ML13196A205: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| author name = Egan J | | author name = Egan J | ||
| author affiliation = Entergy Corp | | author affiliation = Entergy Corp | ||
| addressee name = Balsam B | | addressee name = Balsam B | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR | | addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DLR | ||
| docket = 05000293 | | docket = 05000293 | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Craver, Patti From: Egan, Joseph [jeganl@entergy.com] | {{#Wiki_filter:Craver, Patti From: Egan, Joseph [jeganl@entergy.com] | ||
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:18 PM To: Balsam, Briana | Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:18 PM To: Balsam, Briana | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
RE: Pilgrim clarification question... | RE: Pilgrim clarification question... | ||
Briana, We completed dredging the intake canal (a.k.a. channel, embayment) at the end of last year (2011).Let me check and get back to you regarding any future dredging plans we might have.Thanks, Joe From: Balsam, Briana [mailto:Briana.Balsam0nrcoov] | : Briana, We completed dredging the intake canal (a.k.a. channel, embayment) at the end of last year (2011). | ||
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 4:26 PM To: Egan, Joseph | Let me check and get back to you regarding any future dredging plans we might have. | ||
: Thanks, Joe From: Balsam, Briana [mailto:Briana.Balsam0nrcoov] | |||
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 4:26 PM To: Egan, Joseph | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
FW: Pilgrim clarification question... | FW: Pilgrim clarification question... | ||
Joe, I got (yet another!) | : Joe, I got (yet another!) question from Julie Crocker at NMFS. The first part of her question is easy-the NRC does not require dredging in the Pilgrim operating license. For the second part, the NRC's SEIS states that Entergy has no plans to dredge the intake canal (Section 4.8., page 4-75, paragraph 2), but I wanted to check with you to make sure that this is still an accurate statement before sending Julie a response. | ||
question from Julie Crocker at NMFS. The first part of her question is easy-the NRC does not require dredging in the Pilgrim operating license. For the second part, the NRC's SEIS states that Entergy has no plans to dredge the intake canal (Section 4.8., page 4-75, paragraph 2), but I wanted to check with you to make sure that this is still an accurate statement before sending Julie a response.Thanks!Briana Briana A. Balsam Biologist Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1042 briana.balsam@nrc.gov From: Julie Crocker [mallto:iulie.crockeranoaa.gov] | Thanks! | ||
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 2:20 PM To: Balsam, Brlana | Briana Briana A. Balsam Biologist Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1042 briana.balsam@nrc.gov From: Julie Crocker [mallto:iulie.crockeranoaa.gov] | ||
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 2:20 PM To: Balsam, Brlana \\( y*) (&~ | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Pilgrim clarification question... | Pilgrim clarification question... | ||
Hi Briana - | |||
Thanks, Julie Julie Crocker Protected Resources Division Northeast Regional Office National Marine Fisheries Service 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 2}} | I am working on addressing edits to our consultation letter -- the issue of dredging has come up. Could you 1 6 113 please clarify whether maintenance dredging of the intake canal or any other location is required as part of the | ||
license and whether NRC considers dredging as part of the action under consideration? | |||
: Thanks, Julie Julie Crocker Protected Resources Division Northeast Regional Office National Marine Fisheries Service 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 2}} | |||
Latest revision as of 17:02, 4 November 2019
| ML13196A205 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 05/08/2012 |
| From: | Egan J Entergy Corp |
| To: | Balsam B Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2013-0135 | |
| Download: ML13196A205 (2) | |
Text
Craver, Patti From: Egan, Joseph [jeganl@entergy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:18 PM To: Balsam, Briana
Subject:
RE: Pilgrim clarification question...
- Briana, We completed dredging the intake canal (a.k.a. channel, embayment) at the end of last year (2011).
Let me check and get back to you regarding any future dredging plans we might have.
- Thanks, Joe From: Balsam, Briana [1]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 4:26 PM To: Egan, Joseph
Subject:
FW: Pilgrim clarification question...
- Joe, I got (yet another!) question from Julie Crocker at NMFS. The first part of her question is easy-the NRC does not require dredging in the Pilgrim operating license. For the second part, the NRC's SEIS states that Entergy has no plans to dredge the intake canal (Section 4.8., page 4-75, paragraph 2), but I wanted to check with you to make sure that this is still an accurate statement before sending Julie a response.
Thanks!
Briana Briana A. Balsam Biologist Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1042 briana.balsam@nrc.gov From: Julie Crocker [mallto:iulie.crockeranoaa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 2:20 PM To: Balsam, Brlana \\( y*) (&~
Subject:
Pilgrim clarification question...
Hi Briana -
I am working on addressing edits to our consultation letter -- the issue of dredging has come up. Could you 1 6 113 please clarify whether maintenance dredging of the intake canal or any other location is required as part of the
license and whether NRC considers dredging as part of the action under consideration?
- Thanks, Julie Julie Crocker Protected Resources Division Northeast Regional Office National Marine Fisheries Service 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 2