ML13354B676: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML13354B676 | | number = ML13354B676 | ||
| issue date = 01/07/2014 | | issue date = 01/07/2014 | ||
| title = | | title = Acceptance Letter Regarding License Amendment Request to Adopt TSTF-522, Revise Ventilation System Surveillance Requirements to Operate 10 Hours Per Month, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement.. | ||
| author name = Lamb J | | author name = Lamb J | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 | ||
| addressee name = Pacilio M | | addressee name = Pacilio M | ||
| addressee affiliation = Exelon Nuclear | | addressee affiliation = Exelon Nuclear | ||
| docket = 05000219 | | docket = 05000219 | ||
| license number = | | license number = | ||
| contact person = Lamb J | | contact person = Lamb J | ||
| case reference number = TAC MF3242 | | case reference number = TAC MF3242 | ||
| document type = Acceptance Review Letter | | document type = Acceptance Review Letter | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
| project = TAC:MF3242 | | project = TAC:MF3242 | ||
| stage = | | stage = Acceptance Review | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 7, 2014 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION -ACCEPTANCE LETTER REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT TSTF-522, "REVISE VENTILATION SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS TO OPERATE 10 HOURS PER MONTH," USING THE CONSOLIDATED LINE ITEM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS (TAC NO. MF3242) | OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION -ACCEPTANCE LETTER REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT TSTF-522, "REVISE VENTILATION SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS TO OPERATE 10 HOURS PER MONTH," USING THE CONSOLIDATED LINE ITEM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS (TAC NO. MF3242) | ||
==Dear Mr. Pacilio:== | ==Dear Mr. Pacilio:== | ||
By letter dated December 12, 2013 (Agencywide Documents and Access Management System Accession No. | |||
The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (1 0 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TS) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. | By letter dated December 12, 2013 (Agencywide Documents and Access Management System Accession No. ML13351A412), Exelon Nuclear submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. | ||
Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. | The proposed LAR would adopt TS Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-522, Revision 0, "Revise Ventilation System Surveillance Requirements to Operate for 10 Hours per Month." | ||
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the M. Pacilio environment. | Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (1 0 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TS) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the | ||
M. Pacilio environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3100 or by email at John. Lamb@nrc.gov. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3100 or by email at John. Lamb@nrc.gov. | ||
G. Lamb, Acting Chief | |||
. t Licensing Branch 1-2 i sion of Operating Reactor Licensing ice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-219 cc: Distribution via Listserv | |||
Docket No. 50-219 cc: Distribution via Listserv | ML133548676 *via email OFFICE LPL 1-2/PM LPL 1-2/LAit LPL 1-2/LA* LPL 1-2/BC (A) | ||
NAME JWhited for Jlamb KBeckford ABaxter Jlamb DATE 01/07/2014 01/03/2014 01/06/2014 01/07/2014}} | |||
*via email OFFICE LPL 1-2/PM LPL 1-2/LAit LPL 1-2/LA* LPL 1-2/BC (A) NAME JWhited for Jlamb KBeckford ABaxter Jlamb DATE 01/07/2014 01/03/2014 01/06/2014 01/07/2014 |
Latest revision as of 10:02, 4 November 2019
ML13354B676 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oyster Creek |
Issue date: | 01/07/2014 |
From: | John Lamb Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
To: | Pacilio M Exelon Nuclear |
Lamb J | |
References | |
TAC MF3242 | |
Download: ML13354B676 (3) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 January 7, 2014 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
SUBJECT:
OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION -ACCEPTANCE LETTER REGARDING LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST TO ADOPT TSTF-522, "REVISE VENTILATION SYSTEM SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS TO OPERATE 10 HOURS PER MONTH," USING THE CONSOLIDATED LINE ITEM IMPROVEMENT PROCESS (TAC NO. MF3242)
Dear Mr. Pacilio:
By letter dated December 12, 2013 (Agencywide Documents and Access Management System Accession No. ML13351A412), Exelon Nuclear submitted a license amendment request (LAR) to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
The proposed LAR would adopt TS Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-522, Revision 0, "Revise Ventilation System Surveillance Requirements to Operate for 10 Hours per Month."
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (1 0 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TS) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the
M. Pacilio environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3100 or by email at John. Lamb@nrc.gov.
G. Lamb, Acting Chief
. t Licensing Branch 1-2 i sion of Operating Reactor Licensing ice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-219 cc: Distribution via Listserv
ML133548676 *via email OFFICE LPL 1-2/PM LPL 1-2/LAit LPL 1-2/LA* LPL 1-2/BC (A)
NAME JWhited for Jlamb KBeckford ABaxter Jlamb DATE 01/07/2014 01/03/2014 01/06/2014 01/07/2014