L-2006-098, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Calendar Year 2005: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Florida Power & Light Company, 6501 S. Ocean Drive. Jensen Beach, FL 34957 FPL April 18, 2006 L-2006-098 10 CFR 50.4 10 CFR 50.36 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 RE: St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Calendar Year 2005 The attached report is being submitted pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.1.8. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information summaries and analytical results of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for calendar year 2005.Please contact us should there be any questions regarding this report.Very truly yours, Gordon L. Johnston Acting Vice President St. Lucie Plant Attachment GLJ/tlt an FPL Group company 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 LICENSE NOS. DPR-67, NPF-16 DOCKET NOS. 50-335, 50-389 Data Submitted by: Florida DOH Prepared brA Reviewed by: | {{#Wiki_filter:Florida Power & Light Company, 6501 S. Ocean Drive. Jensen Beach, FL 34957 FPL April 18, 2006 L-2006-098 10 CFR 50.4 10 CFR 50.36 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 RE: St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Calendar Year 2005 The attached report is being submitted pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.1.8. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information summaries and analytical results of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for calendar year 2005. | ||
#I .4 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT-UNITS I & 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION Introduction Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary Deviations | Please contact us should there be any questions regarding this report. | ||
/ Missing Data Analyses with LLDs Above Required Detection Capabilities Land Use Census Key to Sample Locations Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power &Light Company's St. Lucie Site First Quarter 2005 Second Quarter 2005 Third Quarter 2005 Fourth Quarter 2005 Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program 2005 | Very truly yours, Gordon L. Johnston Acting Vice President St. Lucie Plant Attachment GLJ/tlt an FPL Group company | ||
The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the radiological environmental monitoring program for the calendar year indicated. | |||
This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit | 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 LICENSE NOS. DPR-67, NPF-16 DOCKET NOS. 50-335, 50-389 Data Submitted by: Florida DOH Prepared brA Reviewed by: | ||
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A. Purpose The purpose of the radiological environmental monitoring program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures to members of the public resulting from station operation. | |||
The radiological environmental monitoring program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.B. Program Description The radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP) for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to the St. Lucie Units | #I .4 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT-UNITS I & 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE Introduction I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results 4 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary TABLE 1 Deviations / Missing Data TABLE 1A Analyses with LLDs Above Required Detection Capabilities TABLE 1B Land Use Census TABLE 2 Key to Sample Locations ATTACHMENT A Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power & | ||
: a. Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 27 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly. | Light Company's St. Lucie Site ATTACHMENT B First Quarter 2005 Second Quarter 2005 Third Quarter 2005 Fourth Quarter 2005 Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program 2005 ATTACHMENT C i | ||
: b. Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations. | |||
Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements. | 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9.1.8 of St. Lucie Unit 1 and St. Lucie Unit 2 Technical Specifications. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the radiological environmental monitoring program for the calendar year indicated. This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit 1and Unit 2 Technical Specifications. | ||
: c. Surface water samples are collected from two locations. | RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A. Purpose The purpose of the radiological environmental monitoring program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures to members of the public resulting from station operation. The radiological environmental monitoring program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways. | ||
Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and monthly, respectively. | B. Program Description The radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP) for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to the St. Lucie Units 1and 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) Section 3/4.12.1., | ||
Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements. | Monitoring Program. | ||
I 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 d. Shoreline sediment samples are collected from two locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. | : 1. Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies: | ||
Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements. | : a. Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 27 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly. | ||
: e. Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations. | : b. Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements. | ||
Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. | : c. Surface water samples are collected from two locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and monthly, respectively. Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements. | ||
Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements. | I | ||
: f. Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations. | |||
Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements. | 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 | ||
: 9. A goat milk sample is collected from one location. | : d. Shoreline sediment samples are collected from two locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements. | ||
The sample is collected and analyzed on a quarterly basis. No other milk-producing goats feeding on similar wild vegetation have been found in the St. Lucie region;therefore, there is no control location for this sample type.Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies. | : e. Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements. | ||
: 2. Analytical Responsibility Radiological environmental monitoring for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health (DOH), Bureau of Radiation Control (BRC).Samples are collected and analyzed by DOH personnel. | : f. Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations. Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements. | ||
Samples are analyzed at the DOH BRC Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.C. Analytical Results Table 1, Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period.Deviations from the sample schedule or missing data, if any, are noted and explained in Table 1A. Samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI' LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Table 1B. Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided | : 9. A goat milk sample is collected from one location. The sample is collected and analyzed on a quarterly basis. No other milk-producing goats feeding on similar wild vegetation have been found in the St. Lucie region; therefore, there is no control location for this sample type. | ||
The results for nuclides associated with the REMP are listed in ATTACHMENT C, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM.F. Effect of 2005 Hurricane Season Hurricanes Wilma affected the Air Sampling portion of St. Lucie's REMP.* All five Air Sampling Stations had reduced run times due to power loss.* Two of five Air Sampling Stations lost their particulate filters due to wind damage to the filter mounting system.* Other aspects of program (e.g., TLDs soil, water, vegetation sampling) were not affected.The REMP was fully restored well in advance of Units | Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies. | ||
: 2. Analytical Responsibility Radiological environmental monitoring for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health (DOH), Bureau of Radiation Control (BRC). | |||
Samples are collected and analyzed by DOH personnel. | |||
Samples are analyzed at the DOH BRC Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida. | |||
C. Analytical Results Table 1, Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period. | |||
Deviations from the sample schedule or missing data, if any, are noted and explained in Table 1A. Samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI' LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Table 1B. Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided inAttachment B. | |||
2 | |||
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT- UNITS i & 2 D. Land Use Census A land use census out to a distance of a five-mile radius from the St. Lucie Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation, in each of the 16 meteorological sectors. A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census Summary. | |||
E. Interlaboratorv Comparison Program The intercomparison program consists of participating in the DOE Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP). | |||
This program provides similar testing (matrices, nuclides, and levels) as the former EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program and is referred to as the Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP). | |||
The samples are analyzed using the methods applicable to the REMP (gamma spectroscopy, Gross Beta, and Tritium for water). | |||
From the MAPEP handbook: | |||
Acceptance criteria were developed from a review of precision and accuracy data compiled by other performance evaluation programs (PEPs), the analytical methods literature, from several MAPEP pilot studies, and from what is considered reasonable, acceptable, and achievable for routine analyses among the more experienced laboratories. | |||
The results for nuclides associated with the REMP are listed in ATTACHMENT C, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM. | |||
F. Effect of 2005 Hurricane Season Hurricanes Wilma affected the Air Sampling portion of St. Lucie's REMP. | |||
* All five Air Sampling Stations had reduced run times due to power loss. | |||
* Two of five Air Sampling Stations lost their particulate filters due to wind damage to the filter mounting system. | |||
* Other aspects of program (e.g., TLDs soil, water, vegetation sampling) were not affected. | |||
The REMP was fully restored well in advance of Units 1and 2 re-start. | |||
3 | |||
a 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 III. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A. Reporting of Results The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by St. Lucie Plant ODCM. Table I provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by ODCM, Table 4.12-1, for all samples specified by Table 3.12-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation. | |||
These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, and Be-7, which are common in the Florida environment. | These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, and Be-7, which are common in the Florida environment. | ||
B. Interpretation of Results 1. Direct Radiation: | B. Interpretation of Results | ||
The results of direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations. | : 1. Direct Radiation: | ||
The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the pre-operational surveillance program. Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1 .2. Air ParUculates/Radioiodine: | The results of direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations. The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the pre-operational surveillance program. Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1. | ||
The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents. | : 2. Air ParUculates/Radioiodine: | ||
All samples for radiolodine yielded no detectable 1-131. Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation. | The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents. All samples for radiolodine yielded no detectable 1-131. Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation. | ||
The results for air parUculate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements that were made during the pre-operational surveillance program. Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.3. Surface Water: Tritium was detected in 2 of 52 indicator location samples and in 1 of 12 control location samples. The highest level seen was at the control locations and is less than five percent of the Required LLD specified in ODCM Table 4.12-1.No other nuclides attributed to station operation were detected. | The results for air parUculate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements that were made during the pre-operational surveillance program. Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1. | ||
Results for surface water samples are summarized in Table 1.4 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT -UNITS I & 2 4. Waterbome Sediment and Food Products: The results for radioactivity measurements in waterbome sediment, fish and crustacean samples are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the pre-operational surveillance program. There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents. | : 3. Surface Water: | ||
Results for the waterbome sediment, fish and crustacean samples are summarized in Table 1.5. Broad Leaf Vegetation: | Tritium was detected in 2 of 52 indicator location samples and in 1 of 12 control location samples. The highest level seen was at the control locations and is less than five percent of the Required LLD specified in ODCM Table 4.12-1. | ||
The results of radioactivity measurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the pre-operational surveillance program.Cs-137 was detected in one of 12 indicator location samples and in one of 12 control location samples. The highest level seen was at the control locations and is less than one-half of the Required LLD specified in ODCM Table 4.12-1.There were no indications of any other nuclides attributed to plant effluents. | No other nuclides attributed to station operation were detected. Results for surface water samples are summarized in Table 1. | ||
Results for the broad leaf vegetation samples are summarized in Table 1.6. Milk, Goat: Cesium-1 37 was detected the sample. The presence of this nuclide is considered"weapons fallout"; | 4 | ||
the animal uptake is due to the foraging habits of the goat.Samples of the wild vegetation consumed by the "pet goat" (Brazilian Pepper)Indicated the presence of Cs-137. The State Department of Health found comparable levels of Cs-137 in samples from numerous wilderness locations. | |||
The goat | 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 | ||
The owner of the pet goat has indicated the goat may never return to milch. The Goat-Milk sampling is being dropped from the program.7. Land Use Census: No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census. No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway)20 percent greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.5 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT- UNITS I & 2 8. Interlaboratory Comparison Program: The State laboratory participated MAPEP 13 and 14.In MAPEP 13, the results Air Filter and Water matrices for those nuclides associated with nuclear power plant operation and using analytical methods used in the REMP are Acceptable. | : 4. Waterbome Sediment and Food Products: | ||
The Soil matrix had a few warnings in response to over-estimated results. The vegetation sample had on warning result for a nuclide (Co-57) not typically associated with plant effluents. | The results for radioactivity measurements in waterbome sediment, fish and crustacean samples are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the pre-operational surveillance program. There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents. Results for the waterbome sediment, fish and crustacean samples are summarized in Table 1. | ||
: 5. Broad Leaf Vegetation: | |||
The results of radioactivity measurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the pre-operational surveillance program. | |||
Cs-137 was detected in one of 12 indicator location samples and in one of 12 control location samples. The highest level seen was at the control locations and is less than one-half of the Required LLD specified in ODCM Table 4.12-1. | |||
There were no indications of any other nuclides attributed to plant effluents. | |||
Results for the broad leaf vegetation samples are summarized in Table 1. | |||
: 6. Milk, Goat: | |||
Cesium-1 37 was detected the sample. The presence of this nuclide is considered "weapons fallout"; the animal uptake is due to the foraging habits of the goat. | |||
Samples of the wild vegetation consumed by the "pet goat" (Brazilian Pepper) | |||
Indicated the presence of Cs-137. The State Department of Health found comparable levels of Cs-137 in samples from numerous wilderness locations. | |||
The goat isno longer fresh', no more samples are available. The owner of the pet goat has indicated the goat may never return to milch. The Goat-Milk sampling is being dropped from the program. | |||
: 7. Land Use Census: | |||
No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census. No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census. | |||
5 | |||
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT- UNITS I & 2 | |||
: 8. Interlaboratory Comparison Program: | |||
The State laboratory participated MAPEP 13 and 14. | |||
In MAPEP 13, the results Air Filter and Water matrices for those nuclides associated with nuclear power plant operation and using analytical methods used in the REMP are Acceptable. The Soil matrix had a few warnings in response to over-estimated results. The vegetation sample had on warning result for a nuclide (Co-57) not typically associated with plant effluents. | |||
In MAPEP 14, the results for Air filter, Soil, and Water matrices for those nuclides associated with nuclear power plant operation and using analytical methods used in the REMP are Acceptable. | In MAPEP 14, the results for Air filter, Soil, and Water matrices for those nuclides associated with nuclear power plant operation and using analytical methods used in the REMP are Acceptable. | ||
The Vegetation matrix failed, all but one result was Not Acceptable. | The Vegetation matrix failed, all but one result was Not Acceptable. An investigation found the Lab Technician invoked an improper counting geometry file. | ||
An investigation found the Lab Technician invoked an improper counting geometry file.Reanalyzing the assay using the correct geometry file returned Acceptable results for all nuclides except Co-57. Co-57 is not typically associated with plant effluents; assay using REMP methods will typically yield poor results for low levels.The results are listed in Attachment C.C. Conclusions The data obtained through the St. Lucie Plant radiological environmental monitoring program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased. | Reanalyzing the assay using the correct geometry file returned Acceptable results for all nuclides except Co-57. Co-57 is not typically associated with plant effluents; assay using REMP methods will typically yield poor results for low levels. | ||
The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of St. Lucie Units 1 and 2, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.6 TABLE 1 Page 1 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | The results are listed in Attachment C. | ||
C. Conclusions The data obtained through the St. Lucie Plant radiological environmental monitoring program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased. | |||
The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of St. Lucie Units 1 and 2, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. | |||
6 | |||
TABLE 1 Page 1 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: | |||
TLD UNITS: micro-R/hr Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Exposure | Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State) | ||
= 0 TABLE 1 Page 2 of 9 f ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD UNITS: micro-R/hr Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Exposure 5.0 (1041104) NW-10 5.4 (414) 5.3 (414) | ||
Rate, 108 d 4.2 - 6.5 10 mi., NW 6.3 - 6.5 4.9 - 5.7 Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0 | |||
TABLE 1 Page 2 of 9 f | |||
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: | |||
RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS: PICO -Ci/M 3 Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (fob Range Mean (f)b Range 131. | Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State) | ||
= 0 TABLE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS: PICO - Ci/M 3 Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (fob Range Mean (f)b Range 131. , %A ., .. .. | ||
I, YUv VV.UZQ 1MUA1 <MUJA Gross Beta, 258 0.0025 0.014 (205/206) H-34 0.014 (52/52) 0.015 (52/52) 0.004 - 0.030 0.5 mi., N 0.005 - 0.029 0.005 - 0.029 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20 7 Be 0.0052 0.1610 (16/16) H-34 0.1796 (4/4) 0.1616 (4/4) 0.1074 - 0.2163 0.5 mi., N 0.1425 - 0.2163 0.1483 - 0.1822 134CS 0.00069 <MDA <MDA 137 Cs 0.00066 <MDA <MDA 2 1 0Pb 0.0262 (11/16) H-34 0.0301 (3/4) 0.0216 (3/4) 0.0173 - 0.0313 0.5 mi., N 0.0293 - 0.0313 0.0173 - 0.0285 Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0 | |||
TABLE 1 Page 3 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: | |||
SURFACE WATER UNITS: PICO -Ci/LITER | Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State) | ||
= 0 TABLE 1 Page 4 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER UNITS: PICO - Ci/LITER Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (f0b Range Mean (f)b Range Tritium, 64 230 114 (2/52) H-15 114 (2152) 142 (1/12) 110- 118 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 110- 118 Gamma Isotopic, 64 40K 60 349 (52152) H-15 349 (52152) 338 (12/12) 257 - 425 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 257 - 425 262 - 424 54Mn 4 <MDA <MDA 59 Fe 8 <MDA <MDA 58Co 4 <MDA <MDA 60Co 4 <MDA <MDA 65Zn 8 <MDA <MDA 95 Zr-Nb <MDA <MDA 7 | ||
1311 5 <MDA <MDA | |||
'34Cs 5 <MDA <MDA 13 7 Cs <MDA <MDA 5 | |||
140Ba-La 11 <MDA <MDA Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0 | |||
TABLE 1 Page 4 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: | |||
SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO -Ci/Kg, DRY Location with Highest Annual Mean-Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 140 374 (2/2) | Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1& 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State) | ||
= 0 TABLE I Page 5 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO - Ci/Kg, DRY Location with Highest Annual Mean | ||
- Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 140 374 (2/2) H-15 374 (2/2) 219 (2/2) 257 -490 <1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 257 - 490 208 - 230 21 0Pb | |||
< MDA <MDA mRa 49 258 (2/2) H-15 258 (2/2) <MDA 216 - 299 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 216 - 299 23 2 Th 96 (1/2) H-15 96 (1/2) 69 (2/2) | |||
<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 65 - 73 238u 411 (1/2) H-15 411 (1/2) <MDA | |||
<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 58co 9 <MDA <MDA 60Co 12 <MDA <MDA 14 <MDA <MDA 1 37 cs 12 <MDA <MDA Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0 | |||
TABLE I Page 5 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: | |||
CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO -CiIKg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (0 b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 130 1204 (2/2)839 -1568 | Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State) | ||
= 0 TABLE I Page 6 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO - CiIKg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean ( 0 b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 130 1204 (2/2) H-15 1204 (2/2) 1783 (2/2) 839 -1568 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 839 - 1568 1736 - 1830 226 Ra < MDA <MDA 8 | ||
22 Ra <MDA 121 (1/2) 54Mn 9 <MDA <MDA 59Fe <MDA <MDA 16 | |||
'co 9 <MDA <MDA 19 <MDA <MDA 65 Zn 17 <MDA <MDA | |||
'34Cs 9 <MDA <MDA 37 1 Cs <MDA 9 <MDA Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0 | |||
TABLE I Page 6 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Luciae Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: | |||
FISH UNITS: PICO -Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (0b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (fb Range Mean (0b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 130 2788 (2/2)2368 -3208 | Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Luciae Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State) | ||
= 0 TABLE 1 Page 7 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: FISH UNITS: PICO - Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (0b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (fb Range Mean (0b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 130 2788 (2/2) H-15 2788 (2/2) 2212 (2/2) 2368 - 3208 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 2368 - 3208 1838 - 2587 54Mn 9 <MDA <MDA 59 Fe <MDA <MDA 16 58 Co <MDA 9 <MDA 60co 10 <MDA <MDA 65Zn 17 <MDA <MDA 134CS 9 <MDA <MDA 37 1 Cs <MDA <MDA 9 | ||
Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0 | |||
TABLE 1 Page 7 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: | |||
BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: PICO -Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (fb Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona Locations Mean (0bRange (LLD) Mean (f0b Range Gamma Isotopic, 36 T Be 71 | Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State) | ||
= 0 TABLE I Page 8 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: PICO - Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (fb Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona Locations Mean (0bRange (LLD) Mean (f0b Range Gamma Isotopic, 36 T | ||
Be 71 924 (24/24) H-52 958 (12/12) 1215 (12/12) 452 - 2036 1 mi., S/SSE 539 - 2036 505 - 2056 40K 100 4286 (24/24) H-51 4449 (12/12) 3521 (12/12) 3233 - 5746 1 mi., N/NNW 3699 - 5746 2478 - 6025 58Co 6 <MDA <MDA 8 <MDA <MDA 1311 9 <MDA <MDA | |||
'3 4Cs 8 <MDA <MDA 137cs 8 14 (1/24) H-52 14 (1/12) 26 (1/12) 1 mi., S/SSE 210Pb <MDA <MDA 2 2 1 Pb <MDA < MDA 2 6 Ra 319 (5/24) H-52 344 (3/12) 358 (1/12) 210 - 403 1 mi., S/SSE 284 - 403 Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0 | |||
TABLE I Page 8 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 -December 31. 2005 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: | |||
MILK UNITS: PICO -Ci/LITER Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 1 OK 60 1532 (1/1) H-101 1532 (1/1) n/ae 3.5 mi., WSW 21MPb -CODA --n/a 212Pb _ <MDA --n/a 1311. (Chemical 0.1 <MDA --n/a separation | Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State) | ||
PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: MILK UNITS: PICO - Ci/LITER Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 1 OK 60 1532 (1/1) H-101 1532 (1/1) n/ae 3.5 mi., WSW 21MPb - CODA - - n/a 212Pb _ <MDA - - n/a 1311. (Chemical 0.1 <MDA - - n/a separation ) | |||
= 0 TABLE I Page 9 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | 134Cs 5 <MDA - - n/a 1 37 Cs 5 27 (1/1) H-101 27 (1/1) n/a 3.5 mi., WSW Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0 | ||
TABLE I Page 9 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL | |||
==SUMMARY== | ==SUMMARY== | ||
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State) | |||
NOTES | |||
: a. The LLD isan "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal. | |||
LLDs in this column are at time of measurement. The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection. | |||
: b. Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f). | |||
: c. Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A. | |||
: d. Results were based upon the average net response of three elements in a TLD (thermoluminescent dosimeter). | |||
: e. There are no other milk producing goats grazing on similar vegetation, back yard grass and wild bushes inthe St. Lucie region. | |||
Therefore, there is no control location. | |||
MDA refers to minimum detectable activity. | |||
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 TABLE 1A (page 1 of 2) | |||
DEVIATIONS / MISSING DATA A) Pathway: Airborne, |
Revision as of 19:24, 23 November 2019
ML061390027 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Saint Lucie ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/18/2006 |
From: | Johnston G Florida Power & Light Co |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
L-2006-098 | |
Download: ML061390027 (63) | |
Text
Florida Power & Light Company, 6501 S. Ocean Drive. Jensen Beach, FL 34957 FPL April 18, 2006 L-2006-098 10 CFR 50.4 10 CFR 50.36 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 RE: St. Lucie Units I and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335 and 50-389 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Calendar Year 2005 The attached report is being submitted pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.1.8. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information summaries and analytical results of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for calendar year 2005.
Please contact us should there be any questions regarding this report.
Very truly yours, Gordon L. Johnston Acting Vice President St. Lucie Plant Attachment GLJ/tlt an FPL Group company
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 LICENSE NOS. DPR-67, NPF-16 DOCKET NOS. 50-335, 50-389 Data Submitted by: Florida DOH Prepared brA Reviewed by:
- I .4 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT-UNITS I & 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE Introduction I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Discussion and Interpretation of Results 4 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary TABLE 1 Deviations / Missing Data TABLE 1A Analyses with LLDs Above Required Detection Capabilities TABLE 1B Land Use Census TABLE 2 Key to Sample Locations ATTACHMENT A Radiological Surveillance of Florida Power &
Light Company's St. Lucie Site ATTACHMENT B First Quarter 2005 Second Quarter 2005 Third Quarter 2005 Fourth Quarter 2005 Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program 2005 ATTACHMENT C i
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9.1.8 of St. Lucie Unit 1 and St. Lucie Unit 2 Technical Specifications. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the radiological environmental monitoring program for the calendar year indicated. This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit 1and Unit 2 Technical Specifications.
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A. Purpose The purpose of the radiological environmental monitoring program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures to members of the public resulting from station operation. The radiological environmental monitoring program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.
B. Program Description The radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP) for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to the St. Lucie Units 1and 2 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) Section 3/4.12.1.,
Monitoring Program.
- 1. Sample Locations, Types and Frequencies:
- a. Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 27 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). TLDs are collected and analyzed quarterly.
- b. Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly. Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.
- c. Surface water samples are collected from two locations. Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and monthly, respectively. Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.
I
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2
- d. Shoreline sediment samples are collected from two locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.
- e. Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations. Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually. Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.
- f. Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations. Samples are collected and analyzed monthly. Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.
- 9. A goat milk sample is collected from one location. The sample is collected and analyzed on a quarterly basis. No other milk-producing goats feeding on similar wild vegetation have been found in the St. Lucie region; therefore, there is no control location for this sample type.
Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.
- 2. Analytical Responsibility Radiological environmental monitoring for the St. Lucie Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health (DOH), Bureau of Radiation Control (BRC).
Samples are collected and analyzed by DOH personnel.
Samples are analyzed at the DOH BRC Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.
C. Analytical Results Table 1, Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Annual Summary provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period.
Deviations from the sample schedule or missing data, if any, are noted and explained in Table 1A. Samples not meeting the specified "A PRIORI' LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Table 1B. Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided inAttachment B.
2
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT- UNITS i & 2 D. Land Use Census A land use census out to a distance of a five-mile radius from the St. Lucie Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation, in each of the 16 meteorological sectors. A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census Summary.
E. Interlaboratorv Comparison Program The intercomparison program consists of participating in the DOE Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).
This program provides similar testing (matrices, nuclides, and levels) as the former EPA Interlaboratory Comparison Program and is referred to as the Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).
The samples are analyzed using the methods applicable to the REMP (gamma spectroscopy, Gross Beta, and Tritium for water).
From the MAPEP handbook:
Acceptance criteria were developed from a review of precision and accuracy data compiled by other performance evaluation programs (PEPs), the analytical methods literature, from several MAPEP pilot studies, and from what is considered reasonable, acceptable, and achievable for routine analyses among the more experienced laboratories.
The results for nuclides associated with the REMP are listed in ATTACHMENT C, RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM.
F. Effect of 2005 Hurricane Season Hurricanes Wilma affected the Air Sampling portion of St. Lucie's REMP.
- All five Air Sampling Stations had reduced run times due to power loss.
- Two of five Air Sampling Stations lost their particulate filters due to wind damage to the filter mounting system.
- Other aspects of program (e.g., TLDs soil, water, vegetation sampling) were not affected.
The REMP was fully restored well in advance of Units 1and 2 re-start.
3
a 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 III. DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A. Reporting of Results The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by St. Lucie Plant ODCM. Table I provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by ODCM, Table 4.12-1, for all samples specified by Table 3.12-1. In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation.
These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, and Be-7, which are common in the Florida environment.
B. Interpretation of Results
- 1. Direct Radiation:
The results of direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations. The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant. The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the pre-operational surveillance program. Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.
- 2. Air ParUculates/Radioiodine:
The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents. All samples for radiolodine yielded no detectable 1-131. Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation.
The results for air parUculate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements that were made during the pre-operational surveillance program. Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.
- 3. Surface Water:
Tritium was detected in 2 of 52 indicator location samples and in 1 of 12 control location samples. The highest level seen was at the control locations and is less than five percent of the Required LLD specified in ODCM Table 4.12-1.
No other nuclides attributed to station operation were detected. Results for surface water samples are summarized in Table 1.
4
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2
- 4. Waterbome Sediment and Food Products:
The results for radioactivity measurements in waterbome sediment, fish and crustacean samples are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the pre-operational surveillance program. There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents. Results for the waterbome sediment, fish and crustacean samples are summarized in Table 1.
- 5. Broad Leaf Vegetation:
The results of radioactivity measurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the pre-operational surveillance program.
Cs-137 was detected in one of 12 indicator location samples and in one of 12 control location samples. The highest level seen was at the control locations and is less than one-half of the Required LLD specified in ODCM Table 4.12-1.
There were no indications of any other nuclides attributed to plant effluents.
Results for the broad leaf vegetation samples are summarized in Table 1.
- 6. Milk, Goat:
Cesium-1 37 was detected the sample. The presence of this nuclide is considered "weapons fallout"; the animal uptake is due to the foraging habits of the goat.
Samples of the wild vegetation consumed by the "pet goat" (Brazilian Pepper)
Indicated the presence of Cs-137. The State Department of Health found comparable levels of Cs-137 in samples from numerous wilderness locations.
The goat isno longer fresh', no more samples are available. The owner of the pet goat has indicated the goat may never return to milch. The Goat-Milk sampling is being dropped from the program.
- 7. Land Use Census:
No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census. No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20 percent greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.
5
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT- UNITS I & 2
- 8. Interlaboratory Comparison Program:
The State laboratory participated MAPEP 13 and 14.
In MAPEP 13, the results Air Filter and Water matrices for those nuclides associated with nuclear power plant operation and using analytical methods used in the REMP are Acceptable. The Soil matrix had a few warnings in response to over-estimated results. The vegetation sample had on warning result for a nuclide (Co-57) not typically associated with plant effluents.
In MAPEP 14, the results for Air filter, Soil, and Water matrices for those nuclides associated with nuclear power plant operation and using analytical methods used in the REMP are Acceptable.
The Vegetation matrix failed, all but one result was Not Acceptable. An investigation found the Lab Technician invoked an improper counting geometry file.
Reanalyzing the assay using the correct geometry file returned Acceptable results for all nuclides except Co-57. Co-57 is not typically associated with plant effluents; assay using REMP methods will typically yield poor results for low levels.
The results are listed in Attachment C.
C. Conclusions The data obtained through the St. Lucie Plant radiological environmental monitoring program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased.
The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of St. Lucie Units 1 and 2, during the surveillance year, are well within "as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.
6
TABLE 1 Page 1 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State)
PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD UNITS: micro-R/hr Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Exposure 5.0 (1041104) NW-10 5.4 (414) 5.3 (414)
Rate, 108 d 4.2 - 6.5 10 mi., NW 6.3 - 6.5 4.9 - 5.7 Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0
TABLE 1 Page 2 of 9 f
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State)
PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS: PICO - Ci/M 3 Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (fob Range Mean (f)b Range 131. , %A ., .. ..
I, YUv VV.UZQ 1MUA1 <MUJA Gross Beta, 258 0.0025 0.014 (205/206) H-34 0.014 (52/52) 0.015 (52/52) 0.004 - 0.030 0.5 mi., N 0.005 - 0.029 0.005 - 0.029 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20 7 Be 0.0052 0.1610 (16/16) H-34 0.1796 (4/4) 0.1616 (4/4) 0.1074 - 0.2163 0.5 mi., N 0.1425 - 0.2163 0.1483 - 0.1822 134CS 0.00069 <MDA <MDA 137 Cs 0.00066 <MDA <MDA 2 1 0Pb 0.0262 (11/16) H-34 0.0301 (3/4) 0.0216 (3/4) 0.0173 - 0.0313 0.5 mi., N 0.0293 - 0.0313 0.0173 - 0.0285 Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0
TABLE 1 Page 3 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State)
PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER UNITS: PICO - Ci/LITER Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (f0b Range Mean (f)b Range Tritium, 64 230 114 (2/52) H-15 114 (2152) 142 (1/12) 110- 118 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 110- 118 Gamma Isotopic, 64 40K 60 349 (52152) H-15 349 (52152) 338 (12/12) 257 - 425 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 257 - 425 262 - 424 54Mn 4 <MDA <MDA 59 Fe 8 <MDA <MDA 58Co 4 <MDA <MDA 60Co 4 <MDA <MDA 65Zn 8 <MDA <MDA 95 Zr-Nb <MDA <MDA 7
1311 5 <MDA <MDA
'34Cs 5 <MDA <MDA 13 7 Cs <MDA <MDA 5
140Ba-La 11 <MDA <MDA Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0
TABLE 1 Page 4 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1& 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State)
PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO - Ci/Kg, DRY Location with Highest Annual Mean
- Namec Mean (f)b Type and Total Number Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations of Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 140 374 (2/2) H-15 374 (2/2) 219 (2/2) 257 -490 <1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 257 - 490 208 - 230 21 0Pb
< MDA <MDA mRa 49 258 (2/2) H-15 258 (2/2) <MDA 216 - 299 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 216 - 299 23 2 Th 96 (1/2) H-15 96 (1/2) 69 (2/2)
<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 65 - 73 238u 411 (1/2) H-15 411 (1/2) <MDA
<1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 58co 9 <MDA <MDA 60Co 12 <MDA <MDA 14 <MDA <MDA 1 37 cs 12 <MDA <MDA Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0
TABLE I Page 5 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State)
PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO - CiIKg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean ( 0 b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 130 1204 (2/2) H-15 1204 (2/2) 1783 (2/2) 839 -1568 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 839 - 1568 1736 - 1830 226 Ra < MDA <MDA 8
22 Ra <MDA 121 (1/2) 54Mn 9 <MDA <MDA 59Fe <MDA <MDA 16
'co 9 <MDA <MDA 19 <MDA <MDA 65 Zn 17 <MDA <MDA
'34Cs 9 <MDA <MDA 37 1 Cs <MDA 9 <MDA Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0
TABLE I Page 6 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Luciae Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State)
PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: FISH UNITS: PICO - Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (0b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Mean (fb Range Mean (0b Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 130 2788 (2/2) H-15 2788 (2/2) 2212 (2/2) 2368 - 3208 <1 mi., ENE/E/ESE 2368 - 3208 1838 - 2587 54Mn 9 <MDA <MDA 59 Fe <MDA <MDA 16 58 Co <MDA 9 <MDA 60co 10 <MDA <MDA 65Zn 17 <MDA <MDA 134CS 9 <MDA <MDA 37 1 Cs <MDA <MDA 9
Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0
TABLE 1 Page 7 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State)
PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: PICO - Ci/Kg, WET Location with Highest Annual Mean Namec Mean (fb Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Direction Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona Locations Mean (0bRange (LLD) Mean (f0b Range Gamma Isotopic, 36 T
Be 71 924 (24/24) H-52 958 (12/12) 1215 (12/12) 452 - 2036 1 mi., S/SSE 539 - 2036 505 - 2056 40K 100 4286 (24/24) H-51 4449 (12/12) 3521 (12/12) 3233 - 5746 1 mi., N/NNW 3699 - 5746 2478 - 6025 58Co 6 <MDA <MDA 8 <MDA <MDA 1311 9 <MDA <MDA
'3 4Cs 8 <MDA <MDA 137cs 8 14 (1/24) H-52 14 (1/12) 26 (1/12) 1 mi., S/SSE 210Pb <MDA <MDA 2 2 1 Pb <MDA < MDA 2 6 Ra 319 (5/24) H-52 344 (3/12) 358 (1/12) 210 - 403 1 mi., S/SSE 284 - 403 Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0
TABLE I Page 8 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units I & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State)
PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: MILK UNITS: PICO - Ci/LITER Location with Highest Annual Mean Name' Mean (f)b Type and Total Number of Lower Limit of All Indicator Distance & Range Control Locations Analyses Performed Detectiona (LLD) Locations Direction Mean (f)b Range Mean (f)b Range Gamma Isotopic, 1 OK 60 1532 (1/1) H-101 1532 (1/1) n/ae 3.5 mi., WSW 21MPb - CODA - - n/a 212Pb _ <MDA - - n/a 1311. (Chemical 0.1 <MDA - - n/a separation )
134Cs 5 <MDA - - n/a 1 37 Cs 5 27 (1/1) H-101 27 (1/1) n/a 3.5 mi., WSW Number of Non-Routine Reported Measurements = 0
TABLE I Page 9 of 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
Name of Facility St. Lucie Units 1 & 2, Docket No(s). 50-335 & 50-389 Location of Facility St. Lucie. Florida , Reporting Period January 1 - December 31. 2005 (County, State)
NOTES
- a. The LLD isan "a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.
LLDs in this column are at time of measurement. The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.
- b. Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).
- c. Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment A.
- d. Results were based upon the average net response of three elements in a TLD (thermoluminescent dosimeter).
- e. There are no other milk producing goats grazing on similar vegetation, back yard grass and wild bushes inthe St. Lucie region.
Therefore, there is no control location.
MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 TABLE 1A (page 1 of 2)
DEVIATIONS / MISSING DATA A) Pathway: Airborne, Particulates & Radioiodines Location: H-34, 0.5 miles North Dates: 10-12-05 to 10-19-05 Deviation: Failure to perform continuous monitoring Description of Problem: Power was off at time of collection; sample duration was 164.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> out of the 168.3 hour3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> period.
Corrective Action: Requested restoration of power. Power to be restored same day; air sampling equipment will auto-start.
B) Pathway. Airborne, Particulates & Radioiodines Deviation: Failure to perform continuous monitoring Description of Problem: Power loss due to hurricane Wilma caused smaller then expected sample volume Corrective Action: Restored Power Dates: 10-19-05 to 10-25-05, landfall late in planned sampling period of 10-19-05 to 10-26-05 Affected Locations: Runtime (run hours out of sample period hours)
H-08, 6 miles West-northwest 128.8 out of 150 H-12, 12 miles South As found: Power On; 140 out of 146 H-14, 1mile Southeast 117 out of 144 H-30, 2 miles West 121 out of 147 H-34, 0.5 miles North Power off at beginning of period: 109 out of 142
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 TABLE 1A (page 2 of 2)
DEVIATIONS / MISSING DATA C) Pathway: Airborne, Particulates & Radioiodines Deviation: Failure to perform continuous monitoring Description of Particulate Filter loss due to hurricane Wilma Problem:
Corrective Replaced Filter Action:
Dates: 10-19-05 to 10-25-05 Affected Locations: H-14, I mile southeast H-30, 2 miles West D) Pathway: Airborne, Particulates & Radioiodines Deviation: Failure to perform continuous monitoring Description of Power loss due to hurricane Wilma extends into next sampling Problem: period Corrective Action: Restored Power Dates: 10-25-05 to 11-03-05 Affected Locations: Runtime (run hours out of sample period hours)
H-14, I mile southeast 107 out of 220 H-30, 2 miles West 118 out of 216 H-34, 0.5 miles North 204 out of 223 E) Pathway: Ingestion: Milk, goat Location: H 101, 3.5 miles west-southwest Date: Second quarter 2005 Deviation: Failure to monitor Description of Pet goat is no longer fresh; owner indicated animal will not Problem: become milch.
Corrective Action: None: Deleting this from ODCM due to loss of sampling capabilities. (This pet goat was the only milch animal within 5 miles of the power plant.)
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2 TABLE 1B ANALYSIS WITH LLDs ABOVE THE REQUIRED DETECTION CAPABILITIES (LLDs) Listed in ODCM TABLE 4.12-1 1/1/2005- 12/31/2005 The values specified in ODCM Table 4.12-1, Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS (Page 1 of 2)
Distance to Nearest (a. b)
Sector 6/05 - 7/05 6/05 - 7/05 6/05 - 7/05 Milk (c) Animal Residence Garden (d)
N o (e) 0 0 NNE 0 0 0 NE 0 0 0 ENE 00 0 0 E 0 0 0 ESE 0 0 0 SE 0 1.5/142 (g) 0 SSE L (f) 3.3/152 (g) L S L 3.3/191 L SSW L 2.2/212 L SW L 1.9/235 L WSW L 1.9/240 3.41248 (h)
W L 1.9/260 L WNW L 2.2/281 L NW L 3.5/304 L NNW L 3.4/342 (g) L
- *
- 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS (Page 2 of 2)
NOTES
- a. All categories surveyed out to a five-mile radius from the St. Lucie Plant.
- b. The following format is used to denote the location:
distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)
For example, a residence located in the southeast sector at a distance of 1.5 miles bearing 142 degrees is recorded as 1.5/142.
- c. Potential milk animal locations.
- d. Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.
- e. 0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an ocean area.
- f. L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.
- 9. Non-residential occupied buildings in these sectors include the following:
Sector Distance Description SSE 1.8/147 Fire Station NNW 2.8/348 A new community is being developed. At the current time, there are no houses available for occupancy.
- h. The garden is just 500 square feet; it is a herb garden in a residence's backyard. The owner is unwilling to provide a sample; field sampling technician feels garden is incapable of supplying sufficient sample to satisfy LLD requirements. It is not included Inthe REMP program.
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT A KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS
-5; .. :2005. .
ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2 e V , a A: v , < A, .; :>-<- A.' ~ Yz,:.. N4 A A
";'~~"W' A
"
- y "
U4wqk?2 ,.
ff :;. ;'. A, s ,, . t .i,,0S<C ., X ,, ;
X ;, : X'; 0"; i D'. f.D .%' ;(c o;-fwPG ~'0-0g
!.,';
1 -. 't~~
- . 2005 -
ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE LOCATIONS (10 MILES)
NW-10 ' H32 Vero Beach (P/CHEMC-2008-F2-RO)
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS 1 & 2 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 1 OF 4 PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED: TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY Location Direction Approximate Descrintion Name Sector Distance (miles)
N-1 N 1 AlA, North of Blind Creek NNW-5 NNW 5 South of Pete Stone Creek NNW-10 NNW 9 Coast Guard Station NW-5 NW 6 Indian River Dr., at Rio Vista Dr.
NW-10 NW 10 S.R. 68 at S.R. 607 WNW-2 WNW 3 Cemetery South of 7107 Indian River Dr.
WNW-5 WNW 5 U.S. 1 at S.R. 712 WNW-10 WNW 10 S.R. 70, West of Turnpike W-2 W 2 7609 Indian River Drive W-5 W 5 Oleander and Sager Street W-10 W 9 Interstate 95 at S.R. 709 WSW-2 WSW 2 8503 Indian River Dr.
WSW-5 WSW 5 Prima Vista at Yacht Club WSW-lo WSW 10 Del Rio at Davis Street SW-2 SW 2 9207 Indian River Drive SW-5 SW 5 U.S. 1 at Village Green Dr.
SW-10 SW 10 Port St. Lucie Blvd. at Cairo Rd.
SSW-2 SSW 3 10307 Indian River Drive SSW-5 SSW 6 U.S. 1 at Port St. Lucie Blvd.
SSW-lo SSW 8 Pine Valley at Westmoreland Rd.
S-5 S 5 13179 Indian River Drive S-10 S 10 U.S. 1 at S.R. 714 S/SSE-10 SSE 10 Indian River Dr. at Quail Run Lane SSE-5 SSE 5 Entrance to Nettles Island SSE-10 SSE 10 Elliot Museum SE-I SE 1 South of Cooling Canal Control:
H-32 NNW 19 University of Florida IFAS Vero Beach
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 2 OF 4 PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: WEEKLY Location Direction Approximate Description Name Sector Distance (miles)
H-08 WNW 6 FPL Substation, Weatherbee Rd.
H-14 SE 1 On-Site, Near South Property Line H-30 W 2 Power Line, 7609 Indian River Drive H-34 N 0.5 On-Site at Meteorology Tower Control:
H-12 S 12 FPL Substation, SR-76 Stuart
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 3 OF 4 PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED: SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)
SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: H-1 5 WEEKLY, H-59 MONTHLY Location Direction Approximate Description Name Sector Distance (miles)
H-15 ENE/E/SSE <1 Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side AlA Control:
H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED: SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Location Direction Approximate Description Name Sector Distance (miles)
H-15 ENE/E/ESE <1 Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side AlA Control:
H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT A PAGE 4 OF 4 PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED: CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: SEMI-ANNUALLY Location Direction Approximate Description Name Sector Distance (miles)
H-1 5 ENE/E/ESE <1 Ocean Side, Vicinity of St. Lucie Plant Control:
H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED: BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: MONTHLY Location Direction Approximate Description Name Sector Distance (miles)
H-51 N/NNW I Off-Site Near North Property Line H-52 S/SSE 1 Off-Site Near South Property Line Control:
H-59 S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED: MILK SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY: QUARTERLY Location Direction Approximate Description Name Sector Distance (miles)
H-101 WSW 3.5 One Goat, Private Residence, Spanish Lakes, East of USI Control:
None: Not found any fresh goats with similar grazing activities (backyard grass &wild vegetation)
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT B RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY ST. LUCIE SITE 2005 First Quarter 2005 Second Quarter 2005 Third Quarter 2005 Fourth Quarter 2005
SL QR 1Q-2005 ST. LUCIE SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Sampling First Quarter, 2005 Number of Sample Type Collection Frequency Locations Sampled Samples
- 1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 27
- 2. Airborne Weekly 5 65 2.a. Air lodines 2.b. Air Particulates Weekly 5 65
- 3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Weekly 1 13 Monthly 2 3 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 2 2
- 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea Semiannually 2 2 4.a.2. Fish Semiannually 2 2 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly 3 9 4.c. Milk Quarterly 1 I Total: 189 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%
confidence) for the true activity in the sample.
The marine fauna listed In this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.
1 of 7
SL QR IQ-2005
- 1. DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs - (uR/hour)
Sample Deployment 07-Dec-04 Sample Deployment 07-Dec-04 Site Collection 03-Mar Site Collection 03-Mar-05 N-1 4.8 +/- 0.2 SW-2 4.2 +/- 0.2 NNW-5 4.9 +/- 0.2 SW-5 6.0 +/- 0.3 NNW-10 4.6 +/- 0.2 SW-10 5.0 +/- 0.2 NW-5 4.8 +/- 0.2 SSW-2 4.6 +/- 0.2 NW-10 6.3 +/- 0.3 SSW-5 5.3 +/- 0.2 SSW-lo 5.2 +/- 0.2 WNW-2 5.0 +/- 0.2 WNW-5 4.9 +/- 0.2 S-5 4.7 +/- 0.2 WNW-1 0 5.5 +/- 0.2 S-10 4.5 +/- 0.2 S/SSE-10 4.5 +/- 0.2 W-2 4.5 +/- 0.2 W-5 4.9 +/- 0.2 SSE-5 4.6 +/- 0.2 W-10 4.9 +/- 0.2 SSE-1 0 5.1 +/-0.2 WSW-2 4.6 +/- 0.2 SE-A 4.6 +/- 0.2 WSW-5 4.6 +/- 0.2 WSW-10 4.3 +/- 0.2 H-32 4.9 +/- 0.2 2of7
SL QR 1Q-2005 2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES - (DCi/ m3)
Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 06-Jan-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 13-Jan-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 20-Jan-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 27-Jan-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 03-Feb-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 10-Feb-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 16-Feb-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 23-Feb-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 03-Mar-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 09-Mar-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 15-Mar-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 22-Mar-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 31-Mar-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 3 of 7
SL QR IQ-2005 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES - GROSS BETA - (pCi/M 3 )
Sample Sites Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 06-Jan-05 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 13-Jan-05 0.006 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.004 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 20-Jan-05 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 27-Jan-05 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 03-Feb-05 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 10-Feb-05 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/-0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 16-Feb-05 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.016 i 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 23-Feb-05 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.012 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 03-Mar-05 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.011 i 0.002 0.006 +/- 0.001 0.013 +/- 0.002 09-Mar-05 0.019 +/- 0.003 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.010 i 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 15-Mar-05 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/-0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 22-Mar-05 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 31-Mar-05 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 Mean: 0.013 +/- 0.001 0.015 +/- 0.001 0.012 +/- 0.001 0.012 +/- 0.001 0.014 +/- 0.001 2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m 3)
First Quarter, 2005 SamDle Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 H08 0.1559 +/- 0.0139 <0.0255 <0.0019 <0.0015 <0.0560 H12 0.1626 +/- 0.0156 <0.0216 <0.0009 <0.0011 0.0285 +/- 0.0040 H14 0.1768 +/- 0.0145 <0.0231 <0.0018 <0.0017 <0.0518 H30 0.1687 +/- 0.0141 <0.0218 <0.0020 <0.0015 <0.0508 H34 0.2163 +/- 0.0133 <0.0218 <0.0009 <0.0010 0.0313 +/- 0.0038 4 of 7
SL QR IQ-2005 3.a. SURFACE WATER - (PCi/L)
Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)
H15 06-Jan-05 <124 359+/- 34 <3 <3 <5 <4 <8 <6 <5 <3 <4 <6 13-Jan-05 <124 342 +/- 38 <4 <4 <10 <6 <8 <8 <6 <5 <5 <8 20-Jan-05 <124 309 +/-26 <2 <2 <5 <3 <5 <4 <3 <3 <2 <4 27-Jan-05 <127 345 +/- 18 <2 <1 <3 <2 <4 <2 <2 <2 <2 <3 03-Feb-05 <126 333 +/- 35 <3 <3 <8 <4 <7 <7 <5 <3 <3 <7 10-Feb-05 <126 362 +/-40 <3 <3 <7 <4 <7 <7 <6 <4 <4 <6 16-Feb-05 <126 403 +/- 29 <3 <3 <5 <3 <7 <5 <3 <4 <3 <9 23-Feb-05 <126 385 +/- 37 <4 <4 <9 <4 <10 <6 <5 <5 <5 <9 03-Mar-05 <135 353 +/- 31 <3 <4 <7 <4 <8 <7 <5 <4 <4 <5 09-Mar-05 <135 310 +/- 33 <5 <4 <10 <6 <11 <7 <5 <5 <6 <11 15-Mar-05 <138 354 +/- 34 <3 <4 <8 <4 <10 <6 <4 <4 <4 <7 22-Mar-05 <138 348 +/- 26 <3 <3 <6 <4 <5 <4 <3 <3 <2 <5 31-Mar-05 <138 330 +/- 35 <4 <4 <7 <5 <10 <6 <4 <5 <5 <13 H59 13-Jan-05 <124 295 +/-40 <4 <4 <8 <5 <11 <7 <6 <5 <5 <6 03-Feb-05 <126 262+/-41 <6 <5 <12 <7 <12 <11 <7 <6 <7 <10 04-Mar-05 <135 332 +/- 49 <6 <4 <10 <6 <12 <8 <6 <7 <7 <7 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.
(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.
5 of 7
Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Pb-210 Ra-226 Th-232 U-238 H15 10-Feb-05 <81 257 +/-44 <9 <8 <11 <9 <487 216 +/- 93 <49 <374 H59 10-Feb-05 <1 00 230 +/- 59 <11 <12 <14 <11 <854 <344 73 +/- 17 <578 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA - (Blue Crab) - (oCi/ka. wet weiaht)
Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 18-Mar-05 1568 +/- 204 <25 <28 <53 <23 <53 <23 <28 <450 <130 H59 15-Mar-05 1736 +/- 199 <16 <15 <41 <21 <44 <20 <21 <399 <96 4.a.2. FISH - (Mixed Fish) - (pCi/ku. wet weight)
Sample Collection Site Date i K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ra-226 Ra-228w H15 10-Feb-05 3208 +/- 267 <36 <32 <63 <39 <72 <42 <34 <457 <121 H59 15-Mar-05 2587 +/- 174 <21 <18 <36 <22 <43 <22 <16 <389 <81 6 of 7
SL QR IQ-2005 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION - Brazilian PeDper - (DCi/ka. wet weiaht)
Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Pb-210 Ra-226 H51 13-Jan-05 1118 +/- 38 4805 +/- 110 <7 <7 <7 <1046 <163 03-Feb-05 1391 +/- 112 4440 +/- 244 <18 <22 <19 <2629 <328 03-Mar-05 716+ 64 4274 + 175 <15 <12 <14 <760 353 +/- 137 H52 13-Jan-05 1767 + 74 4913 +/- 172 <10 <11 <11 <674 <283 03-Feb-05 2036 +/- 53 3602 +/- 102 <9 <8 <8 <1149 <176 03-Mar-05 914 +/- 87 3654 +/- 191 <16 <15 <19 <2296 284 +/- 126 H59 13-Jan-05 2056 +/- 107 3048 +/- 203 <13 <16 <16 <2501 <353 03-Feb-05 1582 +/- 105 2598 +/- 204 <21 <16 26+/-8 <2614 <406 04-Mar-05 1354 +/- 78 2478 +/- 173 <17 <16 <18 <2278 <364 4.c. MILK - (oCi/L)
Sample Collection Ba-140 Site Date K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A)
H101 31-Mar-05 1532 +/- 58 <0.3 <4 27 +/- 3 <8 (A) This tabulated LLD value is for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity.
7 of 7
SL QR 2Q-2005 ST, LUCIE SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 2005 Collection Frequency Locations Sampled Number of Sample Tvpe Samples
- 1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 27
- 2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines Weekly 5 65 2.b. Air Particulates Weekly 5 65
- 3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Weekly 1 13 Monthly 3 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 0 0
- 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea Semiannually 0 0 4.a.2. Fish Semiannually 0 0 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly 3 9 4.c. Milk Quarterly 0 0 Total: 182 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%
confidence) for the true activity in the sample.
The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.
1 of 7
- 1. DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs - (uR/hour)
Sample Deployment 03-Mar-05 Sample Deployment 03-Mar-05 Site Collection 08-Jun-05 Site Collection 08-Jun-05 N-1 4.7 i 0.3 SW-2 4.7 +/- 0.3 NNW-5 4.7 +/- 0.3 SW-5 6.0 +/- 0.4 NNW-10 5.0 +/- 0.3 SW-lo 4.7 +/- 0.3 NW-5 4.8 +/- 0.3 SSW-2 4.8 +/- 0.3 NW-10 6.3 +/-0.4 SSW-5 5.3 +/- 0.3 WNW-2 4.7 +/- 0.3 SSW-1o 5.4 +/- 0.3 WNW-5 4.8 +/- 0.3 S-5 4.7 +/- 0.3 WNW-1 0 5.6 +/- 0.3 S-10 4.8 +/- 0.3 W-2 4.8 +/- 0.3 S/SSE-1 0 4.6 +/- 0.3 W-5 4.9 +/- 0.3 SSE-5 4.3 +/- 0.3 W-10 5.0 +/- 0.3 SSE-10 5.2 +/- 0.3 WSW-2 4.8 +/- 0.3 SE-I 4.5 +/- 0.3 WSW-5 4.6 +/- 0.3 H-32 5.2 +/- 0.3 WSW-10 4.4 +/- 0.3 2of7
SL QR 2Q-2005 2,a 2.a. IODINE-1 31 INWEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES - (pCi/ m3)
Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 05-Apr-05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 11-Apr-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 20-Apr-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 26-Apr-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 04-May-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 12-May-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 19-May-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 23-May-05 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 31-May-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 07-Jun-05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 <0.03 13-Jun-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 20-Jun-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 (A) 27-Jun-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 (A) Power outage due to flipped breaker. Run time estimated at 81 hours9.375e-4 days <br />0.0225 hours <br />1.339286e-4 weeks <br />3.08205e-5 months <br /> out of 167.
3 of7
i o6 SL QR 2Q-2005 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES - GROSS BETA - (pCi/m 3 )
Sample Site Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 05-Apr-05 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.003 0.017 +/- 0.003 0.015 +/- 0.003 0.013 i 0.003 11-Apr-05 0.017 +/- 0.003 0.020 +/- 0.003 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.003 20-Apr-05 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 26-Apr-05 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.029 +/- 0.003 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.029 +/- 0.003 04-May-05 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 12-May-05 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 19-May-05 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 23-May-05 0.016 +/- 0.003 0.012 +/- 0.003 0.007 +/- 0.003 0.012 +/- 0.003 0.009 t 0.003 31-May-05 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 07-Jun-05 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 13-Jun-05 0.011 +/-0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 20-Jun-05 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.003 27-Jun-05 0.006 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.001 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.004 +/- 0.001 0.005 +/- 0.002 (A) Power outage due to flipped breaker. Run time estimated at 81 hours9.375e-4 days <br />0.0225 hours <br />1.339286e-4 weeks <br />3.08205e-5 months <br /> out of 167.
3 2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m )
Second Quarter, 2005 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Pb-210 H08 0.1518 +/- 0.0103 <0.0226 <0.001 1 <0.0008 0.0207 +/- 0.0034 H12 0.1822 +/- 0.0118 <0.0215 <0.0009 <0.0009 0.0191 +/- 0.0049 H14 0.1690 +/- 0.0117 <0.0224 <0.0010 <0.0007 0.0308 +/- 0.0044 H30 0.1897 +/- 0.0111 <0.0202 <0.0014 <0.0009 0.0245 +/- 0.0050 H34 0.1705 +/- 0.0109 <0.0172 <0.0012 <0.001 1 0.0297 +/- 0.0039 4 of 7
SL QR 2Q-2005 II 3.a. SURFACE WATER - (OCi/L)
Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)
H15 05-Apr-05 <136 315 +/- 40 <5 <4 <9 <5 <11 <8 <5 <6 <5 <12 11 -Apr-05 <136 272 +/- 38 <3 <3 <7 <4 <6 <5 <4 <4 <4 <7 20-Apr-05 <142 382 +/- 17 <2 <1 <3 <2 <4 <3 <2 <2 <2 <4 26-Apr-05 <142 349 +/- 29 <2 <3 <6 <3 <7 <5 <3 <3 <3 <9 04-May-05 <136 383 +/- 29 <3 <3 <5 <3 <7 <5 <3 <3 <3 <9 12-May-05 <135 378 +/- 35 <3 <3 <7 <5 <8 <7 <5 <3 <4 <6 19-May-05 <145 412 +/- 37 <3 <3 <6 <4 <7 <6 <3 <4 <3 <11 23-May-05 <145 378 +/- 27 <3 <3 <6 <3 <7 <3 <3 <3 <3 <5 31-May-05 <145 316 +/- 28 <3 <3 <6 <4 <6 <4 <3 <3 <3 <6 07-Jun-05 <145 417 +/- 37 <4 <3 <6 <4 <7 <6 <4 <3 <4 <7 13-Jun-05 <145 320 +/- 32 <3 <3 <7 <5 <6 <5 <4 <4 <3 <12 20-Jun-05 <133 346 +/- 30 <3 <2 <6 <3 <6 <4 <3 <3 <3 <9 27-Jun-05 <132 308 +/- 38 <3 <2 <6 <4 <9 <6 <4 <4 <4 <8 H59 05-Apr-05 <136 364 +/- 38 <4 <3 <8 <4 <7 <6 <4 <4 <3 <8 12-May-05 <135 381 +/- 17 <1 <2 <3 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <2 <2 07-Jun-05 <145 352 +/- 34 <3 <3 <7 <4 <6 <5 <4 <5 <3 <7 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.
(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.
5 of 7
SL QR 2Q-2005 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT - (DCi/ka. dryweight)
Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 Th-232 U-238 These samples were previously collected.
4.a.1. CRUSTACEA - (pCi/kq. wet weight)
Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 23-Apr-04 1481 +/- 104 <10 <10 <22 <11 <20 <11 <10 <190 <37 H59 This sample was previously collected.
4.a.2. FISH - (pCi/kq. wet weiaht)
Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 These samples were previously collected.
6 of 7
4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION - Brazilian Pepper - (PCi/kQ. wet weiaht)
Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Pb-210 Pb-212 Ra-226 H51 05-Apr-05 452 +/- 65 5746 +/- 187 <17 <11 <10 <615 <92 <262 12-May-05 767 +/- 83 4498 +/- 224 <20 <20 <22 <2278 <79 <311 07-Jun-05 968 +/- 89 4402 +/- 209 <14 <15 <12 <2216 <78 <321 H52 05-Apr-05 597 +/- 77 4933 +/- 229 <20 <17 <18 <2266 <71 <332 12-May-05 778 +/- 74 5123 +/- 247 <23 <16 <15 <2553 <80 <358 07-Jun-05 822 +/- 68 3542 +/- 211 <14 <18 <13 <2127 <69 <331 H59 05-Apr-05 505 +/- 65 6025 +/- 238 <18 <18 <18 <2383 <82 <338 12-May-05 659 +/- 84 2482 +/- 162 <18 <14 <14 <2003 <65 <292 07-Jun-05 1456 +/-89 4062 +/- 223 <16 <18 <16 <2128 <82 <345 4.c. MILK - (DCi/L)
Sample Collection Ba-140 Site Date K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A)
H101 There was no sample available during the quarter.
(A) This tabulated LLD value is for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity.
7 of 7
a SL QR 3Q-2005 ST. LUCIE SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Specification Sampling Third Quarter, 2005 Collection Frequency Locations Sampled Number of Sample Tvpe Samples
- 1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 27
- 2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines Weekly 5 65 2.b. Air Particulates Weekly 5 65
- 3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Weekly 1 13 Monthly 1 3 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 2 2
- 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea Semiannually 2 1 4.a.2. Fish Semiannually 2 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly 3 9 Total: 186 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background and with greater than
.a 50% error term are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95% confidence) for the true activity in the sample.
The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.
I of 8
- 1. DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs (uR/hour)
.
Sample Deployment 08-Jun-05 Sample Deployment 08-Jun-05
-
Site Collection 13-Sep-05 -
Site Collection 13-Sep-05 N-1 4.8t+/-0.3 SW-2 5.0 +/- 0.3 NNW-5 4.8 +/- 0.3 SW-5 6.2 +/- 0.4 NNW-10 5.2 +/- 0.4 SW-10 5.2 +/- 0.3 NW-5 5.0 +/- 0.3 SSW-2 4.9+/-0.3 NW-10 6.4 +/- 0.4 SSW-5 5.9 +/- 0.4 WNW-2 4.8 + 0.3 SSW-lo 5.8 +/- 0.4 WNW-5 5.0 +/- 0.3 S-5 5.1 +/- 0.3 WNW-10 5.8 +/- 0.4 S-10 5.3 +/- 0.4 W-2 4.8 +/- 0.3 S/SSE-l 0 4.9 +/- 0.3 W-5 5.2 +/-0.4 SSE-5 4.8 +/- 0.3 W-10 5.2 +/- 0.4 SSE-10 5.9 +/- 0.4 WSW-2 5.0 +/- 0.3 SE-1 5.0 +/- 0.3 WSW-5 4.9 +/- 0.3 H-32 5.7 +/- 0.4 WSW-l0 4.8 +/- 0.3 2 of 8
- 0' SL QR 3Q-2005 2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES - (DCi/ M 3
)
Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 06-Jul-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 13-Jul-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 20-Jul-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 25-Jul-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.01 01-Aug-05 <0.03 <0.02 <0.02 <0.03 <0.02 09-Aug-05 <0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.02 <0.01 18-Aug-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 24-Aug-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 30-Aug-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 06-Sep-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 13-Sep-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 20-Sep-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 27-Sep-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 3 of 8
a, SL QR 3Q-2005 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES - GROSS BETA - (pCi/m3 )
- - - Sample Site Collection Date -
H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 06-Jul-05 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.012 i 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 13-Jul-05 0.016 i 0.002 0.016 + 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 20-Jul-05 0.006 i 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.001 0.008 +/- 0.002 25-Jul-05 0.014 +/- 0.003 0.014 + 0.003 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 01-Aug-05 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 09-Aug-05 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 18-Aug-05 0.005 +/- 0.001 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.001 0.010 +/- 0.002 24-Aug-05 0.017 +/- 0.002 0.015 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 30-Aug-05 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.002 0.004 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.006 +/- 0.002 06-Sep-05 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.025 +/- 0.003 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 13-Sep-05 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 20-Sep-05 0.029 +/- 0.003 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.030 +/- 0.003 0.024 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 27-Sep-05 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 Mean: 0.013 +/- 0.001 0.013 +/- 0.001 0.013 +/- 0.001 0.012 +/- 0.001 0.013 +/- 0.001 4 of 8
47 SL QR 3Q-2005 2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (pCi/m 3)
Third Quarter. 2005 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 H08 0.1478 +/- 0.0114 <0.0226 <0.0013 <0.0007 0.0232 +/- 0.0038 H12 0.1483 +/- 0.0110 <0.0221 <0.0008 <0.0009 0.0173 +/- 0.0039 H14 0.1137 +/- 0.0112 <0.0193 <0.0008 <0.0008 0.0298 +/- 0.0047 H30 0.1074 +/- 0.0106 <0.0183 <0.0007 <0.0008 0.0251 +/- 0.0042 H34 0.1425 +/- 0.0141 <0.0243 <0.0010 <0.0014 <0.0561 5 of 8
of, SL QR 3Q-2005 3.a. SURFACE WATER - (gCi/L)
Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)
H15 06-Jul-05 <132 345 +/- 23 <2 <2 <5 <2 <5 <4 <2 <3 <3 <6 13-Jul-05 <138 288 +/- 32 <3 <3 <9 <4 <8 <6 <5 <4 <4 <4 20-Jul-05 <138 379 +/- 32 <3 <3 <7 <3 <8 <6 <4 <4 <3 <7 25-Jul-05 <137 363 +/- 23 <2 <2 <5 <3 <5 <4 <3 <3 <2 <5 01-Aug-05 <148 350 +/ <5 <6 <9 <5 <12 <11 <5 <6 <5 <12 10-Aug-05 <147 425 +/- 36 <3 <3 <9 <4 <8 <6 <5 <4 :<4 <7 I8-Aug-05 <142 257 +/- 32 <3 <3 <6 <4 <7 <6 <3 <4 <3 <10 24-Aug-O5 <142 343 +/- 30 <3 <3 <5 <4 <7 <4 <4 <3 <3 <9 30-Aug-05 <145 355 +/- 33 <4 <4 <6 <4 <8 <5 <4 <4 <4 <6 06-Sep-05 <140 346 +/- 34 <3 <3 <6 <4 <8 <6 <4 <4 <3 <8 13-Sep-05 <144 306 +/- 31 <3 <4 <6 <4 <8 <6 <3 <4 <4 <6 20-Sep-05 <156 322 +/- 32 <3 <3 <7 <3 <6 <5 <4 <4 <3 <11 27-Sep-05 <156 376 +/- 38 <3 <4 <7 <4 <7 <6 <5 <4 <4 <6 H59 13-Jul-05 <138 394 +/- 44 <6 <5 <12 <7 <13 <10 <7 <6 <5 <9 10-Aug-05 <142 424 +/- 33 <3 <3 <7 <4 <9 <6 <6 <4 <4 <6 06-Sep-05 <144 262 +/- 48 <5 <5 <9 <6 <10 <7 <5 <5 <5 <9 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.
(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.
6 of 8
SL QR 3Q-2005 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT - (oCi/k. drlyweight)
Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 Th-232 U-238 H15 10-Aug-05 <101 490+/-84 <11 <10 <12 <13 <1016 299+/-14 96+/-15 411 +/-101 H59 10-Aug-05 93+/-40 208+/-45 <7 <7 <9 <8 <456 <253 65 +/- 11 <416 4.a.1. CRUSTACEA - (cCi/kg. wet weight)
Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 13-Sep-05 839 +/- 358 <42 <53 <108 <60 <116 <48 <51 <857 <180 H59 This sample has not yet been collected.
4.a.2. FISH - (pCi/ka. wet weight)
Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 13-Sep-05 2368 +/- 182 <19 <17 <27 <20 <37 <21 <16 <390 <64 H59 This sample has not yet been collected.
7 of 8
SL QR 3Q-2005 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION - Brazilian Penner - (oCi/ka. wet weight)
Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Pb-210 Pb-212 Ra-226 H51 13-Jul-05 585 +/-42 4775 113 <10 <8 <7 <1077 <37 210 +/- 75 10-Aug-05 1242 +/- 94 4698 +/-232 <17 <17 <15 <2385 <82 <358 06-Sep-05 708 +/- 77 3699 +/-208 <14 <14 <17 <2079 <77 <365 H52 13-Jul-05 563 +/- 68 3882 +/- 198 <20 <15 <12 <1842 <60 <253 10-Aug-05 801 +/- 80 3974 +/-209 <14 <15 <15 <2450 <70 403 +/- 158 06-Sep-05 539 +/- 78 4557 +/- 175 <11 <11 14 +/- 5 <679 <83 <248 H59 13-Jul-05 655 +/- 83 3721 +/- 208 <26 <16 <17 <2201 <78 <345 10-Aug-05 1224 +/- 87 4062 +/- 198 <15 <14 <15 <2195 <68 <326 06-Sep-05 1421 +/-76 3840 +/- 163 <11 <10 <12 <674 <84 <261 8 of 8
SL QR 4Q-2005 ST. LUCIE SITE Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 2005 Number of Sample Type Collection Frequency Locations Sampled Samples
- 1. Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 27
- 2. Airborne 2.a. Air lodines Weekly 5 65 2.b. Air Particulates Weekly 5 63
- 3. Waterborne 3.a. Surface Water Weekly 1 13 Monthly 3 3.b. Shoreline Sediment Semiannually 0 0
- 4. Ingestion 4.a. Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1. Crustacea Semiannually I I 4.a.2. Fish Semiannually I 4.b. Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly 3 9 4.c. Milk Quarterly 1 0 Total: 182 NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term. Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%
confidence) for the true activity In the sample.
The marine fauna listed in this report were collected in part, under Florida FWC SAL030.
1 of 7
- 1. DIRECT RADIATION - TLDs - (uR/hour)
Sample Deployment 13-Sep-05 Sample Deployment 13-Sep-05 Site Collection 08-Dec-05 Site Collection 08-Dec-05 N-1 4.9 +/- 0.2 SW-2 5.0 +/- 0.2 NNW-5 4.8 +/- 0.2 SW-5 5.9 +/- 0.3 NNW-10 5.0 +/- 0.2 SW-1o 5.3 +/- 0.2 NW-5 4.6 +/- 0.2 SSW-2 5.0 +/- 0.2 NW-10 6.5 +/- 0.3 SSW-5 6.0 +/- 0.3 WNW-2 5.0 +/- 0.2 SSW-1o 5.8 +/- 0.3 WNW-5 5.4 +/- 0.3 S-5 5.2 +/- 0.2 WNW-10 5.5 +/- 0.3 S-10 5.0 +/- 0.2 W-2 4.7 +/- 0.2 S/SSE-1 0 4.8 +/- 0.2 W-5 5.4 +/- 0.3 SSE-5 4.4 +/- 0.2 W-10 4.9 +/- 0.2 SSE-1 0 5.6 +/- 0.3 WSW-2 5.2 +/- 0.2 SE-1 4.8 +/- 0.2 WSW-5 5.2 +/- 0.2 H-32 5.4 +/- 0.3 WSW-10 4.7 +/- 0.2 2of7
2.a. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR CARTRIDGES - (pCi/ M )
Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 05-Oct-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 12-Oct-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 19-Oct-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 (A) <0.01 25-Oct-05 (B) <0.02 (C) <0.02 (D) <0.02 (E) <0.02 (F) <0.02 03-Nov-05 <0.01 <0.01 (G) <0.01 (H) <0.01 (I) <0.01 09-Nov-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 15-Nov-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 22-Nov-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.0i <0.01 <0.01 28-Nov-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 05-Dec-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 14-Dec-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 21-Dec-05 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 28-Dec-05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 (A) Power off at time of collection, run time 164.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> out of 168.3.
(B) Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 129 hours0.00149 days <br />0.0358 hours <br />2.132936e-4 weeks <br />4.90845e-5 months <br /> out of 150.
(C) Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 140 hours0.00162 days <br />0.0389 hours <br />2.314815e-4 weeks <br />5.327e-5 months <br /> out of 146.
(D) Hurricane Wilma, power outage run time 117 hours0.00135 days <br />0.0325 hours <br />1.934524e-4 weeks <br />4.45185e-5 months <br /> out of 144.
(E) Hurricane Wilma, power outage run time 121 hours0.0014 days <br />0.0336 hours <br />2.000661e-4 weeks <br />4.60405e-5 months <br /> of of 147.
(F) Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 109 hours0.00126 days <br />0.0303 hours <br />1.802249e-4 weeks <br />4.14745e-5 months <br /> out of 142.
(G) Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 107 hours0.00124 days <br />0.0297 hours <br />1.76918e-4 weeks <br />4.07135e-5 months <br /> out of 220.
(H) Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 118 hours0.00137 days <br />0.0328 hours <br />1.951058e-4 weeks <br />4.4899e-5 months <br /> out of 216.
(I) Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 204 hours0.00236 days <br />0.0567 hours <br />3.373016e-4 weeks <br />7.7622e-5 months <br /> out of 223.
3 of 7
A &
SL QR 4Q-2005 2.b.1. AIR PARTICULATES - GROSS BETA - (pCVM 3)
~ 4t Sample Sit-Collection Date H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 05-Oct-O!5 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.001 0.009 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 12-Oct-O5 0.006 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.007 +/- 0.002 19-Oct-O5 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 (A) 0.014 +/- 0.002 25-Oct-O 5 (B) <0.009 (C) 0.008 +/- 0.002 (D) (E) (F) 0.007 +/- 0.002 03-Nov-0 5 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 (G) 0.010 +/- 0.003 (H) 0.016 +/- 0.003 (I) 0.015 +/- 0.002 09-Nov-0 5 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.013 +/- 0.002 15-Nov-0 5 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.003 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.003 0.021 +/- 0.003 22-Nov-0 5 0.007 +/- 0.002 0.005 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 0.011 +/- 0.002 0.008 +/- 0.002 28-Nov-0 5 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.028 +/- 0.003 0.024 +/- 0.003 0.026 +/- 0.003 0.024 +/- 0.003 05-Dec-0 5 0.023 +/- 0.003 0.019 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 0.021 +/- 0.002 0.024 +/- 0.003 14-Dec-0 5 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.010 +/- 0.002 0.014 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.017 +/- 0.002 21-Dec-0 5 0.013 +/- 0.002 0.016 +/- 0.002 0.018 +/- 0.002 0.012 +/- 0.002 0.020 +/- 0.002 28-Dec-0 5 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 0.028 +/- 0.003 0.024 +/- 0.002 0.023 +/- 0.002 Mean: <0.014 0.015 +/- 0.001 <0.014 <0.015 0.016 +/- 0.001 (A) Power off at time of collection, run time 164.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> out of 168.3.
(B) Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 129 hours0.00149 days <br />0.0358 hours <br />2.132936e-4 weeks <br />4.90845e-5 months <br /> out of 150.
(C) Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 140 hours0.00162 days <br />0.0389 hours <br />2.314815e-4 weeks <br />5.327e-5 months <br /> out of 146.
(D) Hurricane Wilma, particulate filter lost.
(E) Hurricane Wilma, particulate filter lost.
(F) Hurricane Wilma, power outage, run time 109 hours0.00126 days <br />0.0303 hours <br />1.802249e-4 weeks <br />4.14745e-5 months <br /> out of 142.
(G) Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 107 hours0.00124 days <br />0.0297 hours <br />1.76918e-4 weeks <br />4.07135e-5 months <br /> out of 220.
(H) Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 118 hours0.00137 days <br />0.0328 hours <br />1.951058e-4 weeks <br />4.4899e-5 months <br /> out of 216.
(I) Power outage at beginning of sampling period, run time 204 hours0.00236 days <br />0.0567 hours <br />3.373016e-4 weeks <br />7.7622e-5 months <br /> out of 223.
2.b.2. AIR PARTICULATES GAMMA ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES (PCi/m 3)
Fourth Quarter, 2005 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-21 0 H08 0.1382 +/-0.0129 <0.0222 <0.001 3 <0.001 1 <0.0563 H12 0.1534 +/- 0.0147 <0.0254 <0.0015 <0.0011 -<0.0586 H14 0.1741 +/-0.0123 <0.0230 <0.0011 <0.0005 0.0282+/-0.0034 H30 0.1644+/-0.0114 <0.0179 <0.0009 <0.0009 0.0282+/-0.0048 H34 0.1891 +/-0.0123 <0.0154 <0.0008 <0.0007 0.0293+/-0.0040 4of7
SL QR 4Q-2005 3.a. SURFACE WATER - (DCi/L)
Sample Collection Zr-95 Ba-140 Site Date H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A) (B)
H15 05-Oct-05 118+/-50 379+/-35 <3 <3 <9 <4 <10 <6 <5 <4 <4 <6 12-Oct-05 <144 387 +/- 33 <3 <4 <6 <4 <8 <5 <5 <3 <3 <6 19-Oct-05 110+/-46 351 +/-27 <3 <2 <5 <3 <6 <5 <3 <3 <3 <11 25-Oct-05 <144 365 +/- 34 <4 <3 <6 <4 <9 <6 <5 <3 <5 <7 03-Nov-05 <157 382 +/- 32 <4 <3 <7 <4 <8 <7 <5 <4 <4 <6 09-Nov-05 <157 294 +/- 20 <2 <2 <4 <2 <4 <3 <3 <2 <2 <3 15-Nov-05 <157 321 +/-25 <3 <3 <6 <3 <6 <5 <3 <3 <3 <6 22-Nov-05 <157 384 +/- 29 <3 <3 <6 <3 <7 <6 <4 <3 <3 <10 ft 28-Nov-05 <156 322 +/- 27 <3 <2 <5 <3 <6 <4 <3 <3 <3 <5 05-Dec-05 <149 362 +/- 40 <4 <5 <8 <7 <11 <9 <5 <5 <5 <7 14-Dec-05 <149 358 +/- 32 <3 <3 <7 <4 <7 <7 <4 <4 <4 <7 21-Dec-05 <149 266 +/- 34 <4 <3 <6 <3 <6 <5 <3 <3 <4 <8 28-Dec-05 <148 416 +/- 30 <3 <3 <7 <3 <6 <5 <4 <4 <3 - <9 H59 05-Oct-05 ' <144 361 +/-35 <4 <3 <7 <5 <7 <6 <6 <4 <3 <5 03-Nov-05 142 +/- 51 285 +/- 25 <3 <2 <5 <3 <5 <4 <3 <2 <3 <3 05-Dec-05 <149 347 +/- 39 <4 <5 <9 <5 <8 <8 <5 <5 <4 <6 (A) These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.
(B) These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.
5 of 7
SL QR 4Q-2005 3.b. SHORELINE SEDIMENT - (DCi/ct. dry weight)
Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Pb-210 Ra-226 Th-232 U-238 These samples were previously collected.
4.a.1. CRUSTACEA - (nCi/ka. wet weight)
Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 This sample was previously collected.
H59 06-Oct-05 1830 +/- 96 <11 <11 <24 <12 <25 <12 <12 <247 121 +/- 35 4.a.2. FISH - (oCi/ka. wet weight)
Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 37 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 This sample was previously collected.
H59 09-Nov-05 1838 +/- 226 <23 <26 <59 <31 <57 <28 <30 <488 <100 6 of 7
SL QR 4Q-2005 4.b. BROADLEAF VEGETATION - Brazilian Petper - (DCi/kq. wet weight)
Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Pb-210 Pb-212 Ra-226 H51 05-Oct-05 1140 +/- 109 4297 +/- 257 <23 <19 <21 <2675 <94 <440 03-Nov-05 897 +/-68 3829 +/- 179 <12 <15 <13 <1956 <72 <267 08-Dec-05 706 +/-40 3922 +/- 104 <7 <7 <8 <1102 <36 <170 H52 05-Oct-05 968 +/- 88 3233 +/- 195 <22 <17 <17 <2201 <74 <359 03-Nov-05 934 +/- 71 3886 +/- 174 <13 <13 <11 <671 <79 <248 05-Dec-05 775 +/- 88 4168 +/- 211 <17 <19 <16 <2213 <90 <300 H59 05-Oct-05 1946+/-54 2703 +/- 93 <10 <9 <8 <1177 <37 <144 03-Nov-05 683 +/- 41 3852 +/- 103 <6 <8 <8 <1123 <38 <166 05-Dec-05 1034 +/- 77 3380 +/- 194 <17 <19 <14 <2029 <74 <361 7 of 7
- 66. i 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 2005 DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY MAPEP 13, June 2005 AND MAPEP 14, December 2005
- 'q I *-:' , 1 - q.
2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT- UNITS 1 & 2 DOE-MAPEP 13 RESULTS Result Ref. Flag Acceptance
-
Radionuclide Value (Evaluation) Ranae Matrix: RdF Air Filter Bq/filter MN54 3.61 3.330 A 2.33 - 4.33 C057 5.01 4.920 A 3.44 - 6.40 C060 3.10 3.030 A 2.12 - 3.94 ZN65 3.63 3.140 A 2.20 - 4.08 CS134 2.94 3.510 A 2.46 - 4.56 CS137 2.44 2.260 A 1.58 - 2.94 Am-241 0.12 0.102 A 0.07 - 0.13 Matrix: GrF Air Filter Bq/filter Gross Beta 0.35 0.297 A 0.15 - 0.45 Matrix: MaS Soil Bq/kg K40 708 604 A 422.8 - 785.2 MN54 593 485 W 339.5 - 630.5 C057 293 242 W 169.4 - 314.6 C060 239 212 A 148.4 - 275.6 ZN65 992 810 W 567.0- 1053 CS134 763 759 A 531.3 - 986.7 CS137 368 315 A 220.5 - 409.5 U238 295 249 A 174.3 - 323.70 AM241 137 109 W 76.30- 141.70 Matrix: MaW Water Bq/L H3 302.8 280 A 196.0 - 364.0 MN54 334.2 331 A 231.7 - 430.3 C057 223.3 227 A 158.9 - 295.1 C060 251.9 251 A 175.7 - 326.3 ZN65 553.0 496 A 347.2 - 644.8 CS134 114.7 127 A 88.90 - 165.1 CS137 325.6 332 A 232.4 - 431.6 AM241 1.8 1.72 A 1.200 -2.240 Matrix: RdV Vegetation, Bq/sample MN54 4.00 5.180 A 3.63 - 6.73 C057 5.90 9.880 W 6.92 - 12.84 C060 2.38 3.150 A 2.21 - 4.10 ZN65 5.20 6.290 A 4.40 - 9.18 CS134 3.39 5.000 A 3.50 - 6.50 CS137 3.00 4.110 A 2.88 - 5.34 AM241 0.15 0.145 A 0.10 - 0.19 Evaluation: A = Acceptable, W = Acceptable with Warning, N = Not Acceptable
V, r , ' , j' - 6
'S 2005 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST. LUCIE PLANT - UNITS I & 2 DOE-MAPEP 14 RESULTS Result Ref. Flag Acceptance
-
Radionuclide Value (Evaluation) Range Matrix: RdF Air Filter Bq/filter MN54 5.0 4.37 A 3.06 -5.68 C057 6.48 6.2 A 4.34 - 8.06 C060 2.96 2.85 A 2.00 - 3.71 ZN65 5.07 4.33 A 3.03 - 5.63 CS134 4.04 3.85 A 2.70 -5.01 CS137 3.55 3.23 A 2.26 -4.20 AM241 0.18 0.158 A 0.11 - 0.21 Matrix: GrF Filter Bq/sample Gross Beta 0.95 0.827 A 0.55- 1.22 Matrix: MaS Soil Bq/kg K40 676 604 A 422.8 - 785.2 MN54 506 439 A 307.3 - 570.7 C057 617 524 A 366.8 - 681.2 C060 307 287 A 200.9 - 373.1 ZN65 948 823 A 576.1 -1070.0 CS134 570 568 A 397.6 - 738.4 CS137 499 439 A 307.3 - 570.7 Matrix: MaW Water Bq/ /L H3 556.4 527 A 368.9 - 685.1 MN54 420.7 418 A 292.6 - 543.4 C057 266.2 272 A 190.4 - 353.6 C060 261.0 261 A 182.7 - 339.3 N163 101.3 100 A 70.0- 130.0 ZN65 351.5 330 A 231.0- 429.0 SR90 9.9 8.98 A 6.29 -11.67 CS134 166.9 167 A 116.9 -217.1 CS137 326.4 333 A 233.1 -432.9 Matrix: MaV Vegetation, Bq/sample Reanalysis MN54 3.96 6.57 N 4.6 - 8.54 6.00 A C057 5.9 13.3 N 9.31 - 17.29 9.18 N C060 2.38 4.43 N 3.1 -5.76 3.91 A ZN65 5.2 10.2 N 7.14- 13.26 9.7 A CS134 3.81 4.09 A 2.86 -5.32 3.75 A CS137 3.00 5A3 N 3.80 - 7.06 4.74 A AM241 0.15 0.23 N 0.16 - 0.30 0.26 A From the MAPEP handbook:
Acceptance criteria were developed from a review of precision and accuracy data compiled by other PEPs, the analytical methods literature, from several MAPEP pilot studies, and from what is considered reasonable, acceptable, and achievable for routine analyses among the more experienced laboratories.