ML17262A423: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:fi/~4IKWP'..":"rT i'raI;,'I jiI PI 4J'iki7i, ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION r Toe%ttate~89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N.Y.14649.0001 ROBERT C MECREDY Vice Pretident Cinna Nuclear Production TELEPHONE AREA CODE 7t6 546'2700 March 26, 1991 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555  
{{#Wiki_filter:fi/~4IKW P'..":"rT r          Toe%
jiI i'raI;,'I PI 4J'iki7i,                                                                                 ttate ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION                     ~ 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N. Y. 14649.0001 ROBERT C MECREDY                                                                             TELEPHONE Vice Pretident                                                                         AREA CODE 7t6 546'2700 Cinna Nuclear Production March 26, 1991 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Reply to a Notice of Violation NRC Inspection Report No.50-244/91-04 R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant NRC Docket No.50-244  
Reply to a Notice of Violation NRC Inspection Report No. 50-244/91-04 R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant NRC Docket No. 50-244


==Dear Sir:==
==Dear Sir:==
This letter is in response to the February 25, 1991 letter from James H.Joyner, Chief, Facilities Radiological Safety and Safeguards Branch, to Robert C.Mecredy, Vice President, Ginna Nuclear Production.
This letter provides the reply to the Notice of Violation, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 26, as well as, infrequent unescorted site access (UNR 50-244/91-04-01).RE TATEMENT F VI LATI N's a result of the inspection conducted on January 23-25, 1991, and in accordance with the"General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (Enforcement Policy 1990), the following violation was identified:
Appendix A, Subpart B, Paragraph 2.4,"Specimen Collection Procedures," Subparagraph (g)(24)states that the collection site person shall enter in the permanent record book all information identifying the specimens.
The collection site person shall sign the permanent record book next to the identifying information.
Appendix A, Subpart A, Paragraph 1.2, DeGnitions, of 10 CFR Part 26 de6nes the"Permanent Record Book" as a permanently bound book in which identifying data on each specimen collected at a collection site are permanently recorded in the sequence of collection.


Contrary to the above, on January 24, 1991, the inspector determined that the licensee's collection site staff was not maintaining, in the Permanent Record Book, identifying data on each specimen collected at the collection site, in the sequence of collection.
This letter is in response to the February 25, 1991 letter from James H. Joyner, Chief, Facilities Radiological Safety and Safeguards Branch, to Robert C. Mecredy, Vice President, Ginna Nuclear Production. This letter provides the reply to the Notice of Violation, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 26, as well as, infrequent unescorted site access (UNR 50-244/91-04-01).
Only contractor personnel specimen collections were being entered in a record book;licensee personnel specimen collections were being maintained in a computer based records system.This is a Severity Level IV Violation.(Supplement VII)REPLY T THE VI LATI N 1.Th R nfr h Vil in Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RG&E)concurs that the stated violation occurred.Since.developing the FFD program, a computerized system for tracking each individual tested, including contractor employees, has been maintained.
RE TATEMENT F VI LATI N's a result of the inspection conducted on January 23-25, 1991, and in accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (Enforcement Policy 1990), the following violation was identified:
This computer program could, if necessary, print a list in chronological order.We also retained a copy of each chain-of-custody form to use as a record signed by the employee being tested, which listed all information identifying the specimens.
Appendix A, Subpart B, Paragraph 2.4, "Specimen Collection Procedures,"
We believed that the combination of the computerized tracking system and a copy of the chain-of-custody form would adequately serve as a permanent record.2.Th rr iv Th Hv B k n Th R'Ahiv RG&E purchased three (3)permanently bound books, one for each collection site.The Site Collection Officer enters the identifying information of the individual tested and specimen collected and the individual signs his/her name.'esults of this action assure that a permanent record book is in place at each collection site to account for all employees, including contractor employees, of the tests performed and specimens collected with identifying information.
Subparagraph (g)(24) states that the collection site person shall enter in the permanent record book all information identifying the specimens.             The collection site person shall sign the permanent record book next to the identifying information. Appendix A, Subpart A, Paragraph 1.2, DeGnitions, of 10 CFR Part 26 de6nes the "Permanent Record Book" as a permanently bound book in which identifying data on each specimen collected at a collection site are permanently recorded in the sequence of collection.
3.1v WillB TknT Avi F hrVi 1 i n On March 1, 1991, the RG&E Fitness For Duty Program Procedures were implemented as a controlled document and distributed to key personnel.
The process for utilizing the permanent record book is included in procedure number FFD-9 titled,"Collection Process and Chain of Custody."


Th D WhnF11 m lin WillB iv FuH compliance with 10 CFR Part 26, Appendix A, Subpart B, Paragraph 2.4,"Specimen Collection Procedures," Subparagraph (g)(24)was achieved on January 24, 1991.On that date, the permanent record book was purchased and the process for entering the required information was activated.
Contrary to the above, on January 24, 1991, the inspector determined that the licensee's collection site staff was not maintaining, in the Permanent Record Book, identifying data on each specimen collected at the collection site, in the sequence of collection. Only contractor personnel specimen collections were being entered in a record book; licensee personnel specimen collections were being maintained in a computer based records system.
244 1--TE TIN FEMP YEE WITH INFRE NT ITEA E All employees who have infrequent access to the site are covered by the Company's Fitness For Duty testing program and must adhere to all provisions of the corporate Drug and Alcohol Abuse Policy.Therefore, we do not believe any additional policies or procedures are necessary.
This is a Severity Level  IV Violation.  (Supplement  VII)
However, RG&E has developed an interim practice for testing of non-RG&E personnel with infrequent site access.We are currently using this interim practice for a trial period to assist us in determining the best method for reaching these individuals.
REPLY T THE VI LATI N
Based on the results of the interim practice during this trial period, an approved procedure will be implemented and included in the RG&E Fitness For Duty Program.Very truly yours, Robert C.Mecredy~IC Mr.Thomas T.Martin Regional Administrator Region 1 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr.Thomas Moslak USNRC Senior Resident Inspector Ginna Station 1503 Lake Road Ontario, NY 14519 m I~~I J S}}
: 1.      Th R        nfr    h  Vil in Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RG&E) concurs that the stated violation occurred. Since. developing the FFD program, a computerized system for tracking each individual tested, including contractor employees, has been maintained. This computer program could, if necessary, print a list in chronological order. We also retained a copy of each chain-of-custody form to use as a record signed by the employee being tested, which listed all information identifying the specimens. We believed that the combination of the computerized tracking system and a copy of the chain-of-custody form would adequately serve as a permanent record.
: 2.      Th      rr  iv        Th    Hv    B      k      n  Th  R'    Ahiv RG&E purchased three (3) permanently bound books, one for each collection site.
The Site Collection Officer enters the identifying information of the individual tested and specimen collected and the individual signs his/her name.
      'esults of this    action assure that a permanent record book is in place at each collection site to account for all employees, including contractor employees, of the tests performed and specimens collected with identifying information.
: 3.                    1v              WillB  TknT Avi          F    hrVi  1  i n On March 1, 1991, the RG&E Fitness For Duty Program Procedures were implemented as a controlled document and distributed to key personnel. The process for utilizing the permanent record book is included in procedure number FFD-9 titled, "Collection Process and Chain of Custody."
 
Th D       WhnF11         m   lin   WillB         iv FuH compliance with 10 CFR Part 26, Appendix A, Subpart B, Paragraph 2.4, "Specimen Collection Procedures," Subparagraph (g)(24) was achieved on January 24, 1991. On that date, the permanent record book was purchased and the process for entering the required information was activated.
244   1-   -   TE TIN       FEMP       YEE WITHINFRE              NT ITEA     E All employees who have infrequent       access to the site are covered by the Company's Fitness For Duty testing program and must adhere to all provisions of the corporate Drug and Alcohol Abuse Policy. Therefore, we do not believe any additional policies or procedures are necessary. However, RG&E has developed an interim practice for testing of non-RG&E personnel with infrequent site access. We are currently using this interim practice for a trial period to assist us in determining the best method for reaching these individuals. Based on the results of the interim practice during this trial period, an approved procedure willbe implemented and included in the RG&E Fitness For Duty Program.
Very truly yours, Robert C. Mecredy
                      ~ IC Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator Region   1 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. Thomas Moslak USNRC Senior Resident Inspector Ginna Station 1503 Lake Road Ontario, NY 14519
 
m I   ~
    ~
JI S}}

Latest revision as of 17:41, 29 October 2019

Responds to NRC 910325 Ltr Re Violations in Insp Rept 50-244/91-04 Re Specimen Collection Procedures.Fitness for Duty Program Procedures Implemented as Controlled Document & Distributed to Key Personnel
ML17262A423
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/26/1991
From: Mecredy R
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9103290193
Download: ML17262A423 (6)


Text

fi/~4IKW P'..":"rT r Toe%

jiI i'raI;,'I PI 4J'iki7i, ttate ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION ~ 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N. Y. 14649.0001 ROBERT C MECREDY TELEPHONE Vice Pretident AREA CODE 7t6 546'2700 Cinna Nuclear Production March 26, 1991 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Reply to a Notice of Violation NRC Inspection Report No. 50-244/91-04 R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant NRC Docket No. 50-244

Dear Sir:

This letter is in response to the February 25, 1991 letter from James H. Joyner, Chief, Facilities Radiological Safety and Safeguards Branch, to Robert C. Mecredy, Vice President, Ginna Nuclear Production. This letter provides the reply to the Notice of Violation, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 26, as well as, infrequent unescorted site access (UNR 50-244/91-04-01).

RE TATEMENT F VI LATI N's a result of the inspection conducted on January 23-25, 1991, and in accordance with the "General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (Enforcement Policy 1990), the following violation was identified:

Appendix A, Subpart B, Paragraph 2.4, "Specimen Collection Procedures,"

Subparagraph (g)(24) states that the collection site person shall enter in the permanent record book all information identifying the specimens. The collection site person shall sign the permanent record book next to the identifying information. Appendix A, Subpart A, Paragraph 1.2, DeGnitions, of 10 CFR Part 26 de6nes the "Permanent Record Book" as a permanently bound book in which identifying data on each specimen collected at a collection site are permanently recorded in the sequence of collection.

Contrary to the above, on January 24, 1991, the inspector determined that the licensee's collection site staff was not maintaining, in the Permanent Record Book, identifying data on each specimen collected at the collection site, in the sequence of collection. Only contractor personnel specimen collections were being entered in a record book; licensee personnel specimen collections were being maintained in a computer based records system.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation. (Supplement VII)

REPLY T THE VI LATI N

1. Th R nfr h Vil in Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RG&E) concurs that the stated violation occurred. Since. developing the FFD program, a computerized system for tracking each individual tested, including contractor employees, has been maintained. This computer program could, if necessary, print a list in chronological order. We also retained a copy of each chain-of-custody form to use as a record signed by the employee being tested, which listed all information identifying the specimens. We believed that the combination of the computerized tracking system and a copy of the chain-of-custody form would adequately serve as a permanent record.
2. Th rr iv Th Hv B k n Th R' Ahiv RG&E purchased three (3) permanently bound books, one for each collection site.

The Site Collection Officer enters the identifying information of the individual tested and specimen collected and the individual signs his/her name.

'esults of this action assure that a permanent record book is in place at each collection site to account for all employees, including contractor employees, of the tests performed and specimens collected with identifying information.

3. 1v WillB TknT Avi F hrVi 1 i n On March 1, 1991, the RG&E Fitness For Duty Program Procedures were implemented as a controlled document and distributed to key personnel. The process for utilizing the permanent record book is included in procedure number FFD-9 titled, "Collection Process and Chain of Custody."

Th D WhnF11 m lin WillB iv FuH compliance with 10 CFR Part 26, Appendix A, Subpart B, Paragraph 2.4, "Specimen Collection Procedures," Subparagraph (g)(24) was achieved on January 24, 1991. On that date, the permanent record book was purchased and the process for entering the required information was activated.

244 1- - TE TIN FEMP YEE WITHINFRE NT ITEA E All employees who have infrequent access to the site are covered by the Company's Fitness For Duty testing program and must adhere to all provisions of the corporate Drug and Alcohol Abuse Policy. Therefore, we do not believe any additional policies or procedures are necessary. However, RG&E has developed an interim practice for testing of non-RG&E personnel with infrequent site access. We are currently using this interim practice for a trial period to assist us in determining the best method for reaching these individuals. Based on the results of the interim practice during this trial period, an approved procedure willbe implemented and included in the RG&E Fitness For Duty Program.

Very truly yours, Robert C. Mecredy

~ IC Mr. Thomas T. Martin Regional Administrator Region 1 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. Thomas Moslak USNRC Senior Resident Inspector Ginna Station 1503 Lake Road Ontario, NY 14519

m I ~

~

JI S