ML082030206: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML082030206
| number = ML082030206
| issue date = 07/11/2008
| issue date = 07/11/2008
| title = Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1, E-Mail to Licensee Re NRC Acceptance Review of Relief Requests 18, 34, and 36 for Unit 1 (TAC MD8712, MD8713, and MD8714.)
| title = E-Mail to Licensee Re NRC Acceptance Review of Relief Requests 18, 34, and 36 for Unit 1 (TAC MD8712, MD8713, and MD8714.)
| author name = Markley M T
| author name = Markley M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV
| addressee name = Stroud R M
| addressee name = Stroud R
| addressee affiliation = Arizona Public Service Co
| addressee affiliation = Arizona Public Service Co
| docket = 05000528
| docket = 05000528
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Michael Markley Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 10:48 AM To: Russell.Stroud@aps.com Cc: Jay Collins  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                     Michael Markley Sent:                     Friday, July 11, 2008 10:48 AM To:                       Russell.Stroud@aps.com Cc:                       Jay Collins


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review re: Relief requests 18, 34, and 36 (MD8712, MD8713, & MD8714) Rusty Stroud:
Acceptance Review re: Relief requests 18, 34, and 36 (MD8712, MD8713, &
By letter dated May 8, 2008, Arizona Public Service Company (APS) submitted relief requests 18, 34, and 36 for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1. The proposed relief request is needed for Unit 1's fall 2008 refueling outage. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
MD8714)
Rusty Stroud:
By letter dated May 8, 2008, Arizona Public Service Company (APS) submitted relief requests 18, 34, and 36 for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1. The proposed relief request is needed for Unit 1's fall 2008 refueling outage. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.
The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.


If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-5723.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-5723.
Mike Markley E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()  
Mike Markley E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review re: Relief requests 18, 34, and 36 (MD8712, MD8713, &
Acceptance Review re: Relief requests 18, 34, and 36 (MD8712, MD8713, &
MD8714)
MD8714)
Sent Date:       7/11/2008 10:33:06 AM Received Date:        7/11/2008 10:48:00 AM From:               Michael Markley  
Sent Date:       7/11/2008 10:33:06 AM Received Date:        7/11/2008 10:48:00 AM From:           Michael Markley Created By:       Michael.Markley@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
Created By:         Michael.Markley@nrc.gov  
 
Recipients:  
 
Russell.Stroud@aps.com (Russell.Stroud@aps.com)
Russell.Stroud@aps.com (Russell.Stroud@aps.com)
Tracking Status: None Jay.Collins@nrc.gov (Jay Collins)
Tracking Status: None Jay.Collins@nrc.gov (Jay Collins)
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
 
Files           Size     Date & Time MESSAGE           7967     7/11/2008 Options Expiration Date:
Post Office:  
Priority:               olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:         False Return Notification:       False Sensitivity:     olNormal Recipients received:}}
 
Files               Size       Date & Time  
 
MESSAGE       7967       7/11/2008  
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                       olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:       False Return Notification:       False  
 
Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 14:50, 14 November 2019

E-Mail to Licensee Re NRC Acceptance Review of Relief Requests 18, 34, and 36 for Unit 1 (TAC MD8712, MD8713, and MD8714.)
ML082030206
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 07/11/2008
From: Markley M
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV
To: Stroud R
Arizona Public Service Co
Markley, M T, NRR/DORL/LP4, 301-415-5723
References
TAC MD8712, TAC MD8713, TAC MD8714
Download: ML082030206 (2)
v • d • e


Text

From: Michael Markley Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 10:48 AM To: Russell.Stroud@aps.com Cc: Jay Collins

Subject:

Acceptance Review re: Relief requests 18, 34, and 36 (MD8712, MD8713, &

MD8714)

Rusty Stroud:

By letter dated May 8, 2008, Arizona Public Service Company (APS) submitted relief requests 18, 34, and 36 for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 1. The proposed relief request is needed for Unit 1's fall 2008 refueling outage. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review.

The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-5723.

Mike Markley E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()

Subject:

Acceptance Review re: Relief requests 18, 34, and 36 (MD8712, MD8713, &

MD8714)

Sent Date: 7/11/2008 10:33:06 AM Received Date: 7/11/2008 10:48:00 AM From: Michael Markley Created By: Michael.Markley@nrc.gov Recipients:

Russell.Stroud@aps.com (Russell.Stroud@aps.com)

Tracking Status: None Jay.Collins@nrc.gov (Jay Collins)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 7967 7/11/2008 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML082030206&oldid=2155190"