ML18201A284: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18201A284
| number = ML18201A284
| issue date = 07/17/2018
| issue date = 07/17/2018
| title = Oyster Creek PSDAR Public Meeting the NRC Review Process
| title = PSDAR Public Meeting the NRC Review Process
| author name = Broaddus D A
| author name = Broaddus D
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LSPB
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LSPB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 9: Line 9:
| docket = 05000219
| docket = 05000219
| license number = DPR-016
| license number = DPR-016
| contact person = Lamb J G, NRR/DORL/LSPB, 415-3100
| contact person = Lamb J, NRR/DORL/LSPB, 415-3100
| case reference number = EPID L-2018-LRO-0022
| case reference number = EPID L-2018-LRO-0022
| document type = Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts
| document type = Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Oyster Creek PSDARThe NRC Review ProcessJuly 17, 2018Forked River, New JerseyDouglas BroaddusChief, Special Projects and Process BranchOffice of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
{{#Wiki_filter:Oyster Creek PSDAR The NRC Review Process July 17, 2018 Forked River, New Jersey Douglas Broaddus Chief, Special Projects and Process Branch Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation
*Key requirements in 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4) -(8), and 50.75  
 
*Regulatory Guide 1.185  
NRCs PSDAR Review Process
-Guidance for information to be included in a PSDAR
* Key requirements in 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4) - (8),
*Reviewed by technical staff in several areas
and 50.75
*Requests for additional information (RAIs)*Considers public commentsNRC's PSDAR Review Process  
* Regulatory Guide 1.185 - Guidance for information to be included in a PSDAR
*Does the PSDAR contain the information required by regulation?
* Reviewed by technical staff in several areas
*Can the decommissioning be completed as described, and within 60 years?
* Requests for additional information (RAIs)
*Can the radiological decommissioning be completed for the estimated cost?
* Considers public comments
*Do the decommissioning activities endanger public health and safety or the environment?NRC's PSDAR Review Process:Evaluation Criteria
 
*Site-specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate (DCE)-Provides reasonable assurance funds are available to complete decommissioning?
NRCs PSDAR Review Process:
-Licensee has a means of adjusting the cost estimate and funding over the storage period?*Annual report of funding levels and changes from amounts in the DCE NRC's PSDAR Review Process: Decommissioning Cost Estimate
Evaluation Criteria
*Provides reasons for concluding that environmental impacts of site
* Does the PSDAR contain the information required by regulation?
-specific decommissioning activities are bounded by previous Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
* Can the decommissioning be completed as described, and within 60 years?
-NUREG-0586, "Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement on Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
* Can the radiological decommissioning be completed for the estimated cost?
"-Consider site
* Do the decommissioning activities endanger public health and safety or the environment?
-specific issues and changes not addressed in prior EIS
 
-Inspection programNRC's PSDAR Review Process: Environmental Review / NEPA
NRCs PSDAR Review Process:
*Staff will notify licensee if no additional information is required
Decommissioning Cost Estimate
-NRC review does not approve the PSDAR
* Site-specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate (DCE)
-Document the NRC review
    - Provides reasonable assurance funds are available to complete decommissioning?
-Addresses comments received
    - Licensee has a means of adjusting the cost estimate and funding over the storage period?
*Licensee may not begin major decommissioning activities until 90 days after NRC receives the PSDAR, per 10 CFR 50.82(a)(5)NRC's PSDAR Review Process 
* Annual report of funding levels and changes from amounts in the DCE
*This public meeting*Federal Rulemaking Web site:http://www.regulations.govSearch for Docket ID: NRC-2018-0111*By Mail: May MaOffice of Administration, Mail Stop:
 
TWFN-7-A60M U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555
NRCs PSDAR Review Process:
-0001*Due September 10, 2018Comment on the PSDAR}}
Environmental Review / NEPA
* Provides reasons for concluding that environmental impacts of site-specific decommissioning activities are bounded by previous Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
    - NUREG-0586, Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement on Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities
    - Consider site-specific issues and changes not addressed in prior EIS
    - Inspection program
 
NRCs PSDAR Review Process
* Staff will notify licensee if no additional information is required
  - NRC review does not approve the PSDAR
  - Document the NRC review
  - Addresses comments received
* Licensee may not begin major decommissioning activities until 90 days after NRC receives the PSDAR, per 10 CFR 50.82(a)(5)
 
Comment on the PSDAR
* This public meeting
* Federal Rulemaking Web site:
http://www.regulations.gov Search for Docket ID: NRC-2018-0111
* By Mail:
May Ma Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN-7-A60M U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
* Due September 10, 2018}}

Latest revision as of 20:55, 20 October 2019

PSDAR Public Meeting the NRC Review Process
ML18201A284
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 07/17/2018
From: Doug Broaddus
Special Projects and Process Branch
To:
Lamb J, NRR/DORL/LSPB, 415-3100
References
EPID L-2018-LRO-0022
Download: ML18201A284 (7)
v • d • e


Text

Oyster Creek PSDAR The NRC Review Process July 17, 2018 Forked River, New Jersey Douglas Broaddus Chief, Special Projects and Process Branch Office of the Nuclear Reactor Regulation

NRCs PSDAR Review Process

and 50.75

  • Reviewed by technical staff in several areas
  • Requests for additional information (RAIs)
  • Considers public comments

NRCs PSDAR Review Process:

Evaluation Criteria

  • Does the PSDAR contain the information required by regulation?
  • Can the decommissioning be completed as described, and within 60 years?
  • Can the radiological decommissioning be completed for the estimated cost?
  • Do the decommissioning activities endanger public health and safety or the environment?

NRCs PSDAR Review Process:

Decommissioning Cost Estimate

  • Site-specific Decommissioning Cost Estimate (DCE)

- Provides reasonable assurance funds are available to complete decommissioning?

- Licensee has a means of adjusting the cost estimate and funding over the storage period?

  • Annual report of funding levels and changes from amounts in the DCE

NRCs PSDAR Review Process:

Environmental Review / NEPA

  • Provides reasons for concluding that environmental impacts of site-specific decommissioning activities are bounded by previous Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)

- NUREG-0586, Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement on Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities

- Consider site-specific issues and changes not addressed in prior EIS

- Inspection program

NRCs PSDAR Review Process

  • Staff will notify licensee if no additional information is required

- NRC review does not approve the PSDAR

- Document the NRC review

- Addresses comments received

  • Licensee may not begin major decommissioning activities until 90 days after NRC receives the PSDAR, per 10 CFR 50.82(a)(5)

Comment on the PSDAR

  • This public meeting
  • Federal Rulemaking Web site:

http://www.regulations.gov Search for Docket ID: NRC-2018-0111

  • By Mail:

May Ma Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN-7-A60M U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

  • Due September 10, 2018
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18201A284&oldid=1926143"