct Rx Trip On page 35, corrected typo of SBLOCA severity (100 lbm/sec)
On oaae 45, provided amplifying instruction on LBLOCA with failure of CDA.
ES-301 7
Form ES-301-7 Facility:
Millstone Unit 3 Scenario:
2K17 NRC-02 Exam Date: December 4, 2017 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 Event Realism/Cred.
Required Verifiable LOO TS CTs Seen.
U/E/S Explanation Actions actions Overlap The following changes were made following NRC validation:
- 1. On Exam Overview (pg 4 ): Changed plant starting conditions from start-up following a refueling to "a mid cycle spurious Reactor Trip". This matches IC conditions. Also, removed Event 2 ('B' Service Water Pump trip).
- 2. On Input Summary (pg 7): Removed Triggers 3, 4, & 5 (associated with deleted 'B' Service Water Pump trip)
- 3. In the scenario time line section, made the following changes:
Corrected Tech Spec/ TRM entries.
On pages 21-22, changed EAL & COP prompts to US from examiner to booth (SM).
On page 27, completed calculation for expectant boration length (was incomplete).
On page 34, removed reference to stopping 'B' / 'C' RCP's and the 'B' EOG (as Service Water Pump event was removed). Added expectation that RCP trip criteria would be met (based on E-0 foldout page).
On page 36, moved up booth instructor cue to initiate SGTR (Trigger 10) at 10%
1 thru 7 E
WR level (based on validation, expect to reach this SG inventory earlier in scenario).
On page 45, changed expectant plant response (based on validation).
- 4. On page 62, changed ES-D-1 form to match changes noted above.
- 5. On page 63, changed power level from 74% to 79%. Also, changed turnover to plant is being restored to service following "a mid cycle spurious Reactor Trip". This matches IC conditions.
- 6. On page 64, added procedure tracking form (last attachment) to aid in training staff in replacing procedures.
The following changes were made following a second NRC validation:
SG Tube Leak changed from 460 to 432 gpd (pgs 7, 18, & 62)
On page 4, editorial changes in first paragraph on power level and reason for hold. Corrected typo in Event 2 to "N16".
On page 29, clarified ISO-NE instructions on MVAR loading.
On page 35, provided note to alert Floor that RCP trip criterion will not be met without first correcting component failures.
On page 43, removed 3MSS*MOV17C (typo).
On paoe 63, provided reason for holdino power.
ES-301 8
Form ES-301-7 Instructions for Completing This Table:
Use this table for each scenario for evaluation.
2 Check this box if the events are not related (e.g., seismic event followed by a pipe rupture) OR if the events do not obey the laws of physics and thermodynamics.
3, 4 In columns 3 and 4, check the box if there is no verifiable or required action, as applicable. Examples of required actions are as follows: (ES-301, D.5f) opening, closing, and throttling valves starting and stopping equipment raising and lowering level, flow, and pressure making decisions and giving directions acknowledging or verifying key alarms and automatic actions (Uncomplicated events that require no operator action beyond this should not be included on the operating test unless they are necessary to set the stage for subsequent events. (Appendix D, 8.3).)
5 Check this box if the level of difficulty is not appropriate.
6 Check this box if the event has a TS.
7 Check this box if the event has a critical task (CT). If the same CT covers more than one event, check the event where the CT started only.
8 Check this box if the event overlaps with another event on any of the last two NRC examinations. (Appendix D, C.1.f) 9 Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the event as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)nhancement, or (S)atisfactory? Mark the answer in column 9.
10 Record any explanations of the events here.
In the shaded boxes, sum the number of check marks in each column.
In column 1, sum the number of events.
In columns 2-4, record the total number of check marks for each column.
In column 5, based on the reviewer's judgement, place a checkmark only if the scenario's LOO is not appropriate.
In column 6, TS are required to be ~ 2 for each scenario. (ES-301, D.5.d)
In column 7, preidentified CTs should be~ 2 for each scenario. (Appendix D; ES-301, D.5.d; ES-301-4)
In column 8, record the number of events not used on the two previous NRC initial licensing exams. A scenario is considered unsatisfactory if there is< 2 new events. (ES-301, D.5.b; Appendix D, C.1.f)
In column 9, record whether the scenario as written (U)nacceptable, in need of (E)nhancement, or (S)atisfactory from column 11 of the simulator scenario table.
I 0 M I
U) w E
0 LL 0 M I
U) w
ES-301 10 Form ES-301-7 Facility:
Millstone Unit 3 Exam Date: December 4, 2017 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 11 Scenario Event Events TS TS CT CT
% Unsat.
Explanation Totals Unsat.
Total Unsat.
Total Unsat.
Scenario U/E/S Elements The following changes were made following NRC validation:
- 1. On Exam Overview (pgs 4-5): Removed Event 3 ('A' Charging Pump Trip) and Event 5 (PZR level failure as is). Also, removed reference to specific Tech Specs, added Critical Task for RCP Trip Criteria, and made tripping bistables discretionary in Event 1.
- 2. On Input Summary (pgs 7-8): Removed associated schedule inputs for Events 3 & 5 (triggers 5, 8, & 9).
- 4. In the scenario time line section, made the following changes:
Corrected Tech Spec/ TRM entries.
On page 15, made tripping bistables discretionary for Event 1.
On pages 21-22, changed expected flowpath thru AOP 3571.
2K17 NRC-01 10 0
3 0
3 0
0 E
Also, corrected typo on pg. 22 (move onto event 3 vice 2).
Removed Event 3, 'A' Charging Pump Trip.
On page 24, modified RCP upper seal failure so that it starts to slowly degrade from onset of trigger 7.
On page 29, modified expectant flowpath for AOP 3575 (given a RE Rx Plan exists for power reduction).
Removed Event 5, Controlling PZR Level Fails AS-IS On page 37, added Critical Task to trip RCP's.
On page 43, removed floor instructor note regarding possible transition to FR-Z.1 (unlikely to have met transition at this point).
On page 44, moved transition to LGBLOCA (Event 8) earlier in E-
- 1.
- 5. On page 49, Exam Guide Summary, clarified CT-3 description (bounded condition to 520k RWST) and added a fourth critical task (CT-16).
- 6. On page 50, revised ES-D-1 form to match above changes.
- 7. Added procedure tracking form (last attachment) to aid in training staff in replacing procedures.
The following changes were made following a second NRC validation:
On page 7, modified severity of CV14C (& ramp) to achieve Rx Trip criterion being met On page 24, made corresponding change to CV14C in body of guide On page 31, slightly modified desired MVAR On page 34 slightly increased severity of CV13C malfunction from 10.5 to 12 (to achieve Rx Trip criterion being met) AND provided a second ARP that may be used to direct Rx Trip On page 35, corrected typo of SBLOCA severity (100 lbm/sec)
On page 45, provided amplifying instruction on LBLOCA with failure of CDA.
The following changes were made following NRC validation:
- 1. On Exam Overview (pg 4): Changed plant starting conditions from start-up following a refueling to "a mid cycle spurious Reactor Trip". This matches IC conditions. Also, removed Event 2 ('B' Service Water Pump trip).
- 2. On Input Summary (pg 7): Removed Triggers 3, 4, & 5 (associated with deleted 'B' Service Water Pump trip)
- 3. In the scenario time line section, made the following changes:
Corrected Tech Spec/ TRM entries.
2K17 NRC-02 8
0 3
0 2
0 0
E.
On pages 21-22, changed EAL & COP prompts to US from examiner to booth (SM).
On page 27, completed calculation for expectant boration length (was incomplete).
On page 34, removed reference to stopping 'B' / 'C' RCP's and the
'B' EDG (as Service Water Pump event was removed). Added expectation that RCP trip criteria would be met (based on E-0 foldout page).
On page 36, moved up booth instructor cue to initiate SGTR (Trigger 10) at 10% WR level (based on validation, expect to reach this SG inventory earlier in scenario).
ES-301 12 Form ES-301-7 On page 45, changed expectant plant response (based on validation).
- 4. On page 62, changed ES-D-1 form to match changes noted above.
- 5. On page 63, changed power level from 74% to 79%. Also, changed turnover to plant is being restored to service following "a mid cycle spurious Reactor Trip". This matches IC conditions.
- 6. On page 64, added procedure tracking form (last attachment) to aid in training staff in replacing procedures.
The following changes were made following a second NRC validation:
SG Tube Leak changed from 460 to 432 gpd (pgs 7, 18, & 62)
On page 4, editorial changes in first paragraph on power level and reason for hold. Corrected typo in Event 2 to "N16".
On page 29, clarified ISO-NE instructions on MVAR loading.
On page 35, provided note to alert Floor that RCP trip criterion will not be met without first correcting component failures.
On page 43, removed 3MSS*MOV17C (typo).
On page 63, provided reason for holding power.
Instructions for Completing This Table:
Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.
1, 3, 5 For each simulator scenario, enter the total number of events (column 1 ), TS entries/actions (column 3), and CTs (column 5).
This number should match the respective scenario from the event-based scenario tables (the sum from columns 1, 6, and 7, respectively).
2, 4, 6 For each simulator scenario, evaluate each event, TS, and CT as (S)atisfactory, (E)nhance, or (U)nsatisfactory based on the following criteria:
- a.
Events. Each event is described on a Form ES-D-2, including all switch manipulations, pertinent alarms, and verifiable actions. Event actions are balanced between at-the-controls and balance-of-plant applicants during the scenario. All event-related attributes on Form ES-301-4 are met. Enter the total number of unsatisfactory events in column 2.
- b.
TS. A scenario includes at least two TS entries/actions across at least two different events. TS entries and actions are detailed on Form ES-D-2. Enter the total number of unsatisfactory TS entries/actions in column 4. (ES-301, D.5d)
- c.
CT. Check that a scenario includes at least two preidentified CTs. This criterion is a target quantitative attribute, not an absolute minimum requirement. Check that each CT is explicitly bounded on Form ES-D-2 with measurable performance standards (see Appendix D). Enter the total number of unsatisfactory CTs in column 6.
(
2 + 4 + 6) 7 In column 7, calculate the percentage of unsatisfactory scenario elements:
1 + 3 + 5 100%
If the value in column 7 is> 20%, mark the scenario as (U)nsatisfactory in column 8. If column 7 is s 20%, annotate with (E)nhancement or (S)atisfactory.
9 In column 9, explain each unsatisfactory event, TS, and CT. Editorial comments can also be added here.
Save initial review comments and detail subsequent comment resolution so that each exam-bound scenario is marked by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form.
ES-301 14 Form ES-301-7 Site name: Millstone Unit 3 Exam Date: December 4, 2017 Admin.
JPMs Sim./In-Plant JPMs Scenarios Op. Test Totals:
Total 9
11 2
22 Total Unsat.
0 0
0 0
Total Edits 9
7 2
18 OPERATING TEST TOTALS Total Sat.
0 4
0 4
0 Explanation Instructions for Completing This Table:
Update data for this table from quality reviews and totals in the previous tables and then calculate the percentage of total items that are unsatisfactory and give an explanation in the space provided.
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Enter the total number of items submitted for the operating test in the "Total" column. For example, if nine administrative JPMs were submitted, enter "9" in the "Total" items column for administrative JPMs.
For scenarios, enter the total number of simulator scenarios.
Enter the total number of (U)nsatisfactory JPMs and scenarios from the two JPMs column 5 and simulator scenarios column 8 in the previous tables. Provide an explanation in the space provided.
Enter totals for (E)nhancements needed and (S)atisfactory JPMs and scenarios from the previous tables. This task is for tracking only.
Total each column and enter the amounts in the "Op. Test Totals" row.
Calculate the percentage of the operating test that is (U)nsatisfactory (Op. Test Total Unsat.)/(Op. Test Total) and place this value in the bolded "% Unsat." cell.
Refer to ES-501, E.3.a, to rate the overall operating test as follows:
satisfactory, if the "Op. Test Total""% Unsat." is s; 20%
unsatisfactory, if "Op. Test Total""% Unsat." is> 20%
Update this table and the tables above with post-exam changes if the "as-administered" operating test required content changes, including the following:
The JPM performance standards were incorrect.
The administrative JPM tasks/keys were incorrect.
CTs were incorrect in the scenarios (not including postscenario critical tasks defined in Appendix D).
The EOP strategy was incorrect in a scenario(s).
TS entries/actions were determined to be incorrect in a scenarios.