ML061940236: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/02/2006
| issue date = 08/02/2006
| title = Issuance of Amendment Technical Specifications Change to Steam Generator Tube Inservice Inspection Program Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process
| title = Issuance of Amendment Technical Specifications Change to Steam Generator Tube Inservice Inspection Program Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process
| author name = Holland D G
| author name = Holland D
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV
| addressee name = Forbes J S
| addressee name = Forbes J
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc
| docket = 05000368
| docket = 05000368
| license number = NPF-006
| license number = NPF-006
| contact person = Holland D G, NRR/DLPM, 415-1436
| contact person = Holland D, NRR/DLPM, 415-1436
| case reference number = TAC MC8540
| case reference number = TAC MC8540
| document type = Letter, License-Operating (New/Renewal/Amendments) DKT 50, Safety Evaluation
| document type = Letter, License-Operating (New/Renewal/Amendments) DKT 50, Safety Evaluation
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:August 2, 2006Mr. Jeffrey S. ForbesSite Vice President Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc.
{{#Wiki_filter:August 2, 2006 Mr. Jeffrey S. Forbes Site Vice President Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc.
1448 S. R. 333 Russellville, AR 72801
1448 S. R. 333 Russellville, AR 72801


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE: TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE TO STEAM GENERATOR TUBEINSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM USING CONSOLIDATED LINE ITEM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS (TAC NO. MC8540)  
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE:
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE TO STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM USING CONSOLIDATED LINE ITEM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS (TAC NO. MC8540)


==Dear Mr. Forbes:==
==Dear Mr. Forbes:==


The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 266 to Renewed Facility OperatingLicense No. NPF-6 for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2. The amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications in response to your application dated September 19, 2005, as supplemented by letters dated May 11 and June 19, 2006. The amendment revises the existing steam generator tube surveillance program to beconsistent with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's approved Technical SpecificationTask Force Standard Technical Specification Change Traveler, TSTF-449, "Steam GeneratorTube Integrity," Revision 4. TSTF-449 is part of the consolidated line item improvement process. A copy of our related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will beincluded in the Commission's next biweekly Federal Register notice.Sincerely,/RA/Drew G. Holland, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket No. 50-368
The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 266 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6 for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2. The amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications in response to your application dated September 19, 2005, as supplemented by letters dated May 11 and June 19, 2006.
The amendment revises the existing steam generator tube surveillance program to be consistent with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions approved Technical Specification Task Force Standard Technical Specification Change Traveler, TSTF-449, Steam Generator Tube Integrity, Revision 4. TSTF-449 is part of the consolidated line item improvement process.
A copy of our related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's next biweekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely,
                                            /RA/
Drew G. Holland, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-368


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. Amendment No. 266 to NPF-62. Safety Evaluationcc w/encls:See next page August 2, 2006Mr. Jeffrey S. ForbesSite Vice President Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc.
: 1. Amendment No. 266 to NPF-6
: 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls:   See next page
 
August 2, 2006 Mr. Jeffrey S. Forbes Site Vice President Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc.
1448 S. R. 333 Russellville, AR 72801
1448 S. R. 333 Russellville, AR 72801


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE: TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE TO STEAM GENERATOR TUBEINSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM USING CONSOLIDATED LINE ITEM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS (TAC NO. MC8540)  
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE:
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE TO STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM USING CONSOLIDATED LINE ITEM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS (TAC NO. MC8540)


==Dear Mr. Forbes:==
==Dear Mr. Forbes:==


The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 266 to Renewed Facility OperatingLicense No. NPF-6 for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2. The amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications in response to your application dated September 19, 2005, as supplemented by letters dated May 11 and June 19, 2006. The amendment revises the existing steam generator tube surveillance program to beconsistent with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's approved Technical SpecificationTask Force Standard Technical Specification Change Traveler, TSTF-449, "Steam GeneratorTube Integrity," Revision 4. TSTF-449 is part of the consolidated line item improvement process. A copy of our related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will beincluded in the Commission's next biweekly Federal Register notice.Sincerely,/RA/
The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 266 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6 for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2. The amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications in response to your application dated September 19, 2005, as supplemented by letters dated May 11 and June 19, 2006.
Drew G. Holland, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket No. 50-368
The amendment revises the existing steam generator tube surveillance program to be consistent with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions approved Technical Specification Task Force Standard Technical Specification Change Traveler, TSTF-449, Steam Generator Tube Integrity, Revision 4. TSTF-449 is part of the consolidated line item improvement process.
A copy of our related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's next biweekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely,
                                                  /RA/
Drew G. Holland, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-368


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. Amendment No. 266 to NPF-62. Safety Evaluationcc w/encls:See next pageDISTRIBUTION
: 1. Amendment No. 266 to NPF-6
:PUBLICLPLIV RFRidsNrrDorlDprEThomas, DIRSRidsRgn4MailCenter (DGraves)GHillRidsOgcRpRidsNrrDirsItsbRidsAcrsAcnwMailCenterRidsNrrDorlLpl4RidsNrrLAFeizollahiRidsNrrPMDHollandAccession No.: PKG ML062160314 (ML061940236; TS Pg ML062160471)OFFICENRR/LPL4/PMNRR/LPL4/LAOGC : NLONRR/LPL4/BCNAMEDHollandLFeizollahiMZoblerDTeraoDATE7/18/067/14/067/26/067/28/06OFFICIAL RECORD COPY ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.DOCKET NO. 50-368ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 266             Renewed License No. NPF-61.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment by Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee), dated September 19, 2005, as supplemented by letters dated May 11 and June 19, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of theAct, and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by thisamendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations;D.The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the commondefense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2.Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications asindicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6.3.The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implementedwithin 90 days from the date of issuance.FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/David Terao, ChiefPlant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
: 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls:     See next page DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC                            RidsRgn4MailCenter (DGraves)       RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter LPLIV RF                          GHill                              RidsNrrDorlLpl4 RidsNrrDorlDpr                    RidsOgcRp                          RidsNrrLAFeizollahi EThomas, DIRS                      RidsNrrDirsItsb                    RidsNrrPMDHolland Accession No.: PKG ML062160314 (ML061940236; TS Pg ML062160471)
OFFICE      NRR/LPL4/PM        NRR/LPL4/LA          OGC : NLO      NRR/LPL4/BC NAME        DHolland          LFeizollahi          MZobler        DTerao DATE        7/18/06            7/14/06              7/26/06        7/28/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
 
ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
DOCKET NO. 50-368 ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 266 Renewed License No. NPF-6
: 1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A. The application for amendment by Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee), dated September 19, 2005, as supplemented by letters dated May 11 and June 19, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
: 2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6.
: 3. The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 90 days from the date of issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                              /RA/
David Terao, Chief Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
Changes to the Technical   Specifications and Renewed Facility Operating LicenseDate of Issuance: August 2, 2006 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 266RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6DOCKET NO. 50-368Replace page 3 of the Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6 with the attached revised page 3.Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revisedpages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change. REMOVEINSERT1-31-31-41-4 3/4 4-63/4 4-6 3/4 4-143/4 4-14 3/4 4-14a3/4 4-14a 6-86-8 6-96-9 6-10----
Changes to the Technical Specifications and Renewed Facility Operating License Date of Issuance: August 2, 2006
6-11----
 
6-12----
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 266 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6 DOCKET NO. 50-368 Replace page 3 of the Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6 with the attached revised page 3.
6-13----
Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.
6-226-22 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONRELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 266 TORENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2DOCKET NO. 50-36
REMOVE                    INSERT 1-3                        1-3 1-4                        1-4 3/4 4-6                    3/4 4-6 3/4 4-14                  3/4 4-14 3/4 4-14a                  3/4 4-14a 6-8                        6-8 6-9                        6-9 6-10                       ----
6-11                       ----
6-12                       ----
6-13                       ----
6-22                      6-22
 
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 266 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6 ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-368
 
==1.0    INTRODUCTION==
 
By application dated September 19, 2005 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML052760279), as supplemented by letters dated May 11 (ADAMS Accession No. ML061380106) and June 19, 2006 (ADAMS Accession No. ML061780153), Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee) requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2. The supplements dated May 11 and June 19, 2006, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register on January 3, 2006 (71 FR 147).
The proposed changes would revise the existing steam generator (SG) tube surveillance program to be consistent with TS Task Force (TSTF) Change TSTF-449, Revision 4, "Steam Generator Tube Integrity," and the model safety evaluation (SE) prepared by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2005 (70 FR 10298), under the consolidated line item improvement process (CLIIP). In this regard, the scope of the application includes changes to the definition of leakage, changes to the primary-to-secondary leakage requirements, changes to the SG tube surveillance program (SG tube integrity), changes to the SG reporting requirements, and associated changes to the TS Bases.
 
==2.0    REGULATORY EVALUATION==
 
The background, description, and applicability of the proposed changes associated with the SG tube integrity issue and the applicable regulatory requirements were included in the NRC staffs model SE published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2005 (70 FR 10298). The "Notice of Availability of Model Application Concerning Technical Specification; Improvement To Modify Requirements Regarding Steam Generator Tube Integrity; Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process" was published in the Federal Register on May 6, 2005 (70 FR 24126), which made the model application available to licensees for use.
 
==3.0      TECHNICAL EVALUATION==
 
In its September 19, 2005, application and May 11 and June 19, 2006, letters, the licensee proposed changes to the TSs that are consistent with the proposed changes approved in TSTF-449. The NRC model SE provides a detailed evaluation of the proposed changes that are requested by the licensee in its application. Consistent with TSTF-449, the proposed TS changes include: (1) a revised definition of IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE and PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE in TS 1.14 and 1.16, respectively, (2) a revised TS 3.4.6.2, "Reactor Coolant System Operational Leakage," (3) a revised TS 3/4.4.5, "Steam Generator (SG) Tube Integrity," (4) a revised TS 6.5.9, "Steam Generator (SG) Program," and (5) a revised TS 6.6.7, "Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report." The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's application and found it to be consistent with TSTF-449.
3.1      Conclusion The proposed TS changes establish a programmatic, largely performance-based regulatory framework for ensuring SG tube integrity is maintained. The NRC staff finds that it addresses key shortcomings of the current framework by ensuring that SG programs are focused on accomplishing the overall objective of maintaining tube integrity. It incorporates performance criteria for evaluating tube integrity that the NRC staff finds consistent with the structural margins and the degree of leak tightness assumed in the current plant licensing basis. The NRC staff finds that maintaining these performance criteria provide reasonable assurance that the SGs can be operated safely without an increase in risk.
The revised TSs will contain limited specific details concerning how the SG Program is to achieve the required objective of maintaining tube integrity; the intent being that the licensee will have the flexibility to determine the specific strategy for meeting this objective. However, the NRC staff finds that the revised TSs include sufficient regulatory constraints on the establishment and implementation of the SG Program such as to provide reasonable assurance that tube integrity will be maintained.
Failure to meet the performance criteria will be reportable pursuant to the requirements in Parts 50.72 and 50.73 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). The NRC reactor oversight process provides a process by which the NRC staff can verify that the licensee has identified any SG Program deficiencies that may have contributed to such an occurrence and that appropriate corrective actions have been implemented.
In conclusion, the NRC staff finds that the TS changes proposed by the licensee in its September 19, 2005, application as supplemented by its May 11 and June 19, 2006, letters, conform to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36 and establish a TS framework that will provide reasonable assurance that SG tube integrity is maintained without undue risk to public health and safety.
 
==4.0      STATE CONSULTATION==


==81.0INTRODUCTION==
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Arkansas State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
By application dated September 19, 2005 (Agencywide Documents Access and ManagementSystem (ADAMS) Accession No. ML052760279), as supplemented by letters dated May 11 (ADAMS Accession No. ML061380106) and June 19, 2006 (ADAMS Accession No. ML061780153), Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee) requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2. The supplements dated May 11 and June 19, 2006, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expandthe scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff's originalproposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the FederalRegister on January 3, 2006 (71 FR 147). The proposed changes would revise the existing steam generator (SG) tube surveillanceprogram to be consistent with TS Task Force (TSTF) Change TSTF-449, Revision 4, "Steam Generator Tube Integrity," and the model safety evaluation (SE) prepared by the NuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC) and published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2005(70 FR 10298), under the consolidated line item improvement process (CLIIP). In this regard, the scope of the application includes changes to the definition of leakage, changes to the primary-to-secondary leakage requirements, changes to the SG tube surveillance program (SGtube integrity), changes to the SG reporting requirements, and associated changes to the TSBases.


==2.0REGULATORY EVALUATION==
==5.0      ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION==
The background, description, and applicability of the proposed changes associated with theSG tube integrity issue and the applicable regulatory requirements were included in the NRCstaff's model SE published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2005 (70 FR 10298). The"Notice of Availability of Model Application Concerning Technical Specification; Improvement ToModify Requirements Regarding Steam Generator Tube Integrity; Using the Consolidated LineItem Improvement Process" was published in the Federal Register on May 6, 2005(70 FR 24126), which made the model application available to licensees for use. 


==3.0TECHNICAL EVALUATION==
The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding published January 3, 2006 (71 FR 147). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
In its September 19, 2005, application and May 11 and June 19, 2006, letters, the licenseeproposed changes to the TSs that are consistent with the proposed changes approved inTSTF-449. The NRC model SE provides a detailed evaluation of the proposed changes thatare requested by the licensee in its application. Consistent with TSTF-449, the proposed TSchanges include:  (1) a revised definition of IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE and PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE in TS 1.14 and 1.16, respectively, (2) a revised TS 3.4.6.2, "ReactorCoolant System Operational Leakage," (3) a revised TS 3/4.4.5, "Steam Generator (SG) TubeIntegrity," (4) a revised TS 6.5.9, "Steam Generator (SG) Program," and (5) a revised TS 6.6.7,"Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report."  The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's applicationand found it to be consistent with TSTF-449. 3.1ConclusionThe proposed TS changes establish a programmatic, largely performance-based regulatoryframework for ensuring SG tube integrity is maintained. The NRC staff finds that it addresseskey shortcomings of the current framework by ensuring that SG programs are focused on accomplishing the overall objective of maintaining tube integrity. It incorporates performance criteria for evaluating tube integrity that the NRC staff finds consistent with the structuralmargins and the degree of leak tightness assumed in the current plant licensing basis. The NRC staff finds that maintaining these performance criteria provide reasonable assurance thatthe SGs can be operated safely without an increase in risk.The revised TSs will contain limited specific details concerning how the SG Program is toachieve the required objective of maintaining tube integrity; the intent being that the licenseewill have the flexibility to determine the specific strategy for meeting this objective. However, the NRC staff finds that the revised TSs include sufficient regulatory constraints on theestablishment and implementation of the SG Program such as to provide reasonable assurancethat tube integrity will be maintai ned.Failure to meet the performance criteria will be reportable pursuant to the requirements inParts 50.72 and 50.73 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). The NRCreactor oversight process provides a process by which the NRC staff can verify that the licensee has identified any SG Program deficiencies that may have contributed to such an occurrence and that appropriate corrective actions have been implemented.In conclusion, the NRC staff finds that the TS changes proposed by the licensee in itsSeptember 19, 2005, application as supplemented by its May 11 and June 19, 2006, letters,conform to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36 and establish a TS framework that will providereasonable assurance that SG tube integrity is maintained without undue risk to public health and safety.


==4.0STATE CONSULTATION==
==6.0      CONCLUSION==
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Arkansas State official was notified of theproposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments. 


==5.0ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION==
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above that (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facilitycomponent located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff hasdetermined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and nosignificant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there isno significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding published January 3, 2006 (71 FR 147). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibilitycriteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.


==6.0CONCLUSION==
==7.0      REFERENCES==
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above that (1) there isreasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered byoperation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to thecommon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.


==7.0REFERENCES==
A complete list of references used to complete this review can be found in the NRCs model SE published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2005 (70 FR 10298).
A complete list of references used to complete this review can be found in the NRC's model SEpublished in the Federal Register on March 2, 2005 (70 FR 10298).Principal Contributor: Eric M. Thomas Date: August 2, 2006 Arkansas Nuclear One cc:
Principal Contributor: Eric M. Thomas Date: August 2, 2006
Senior Vice President  & Chief Operating Officer Entergy Operations, Inc.
P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS  39286-1995Director, Division of Radiation  Control and Emergency Management Arkansas Department of Health 4815 West Markham Street, Slot 30 Little Rock, AR  72205-3867Winston & Strawn1700 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20006-3817Senior Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission


P. O. Box 310 London, AR  72847Regional Administrator, Region IV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-8064County Judge of Pope County Pope County Courthouse Russellville, AR 72801Vice President, Operations SupportEntergy Operations, Inc.
Arkansas Nuclear One cc:
P. O. Box 31995 Jackson, MS 39286-1995Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway P. O. Box 651 Jackson, MS 39205}}
Senior Vice President              Regional Administrator, Region IV
& Chief Operating Officer        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Entergy Operations, Inc.          611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 P. O. Box 31995                    Arlington, TX 76011-8064 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 County Judge of Pope County Director, Division of Radiation    Pope County Courthouse Control and Emergency Management  Russellville, AR 72801 Arkansas Department of Health 4815 West Markham Street, Slot 30  Vice President, Operations Support Little Rock, AR 72205-3867        Entergy Operations, Inc.
P. O. Box 31995 Winston & Strawn                  Jackson, MS 39286-1995 1700 K Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006-3817          Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway P. O. Box 651 Senior Resident Inspector          Jackson, MS 39205 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 310 London, AR 72847}}

Latest revision as of 17:27, 23 November 2019

Issuance of Amendment Technical Specifications Change to Steam Generator Tube Inservice Inspection Program Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process
ML061940236
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 08/02/2006
From: Holland D
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV
To: Forbes J
Entergy Operations
Holland D, NRR/DLPM, 415-1436
References
TAC MC8540
Download: ML061940236 (9)


Text

August 2, 2006 Mr. Jeffrey S. Forbes Site Vice President Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc.

1448 S. R. 333 Russellville, AR 72801

SUBJECT:

ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE:

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE TO STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM USING CONSOLIDATED LINE ITEM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS (TAC NO. MC8540)

Dear Mr. Forbes:

The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 266 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6 for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2. The amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications in response to your application dated September 19, 2005, as supplemented by letters dated May 11 and June 19, 2006.

The amendment revises the existing steam generator tube surveillance program to be consistent with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions approved Technical Specification Task Force Standard Technical Specification Change Traveler, TSTF-449, Steam Generator Tube Integrity, Revision 4. TSTF-449 is part of the consolidated line item improvement process.

A copy of our related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's next biweekly Federal Register notice.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Drew G. Holland, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-368

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 266 to NPF-6
2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: See next page

August 2, 2006 Mr. Jeffrey S. Forbes Site Vice President Arkansas Nuclear One Entergy Operations, Inc.

1448 S. R. 333 Russellville, AR 72801

SUBJECT:

ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE:

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE TO STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM USING CONSOLIDATED LINE ITEM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS (TAC NO. MC8540)

Dear Mr. Forbes:

The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 266 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6 for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2. The amendment consists of changes to the Technical Specifications in response to your application dated September 19, 2005, as supplemented by letters dated May 11 and June 19, 2006.

The amendment revises the existing steam generator tube surveillance program to be consistent with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions approved Technical Specification Task Force Standard Technical Specification Change Traveler, TSTF-449, Steam Generator Tube Integrity, Revision 4. TSTF-449 is part of the consolidated line item improvement process.

A copy of our related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's next biweekly Federal Register notice.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Drew G. Holland, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-368

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 266 to NPF-6
2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: See next page DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsRgn4MailCenter (DGraves) RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter LPLIV RF GHill RidsNrrDorlLpl4 RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsOgcRp RidsNrrLAFeizollahi EThomas, DIRS RidsNrrDirsItsb RidsNrrPMDHolland Accession No.: PKG ML062160314 (ML061940236; TS Pg ML062160471)

OFFICE NRR/LPL4/PM NRR/LPL4/LA OGC : NLO NRR/LPL4/BC NAME DHolland LFeizollahi MZobler DTerao DATE 7/18/06 7/14/06 7/26/06 7/28/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.

DOCKET NO. 50-368 ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 266 Renewed License No. NPF-6

1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

A. The application for amendment by Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee), dated September 19, 2005, as supplemented by letters dated May 11 and June 19, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6.
3. The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 90 days from the date of issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

/RA/

David Terao, Chief Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications and Renewed Facility Operating License Date of Issuance: August 2, 2006

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 266 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6 DOCKET NO. 50-368 Replace page 3 of the Renewed Facility Operating License No. NPF-6 with the attached revised page 3.

Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.

REMOVE INSERT 1-3 1-3 1-4 1-4 3/4 4-6 3/4 4-6 3/4 4-14 3/4 4-14 3/4 4-14a 3/4 4-14a 6-8 6-8 6-9 6-9 6-10 ----

6-11 ----

6-12 ----

6-13 ----

6-22 6-22

SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 266 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-6 ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.

ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-368

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By application dated September 19, 2005 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML052760279), as supplemented by letters dated May 11 (ADAMS Accession No. ML061380106) and June 19, 2006 (ADAMS Accession No. ML061780153), Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee) requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit No. 2. The supplements dated May 11 and June 19, 2006, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register on January 3, 2006 (71 FR 147).

The proposed changes would revise the existing steam generator (SG) tube surveillance program to be consistent with TS Task Force (TSTF) Change TSTF-449, Revision 4, "Steam Generator Tube Integrity," and the model safety evaluation (SE) prepared by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2005 (70 FR 10298), under the consolidated line item improvement process (CLIIP). In this regard, the scope of the application includes changes to the definition of leakage, changes to the primary-to-secondary leakage requirements, changes to the SG tube surveillance program (SG tube integrity), changes to the SG reporting requirements, and associated changes to the TS Bases.

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

The background, description, and applicability of the proposed changes associated with the SG tube integrity issue and the applicable regulatory requirements were included in the NRC staffs model SE published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2005 (70 FR 10298). The "Notice of Availability of Model Application Concerning Technical Specification; Improvement To Modify Requirements Regarding Steam Generator Tube Integrity; Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process" was published in the Federal Register on May 6, 2005 (70 FR 24126), which made the model application available to licensees for use.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

In its September 19, 2005, application and May 11 and June 19, 2006, letters, the licensee proposed changes to the TSs that are consistent with the proposed changes approved in TSTF-449. The NRC model SE provides a detailed evaluation of the proposed changes that are requested by the licensee in its application. Consistent with TSTF-449, the proposed TS changes include: (1) a revised definition of IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE and PRESSURE BOUNDARY LEAKAGE in TS 1.14 and 1.16, respectively, (2) a revised TS 3.4.6.2, "Reactor Coolant System Operational Leakage," (3) a revised TS 3/4.4.5, "Steam Generator (SG) Tube Integrity," (4) a revised TS 6.5.9, "Steam Generator (SG) Program," and (5) a revised TS 6.6.7, "Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report." The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's application and found it to be consistent with TSTF-449.

3.1 Conclusion The proposed TS changes establish a programmatic, largely performance-based regulatory framework for ensuring SG tube integrity is maintained. The NRC staff finds that it addresses key shortcomings of the current framework by ensuring that SG programs are focused on accomplishing the overall objective of maintaining tube integrity. It incorporates performance criteria for evaluating tube integrity that the NRC staff finds consistent with the structural margins and the degree of leak tightness assumed in the current plant licensing basis. The NRC staff finds that maintaining these performance criteria provide reasonable assurance that the SGs can be operated safely without an increase in risk.

The revised TSs will contain limited specific details concerning how the SG Program is to achieve the required objective of maintaining tube integrity; the intent being that the licensee will have the flexibility to determine the specific strategy for meeting this objective. However, the NRC staff finds that the revised TSs include sufficient regulatory constraints on the establishment and implementation of the SG Program such as to provide reasonable assurance that tube integrity will be maintained.

Failure to meet the performance criteria will be reportable pursuant to the requirements in Parts 50.72 and 50.73 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). The NRC reactor oversight process provides a process by which the NRC staff can verify that the licensee has identified any SG Program deficiencies that may have contributed to such an occurrence and that appropriate corrective actions have been implemented.

In conclusion, the NRC staff finds that the TS changes proposed by the licensee in its September 19, 2005, application as supplemented by its May 11 and June 19, 2006, letters, conform to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36 and establish a TS framework that will provide reasonable assurance that SG tube integrity is maintained without undue risk to public health and safety.

4.0 STATE CONSULTATION

In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Arkansas State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding published January 3, 2006 (71 FR 147). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.

6.0 CONCLUSION

The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above that (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

7.0 REFERENCES

A complete list of references used to complete this review can be found in the NRCs model SE published in the Federal Register on March 2, 2005 (70 FR 10298).

Principal Contributor: Eric M. Thomas Date: August 2, 2006

Arkansas Nuclear One cc:

Senior Vice President Regional Administrator, Region IV

& Chief Operating Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Entergy Operations, Inc. 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 P. O. Box 31995 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 Jackson, MS 39286-1995 County Judge of Pope County Director, Division of Radiation Pope County Courthouse Control and Emergency Management Russellville, AR 72801 Arkansas Department of Health 4815 West Markham Street, Slot 30 Vice President, Operations Support Little Rock, AR 72205-3867 Entergy Operations, Inc.

P. O. Box 31995 Winston & Strawn Jackson, MS 39286-1995 1700 K Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20006-3817 Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway P. O. Box 651 Senior Resident Inspector Jackson, MS 39205 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 310 London, AR 72847