IR 05000443/2015003: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 76: Line 76:
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.
{{a|1R04}}
{{a|1R04}}
==1R04 Equipment Alignment==
==1R04 Equipment Alignment


===.1 Partial System Walkdowns===
===.1 Partial System Walkdowns===
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.04|count=4}}
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.04|count=4}}==


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Line 88: Line 88:
No findings were identified.
No findings were identified.
{{a|1R05}}
{{a|1R05}}
==1R05 Fire Protection==
==1R05 Fire Protection


===.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Walkdowns===
===.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Walkdowns===
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.05Q|count=5}}
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.05Q|count==
=5}}


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====

Revision as of 21:35, 16 November 2019

IR 05000443/2015003, July 1, 2015 Through September 30, 2015, Seabrook Station, Unit 1, Integrated Inspection
ML15309A559
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/05/2015
From: Glenn Dentel
Reactor Projects Branch 3
To: Dean Curtland
NextEra Energy Seabrook
dentel, gt
References
IR 2015003
Download: ML15309A559 (28)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ber 5, 2015

SUBJECT:

SEABROOK STATION, UNIT NO. 1 - INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000443/2015003

Dear Mr. Curtland:

On September 30, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on October 9, 2015, with you and other members of your staff.

NRC Inspectors examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

No NRC-identified or self-revealing findings were identified during this inspection.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRCs Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of the NRCs Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely, /RA/ Glenn T. Dentel, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Docket No. 50-443 License No. NPF-86

Enclosure:

Inspection Report 05000443/2015003 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information

REGION I== Docket No.: 50-443 License No.: NPF-86 Report No.: 05000443/2015003 Licensee: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Facility: Seabrook Station, Unit No.1 Location: Seabrook, New Hampshire 03874 Dates: July 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015 Inspectors: P. Cataldo, Senior Resident Inspector C. Newport, Resident Inspector J. Vazquez, Project Engineer J. Richmond, Senior Reactor Inspector B. Dionne, Health Physicist Approved by: Glenn T. Dentel, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Enclosure

SUMMARY

IR 05000443/2015003; 07/01/2015-09/30/2015; Seabrook Station, Unit No. 1; Routine

Integrated Inspection Report.

This report covered a three-month period of inspection by resident inspectors and announced inspections performed by regional inspectors. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 5.

No findings were identified.

REPORT DETAILS

Summary of Plant Status

Seabrook operated at full power for the majority of the period. On September 9, 2015, Seabrook commenced a gradual reduction from full power for a planned coastdown for the upcoming refueling outage 17 (OR17). On September 27, 2015, power was further reduced and held at 55% to perform leak checks on selected main condenser tubes. On September 30, 2015, Seabrook commenced a normal reactor shutdown for the OR17 refueling outage.

Documents reviewed for each section of this inspection report are listed in the Attachment.

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity

1R01 Adverse Weather Protection

.1 External Flooding

a. Inspection Scope

During the period of July 6 to 9, 2015, the inspectors performed an inspection of the external flood protection measures for Seabrook Station. The inspectors reviewed the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), Chapters 2.4.2.2 and 3.4.1, which depicts the design flood levels and protection areas containing safety-related equipment to identify areas that may be affected by external flooding. The inspectors conducted a general site walkdown of outside areas, the fuel storage building, the control building, and the emergency diesel generator (EDG) building, to ensure that NextEra erected flood protection measures in accordance with design specifications. The inspectors also reviewed operating procedures for mitigating external flooding during severe weather to determine if NextEra planned or established adequate measures to protect against external flooding events.

b. Findings

No findings were identified. ==1R04 Equipment Alignment

.1 Partial System Walkdowns

==

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors performed partial walkdowns of the following systems: A EDG return to service on July 14, 2015 Service water (SW) during circulating water wood flour addition on July 23, 2015 A EDG during B EDG inoperability on August 24, 2015 A charging pump return to service on September 18, 2015 The inspectors selected these systems based on their risk-significance relative to the reactor safety cornerstones at the time they were inspected. The inspectors reviewed applicable operating procedures, system diagrams, the UFSAR, technical specifications (TSs), work orders (WOs), condition reports (CRs), and the impact of ongoing work activities on redundant trains of equipment to identify conditions that could have impacted the systems performance of its intended safety functions. The inspectors also performed field walkdowns of accessible portions of the systems to verify system components and support equipment were aligned correctly and were operable. The inspectors examined the material condition of the components and observed operating parameters of equipment to verify that there were no deficiencies. The inspectors also reviewed whether NextEra staff had properly identified equipment issues and entered them into the corrective action program (CAP) for resolution with the appropriate significance characterization.

b. Findings

No findings were identified. ==1R05 Fire Protection

.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Walkdowns