ML18205A550
| ML18205A550 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 08/06/2018 |
| From: | John Lamb Special Projects and Process Branch |
| To: | Bryan Hanson Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| Lamb J, NRR/DORL/LSPB, 415-3100 | |
| References | |
| EPID L-2018-LRO-0022 | |
| Download: ML18205A550 (7) | |
Text
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Public Meeting Memo to File Public Meeting Feedback August 6, 2018
Title:
Public Meeting to Discuss the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (EPID L-2018-LR0-0022)
Meeting Identifier: 20180713 Date of Meeting: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 Location: Community Hall - Lacey Township, 101 North Main Street, Forked River, NJ Type of Meeting: Category 3 Purpose of the Meeting:
The purpose of this meeting was to discuss and answer questions on the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek) Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR), submitted by Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon or the licensee) on May 21, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18141A775). The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff also solicited written comments from the public on those questions that could not be answered during the public meeting.
NRC Public Meeting Feedback:
The staff received two NRC Public Meeting Feedback forms. A summary of the results of the feedback forms is provided below.
- 1. The meeting achieved its stated purpose.
Strongly Disagree Disagree 0% (0) 0% (0)
Neutral 50% (1)
Agree 50% (1)
- 2. This meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed.
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree 0% (0) 0% (0) 0% (4) 100% (2)
Strongly Agree 0% (0)
Strongly Agree 0% (0)
- 3. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient.
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 0% (0) 0% (0) 50% (1) 50% (1) 0% (26)
- 4. The meeting facility, room set up, microphones, and visuals used contributed to the success of the meeting.
Strongly Disagree 50% (1)
Disagree 0% (0)
Neutral 0% (0)
Agree 50% (1)
Strongly Agree 0% (0)
- 5. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views.
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree 0% (0) 0% (0) 50% (1) 50% (1) 0% (0)
- 6. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff.
Strongly Disagree 0% (0)
Disagree 0% (2)
Neutral 50% (1)
Agree 50% (1)
Strongly Agree 0% (0)
- 7. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable, fair, and balanced.
Strongly Disagree 0% (0)
Disagree 0% (0)
Neutral 50% (1)
Agree 50% (1)
- 8. I am satisfied with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting.
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree 0% (0) 0% (0) 50% (1) 50% (1)
Strongly Agree 0% (0)
Strongly Agree 0% (0)
One person provided a suggestion on a way that the NRC could improve its public meeting.
The person stated: "Community Hall is NOT the best venue for larger community meetings in Lacey."
The NRC staff will take this feedback into consideration for the next public meeting scheduled in the vicinity of Oyster Creek.
Docket No. 50-219 cc: Listserv
Enclosures:
- 1. NRC Public Meeting Feedback
- 2. NRC Public Meeting Feedback
ENCLOSURE 1 NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK
NRCFORM859 (04-2017)
U.S. NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMIISSION APPROVED BY 0MB: NO. 3160-0217 EXPIRES: 12131/2019
,_rr-I, l~i\\
i
~ rJ NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK EsUmalad bllden per 1asponaa to comply.tl1 this vabltary lnbmllDn llql.llSI: 15 IMlllas. TIie informlllon
- be used to aaess the ~
rt NRC sllllf C011111nC1111an 111d oulJallch...
the ptdc. Send 1X11111118111s n,gadlng 111s estlmale to the lnlonnalm Sel*'8 llrlnch [T *2 F43J, U.S.
Nuclalr ~
CClmmialon, Wlllqmn, DC 20555-0001, or by &-1111111 to 11/~.c>-'L<-ct, f&;y.,,:wJ;:11;, '11' 11111 to the Desk Ollcer, Ollce rt lnlannllan 111d Rlgullllaly Affllill, NE08,103J2 (3150-0217), Offic:e of Management 111d Budget. Waslqbl. DC. If a -
uaed to llr.,oaa an lnfDnnllllDn colacllon does not display a a,118111y vaal 0MB anal number, the NRC may not ainducl or sponsor, and a pe11011 is not llqUnd ID IIISpDl1d to. the inlonnllllon callec:lan.
Meeting Meeting
~
Date: J\\hf 141,20\\<{
Title:
A,c.c,-\\-cr( roll l\\*, nthN\\\\~1(\\(1 Thank you for attending this public meeting hosted by the NRC. In order to he~ us understand your views about this meeting and improve future meetings, please take a couple minutes to answer the questions below.
There are several ways you can provide your feedback:
- 1) Scanning the Quick Response (QR) Code on the back of this form with your smartphone to link directly to our feedback page. If you do not have a QR reader on your mobile device, you can use your App store to access available QR scanning applications suitable for your device.
- 2) Through any computer by going to the Public Meeting Schedule and pressing the "Meeting Feedback* link for the specific meeting, or pressing the "[... more]9 link for a specific meeting and then pressing the "Meeting Feedback*
link on the "Meeting Details" page.
- 3) By filling out this hard copy of our "Public Meeting Feedback Form* and providing it to an NRC staff member or mailing it in.
Please fold on the dotted lln* with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mall back to the NRC.
Note: You have up to 30 dap after the meeting has ended to submit feedback on the publlc meeting that you've attended. Thank you again for your participation.
Please address the following statements in terms of your experience at the meeting. 1 is "strongly disagree" and 5 is "strongly agree."
'!EITHER "STRONGI.Y "IIT1ICNGI. y AOREEOR *-
- 1. The meeting achieved its stated purpose.
- 2. This meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed.
- 3. The meeting location, format, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient.
- 4. The meeting facility, room set up, microphones, and visuals used contributed to the success of the meeting.
- 5. Attendees, including those participating remotely, were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views.
- 6. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff.
- 7. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable, fair and balanced.
- 8. I am satisfied overall with the NRC staff who participat~
in the meeting.
OPTIONAL 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 1
2 DISAGREE" 3
(@
5 3
(!)
5 3.~
5 3 V 5
3 t) 5 3
(3) 5 3
I )
5 3
,; )
C,/
5 Name
( ;>"c.D,'lie\\ l)
Telephone No.
E-Mail Organization _
_..Lo::.< *..;. ~:;;.,,u)_..i,.\\*..,!"...
- l...:C.~:,......
,~.:..* _.l.,,,_li...,.C... e~i.+----,---
0 CIHlck here f you would like a member NRC sta,,to contact you.
NRC 659 (04-2017)
ENCL0SURE2 NRC PUBLIC MEETING FEEDBACK
NRC FORM659 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY 0MB: NO. 3150-0217 EXPIRES: 12/31/2019 (04-2017)
Estimated burden per response to comply with !his voluntary information request 15 minutes. The cJP""Eoc,~
information will be used to assess Ille effectiveness of NRC slaff communications and outreach wilh
'¥'
NRC PUBLIC MEETING the public. Send comments regarding !his estimate to the Information Services Branch (T-2 F43), U.S.
C i
FEEDBACK Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Waslington, DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to ~
ti Resource@nrn and to Ille Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202 Q
\\.+_,
~
(3150-0217), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC. If a means used to impose an information collection does not display a cummtiy valid 0MB control number, Ille NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.
Meeting ~7)?
Meeting De e ~::::; ~;;::: 0P Jlud~ f wer lkzts-Date:
Title:
Thank you for attending this public meeting hosted by the NRC. In order to help us understand your views about this meeting and improve future meetings, please take a couple minutes to answer the questions below.
There are several ways you can provide your feedback:
- 1) Scanning the Quick Response (QR) Code on the back of this form with your smartphone to link directly to our feedback page. If you do not have a QR reader on your mobile device, you can use your App store to access available QR scanning applications suitable for your device.
- 2) Through any computer by going to the Public Meeting Schedule and pressing the "Meeting Feedback" link for the specific meeting, or pressing the "[... more]" link for a specific meeting and then pressing the "Meeting Feedback" link on the "Meeting Details" page.
- 3) By filling out this hard copy of our "Public Meeting Feedback Form" and providing it to an NRC staff member or mailing it in.
Please fold on the dotted lines with Business Reply side out, tape the bottom, and mail back to the NRC.
Note: You have up to 30 days after the meeting has ended to submit feedback on the public meeting that you've attended. Thank you again for your participation.
Please address the following statements in terms of your experience at the meeting. 1 is "strongly disagree" and 5 is "strongly agree."
"STRONGLY "NEITHER "STRONGLY "DISAGREE" AGREE OR "AGREE" DISAGREE" DISAGREE" AGREE"
- 1. The meeting achieved its stated purpose.
1 2
G) 4 5
- 2. This meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed.
1 2
3 0 5
I
- 3. The meeting location, format, starting time, and duration were 1
2 (i) 4 5
reasonably convenient.
~ t1r:l.,-J,n '2 I 1~..J_,,
- 4. The meeting facility, room set ui(;microphone and vi'suals G 2
3 4
5 used.contributed to the success oT me meeting.
- 5. Attendees, including those participating remotely, were given 1
2 0 4
5 sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views.
- 6. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff.
1 2 0 4
5
- 7. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff 1
2 © 4
5 were understandable, fair and balanced.
- 8. I am satisfied overall with the NRC staff who participated 1
2 Ci) 4 5
in the meeting.
OPTIONA~0
~
~
~.~':!.t.4; ~
Organization Name
'J-J~ --
Telephone~o. ~---.-
member of NRC staff to contact you.
NRC 659 (04-2017)
Please provide any suggestions you have on ways the NRC could improve its public meetings:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001 QR CODE BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST CLASS MAIL PERMIT NO. 12904 WASHINGTON DC POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATIN: I I MAIL STOP: I NAME AND (HQ Staff Only) ;::::========!
OR CHOOSE I OFFICE REGION Select Region...
L..------------~
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON DC 20555-0001 NO POSTAGE NECESSARY IF MAILED INTHE UNITED STATES
ML18205A550 EAndrews, RI JAnderson, NSIR DBroaddus, NRR SHarwell, NRR BWatson, NMSS TSmith, NMSS NSheehan, OPA RI DScrenci, OPA RI JWeil, OCA DMclntyre, OPA MFannon, RI MYoung, RI DTifft, RI
- via email OFFICE NRR/DORL/LSPB/PM NRR/DORL/LSPB/LA
- NMSS/DUWP/RDP/BC*
NAME JLamb JBurkhardt BWatson DATE 7/26/18 7/26/18 7/30/18 OFFICE N RR/DORL/LSPB/BC NRR/DORL/LSPB/PM NAME DBroaddus (EBrown for)
JLamb DATE 8/3/18 8/6/18