ML101241084: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 05/04/2010
| issue date = 05/04/2010
| title = Acceptance Review for TACs ME3574 and ME3575- Salem 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request - TSTF-425
| title = Acceptance Review for TACs ME3574 and ME3575- Salem 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request - TSTF-425
| author name = Ennis R B
| author name = Ennis R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2
| addressee name = Keenan J J
| addressee name = Keenan J
| addressee affiliation = PSEG Nuclear, LLC
| addressee affiliation = PSEG Nuclear, LLC
| docket = 05000272, 05000311
| docket = 05000272, 05000311
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person = Ennis R B, NRR/DORL, 415-1420
| contact person = Ennis R, NRR/DORL, 415-1420
| case reference number = TAC ME3574, TAC ME3575
| case reference number = TAC ME3574, TAC ME3575
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Ennis, Rick Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 1:16 PM To: Jeff Keenan Cc: Paul Duke; Lingam, Siva; Feintuch, Karl  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                     Ennis, Rick Sent:                     Tuesday, May 04, 2010 1:16 PM To:                       Jeff Keenan Cc:                       Paul Duke; Lingam, Siva; Feintuch, Karl


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for TACs ME3574 and ME3575- Salem 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request - TSTF-425 Jeff, By letter dated March 23, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML100910154), PSEG Nuclear LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Salem). The proposed amendment would modify the Technical Specifications (TSs) by relocating specific surveillance frequencies to a licensee-controlled program. The proposed amendment is based on NRC-approved Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-425, Revision 3, "Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - RITSTF [Risk-Informed TSTF] Initiative 5b."
Acceptance Review for TACs ME3574 and ME3575- Salem 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request - TSTF-425
: Jeff, By letter dated March 23, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML100910154), PSEG Nuclear LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Salem). The proposed amendment would modify the Technical Specifications (TSs) by relocating specific surveillance frequencies to a licensee-controlled program. The proposed amendment is based on NRC-approved Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-425, Revision 3, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - RITSTF [Risk-Informed TSTF] Initiative 5b.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.
Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staff
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (9E28710E0B702149AEC663972863644023681B3CA8)
=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.
 
Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing  Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
 
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (9E28710E0B702149AEC663972863644023681B3CA8)  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review for TACs ME3574 and ME3575- Salem 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request - TSTF-425 Sent Date:       05/04/2010 1:16:27 PM Received Date:       05/04/2010 1:16:27 PM From:               Ennis, Rick  
Acceptance Review for TACs ME3574 and ME3575- Salem 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request - TSTF-425 Sent Date:     05/04/2010 1:16:27 PM Received Date:       05/04/2010 1:16:27 PM From:           Ennis, Rick Created By:       Rick.Ennis@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
Created By:         Rick.Ennis@nrc.gov  
 
Recipients:
Jeff.Keenan@pseg.com (Jeff Keenan)
Jeff.Keenan@pseg.com (Jeff Keenan)
Tracking Status: None Paul.Duke@pseg.com (Paul Duke)
Tracking Status: None Paul.Duke@pseg.com (Paul Duke)
Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)
Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)
 
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)                 Tracking Status: None  
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files         Size     Date & Time MESSAGE         14204       05/04/2010 Options Expiration Date:
 
Priority:               olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:        False Return Notification:     False Sensitivity:     olNormal Recipients received:}}
Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov  
 
Files               Size       Date & Time  
 
MESSAGE       14204       05/04/2010  
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                       olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:        False Return Notification:       False  
 
Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 18:53, 13 November 2019

Acceptance Review for TACs ME3574 and ME3575- Salem 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request - TSTF-425
ML101241084
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 05/04/2010
From: Richard Ennis
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Keenan J
Public Service Enterprise Group
Ennis R, NRR/DORL, 415-1420
References
TAC ME3574, TAC ME3575
Download: ML101241084 (1)


Text

From: Ennis, Rick Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 1:16 PM To: Jeff Keenan Cc: Paul Duke; Lingam, Siva; Feintuch, Karl

Subject:

Acceptance Review for TACs ME3574 and ME3575- Salem 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request - TSTF-425

Jeff, By letter dated March 23, 2010 (ADAMS Accession No. ML100910154), PSEG Nuclear LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (Salem). The proposed amendment would modify the Technical Specifications (TSs) by relocating specific surveillance frequencies to a licensee-controlled program. The proposed amendment is based on NRC-approved Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-425, Revision 3, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - RITSTF [Risk-Informed TSTF] Initiative 5b.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.

Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (9E28710E0B702149AEC663972863644023681B3CA8)

Subject:

Acceptance Review for TACs ME3574 and ME3575- Salem 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request - TSTF-425 Sent Date: 05/04/2010 1:16:27 PM Received Date: 05/04/2010 1:16:27 PM From: Ennis, Rick Created By: Rick.Ennis@nrc.gov Recipients:

Jeff.Keenan@pseg.com (Jeff Keenan)

Tracking Status: None Paul.Duke@pseg.com (Paul Duke)

Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)

Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 14204 05/04/2010 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: