|
|
Line 15: |
Line 15: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:December 1, 2008 | | {{#Wiki_filter:December 1, 2008 10 CFR 50.71 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen: |
| | | In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) ) 50-328 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN) - REVISIONS TO THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL (TRM) AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (TS) BASES (UNIT 1 REVISIONS 31, 32, AND 33; UNIT 2 REVISIONS 30, 31 AND 32) |
| 10 CFR 50.71 | |
| | |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |
| | |
| ATTN: Document Control Desk | |
| | |
| Washington, D.C. 20555 | |
| | |
| Gentlemen: | |
| | |
| In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) ) 50-328 | |
| | |
| SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN) - REVISIONS TO THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL (TRM) AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (TS) BASES (UNIT 1 REVISIONS 31, 32, AND 33; UNIT 2 REVISIONS 30, 31 AND 32) | |
|
| |
|
| ==Reference:== | | ==Reference:== |
| TVA Letter to NRC dated May 15, 2007, "SQN - Revisions to the | | TVA Letter to NRC dated May 15, 2007, SQN - Revisions to the Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) (Revisions 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, And |
| | | : 44) and Technical Specification (TS) Bases (Unit 1 Revisions 29 and 30; Unit 2 Revisions 28 and 29) |
| Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) (Revisions 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, And | | The purpose of this letter is to provide NRC updates, which have been incorporated into the TRM and TS Bases, in accordance with the requirements of their respective Administrative Control Section. No changes have been made to the TRM since last reported in the Referenced Letter. |
| : 44) and Technical Specification (TS) Bases (Unit 1 Revisions 29 and 30; Unit 2 | | TS Bases revisions 31 and 30, for Units 1 and 2 respectively, were approved on December 12, 2007. The revisions corrected information regarding the power range negative rate reactor protection trip function in Bases Section 2.2.1, Reactor Trip System - Power Range, Neutron Flux, High Rates. The correction provided consistency between the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR), event analysis for a rod cluster control assembly misalignment, and the bases in regards to the protective function for differing degrees of reactivity insertion. |
| | | Bases revisions 32 and 31, for Units 1 and 2 respectively, revised the discussion for protective and engineering safety features instrumentation associated with an auxiliary feedwater start signal as a result of a main feedwater pump trip. These changes dated August 29, 2008, were associated with Unit 1 Amendment No. 319 and Unit 2 Amendment No. 312 which revised the operability requirements for the start signal channel; consequently, providing operational allowances for placing in to and securing from service a main feedwater pump. |
| Revisions 28 and 29)" | |
| | |
| The purpose of this letter is to provide NRC updates, which have been incorporated into | |
| | |
| the TRM and TS Bases, in accordance with the requirements of their respective | |
| | |
| Administrative Control Section. No changes have been made to the TRM since last | |
| | |
| reported in the Referenced Letter. | |
| | |
| TS Bases revisions 31 and 30, for Units 1 and 2 respectively, were approved on | |
| | |
| December 12, 2007. The revisions corrected information regarding the power range | |
| | |
| negative rate reactor protection trip function in Bases Section 2.2.1, "Reactor Trip | |
| | |
| System - Power Range, Neutron Flux, High Rates." The correction provided | |
| | |
| consistency between the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR), event analysis | |
| | |
| for a rod cluster control assembly misalignment, and the bases in regards to the | |
| | |
| protective function for differing degrees of reactivity insertion. | |
| | |
| Bases revisions 32 and 31, for Units 1 and 2 respectively, revised the discussion for | |
| | |
| protective and engineering safety features instrumentation associated with an auxiliary | |
| | |
| feedwater start signal as a result of a main feedwater pump trip. These changes dated | |
| | |
| August 29, 2008, were associated with Unit 1 Amendment No. 319 and Unit 2 | |
| | |
| Amendment No. 312 which revised the operability requirements for the start signal | |
| | |
| channel; consequently, providing operational allowances for placing in to and securing | |
| | |
| from service a main feedwater pump. | |
| | |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 December 1, 2008
| |
| | |
| Bases revisions 33 and 32, for Units 1 and 2 respectively, were approved on
| |
| | |
| August 28, 2008. The revisions expanded the bases of Specification 3.6.5.9, "Divider
| |
| | |
| Barrier Seal," to clarify the individual components of the specification surveillance
| |
| | |
| requirements. The expansion clarified how t he surveillance requirements work together to determine operability of the seal. The change also provided clarification to the
| |
| | |
| minimum bypass of steam flow information and references to UFSAR sections where
| |
| | |
| the divider barrier seal is discussed.
| |
| | |
| Please direct questions concerning this issue to me at (423) 843-7170.
| |
| | |
| Sincerely,
| |
| | |
| Original signed by James D. Smith
| |
| | |
| Manager, Site Licensing and
| |
| | |
| Industry Affairs
| |
| | |
| Enclosure
| |
| | |
| cc: (Enclosure):
| |
| Brendan T. Moroney, Senior Project Manager
| |
| | |
| U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
| |
|
| |
|
| Mail Stop 08G-9a | | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 December 1, 2008 Bases revisions 33 and 32, for Units 1 and 2 respectively, were approved on August 28, 2008. The revisions expanded the bases of Specification 3.6.5.9, Divider Barrier Seal, to clarify the individual components of the specification surveillance requirements. The expansion clarified how the surveillance requirements work together to determine operability of the seal. The change also provided clarification to the minimum bypass of steam flow information and references to UFSAR sections where the divider barrier seal is discussed. |
| | | Please direct questions concerning this issue to me at (423) 843-7170. |
| One White Flint North | | Sincerely, Original signed by James D. Smith Manager, Site Licensing and Industry Affairs Enclosure cc: (Enclosure): |
| | | Brendan T. Moroney, Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 08G-9a One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2739 |
| 11555 Rockville Pike | |
| | |
| Rockville, Maryland 20852-2739 | |
|
| |
|
| ENCLOSURE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA) | | ENCLOSURE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA) |
| SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN) | | SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN) |
| UNITS 1 AND 2 REVISIONS TO THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL (TRM) AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (TS) BASES (UNIT 1 REVISIONS 31, 32, AND 33; UNIT 2 REVISIONS 30, 31 AND 32) | | UNITS 1 AND 2 REVISIONS TO THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL (TRM) AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (TS) BASES (UNIT 1 REVISIONS 31, 32, AND 33; UNIT 2 REVISIONS 30, 31 AND 32) |
| TS BASES PAGES - UNIT 1 TS BASES PAGES - UNIT 2 B2-3 B3/4 3-2a B3/4 6-6 B2-3 B3/4 3-2a B3/4 6-6 SAFETY LIMITS | | TS BASES PAGES - UNIT 1 TS BASES PAGES - UNIT 2 B2-3 B2-3 B3/4 3-2a B3/4 3-2a B3/4 6-6 B3/4 6-6 |
| | |
| BASES Manual Reactor Trip
| |
| | |
| The Manual Reactor Trip is a redundant channel to the automatic protective instrumentation channels and provides manual reactor trip capability.
| |
| | |
| Power Range, Neutron Flux
| |
| | |
| The Power Range, Neutron Flux channel high set point provides reactor core protection against reactivity excursions which are too rapid to be protect ed by temperature and pressure protective circuitry.
| |
| The low set point provides redundant protection in the power range for a power excursion beginning from low power. The trip associated with the low setpoint may be manually bypassed when P-10 is active (two of the four power range channels indicate a power level of above approximately 10 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER) and is automatically reinstated when P-10 becomes inactive (three of the four channels indicate a power level below approximat ely 9 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER).
| |
| | |
| Power Range, Neutron Flux, High Rates
| |
| | |
| The Power Range Positive Rate trip provides protection against rapid flux increases which are characteristic of rod ejection events from any power level. Specifically, this trip complements the Power Range Neutron Flux High and Low trips to ensure that t he criteria are met for rod ejection from partial power.
| |
| | |
| The Power Range Negative Rate trip provides protection to ensure that the minimum DNBR is maintained above the safety analysis DNBR limit for cont rol rod drop accidents. At high power a single or multiple rod drop accident could cause local flux peaking which, when in conjunction with nuclear power being maintained equivalent to turbine power by action of the automatic rod control system, could cause an unconservative local DNBR to exist. The Power Range Negative Rate trip will prevent this
| |
| | |
| from occurring by tripping the reactor for all single dr opped rods with a reactivity insertion of greater than 500 pcm or multiple dropped rods.
| |
| | |
| Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux
| |
| | |
| The Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux trips provide reactor core protection during reactor startup. These trips provide redundant protection to the low setpoint trip of the Power Range, Neutron Flux channels. The Source Range Channels will initiate a reactor trip at about 10
| |
| +5 counts per second unless manually blocked when P-6 becomes active. The Intermediate
| |
| | |
| December 12, 2007 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 B 2-3 Amendment No. 138 INSTRUMENTATION
| |
| | |
| BASES The placing of a channel in the trip condition pr ovides the safety function of the channel. If the channel is tripped for testing and no other condition would have indicated inoperability, the channel should not be declared inoperable.
| |
| | |
| The Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) Suction Pressure-Low function must be OPERABLE in MODES 1, 2, and 3 to ensure a safety grade supply of water for the AFW System to maintain the steam generators
| |
| | |
| as the heat sink for the reactor. This function does not have to be OPERABLE in MODES 5 and 6 because heat being generated in the reactor is removed via the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) System
| |
| | |
| and does not require the steam generators as a heat sink. In MODE 4, AFW automatic suction transfer does not need to be OPERABLE because RHR will already be in operation, or sufficient time is available to place RHR in operation to remove decay heat.
| |
| | |
| Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, t he footnote (a) to the Minimum Channels Operable column will allow a channel to be inoperable for a period of 4 hours and is consistent with the modifying Notes to LCOs associated ECCS and LTOP system of the NUREG-1431. The time to return to service of four hours is reasonable, based on operating experience that this activity can be accomplished in this time period, and the credited accident mitigati on functions are still available.
| |
| Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, the footnote (b) to Applicable Modes column modifies the need for the auto-start of the AFW pumps in Mode 2 without a MFW pump running as the motor-driven AFW pumps are already operating and supplying feedwat er to the SGs to provide the heat sink.
| |
| 3/4.3.3 MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION
| |
| | |
| 3/4.3.3.1 RADIATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION
| |
| | |
| The OPERABILITY of the radiation monitoring c hannels ensures that 1) the radiation levels are continually measured in the areas served by the i ndividual channels and 2) the alarm or automatic action is initiated when the radiation level trip setpoint is exceeded.
| |
| | |
| Relative to the control room instrumentation isolation function, one set of process radiation monitors acts to automatically initiate control room isolation. The actuation instrumentation consists of redundant radiation monitors. A high radiation signal fr om the detector will initiate its associated train of the Control Room Emergency Ventilation System (CREVS). The CREVS is also automatically actuated by
| |
| | |
| a safety injection (SI) signal from either unit.
| |
| The SI function is discussed in LCO 3.3.2, "Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrument ation." In addition, the control room operator can manually initiate CREVS.
| |
| | |
| 3/4.3.3.2 MOVABLE INCORE DETECTORS
| |
| | |
| This specification is deleted.
| |
| | |
| August 29, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 B 3/4 3-2a Amendment Nos. 54, 190, 223, 238, 251, 256, 305, 319 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| |
|
| |
|
| BASES 3/4.6.5.6 CONTAINMENT AIR RETURN FANS | | SAFETY LIMITS BASES Manual Reactor Trip The Manual Reactor Trip is a redundant channel to the automatic protective instrumentation channels and provides manual reactor trip capability. |
| | Power Range, Neutron Flux The Power Range, Neutron Flux channel high setpoint provides reactor core protection against reactivity excursions which are too rapid to be protected by temperature and pressure protective circuitry. |
| | The low set point provides redundant protection in the power range for a power excursion beginning from low power. The trip associated with the low setpoint may be manually bypassed when P-10 is active (two of the four power range channels indicate a power level of above approximately 10 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER) and is automatically reinstated when P-10 becomes inactive (three of the four channels indicate a power level below approximately 9 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER). |
| | Power Range, Neutron Flux, High Rates The Power Range Positive Rate trip provides protection against rapid flux increases which are characteristic of rod ejection events from any power level. Specifically, this trip complements the Power Range Neutron Flux High and Low trips to ensure that the criteria are met for rod ejection from partial power. |
| | The Power Range Negative Rate trip provides protection to ensure that the minimum DNBR is maintained above the safety analysis DNBR limit for control rod drop accidents. At high power a single or multiple rod drop accident could cause local flux peaking which, when in conjunction with nuclear power being maintained equivalent to turbine power by action of the automatic rod control system, could cause an unconservative local DNBR to exist. The Power Range Negative Rate trip will prevent this from occurring by tripping the reactor for all single dropped rods with a reactivity insertion of greater than 500 pcm or multiple dropped rods. |
| | Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux The Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux trips provide reactor core protection during reactor startup. These trips provide redundant protection to the low setpoint trip of the Power Range, Neutron Flux channels. The Source Range Channels will initiate a reactor trip at about 10+5 counts per second unless manually blocked when P-6 becomes active. The Intermediate December 12, 2007 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 B 2-3 Amendment No. 138 |
|
| |
|
| The OPERABILITY of the containment air return fans ensures that following a LOCA 1) the | | INSTRUMENTATION BASES The placing of a channel in the trip condition provides the safety function of the channel. If the channel is tripped for testing and no other condition would have indicated inoperability, the channel should not be declared inoperable. |
| | The Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) Suction Pressure-Low function must be OPERABLE in MODES 1, 2, and 3 to ensure a safety grade supply of water for the AFW System to maintain the steam generators as the heat sink for the reactor. This function does not have to be OPERABLE in MODES 5 and 6 because heat being generated in the reactor is removed via the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) System and does not require the steam generators as a heat sink. In MODE 4, AFW automatic suction transfer does not need to be OPERABLE because RHR will already be in operation, or sufficient time is available to place RHR in operation to remove decay heat. |
| | Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, the footnote (a) to the Minimum Channels Operable column will allow a channel to be inoperable for a period of 4 hours and is consistent with the modifying Notes to LCOs associated ECCS and LTOP system of the NUREG-1431. The time to return to service of four hours is reasonable, based on operating experience that this activity can be accomplished in this time period, and the credited accident mitigation functions are still available. |
| | Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, the footnote (b) to Applicable Modes column modifies the need for the auto-start of the AFW pumps in Mode 2 without a MFW pump running as the motor-driven AFW pumps are already operating and supplying feedwater to the SGs to provide the heat sink. |
| | 3/4.3.3 MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.3.1 RADIATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The OPERABILITY of the radiation monitoring channels ensures that 1) the radiation levels are continually measured in the areas served by the individual channels and 2) the alarm or automatic action is initiated when the radiation level trip setpoint is exceeded. |
| | Relative to the control room instrumentation isolation function, one set of process radiation monitors acts to automatically initiate control room isolation. The actuation instrumentation consists of redundant radiation monitors. A high radiation signal from the detector will initiate its associated train of the Control Room Emergency Ventilation System (CREVS). The CREVS is also automatically actuated by a safety injection (SI) signal from either unit. The SI function is discussed in LCO 3.3.2, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation. In addition, the control room operator can manually initiate CREVS. |
| | 3/4.3.3.2 MOVABLE INCORE DETECTORS This specification is deleted. |
| | August 29, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 B 3/4 3-2a Amendment Nos. 54, 190, 223, 238, 251, 256, 305, 319 |
|
| |
|
| containment atmosphere is circulated for cooling by the spray system and 2) the accumulation of hydrogen in localized portions of the containment structure is minimized. | | CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS BASES 3/4.6.5.6 CONTAINMENT AIR RETURN FANS The OPERABILITY of the containment air return fans ensures that following a LOCA 1) the containment atmosphere is circulated for cooling by the spray system and 2) the accumulation of hydrogen in localized portions of the containment structure is minimized. |
| | | 3/4.6.5.7 and 3/4.6.5.8 FLOOR AND REFUELING CANAL DRAINS The OPERABILITY of the ice condenser floor and refueling canal drains ensures that following a LOCA, the water from the melted ice and containment spray system has access for drainage back to the containment lower compartment and subsequently to the sump. This condition ensures the availability of the water for long term cooling of the reactor during the post accident phase. |
| 3/4.6.5.7 and 3/4.6.5.8 FLOOR AND REFUELING CANAL DRAINS | | 3/4.6.5.9 DIVIDER BARRIER SEAL The requirement for the divider barrier seal to be OPERABLE ensures that a minimum bypass steam flow will occur from the lower to the upper containment compartments during a LOCA. This condition ensures a diversion of steam through the ice condenser bays that is consistent with the LOCA analyses. |
| | | This LCO establishes the minimum equipment requirements to ensure that the Divider Barrier Seal performs its safety function to minimize bypassing of the ice condenser by the hot steam and air mixture released into the lower compartment during a Design Basis Accident (DBA). This ensures that most of the gases pass through the ice bed, which condenses the steam and limits pressure and temperature during the accident transient. Limiting the pressure and temperature reduces the release of fission product radioactivity from containment to the environment in the event of a DBA. |
| The OPERABILITY of the ice condenser floor and re fueling canal drains ensures that following a LOCA, the water from the melted ice and containment spray system has access for drainage back to the containment lower compartment and subsequently to the sump. This condition ensures the availability of | | Divider barrier integrity ensures that the high energy fluids released during a DBA would be directed through the ice condenser and that the ice condenser would function as designed if called upon to act as a passive heat sink following a DBA. The limiting DBAs considered relative to containment temperature and pressure are the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and the main steam line break (MSLB). The total allowable Divider Barrier leakage flow area is approximately 5 square feet (includes divider barrier seal). |
| | | A bypass leakage of 5 square feet, or less, will have no affect upon the ability of the Ice Condenser to perform its design function. (Ref. FSAR Sections 3.8.3 and 6.2.1.) |
| the water for long term cooling of the reactor during the post accident phase. | |
| | |
| 3/4.6.5.9 DIVIDER BARRIER SEAL | |
| | |
| The requirement for the divider barrier seal to be OPERABLE ensures that a minimum bypass | |
| | |
| steam flow will occur from the lower to the upper containment compartments during a LOCA. This | |
| | |
| condition ensures a diversion of steam through the ic e condenser bays that is consistent with the LOCA analyses. | |
| | |
| This LCO establishes the minimum equipment require ments to ensure that the Divider Barrier Seal performs its safety function to minimize bypassing of the ice condenser by the hot steam and air mixture released into the lower compartment during a Design Basis Accident (DBA). This ensures that most of the gases pass through the ice bed, which condenses the steam and limits pressure and temperature during the accident transient. Limiting the pressure and temperature reduces the release of fission product radioactivity from containment to the environment in the event of a DBA. | |
| Divider barrier integrity ensures that the high energy fluids released during a DBA would be directed through the ice condenser and that the ice condenser w ould function as designed if called upon to act as a passive heat sink following a DBA. The limiting DBAs considered relative to containment temperature and pressure are the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and the main steam line break (MSLB). The total allowable Divider Barrier leakage flow area is approximat ely 5 square feet (includes divider barrier seal). A bypass leakage of 5 square feet, or less, will have no affect upon the ability of the Ice Condenser to perform its design function. (Ref. FSAR Sections 3.8.3 and 6.2.1.) | |
| Conducting periodic physical property tests on the Divider Barrier Seal test coupons provides assurance that the seal material has not degraded in the containment environment, including effects of radiation, age and chemical attack. | | Conducting periodic physical property tests on the Divider Barrier Seal test coupons provides assurance that the seal material has not degraded in the containment environment, including effects of radiation, age and chemical attack. |
| The visual inspection of the Divider barrier Seal around the perimeter provides assurance that the seal is properly secured in place and no visual evi dence of deterioration due to holes, ruptures, chemical attack, abrasion, radiation damage, or changes in physical appearances due to time related exposure to the containment environment. | | The visual inspection of the Divider barrier Seal around the perimeter provides assurance that the seal is properly secured in place and no visual evidence of deterioration due to holes, ruptures, chemical attack, abrasion, radiation damage, or changes in physical appearances due to time related exposure to the containment environment. |
| | | August 28, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 B 3/4 6-6 Amendment No. 197 |
| August 28, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 B 3/4 6-6 Amendment No. 197 2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS | |
| | |
| BASES
| |
| | |
| Manual Reactor Trip
| |
| | |
| The Manual Reactor Trip is a redundant channel to the automatic protective instrumentation channels and provides a manual reactor trip capability.
| |
| | |
| Power Range, Neutron Flux
| |
| | |
| The Power Range, Neutron Flux channel high set point provides reactor core protection against reactivity excursions which are too rapid to be protect ed by temperature and pressure protective circuitry.
| |
| The low set point provides redundant protection in the power range for a power excursion beginning from low power. The trip associated with the low setpoint may be manually bypassed when P-10 is active (two of the four power range channels indicate a power level of above approximately 10 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER) and is automatically reinstated when P-10 becomes inactive (three of the four channels indicate a power level below approxim ately 9 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER).
| |
| | |
| Power Range, Neutron Flux, High Rates
| |
| | |
| The Power Range Positive Rate trip provides protection against rapid flux increases which are characteristic of rod ejection events from any power level. Specifically, this trip complements the Power Range Neutron Flux High and Low trips to ensure that t he criteria are met for rod ejection from partial power.
| |
| | |
| The Power Range Negative Rate trip provides protection to ensure that the minimum DNBR is maintained above the safety analysis DNBR limit for cont rol rod drop accidents. At high power a single or multiple rod drop accident could cause local flux peaking which, when in conjunction with nuclear power being maintained equivalent to turbine power by action of the automatic rod control system, could cause an unconservative local DNBR to exist. The Power Range Negative Rate trip will prevent this from occurring by tripping the reactor for all single dr opped rods with a reactivity insertion of greater than 500 pcm or multiple dropped rods. .
| |
| Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux
| |
| | |
| The Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux trips provide reactor core protection during reactor startup. These trips provide redundant protection to the low setpoint trip of the Power Range, Neutron Flux channels. The Source Range Channels will initiate a reactor trip at about 10
| |
| +5 counts per second unless manually blocked when P-6 becomes active. The Intermediate
| |
| | |
| December 12, 2007 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 B 2-3 Amendment No. 129, 130 INSTRUMENTATION
| |
| | |
| BASES REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM AND ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE ACTUATION SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION (Continued)
| |
| Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, t he footnote (a) to the Minimum Channels Operable column will allow a channel to be inoperable for a period of 4 hours and is consistent with the modifying Notes to LCOs associated ECCS and LTOP system of the NUREG-1431. The time to return to service of four hours is reasonable, based on operating experience that this activity can be accomplished in this time period, and the credited accident mitigati on functions are still available.
| |
| Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, the footnote (b) to Applicable Modes column modifies the need for the auto-start of the AFW pumps in Mode 2 without a MFW pump running as the motor-driven AFW pumps are already operating and supplying feedwat er to the SGs to provide the heat sink.
| |
| 3/4.3.3 MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION
| |
| | |
| 3/4.3.3.1 RADIATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION
| |
| | |
| The OPERABILITY of the radiation monitoring c hannels ensures that 1) the radiation levels are continually measured in the areas served by the i ndividual channels and 2) the alarm or automatic action is initiated when the radiation level trip setpoint is exceeded.
| |
| | |
| Relative to the control room instrumentation isolation function, one set of process radiation monitors acts to automatically initiate control room isolation. The actuation instrumentation consists of redundant radiation monitors. A high radiation signal fr om the detector will initiate its associated train of the Control Room Emergency Ventilation System (CREVS). The CREVS is also automatically actuated by
| |
| | |
| a safety injection (SI) signal from either unit.
| |
| The SI function is discussed in LCO 3.3.2, "Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrument ation." In addition, the control room operator can manually initiate CREVS.
| |
| | |
| 3/4.3.3.2 MOVABLE INCORE DETECTORS
| |
| | |
| This specification is deleted.
| |
|
| |
|
| August 29, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 B 3/4 3-2a Amendment No. 46, 72, 182, 214, 228, 247, 295, 312 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
| | 2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS BASES Manual Reactor Trip The Manual Reactor Trip is a redundant channel to the automatic protective instrumentation channels and provides a manual reactor trip capability. |
| | Power Range, Neutron Flux The Power Range, Neutron Flux channel high setpoint provides reactor core protection against reactivity excursions which are too rapid to be protected by temperature and pressure protective circuitry. |
| | The low set point provides redundant protection in the power range for a power excursion beginning from low power. The trip associated with the low setpoint may be manually bypassed when P-10 is active (two of the four power range channels indicate a power level of above approximately 10 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER) and is automatically reinstated when P-10 becomes inactive (three of the four channels indicate a power level below approximately 9 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER). |
| | Power Range, Neutron Flux, High Rates The Power Range Positive Rate trip provides protection against rapid flux increases which are characteristic of rod ejection events from any power level. Specifically, this trip complements the Power Range Neutron Flux High and Low trips to ensure that the criteria are met for rod ejection from partial power. |
| | The Power Range Negative Rate trip provides protection to ensure that the minimum DNBR is maintained above the safety analysis DNBR limit for control rod drop accidents. At high power a single or multiple rod drop accident could cause local flux peaking which, when in conjunction with nuclear power being maintained equivalent to turbine power by action of the automatic rod control system, could cause an unconservative local DNBR to exist. The Power Range Negative Rate trip will prevent this from occurring by tripping the reactor for all single dropped rods with a reactivity insertion of greater than 500 pcm or multiple dropped rods. |
| | . |
| | Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux The Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux trips provide reactor core protection during reactor startup. These trips provide redundant protection to the low setpoint trip of the Power Range, Neutron Flux channels. The Source Range Channels will initiate a reactor trip at about 10+5 counts per second unless manually blocked when P-6 becomes active. The Intermediate December 12, 2007 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 B 2-3 Amendment No. 129, 130 |
|
| |
|
| BASES 3/4.6.5.6 CONTAINMENT AIR RETURN FANS | | INSTRUMENTATION BASES REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM AND ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE ACTUATION SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION (Continued) |
| | Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, the footnote (a) to the Minimum Channels Operable column will allow a channel to be inoperable for a period of 4 hours and is consistent with the modifying Notes to LCOs associated ECCS and LTOP system of the NUREG-1431. The time to return to service of four hours is reasonable, based on operating experience that this activity can be accomplished in this time period, and the credited accident mitigation functions are still available. |
| | Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, the footnote (b) to Applicable Modes column modifies the need for the auto-start of the AFW pumps in Mode 2 without a MFW pump running as the motor-driven AFW pumps are already operating and supplying feedwater to the SGs to provide the heat sink. |
| | 3/4.3.3 MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.3.1 RADIATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The OPERABILITY of the radiation monitoring channels ensures that 1) the radiation levels are continually measured in the areas served by the individual channels and 2) the alarm or automatic action is initiated when the radiation level trip setpoint is exceeded. |
| | Relative to the control room instrumentation isolation function, one set of process radiation monitors acts to automatically initiate control room isolation. The actuation instrumentation consists of redundant radiation monitors. A high radiation signal from the detector will initiate its associated train of the Control Room Emergency Ventilation System (CREVS). The CREVS is also automatically actuated by a safety injection (SI) signal from either unit. The SI function is discussed in LCO 3.3.2, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation. In addition, the control room operator can manually initiate CREVS. |
| | 3/4.3.3.2 MOVABLE INCORE DETECTORS This specification is deleted. |
| | August 29, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 B 3/4 3-2a Amendment No. 46, 72, 182, 214, 228, 247, 295, 312 |
|
| |
|
| The OPERABILITY of the containment air return fans ensures that following a LOCA 1) the | | CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS BASES 3/4.6.5.6 CONTAINMENT AIR RETURN FANS The OPERABILITY of the containment air return fans ensures that following a LOCA 1) the containment atmosphere is circulated for cooling by the spray system and 2) the accumulation of hydrogen in localized portions of the containment structure is minimized. |
| | | 3/4.6.5.7 and 3/4.6.5.8 FLOOR AND REFUELING CANAL DRAINS The OPERABILITY of the ice condenser floor and refueling canal drains ensures that following a LOCA, the water from the melted ice and containment spray system has access for drainage back to the containment lower compartment and subsequently to the sump. This condition ensures the availability of the water for long term cooling of the reactor during the post accident phase. |
| containment atmosphere is circulated for cooling by the spray system and 2) the accumulation of hydrogen in localized portions of the containment structure is minimized. | | 3/4.6.5.9 DIVIDER BARRIER SEAL The requirement for the divider barrier seal to be OPERABLE ensures that a minimum bypass steam flow will occur from the lower to the upper containment compartments during a LOCA. This condition ensures a diversion of steam through the ice condenser bays that is consistent with the LOCA analyses. |
| | | This LCO establishes the minimum equipment requirements to ensure that the Divider Barrier Seal performs its safety function to minimize bypassing of the ice condenser by the hot steam and air mixture released into the lower compartment during a Design Basis Accident (DBA). This ensures that most of the gases pass through the ice bed, which condenses the steam and limits pressure and temperature during the accident transient. Limiting the pressure and temperature reduces the release of fission product radioactivity from containment to the environment in the event of a DBA. |
| 3/4.6.5.7 and 3/4.6.5.8 FLOOR AND REFUELING CANAL DRAINS | | Divider barrier integrity ensures that the high energy fluids released during a DBA would be directed through the ice condenser and that the ice condenser would function as designed if called upon to act as a passive heat sink following a DBA. The limiting DBAs considered relative to containment temperature and pressure are the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and the main steam line break (MSLB). The total allowable Divider Barrier leakage flow area is approximately 5 square feet (includes divider barrier seal). |
| | | A bypass leakage of 5 square feet, or less, will have no affect upon the ability of the Ice Condenser to perform its design function. (Ref. FSAR Sections 3.8.3 and 6.2.1.) |
| The OPERABILITY of the ice condenser floor and re fueling canal drains ensures that following a LOCA, the water from the melted ice and containment spray system has access for drainage back to the containment lower compartment and subsequently to the sump. This condition ensures the availability of | |
| | |
| the water for long term cooling of the reactor during the post accident phase. | |
| | |
| 3/4.6.5.9 DIVIDER BARRIER SEAL | |
| | |
| The requirement for the divider barrier seal to be OPERABLE ensures that a minimum bypass | |
| | |
| steam flow will occur from the lower to the upper containment compartments during a LOCA. This | |
| | |
| condition ensures a diversion of steam through the ic e condenser bays that is consistent with the LOCA analyses. | |
| | |
| This LCO establishes the minimum equipment require ments to ensure that the Divider Barrier Seal performs its safety function to minimize bypassing of the ice condenser by the hot steam and air mixture released into the lower compartment during a Design Basis Accident (DBA). This ensures that most of the gases pass through the ice bed, which condenses the steam and limits pressure and temperature during the accident transient. Limiting the pressure and temperature reduces the release of fission product radioactivity from containment to the environment in the event of a DBA. | |
| Divider barrier integrity ensures that the high energy fluids released during a DBA would be directed through the ice condenser and that the ice condenser w ould function as designed if called upon to act as a passive heat sink following a DBA. The limiting DBAs considered relative to containment temperature and pressure are the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and the main steam line break (MSLB). The total allowable Divider Barrier leakage flow area is approximat ely 5 square feet (includes divider barrier seal). A bypass leakage of 5 square feet, or less, will have no affect upon the ability of the Ice Condenser to perform its design function. (Ref. FSAR Sections 3.8.3 and 6.2.1.) | |
| Conducting periodic physical property tests on the Divider Barrier Seal test coupons provides assurance that the seal material has not degraded in the containment environment, including effects of radiation, age and chemical attack. | | Conducting periodic physical property tests on the Divider Barrier Seal test coupons provides assurance that the seal material has not degraded in the containment environment, including effects of radiation, age and chemical attack. |
| The visual inspection of the Divider barrier Seal around the perimeter provides assurance that the seal is properly secured in place and no visual evi dence of deterioration due to holes, ruptures, chemical attack, abrasion, radiation damage, or changes in physical appearances due to time related exposure to the containment environment. | | The visual inspection of the Divider barrier Seal around the perimeter provides assurance that the seal is properly secured in place and no visual evidence of deterioration due to holes, ruptures, chemical attack, abrasion, radiation damage, or changes in physical appearances due to time related exposure to the containment environment. |
| | | August 28, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 B 3/4 6-6 Amendment No. 188}} |
| August 28, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 B 3/4 6-6 Amendment No. 188}} | |
|
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARML24304A8492024-10-31031 October 2024 December 2024 Requalification Inspection Notification Letter IR 05000327/20250102024-10-29029 October 2024 Notification of Sequoyah, Units 1 and 2 - Comprehensive Engineering Team Inspection - U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inspection Report 05000327/2025010 and 05000328/2025010 ML24298A1172024-10-24024 October 2024 Cycle 26, 180-Day Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report CNL-24-074, Tennessee Valley Authority - Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions2024-10-23023 October 2024 Tennessee Valley Authority - Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions 05000327/LER-2024-001, Reactor Trip Due to a Turbine Trip2024-10-17017 October 2024 Reactor Trip Due to a Turbine Trip ML24282B0412024-10-15015 October 2024 Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 ML24260A1682024-10-0404 October 2024 Regulatory Audit Summary Related to Request to Add and Revise Notes Related to Technical Specification Table 3.3.2-1, Function 5 ML24284A1072024-09-26026 September 2024 Affidavit for Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 05000328/LER-2024-001, Reactor Trip Due to an Electrical Trouble Turbine Trip2024-09-25025 September 2024 Reactor Trip Due to an Electrical Trouble Turbine Trip CNL-24-060, Supplement to Request for Approval of the Tennessee Valley Authority Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Description2024-09-24024 September 2024 Supplement to Request for Approval of the Tennessee Valley Authority Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Description CNL-24-047, Decommitment of Flood Mode Mitigation Improvement Systems2024-09-24024 September 2024 Decommitment of Flood Mode Mitigation Improvement Systems ML24262A0602024-09-23023 September 2024 Summary of August 19, 2024, Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding a Proposed Supplement to the Tennessee Valley Authority Nuclear Quality Assurance Plan ML24267A0402024-09-19019 September 2024 Cycle 27 Core Operating Limits Report Revision 0 CNL-24-065, Tennessee Valley Authority – Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions2024-09-18018 September 2024 Tennessee Valley Authority – Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions ML24185A1742024-09-18018 September 2024 Cover Letter - Issuance of Exemption Related to Non-Destructive Examination Compliance Regarding Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ML24253A0152024-09-0808 September 2024 Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions ML24247A2212024-08-29029 August 2024 Notification of Deviation from Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group (PWROG) Letter OG-21-160, NEI 03-08 Needed Guidance: PWR Lower Radial Support Clevis Insert X-750 Bolt Inspection Requirements, September 1, 2021 ML24247A1802024-08-28028 August 2024 Application to Revise the Fuel Handling Accident Analysis, to Delete Technical Specification 3.9.4, Containment Penetrations, and to Modify Technical Specification 3.3.6, Containment Ventilation Isolation Instrumentation for Sequoyah Nuclea IR 05000327/20240052024-08-26026 August 2024 Updated Inspection Plan for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Report 05000327/2024005 and 05000328/2024005 ML24239A3972024-08-23023 August 2024 Rssc Wire & Cable LLC Dba Marmon - Part 21 Final Notification - 57243-EN 57243 CNL-24-061, Supplement to Application to Revise Function 5 of Technical Specification Table 3.3.2-1, ‘Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation,’ for the Sequoyah and Watts Bar (SQN-TS-23-02 and WBN-TS-23-08),2024-08-19019 August 2024 Supplement to Application to Revise Function 5 of Technical Specification Table 3.3.2-1, ‘Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation,’ for the Sequoyah and Watts Bar (SQN-TS-23-02 and WBN-TS-23-08), IR 05000327/20240022024-07-31031 July 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000327/2024002 and 05000328/2024002 ML24211A0572024-07-29029 July 2024 Submittal of Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revision ML24211A0542024-07-29029 July 2024 Operator License Examination Report ML24211A0412024-07-26026 July 2024 Unit 1 Cycle 26 Refueling Outage - 90-Day Inservice Inspection Summary Report ML24199A0012024-07-22022 July 2024 Clarification and Correction to Exemption from Requirement of 10 CFR 37.11(c)(2) ML24172A1342024-07-15015 July 2024 Exemptions from 10 CFR 37.11(C)(2) (EPID L-2023-LLE-0024) - Letter ML24191A4652024-07-0909 July 2024 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2024-01, Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML24177A0282024-06-25025 June 2024 Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions ML24176A0222024-06-24024 June 2024 Retraction of Interim Report of a Deviation or Failure to Comply – Transducer Model 8005N ML24089A1152024-06-21021 June 2024 Transmittal Letter, Environmental Assessments and Findings of No Significant Impact Related to Exemption Requests from 10 CFR 37.11(c)(2) ML24145A0852024-05-30030 May 2024 1B-B Diesel Generator Failure - Final Significance Determination Letter ML24145A1052024-05-29029 May 2024 301 Exam Approval Letter ML24134A1762024-05-13013 May 2024 Submittal of 2023 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report CNL-24-040, Tennessee Valley Authority - Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions2024-05-0808 May 2024 Tennessee Valley Authority - Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions ML24128A0352024-05-0707 May 2024 Providing Supplemental Information to Apparent Violation ML24120A0582024-04-26026 April 2024 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 ML24116A2612024-04-25025 April 2024 Interim Report of a Deviation or Failure to Comply - Transducer Model 8005N ML24114A0482024-04-23023 April 2024 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 2023 Monitoring Period CNL-24-037, Clinch River, Sequoyah, Units 1 and 2, Watts Bar, Unit 1 and 2, Nuclear Quality Assurance Plan, TVA-NQA-PLN89-A, Revision 422024-04-22022 April 2024 Clinch River, Sequoyah, Units 1 and 2, Watts Bar, Unit 1 and 2, Nuclear Quality Assurance Plan, TVA-NQA-PLN89-A, Revision 42 ML24144A2362024-04-20020 April 2024 Discharge Monitoring Report (Dmr), March 2024 ML24144A2322024-04-20020 April 2024 Tennessee Multi-Sector Permit (Tmsp), 2024 Annual Discharge Monitoring Report for Outfalls SW-3, SW-3, and SW-9 ML24089A0882024-04-18018 April 2024 – Exemption from Select Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73; Security Notifications, Reports, and Recordkeeping and Suspicious Activity Reporting ML24102A1212024-04-18018 April 2024 Summary of Conference Call with Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 Spring 2024 Steam Generator Tube Inspections CNL-24-024, Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System Project Milestone Status Update2024-04-17017 April 2024 Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System Project Milestone Status Update CNL-24-033, Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions2024-04-17017 April 2024 Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions IR 05000327/20240012024-04-17017 April 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000327/2024001 and 05000328/2024001 ML24109A0272024-04-16016 April 2024 Cycle 27 Core Operating Limits Report Revision 0 CNL-23-006, Application to Modify Technical Specifications 3.8.1, AC Sources – Operating, and 3.8.2, AC Sources – Shutdown, for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN-TSC-22-03)2024-04-15015 April 2024 Application to Modify Technical Specifications 3.8.1, AC Sources – Operating, and 3.8.2, AC Sources – Shutdown, for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN-TSC-22-03) ML24106A0502024-04-12012 April 2024 Discharge Monitoring Report (Dmr), February 2024 2024-09-08
[Table view] Category:Manual
MONTHYEARML23283A2792023-10-10010 October 2023 Revisions to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Requirements Manual ML22145A1402022-05-16016 May 2022 Technical Requirements Manual ML22145A1412022-05-16016 May 2022 Technical Specification Bases, Manual ML22125A1242022-05-0404 May 2022 Revisions to the Technical Requirements Manual ML20304A4032020-10-28028 October 2020 Revisions to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Requirements Manual ML19150A2592019-05-29029 May 2019 Revisions to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Requirements Manual ML19080A0562019-03-13013 March 2019 TRM2 - Technical Requirements Manual, Unit 2 ML17333A1582017-11-28028 November 2017 Revisions to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Requirements Manual ML17116A2702017-04-26026 April 2017 Submittal of Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for 2016 Monitoring Period, Radiological Impact Assessment Report and Rev. 60 to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual ML13193A0392013-07-0505 July 2013 Revisions to the Technical Requirements Manual and Specification Bases ML11126A1942010-09-10010 September 2010 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Revision 56 ML1012409122009-02-17017 February 2009 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Revision 55 ML0833701212008-12-0101 December 2008 Revisions to the Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) and Technical Specification (TS) Bases (Unit 1 Revisions 31, 32, and 33; Unit 2 Revisions 30, 31 and 32) ML0812900722008-04-28028 April 2008 ISFSI, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Revision 52 ML0713703222006-11-24024 November 2006 Enclosure 3, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Revision 51 ML0612504782005-08-21021 August 2005 Rev. 48 to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual ML0612502792005-08-21021 August 2005 Enclosure 3, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Revision 48, Sequoyah Nuclear Plant ML0413205392004-04-26026 April 2004 2003 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report ML0311301192003-04-21021 April 2003 2002 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (ARERR) ML0211508222002-04-19019 April 2002 2001 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report (ARERR) 2023-10-10
[Table view] Category:Technical Specification
MONTHYEARCNL-23-036, Application to Revise Function 5 of Technical Specification Table 3.3.2-1, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation, for the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (SQN-TS-23-02 and WBN-TS-23-08)2023-12-18018 December 2023 Application to Revise Function 5 of Technical Specification Table 3.3.2-1, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation, for the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (SQN-TS-23-02 and WBN-TS-23-08) ML23277A0462023-10-0404 October 2023 Revisions to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification Bases CNL-23-059, Supplement to Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-567-A, Revision 1, Add Containment Sump TS to Address GSI-191 Issues (SQN-TS-23-2023-09-20020 September 2023 Supplement to Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-567-A, Revision 1, Add Containment Sump TS to Address GSI-191 Issues (SQN-TS-23-03 CNL-23-028, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-567-A, Revision 1, Add Containment Sump TS to Address GSI-191 Issues (SQN-TS-23-03 and WBN-TS-23-06)2023-08-0202 August 2023 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-567-A, Revision 1, Add Containment Sump TS to Address GSI-191 Issues (SQN-TS-23-03 and WBN-TS-23-06) CNL-22-037, Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-541-A, Add Exceptions to Surveillance Requirements for Valves and Dampers Locked in the Actuated Position (BFN TS-533)2023-01-31031 January 2023 Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-541-A, Add Exceptions to Surveillance Requirements for Valves and Dampers Locked in the Actuated Position (BFN TS-533) CNL-22-008, And Watts Bar Nuclear Plant - Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-529, Clarify Use and Application Rules (BFN-TS-541, SQN-TS-21-09, and WBN-TS-22-002)2022-06-13013 June 2022 And Watts Bar Nuclear Plant - Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-529, Clarify Use and Application Rules (BFN-TS-541, SQN-TS-21-09, and WBN-TS-22-002) ML22145A1412022-05-16016 May 2022 Technical Specification Bases, Manual ML22125A1272022-05-0404 May 2022 Revisions to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification Bases ML22108A2822022-04-27027 April 2022 Summary of Regulatory Audit Regarding the License Amendment Request to Revise TS to Adopt TSTF 505, Rev. 2, Provide Risk-Informed Extended Completion Times RITSTF Initiative 4b CNL-21-091, Exigent License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.4.12, Low Temperature Overpressure Protection System (SQN-TS-21-06)2021-10-22022 October 2021 Exigent License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.4.12, Low Temperature Overpressure Protection System (SQN-TS-21-06) CNL-20-076, Response to Request for Additional Information Re Application to Revise Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN) Unit 1 Technical Specifications for Steam Generator Tube Inspection Frequency (SQN-TS-20-01)2020-09-23023 September 2020 Response to Request for Additional Information Re Application to Revise Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN) Unit 1 Technical Specifications for Steam Generator Tube Inspection Frequency (SQN-TS-20-01) CNL-20-014, Application to Modify the Technical Specification to Allow for Transition to Westinghouse RFA-2 Fuel (SQN-TS-20-09)2020-09-23023 September 2020 Application to Modify the Technical Specification to Allow for Transition to Westinghouse RFA-2 Fuel (SQN-TS-20-09) CNL-19-116, Exigent License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 4.2.2, Control Rod Assemblies (SQN-TS-19-05)2019-11-16016 November 2019 Exigent License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 4.2.2, Control Rod Assemblies (SQN-TS-19-05) CNL-19-072, Technical Specification Change - Reactor Vessel Level Instrumentation Inoperable - Exigent Amendment (SQN-TS-2019-03)2019-07-14014 July 2019 Technical Specification Change - Reactor Vessel Level Instrumentation Inoperable - Exigent Amendment (SQN-TS-2019-03) ML19151A5842019-05-31031 May 2019 Revisions to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification Bases CNL-18-130, Revised Application to Modify the Technical Specifications for Unbalanced Voltage Relays2018-11-19019 November 2018 Revised Application to Modify the Technical Specifications for Unbalanced Voltage Relays ML17333A4012017-11-29029 November 2017 Revisions to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification Bases CNL-16-051, Proposed Technical Specification Change to Revise the Note Modifying SR 3.8.1.17 of TS 3.8.1 AC Sources - Operating (TS-SQN-16-04)2017-03-13013 March 2017 Proposed Technical Specification Change to Revise the Note Modifying SR 3.8.1.17 of TS 3.8.1 AC Sources - Operating (TS-SQN-16-04) CNL-16-011, Proposed Technical Specification Change to Extend the Allowed Completion Time to Restore Essential Raw Cooling Water System Train to Operable Status from 72 Hours to 7 Days (TS-SQN-16-01)2016-03-11011 March 2016 Proposed Technical Specification Change to Extend the Allowed Completion Time to Restore Essential Raw Cooling Water System Train to Operable Status from 72 Hours to 7 Days (TS-SQN-16-01) CNL-15-128, Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 5 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 5 of 8 ML15176A6822015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 4 of 8 ML15176A6792015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 2 of 8 ML15176A7182015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 6 of 8 ML15176A6642015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 1 of 8 ML15176A7402015-06-19019 June 2015 Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 7 of 8 ML15176A7482015-06-19019 June 2015 Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 8 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 1 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 1 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 2 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 2 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 3 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 3 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 4 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 4 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 5 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 5 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 7 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 7 of 8 ML15176A6812015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 3 of 8 CNL-14-176, Application to Revise Technical Specification 6.8.4.h, Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, (SQN-TS-14-03)2014-12-0202 December 2014 Application to Revise Technical Specification 6.8.4.h, Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, (SQN-TS-14-03) ML14342B0042014-12-0101 December 2014 Cycle 19 - 180-Day Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report ML13193A0392013-07-0505 July 2013 Revisions to the Technical Requirements Manual and Specification Bases ML11249A0612011-08-31031 August 2011 Application for Temporary Change to TS to Allow Use of Penetrations in Shield Building Dome During Modes 1 Through 4;and Request for Specific Usage of Alternate Source Term Methodology for Calculating Radiation Doses Associated. ML11195A1172011-07-29029 July 2011 Issuance of Amendments Regarding the Cyber Security Plan (TS-09-06) (TACs ME4955 and ME4956) ML11129A1882011-05-0606 May 2011 TS 11-06, Emergency Technical Specification Change for One-Time Extension of Surveillance Requirements Associated with Reactor Trip System and Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation ML1014701582010-05-24024 May 2010 Revisions to Technical Requirements Manual and Technical Specification Bases ML0929503402009-10-20020 October 2009 License Amendment Request for Adoption of TSTF-511, Revision 0, Eliminate Working Hour Restrictions from TS 5.2.2 to Support Compliance with 10 CFR Part 26 - Browns Ferry TS Change 469; Sequoyah Change 09-04; and Watts Change 09-19 ML0833701212008-12-0101 December 2008 Revisions to the Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) and Technical Specification (TS) Bases (Unit 1 Revisions 31, 32, and 33; Unit 2 Revisions 30, 31 and 32) ML0710101532007-04-0202 April 2007 Additional Information for Technical Specification Change 05-09 - Application for Technical Specification Improvement Regarding Steam Generator Tube Integrity and Deletion of License Condition ML0702500312007-01-12012 January 2007 Technical Specification (TS) Change 06-06 - Revised Steam Generator (SG) Voltage-Based Repair Criteria - Probability of Prior Cycle Detection (Popcd) ML0634700292006-12-0707 December 2006 Technical Specifications (TS) Change 06-03 Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) Temperature Increase and Elevation Changes Supplemental Information ML0635302012006-11-30030 November 2006 Correction to Amendments Regarding Addition of Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.7 on Inoperable Snubbers - Tech Specs Unit 2 - S118818 ML0635302082006-11-30030 November 2006 Correction to Amendments Regarding Addition of Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.7 on Inoperable Snubbers - Unit 1 Tech Specs - S118819 ML0622300952006-08-0202 August 2006 Tech Spec Pages for Amendment 309 Regarding Changes to Cyclic and Transient Limits with Design Features Revision (TS 05-02) ML0622301112006-08-0202 August 2006 Tech Spec Pages for Amendment 298 Regarding Changes to Cyclic and Transient Limits with Design Features Revision (TS 05-02) ML0621401022006-07-12012 July 2006 Technical Specifications (TS) Change 06-03 Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) Temperature Increase and Elevation Changes 2023-09-20
[Table view] Category:Bases Change
MONTHYEARML23277A0462023-10-0404 October 2023 Revisions to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification Bases ML22145A1412022-05-16016 May 2022 Technical Specification Bases, Manual CNL-21-091, Exigent License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.4.12, Low Temperature Overpressure Protection System (SQN-TS-21-06)2021-10-22022 October 2021 Exigent License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.4.12, Low Temperature Overpressure Protection System (SQN-TS-21-06) CNL-20-014, Application to Modify the Technical Specification to Allow for Transition to Westinghouse RFA-2 Fuel (SQN-TS-20-09)2020-09-23023 September 2020 Application to Modify the Technical Specification to Allow for Transition to Westinghouse RFA-2 Fuel (SQN-TS-20-09) CNL-19-072, Technical Specification Change - Reactor Vessel Level Instrumentation Inoperable - Exigent Amendment (SQN-TS-2019-03)2019-07-14014 July 2019 Technical Specification Change - Reactor Vessel Level Instrumentation Inoperable - Exigent Amendment (SQN-TS-2019-03) ML19151A5842019-05-31031 May 2019 Revisions to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification Bases CNL-18-130, Revised Application to Modify the Technical Specifications for Unbalanced Voltage Relays2018-11-19019 November 2018 Revised Application to Modify the Technical Specifications for Unbalanced Voltage Relays ML17333A4012017-11-29029 November 2017 Revisions to the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Technical Specification Bases CNL-16-011, Proposed Technical Specification Change to Extend the Allowed Completion Time to Restore Essential Raw Cooling Water System Train to Operable Status from 72 Hours to 7 Days (TS-SQN-16-01)2016-03-11011 March 2016 Proposed Technical Specification Change to Extend the Allowed Completion Time to Restore Essential Raw Cooling Water System Train to Operable Status from 72 Hours to 7 Days (TS-SQN-16-01) ML15176A6812015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 3 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 1 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 1 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 2 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 2 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 3 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 3 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 4 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 4 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 5 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 5 of 8 NL-15-128, Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 7 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 7 of 8 ML15176A6642015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 1 of 8 ML15176A6792015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 2 of 8 ML15176A7482015-06-19019 June 2015 Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 8 of 8 ML15176A7402015-06-19019 June 2015 Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 7 of 8 ML15176A6822015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 4 of 8 CNL-15-128, Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 5 of 82015-06-19019 June 2015 Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 5 of 8 ML15176A7182015-06-19019 June 2015 Sequoyah Nuclear Plants, Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications Conversion to NUREG-1431, Rev. 4.0 (SQN-TS-11-10) - Supplement 2. Part 6 of 8 CNL-14-176, Application to Revise Technical Specification 6.8.4.h, Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, (SQN-TS-14-03)2014-12-0202 December 2014 Application to Revise Technical Specification 6.8.4.h, Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, (SQN-TS-14-03) ML14342B0042014-12-0101 December 2014 Cycle 19 - 180-Day Steam Generator Tube Inspection Report ML13193A0392013-07-0505 July 2013 Revisions to the Technical Requirements Manual and Specification Bases ML11249A0612011-08-31031 August 2011 Application for Temporary Change to TS to Allow Use of Penetrations in Shield Building Dome During Modes 1 Through 4;and Request for Specific Usage of Alternate Source Term Methodology for Calculating Radiation Doses Associated. ML1014701582010-05-24024 May 2010 Revisions to Technical Requirements Manual and Technical Specification Bases ML0833701212008-12-0101 December 2008 Revisions to the Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) and Technical Specification (TS) Bases (Unit 1 Revisions 31, 32, and 33; Unit 2 Revisions 30, 31 and 32) ML0710101532007-04-0202 April 2007 Additional Information for Technical Specification Change 05-09 - Application for Technical Specification Improvement Regarding Steam Generator Tube Integrity and Deletion of License Condition ML0702500312007-01-12012 January 2007 Technical Specification (TS) Change 06-06 - Revised Steam Generator (SG) Voltage-Based Repair Criteria - Probability of Prior Cycle Detection (Popcd) ML0634700292006-12-0707 December 2006 Technical Specifications (TS) Change 06-03 Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) Temperature Increase and Elevation Changes Supplemental Information ML0621401022006-07-12012 July 2006 Technical Specifications (TS) Change 06-03 Ultimate Heat Sink (UHS) Temperature Increase and Elevation Changes ML0513102802005-04-27027 April 2005 Technical Specifications Change 04-06 - Relocation of Specifications in Accordance with Part 50.36 in Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. ML0428600542004-09-30030 September 2004 Units 1 and 2 - Technical Specification Change No. 04-01 - New Specification for Loss of Power Instrumentation for Emergency Diesel Generator and Auxiliary Feedwater Actuation. ML0423804982004-08-12012 August 2004 Technical Specifications Change 03-11 Deletion of Vacuum Relief Flow Requirements from Auxiliary Building Gas Treatment System Surveillance Requirements L-87-009, Revisions to the Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) (Revisions 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27) and Technical Specification (TS) Bases (Unit 1 Revisions 22, 23, and 24; Unit 2 Revisions 22 and 23)2004-05-0505 May 2004 Revisions to the Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) (Revisions 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27) and Technical Specification (TS) Bases (Unit 1 Revisions 22, 23, and 24; Unit 2 Revisions 22 and 23) ML0407608862004-03-0505 March 2004 Technical Specifications (TS) Change 03-05, Physics Tests Exceptions and Refueling Operations. ML0330404062003-10-22022 October 2003 Technical Specification (TS) Change 03-12, Application for TS Improvement to Extend the Completion Time for Action a of TS 3/4.5.1, 'Accumulator,' Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process (Cliip). ML0316108592003-06-0505 June 2003 TS Change No.03-08, Reactor Coolant System Heatup & Cooldown Curves ML0314903552003-05-19019 May 2003 Revised Information Regarding TS Change 02-07, One Time Frequency Extension for Type a Test Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test ML0313507612003-05-0909 May 2003 Tech Spec Change 01-09, Operations Involving Positive Reactivity Additions. ML0307902812003-03-13013 March 2003 TS Change 03-01, Revision of Boron Requirements for Cold Leg Accumulators & Refueling Water Storage Tanks ML0303401192003-01-29029 January 2003 Application for Technical Specification (TS) Change - Missed Surveillances Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process (Revision 2) ML0229404772002-10-0404 October 2002 Seqouyah Units 1 & 2 Technical Specification (TS) Change No. 02-07, One-Time Frequency Extension for Type a Test (Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (Cilrt). ML0215504372002-05-0808 May 2002 Unit 2 - Supplemental Information to Support Emergency Technical Specification (TS) Change 02-05, Steam Generator (SG) Inspecton Scope - TAC MB4994 2023-10-04
[Table view] |
Text
December 1, 2008 10 CFR 50.71 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:
In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) ) 50-328 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN) - REVISIONS TO THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL (TRM) AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (TS) BASES (UNIT 1 REVISIONS 31, 32, AND 33; UNIT 2 REVISIONS 30, 31 AND 32)
Reference:
TVA Letter to NRC dated May 15, 2007, SQN - Revisions to the Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) (Revisions 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, And
- 44) and Technical Specification (TS) Bases (Unit 1 Revisions 29 and 30; Unit 2 Revisions 28 and 29)
The purpose of this letter is to provide NRC updates, which have been incorporated into the TRM and TS Bases, in accordance with the requirements of their respective Administrative Control Section. No changes have been made to the TRM since last reported in the Referenced Letter.
TS Bases revisions 31 and 30, for Units 1 and 2 respectively, were approved on December 12, 2007. The revisions corrected information regarding the power range negative rate reactor protection trip function in Bases Section 2.2.1, Reactor Trip System - Power Range, Neutron Flux, High Rates. The correction provided consistency between the updated final safety analysis report (UFSAR), event analysis for a rod cluster control assembly misalignment, and the bases in regards to the protective function for differing degrees of reactivity insertion.
Bases revisions 32 and 31, for Units 1 and 2 respectively, revised the discussion for protective and engineering safety features instrumentation associated with an auxiliary feedwater start signal as a result of a main feedwater pump trip. These changes dated August 29, 2008, were associated with Unit 1 Amendment No. 319 and Unit 2 Amendment No. 312 which revised the operability requirements for the start signal channel; consequently, providing operational allowances for placing in to and securing from service a main feedwater pump.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 December 1, 2008 Bases revisions 33 and 32, for Units 1 and 2 respectively, were approved on August 28, 2008. The revisions expanded the bases of Specification 3.6.5.9, Divider Barrier Seal, to clarify the individual components of the specification surveillance requirements. The expansion clarified how the surveillance requirements work together to determine operability of the seal. The change also provided clarification to the minimum bypass of steam flow information and references to UFSAR sections where the divider barrier seal is discussed.
Please direct questions concerning this issue to me at (423) 843-7170.
Sincerely, Original signed by James D. Smith Manager, Site Licensing and Industry Affairs Enclosure cc: (Enclosure):
Brendan T. Moroney, Senior Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop 08G-9a One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, Maryland 20852-2739
ENCLOSURE TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA)
SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SQN)
UNITS 1 AND 2 REVISIONS TO THE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS MANUAL (TRM) AND TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (TS) BASES (UNIT 1 REVISIONS 31, 32, AND 33; UNIT 2 REVISIONS 30, 31 AND 32)
TS BASES PAGES - UNIT 1 TS BASES PAGES - UNIT 2 B2-3 B2-3 B3/4 3-2a B3/4 3-2a B3/4 6-6 B3/4 6-6
SAFETY LIMITS BASES Manual Reactor Trip The Manual Reactor Trip is a redundant channel to the automatic protective instrumentation channels and provides manual reactor trip capability.
Power Range, Neutron Flux The Power Range, Neutron Flux channel high setpoint provides reactor core protection against reactivity excursions which are too rapid to be protected by temperature and pressure protective circuitry.
The low set point provides redundant protection in the power range for a power excursion beginning from low power. The trip associated with the low setpoint may be manually bypassed when P-10 is active (two of the four power range channels indicate a power level of above approximately 10 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER) and is automatically reinstated when P-10 becomes inactive (three of the four channels indicate a power level below approximately 9 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER).
Power Range, Neutron Flux, High Rates The Power Range Positive Rate trip provides protection against rapid flux increases which are characteristic of rod ejection events from any power level. Specifically, this trip complements the Power Range Neutron Flux High and Low trips to ensure that the criteria are met for rod ejection from partial power.
The Power Range Negative Rate trip provides protection to ensure that the minimum DNBR is maintained above the safety analysis DNBR limit for control rod drop accidents. At high power a single or multiple rod drop accident could cause local flux peaking which, when in conjunction with nuclear power being maintained equivalent to turbine power by action of the automatic rod control system, could cause an unconservative local DNBR to exist. The Power Range Negative Rate trip will prevent this from occurring by tripping the reactor for all single dropped rods with a reactivity insertion of greater than 500 pcm or multiple dropped rods.
Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux The Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux trips provide reactor core protection during reactor startup. These trips provide redundant protection to the low setpoint trip of the Power Range, Neutron Flux channels. The Source Range Channels will initiate a reactor trip at about 10+5 counts per second unless manually blocked when P-6 becomes active. The Intermediate December 12, 2007 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 B 2-3 Amendment No. 138
INSTRUMENTATION BASES The placing of a channel in the trip condition provides the safety function of the channel. If the channel is tripped for testing and no other condition would have indicated inoperability, the channel should not be declared inoperable.
The Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) Suction Pressure-Low function must be OPERABLE in MODES 1, 2, and 3 to ensure a safety grade supply of water for the AFW System to maintain the steam generators as the heat sink for the reactor. This function does not have to be OPERABLE in MODES 5 and 6 because heat being generated in the reactor is removed via the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) System and does not require the steam generators as a heat sink. In MODE 4, AFW automatic suction transfer does not need to be OPERABLE because RHR will already be in operation, or sufficient time is available to place RHR in operation to remove decay heat.
Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, the footnote (a) to the Minimum Channels Operable column will allow a channel to be inoperable for a period of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> and is consistent with the modifying Notes to LCOs associated ECCS and LTOP system of the NUREG-1431. The time to return to service of four hours is reasonable, based on operating experience that this activity can be accomplished in this time period, and the credited accident mitigation functions are still available.
Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, the footnote (b) to Applicable Modes column modifies the need for the auto-start of the AFW pumps in Mode 2 without a MFW pump running as the motor-driven AFW pumps are already operating and supplying feedwater to the SGs to provide the heat sink.
3/4.3.3 MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.3.1 RADIATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The OPERABILITY of the radiation monitoring channels ensures that 1) the radiation levels are continually measured in the areas served by the individual channels and 2) the alarm or automatic action is initiated when the radiation level trip setpoint is exceeded.
Relative to the control room instrumentation isolation function, one set of process radiation monitors acts to automatically initiate control room isolation. The actuation instrumentation consists of redundant radiation monitors. A high radiation signal from the detector will initiate its associated train of the Control Room Emergency Ventilation System (CREVS). The CREVS is also automatically actuated by a safety injection (SI) signal from either unit. The SI function is discussed in LCO 3.3.2, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation. In addition, the control room operator can manually initiate CREVS.
3/4.3.3.2 MOVABLE INCORE DETECTORS This specification is deleted.
August 29, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 B 3/4 3-2a Amendment Nos. 54, 190, 223, 238, 251, 256, 305, 319
CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS BASES 3/4.6.5.6 CONTAINMENT AIR RETURN FANS The OPERABILITY of the containment air return fans ensures that following a LOCA 1) the containment atmosphere is circulated for cooling by the spray system and 2) the accumulation of hydrogen in localized portions of the containment structure is minimized.
3/4.6.5.7 and 3/4.6.5.8 FLOOR AND REFUELING CANAL DRAINS The OPERABILITY of the ice condenser floor and refueling canal drains ensures that following a LOCA, the water from the melted ice and containment spray system has access for drainage back to the containment lower compartment and subsequently to the sump. This condition ensures the availability of the water for long term cooling of the reactor during the post accident phase.
3/4.6.5.9 DIVIDER BARRIER SEAL The requirement for the divider barrier seal to be OPERABLE ensures that a minimum bypass steam flow will occur from the lower to the upper containment compartments during a LOCA. This condition ensures a diversion of steam through the ice condenser bays that is consistent with the LOCA analyses.
This LCO establishes the minimum equipment requirements to ensure that the Divider Barrier Seal performs its safety function to minimize bypassing of the ice condenser by the hot steam and air mixture released into the lower compartment during a Design Basis Accident (DBA). This ensures that most of the gases pass through the ice bed, which condenses the steam and limits pressure and temperature during the accident transient. Limiting the pressure and temperature reduces the release of fission product radioactivity from containment to the environment in the event of a DBA.
Divider barrier integrity ensures that the high energy fluids released during a DBA would be directed through the ice condenser and that the ice condenser would function as designed if called upon to act as a passive heat sink following a DBA. The limiting DBAs considered relative to containment temperature and pressure are the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and the main steam line break (MSLB). The total allowable Divider Barrier leakage flow area is approximately 5 square feet (includes divider barrier seal).
A bypass leakage of 5 square feet, or less, will have no affect upon the ability of the Ice Condenser to perform its design function. (Ref. FSAR Sections 3.8.3 and 6.2.1.)
Conducting periodic physical property tests on the Divider Barrier Seal test coupons provides assurance that the seal material has not degraded in the containment environment, including effects of radiation, age and chemical attack.
The visual inspection of the Divider barrier Seal around the perimeter provides assurance that the seal is properly secured in place and no visual evidence of deterioration due to holes, ruptures, chemical attack, abrasion, radiation damage, or changes in physical appearances due to time related exposure to the containment environment.
August 28, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 1 B 3/4 6-6 Amendment No. 197
2.2 LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETTINGS BASES Manual Reactor Trip The Manual Reactor Trip is a redundant channel to the automatic protective instrumentation channels and provides a manual reactor trip capability.
Power Range, Neutron Flux The Power Range, Neutron Flux channel high setpoint provides reactor core protection against reactivity excursions which are too rapid to be protected by temperature and pressure protective circuitry.
The low set point provides redundant protection in the power range for a power excursion beginning from low power. The trip associated with the low setpoint may be manually bypassed when P-10 is active (two of the four power range channels indicate a power level of above approximately 10 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER) and is automatically reinstated when P-10 becomes inactive (three of the four channels indicate a power level below approximately 9 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER).
Power Range, Neutron Flux, High Rates The Power Range Positive Rate trip provides protection against rapid flux increases which are characteristic of rod ejection events from any power level. Specifically, this trip complements the Power Range Neutron Flux High and Low trips to ensure that the criteria are met for rod ejection from partial power.
The Power Range Negative Rate trip provides protection to ensure that the minimum DNBR is maintained above the safety analysis DNBR limit for control rod drop accidents. At high power a single or multiple rod drop accident could cause local flux peaking which, when in conjunction with nuclear power being maintained equivalent to turbine power by action of the automatic rod control system, could cause an unconservative local DNBR to exist. The Power Range Negative Rate trip will prevent this from occurring by tripping the reactor for all single dropped rods with a reactivity insertion of greater than 500 pcm or multiple dropped rods.
.
Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux The Intermediate and Source Range, Nuclear Flux trips provide reactor core protection during reactor startup. These trips provide redundant protection to the low setpoint trip of the Power Range, Neutron Flux channels. The Source Range Channels will initiate a reactor trip at about 10+5 counts per second unless manually blocked when P-6 becomes active. The Intermediate December 12, 2007 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 B 2-3 Amendment No. 129, 130
INSTRUMENTATION BASES REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM AND ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE ACTUATION SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION (Continued)
Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, the footnote (a) to the Minimum Channels Operable column will allow a channel to be inoperable for a period of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> and is consistent with the modifying Notes to LCOs associated ECCS and LTOP system of the NUREG-1431. The time to return to service of four hours is reasonable, based on operating experience that this activity can be accomplished in this time period, and the credited accident mitigation functions are still available.
Relative to TS Table 3.3-3 Functional Unit 6.f, the footnote (b) to Applicable Modes column modifies the need for the auto-start of the AFW pumps in Mode 2 without a MFW pump running as the motor-driven AFW pumps are already operating and supplying feedwater to the SGs to provide the heat sink.
3/4.3.3 MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.3.1 RADIATION MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The OPERABILITY of the radiation monitoring channels ensures that 1) the radiation levels are continually measured in the areas served by the individual channels and 2) the alarm or automatic action is initiated when the radiation level trip setpoint is exceeded.
Relative to the control room instrumentation isolation function, one set of process radiation monitors acts to automatically initiate control room isolation. The actuation instrumentation consists of redundant radiation monitors. A high radiation signal from the detector will initiate its associated train of the Control Room Emergency Ventilation System (CREVS). The CREVS is also automatically actuated by a safety injection (SI) signal from either unit. The SI function is discussed in LCO 3.3.2, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation. In addition, the control room operator can manually initiate CREVS.
3/4.3.3.2 MOVABLE INCORE DETECTORS This specification is deleted.
August 29, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 B 3/4 3-2a Amendment No. 46, 72, 182, 214, 228, 247, 295, 312
CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS BASES 3/4.6.5.6 CONTAINMENT AIR RETURN FANS The OPERABILITY of the containment air return fans ensures that following a LOCA 1) the containment atmosphere is circulated for cooling by the spray system and 2) the accumulation of hydrogen in localized portions of the containment structure is minimized.
3/4.6.5.7 and 3/4.6.5.8 FLOOR AND REFUELING CANAL DRAINS The OPERABILITY of the ice condenser floor and refueling canal drains ensures that following a LOCA, the water from the melted ice and containment spray system has access for drainage back to the containment lower compartment and subsequently to the sump. This condition ensures the availability of the water for long term cooling of the reactor during the post accident phase.
3/4.6.5.9 DIVIDER BARRIER SEAL The requirement for the divider barrier seal to be OPERABLE ensures that a minimum bypass steam flow will occur from the lower to the upper containment compartments during a LOCA. This condition ensures a diversion of steam through the ice condenser bays that is consistent with the LOCA analyses.
This LCO establishes the minimum equipment requirements to ensure that the Divider Barrier Seal performs its safety function to minimize bypassing of the ice condenser by the hot steam and air mixture released into the lower compartment during a Design Basis Accident (DBA). This ensures that most of the gases pass through the ice bed, which condenses the steam and limits pressure and temperature during the accident transient. Limiting the pressure and temperature reduces the release of fission product radioactivity from containment to the environment in the event of a DBA.
Divider barrier integrity ensures that the high energy fluids released during a DBA would be directed through the ice condenser and that the ice condenser would function as designed if called upon to act as a passive heat sink following a DBA. The limiting DBAs considered relative to containment temperature and pressure are the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and the main steam line break (MSLB). The total allowable Divider Barrier leakage flow area is approximately 5 square feet (includes divider barrier seal).
A bypass leakage of 5 square feet, or less, will have no affect upon the ability of the Ice Condenser to perform its design function. (Ref. FSAR Sections 3.8.3 and 6.2.1.)
Conducting periodic physical property tests on the Divider Barrier Seal test coupons provides assurance that the seal material has not degraded in the containment environment, including effects of radiation, age and chemical attack.
The visual inspection of the Divider barrier Seal around the perimeter provides assurance that the seal is properly secured in place and no visual evidence of deterioration due to holes, ruptures, chemical attack, abrasion, radiation damage, or changes in physical appearances due to time related exposure to the containment environment.
August 28, 2008 SEQUOYAH - UNIT 2 B 3/4 6-6 Amendment No. 188