ML12117A254: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:CatawbaNuclearStation Catawba Nuclear StationAnnualAssessmentMeeting Annual Assessment Meeting 2011 Reactor Oversight ProcessNuclearRegulatoryCommission Region 2 Nuclear Regulatory Commission
{{#Wiki_filter:Catawba Nuclear Station Annual Assessment Meeting 2011 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region 2 Enclosure 2
-Region 2 A g enda g Introduction Reactor Oversight Process Industry Performance Catawba Nuclear Station Performance Results Public Questions to NRC Meetin g's Pur p ose gpNRC will discuss the Reactor Oversight Pdthffth P rocess an d th e per f ormance o f th e nuclear industry as a whole in 2011 Pbliffdiif P u bli c f orum f or di scuss i on o f Catawba's performance in 20 11 Re g ion 2 Or g anization g g Victor McCree Regional Administrator Len WertDeputyRegionalAdministrator Deputy Regional Administrator Rick CroteauDirector, Division of Reactor Pro j ects Joel MundayDirector, Division of Reactor Safet y j Bill Jones Deputy Director y Chris Christensen Deputy Director Jonathan Bartley Branch Chief Regional Inspectors Project EngineersCurtis Rapp, Senior PEEric Stamm, PE Catawba Resident Inspectors Andy Hutto, Senior RIRon Cureton, RI What We Do Security Safety Environment Environment What We Regulate Materials Reactors MaterialsWaste What We Don't Regulate Radon Military X Rays X-Rays Assurance of Plant Safety Continuous Tii Lon g-Term T ra i n i ng g Maintenance Regulation Regulation Compliance Defense In-Depth Regulatory Principles Inde p endence p OpennessEfficiencyEfficiency Clarity Reliability Reliability How We Regulate Regulatory FrameworkNRC's Safety MissionPUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETYAS A RESULT OF CIVILIANNUCLEARREACTOR Mission Strate g ic NUCLEAR REACTOROPERATIONREACTORRADIATION g Performance AreasREACTOR SAFETYRADIATION SAFETY SAFEGUARDSINITIATING EVENTSMITIGATING SYSTEMS BARRIER INTEGRITY EMERGENCYPREPAREDNESS PUBLIC RADIATION SAFETYOCCUPATIONAL RADIATION SAFETY SECURITY Cornerstones SAFETY SAFETY Cross-Cutting AreasHuman Performance--Safety Conscious Work Environment--Problem Identification & Resolution Performance Indicators17PerformanceIndicators 17 Performance IndicatorsPI's for each cornerstoneLicenseesubmitsdatatoNRC Licensee submits data to NRC quarterlyInspectionprogramverifiesaccuracy Inspection program verifies accuracy Data available on NRC website Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green WhiteYellow Red Increasing Safety SignificanceItiFidi I nspec ti on Fi n di ngs Green WhiteYellow Red Increasing Safety Significance Action Matrix Columns Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Repetitive Unacceptable Licensee Response Regulatory Response Degraded Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Unacceptable Performance Increasing
 
*SafetySignificance
Agenda g
*Safety Significance*Inspection  
Introduction Reactor Oversight Process Industry Performance Catawba Nuclear Station Performance Results Public Questions to NRC Enclosure 2
*ManagementInvolvement Management Involvement*Regulatory Action Industr y-Wide Performance y 11 3 1 1As of 12/31/2011LiR Li censee R esponse Regulatory Response Degraded Cornerstone Multiple/Repetitive Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone Unacceptable IMC 0350 Process 88 Industry-Wide Inspection Findings Finding data curren t as of 2/24/2012 and does not include security findingsCalendarYear 846 Calendar Year 2011 data Green 13 White 2 0Yellow Red Industr y-Wide Performance y IndicatorsCalendar Year 2011data 6585 9 Green White 0 0Yellow Red 0 Red NRC Annual Assessment SummaryDukeEnergyoperatedtheplantsafelyandin Catawba Nuclear Station Duke Energy operated the plant safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
 
Catawba was in the Licensee Response ClfthNRC'ROPAtiMtif C o l umn o f th e NRC's ROP A c ti on M a t r i x f or the last quarter of 2011.Substantive cross-cutting issues: None NRC Annual Assessment Summary Catawba Nuclear StationAll cornerstone objectives were metNRCplansbaselineinspectionsatCatawba NRC plans baseline inspections at Catawba Nuclear Station for 2012 NRC Ins p ection Activities p 2,326hoursofinspectionandrelated activitiesCatawba Nuclear Station for 2011 2,326 hours of inspection and related activities comprised of baseline and plant statusTwo resident inspectors on site -residents are stationedatthesiteandwalkthroughtheplantevery stationed at the site and walk through the plant every day8 regional inspections No major team inspections Catawba PIs and Findin g s g January1throughDecember312011All Findings and Performance Indicators G January 1 through December 31 , 2011 were G reen Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident
Meetings g Purposep NRC will discuss the Reactor Oversight P
*ActionsinresponsetoJapanNuclearAccident Actions in response to Japan Nuclear Accident Website: http://www.nrc.gov/japan/japan-info.html*Mailbox for comments on staff actions:
Process  and d th the performance f       off th the nuclear industry as a whole in 2011 P bli fforum ffor discussion Public            di     i off Catawbas performance in 2011 Enclosure 2
JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov*Office of Public Affairs Point of Contact:
 
OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 301-415-8200 NRC Social Media Channels Blog: http://publicblognrcgatewaygov/
Region g             2 Organization    g Victor McCree Regional Administrator Len Wert Deputy Regional Administrator Rick Croteau                                  Joel Munday Director, Division of Reactor                 Director, Division of Reactor j
*Blog: http://public
Projects                                        Safetyy Bill Jones                               Chris Christensen Deputy Director                               Deputy Director Jonathan Bartley Branch Chief Regional Inspectors Catawba Project Engineers Resident Inspectors Curtis Rapp, Senior PE Andy Hutto, Senior RI Eric Stamm, PE Ron Cureton, RI Enclosure 2
-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/*Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nrcgov/
 
*Twitter:https://twittercom/#!/nrcgov Twitter: https://twitter
What We Do Safety    Security Environment Enclosure 2
.com/#!/nrcgov*YouTube:
 
http://www.youtube.com/user/NRCgov*RSS: htt p://www.nrc.
What We Regulate Reactors Materials Waste Enclosure 2
g ov/p ublic-pgp involve/listserver.html#rss 23 Contactin g the NRC g Report an emergency
 
*(301)816-5100(callcollect)
What We Dont Regulate Military              Radon X Rays X-Rays Enclosure 2
(301) 816 5100 (call collect)Report a safety concern
 
*(800)695 7403*(800) 695-7403*Allegation@nrc.govGliftiti G enera l i n f orma ti on or ques ti ons*www.nrc.gov Contact Catawba Resident Inspectors*803-831-2963 EndofPresentation End of PresentationNuclearRegulatoryCommission Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 2RockHillSouthCarolina Rock Hill , South CarolinaAil242012 A pr il 24 , 2012}}
Assurance of Plant Safety Continuous                 Long-Term g
T i i Training                Maintenance Regulation Compliance Defense In-Depth Enclosure 2
 
Regulatory Principles Independence p
Openness Efficiency Clarity Reliability Enclosure 2
 
How We Regulate Enclosure 2
 
Regulatory Framework PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY NRCs Safety        AS A RESULT OF CIVILIAN NUCLEAR REACTOR Mission               OPERATION REACTOR            RADIATION Strategic g SAFEGUARDS SAFETY              SAFETY                                Performance Areas Cornerstones PUBLIC      OCCUPATIONAL INITIATING  MITIGATING  BARRIER     EMERGENCY    RADIATION     RADIATION EVENTS      SYSTEMS    INTEGRITY  PREPAREDNESS                                    SECURITY SAFETY         SAFETY Cross-Cutting Areas Human Performance--Safety Conscious Work Environment--Problem Identification & Resolution Enclosure 2
 
Performance Indicators 17 Performance Indicators PIs for each cornerstone Licensee submits data to NRC quarterly Inspection program verifies accuracy Data available on NRC website Enclosure 2
 
Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green     White    Yellow    Red Increasing Safety Significance I
Inspection ti Findings Fi di Green     White    Yellow    Red Increasing Safety Significance Enclosure 2
 
Action Matrix Columns Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Repetitive Unacceptable Response Response                 Degraded       Performance Increasing
* Safety Significance
* Inspection
* Management Involvement
* Regulatory Action Enclosure 2
 
Industry-Wide y      Performance 3 11           As of 12/31/2011 11 Li Licensee  R
 
===Response===
Regulatory Response Degraded Cornerstone Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone Unacceptable IMC 0350 Process 88 Enclosure 2
 
Industry-Wide Inspection Findings Finding data current as of 2/24/2012 and does not include security findings Calendar Year 2011 data Green 846 White    13 Yellow    2 Red       0 Enclosure 2
 
Industry-Wide y      Performance Indicators Calendar Year 2011 data Green    6585 White          9 Yellow          0 Red             0 Enclosure 2
 
NRC Annual Assessment Summary Catawba Nuclear Station Duke Energy operated the plant safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
Catawba was in the Licensee Response C l Column  off the th NRCs NRC ROP A Action ti Matrix M t i ffor the last quarter of 2011.
Substantive cross-cutting issues: None Enclosure 2
 
NRC Annual Assessment Summary Catawba Nuclear Station All cornerstone objectives were met NRC plans baseline inspections at Catawba Nuclear Station for 2012 Enclosure 2
 
NRC Inspection p             Activities Catawba Nuclear Station for 2011 2,326 hours of inspection and related activities comprised of baseline and plant status Two resident inspectors on site - residents are stationed at the site and walk through the plant every day 8 regional inspections No major team inspections Enclosure 2
 
Catawba PIs and Findings        g January 1 through December 31 31, 2011 All Findings and Performance Indicators were Green G
Enclosure 2
 
Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident
* Actions in response to Japan Nuclear Accident Website: http://www.nrc.gov/japan/japan-info.html
* Mailbox for comments on staff actions:
JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov
* Office of Public Affairs Point of Contact:
OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 301-415-8200 Enclosure 2
 
NRC Social Media Channels
* Blog:       http://public blog nrc gateway gov/
http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/
* Flickr:     http://www.flickr.com/photos/nrcgov/
* Twitter:     https://twitter com/#!/nrcgov https://twitter.com/#!/nrcgov
* YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/NRCgov
* RSS:         http://www.nrc.gov/public-p            g p involve/listserver.html#rss 23 Enclosure 2
 
Contactingg the NRC Report an emergency
  * (301) 816-5100 816 5100 (call collect)
Report a safety concern
  * (800) 695 695-7403 7403
* Allegation@nrc.gov G
Generall iinformation f     ti or questions ti
* www.nrc.gov Contact Catawba Resident Inspectors
* 803-831-2963 Enclosure 2
 
End of Presentation Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 2 Rock Hill, Hill South Carolina A il 24, April 24 2012 Enclosure 2}}

Revision as of 04:26, 12 November 2019

2011 EOC Slides
ML12117A254
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/26/2012
From:
NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB1
To:
References
Download: ML12117A254 (25)
v • d • e


Text

Catawba Nuclear Station Annual Assessment Meeting 2011 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region 2 Enclosure 2

Agenda g

Introduction Reactor Oversight Process Industry Performance Catawba Nuclear Station Performance Results Public Questions to NRC Enclosure 2

Meetings g Purposep NRC will discuss the Reactor Oversight P

Process and d th the performance f off th the nuclear industry as a whole in 2011 P bli fforum ffor discussion Public di i off Catawbas performance in 2011 Enclosure 2

Region g 2 Organization g Victor McCree Regional Administrator Len Wert Deputy Regional Administrator Rick Croteau Joel Munday Director, Division of Reactor Director, Division of Reactor j

Projects Safetyy Bill Jones Chris Christensen Deputy Director Deputy Director Jonathan Bartley Branch Chief Regional Inspectors Catawba Project Engineers Resident Inspectors Curtis Rapp, Senior PE Andy Hutto, Senior RI Eric Stamm, PE Ron Cureton, RI Enclosure 2

What We Do Safety Security Environment Enclosure 2

What We Regulate Reactors Materials Waste Enclosure 2

What We Dont Regulate Military Radon X Rays X-Rays Enclosure 2

Assurance of Plant Safety Continuous Long-Term g

T i i Training Maintenance Regulation Compliance Defense In-Depth Enclosure 2

Regulatory Principles Independence p

Openness Efficiency Clarity Reliability Enclosure 2

How We Regulate Enclosure 2

Regulatory Framework PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY NRCs Safety AS A RESULT OF CIVILIAN NUCLEAR REACTOR Mission OPERATION REACTOR RADIATION Strategic g SAFEGUARDS SAFETY SAFETY Performance Areas Cornerstones PUBLIC OCCUPATIONAL INITIATING MITIGATING BARRIER EMERGENCY RADIATION RADIATION EVENTS SYSTEMS INTEGRITY PREPAREDNESS SECURITY SAFETY SAFETY Cross-Cutting Areas Human Performance--Safety Conscious Work Environment--Problem Identification & Resolution Enclosure 2

Performance Indicators 17 Performance Indicators PIs for each cornerstone Licensee submits data to NRC quarterly Inspection program verifies accuracy Data available on NRC website Enclosure 2

Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green White Yellow Red Increasing Safety Significance I

Inspection ti Findings Fi di Green White Yellow Red Increasing Safety Significance Enclosure 2

Action Matrix Columns Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Repetitive Unacceptable Response Response Degraded Performance Increasing

  • Safety Significance
  • Inspection
  • Management Involvement
  • Regulatory Action Enclosure 2

Industry-Wide y Performance 3 11 As of 12/31/2011 11 Li Licensee R

Response

Regulatory Response Degraded Cornerstone Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone Unacceptable IMC 0350 Process 88 Enclosure 2

Industry-Wide Inspection Findings Finding data current as of 2/24/2012 and does not include security findings Calendar Year 2011 data Green 846 White 13 Yellow 2 Red 0 Enclosure 2

Industry-Wide y Performance Indicators Calendar Year 2011 data Green 6585 White 9 Yellow 0 Red 0 Enclosure 2

NRC Annual Assessment Summary Catawba Nuclear Station Duke Energy operated the plant safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.

Catawba was in the Licensee Response C l Column off the th NRCs NRC ROP A Action ti Matrix M t i ffor the last quarter of 2011.

Substantive cross-cutting issues: None Enclosure 2

NRC Annual Assessment Summary Catawba Nuclear Station All cornerstone objectives were met NRC plans baseline inspections at Catawba Nuclear Station for 2012 Enclosure 2

NRC Inspection p Activities Catawba Nuclear Station for 2011 2,326 hours0.00377 days <br />0.0906 hours <br />5.390212e-4 weeks <br />1.24043e-4 months <br /> of inspection and related activities comprised of baseline and plant status Two resident inspectors on site - residents are stationed at the site and walk through the plant every day 8 regional inspections No major team inspections Enclosure 2

Catawba PIs and Findings g January 1 through December 31 31, 2011 All Findings and Performance Indicators were Green G

Enclosure 2

Actions in Response to the Japan Nuclear Accident

  • Mailbox for comments on staff actions:

JLD_Public.Resource@nrc.gov

  • Office of Public Affairs Point of Contact:

OPA.resource@nrc.gov or 301-415-8200 Enclosure 2

NRC Social Media Channels

http://public-blog.nrc-gateway.gov/

Contactingg the NRC Report an emergency

  • (301) 816-5100 816 5100 (call collect)

Report a safety concern

  • (800) 695 695-7403 7403
  • Allegation@nrc.gov G

Generall iinformation f ti or questions ti

  • www.nrc.gov Contact Catawba Resident Inspectors
  • 803-831-2963 Enclosure 2

End of Presentation Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 2 Rock Hill, Hill South Carolina A il 24, April 24 2012 Enclosure 2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12117A254&oldid=2101506"