ML091980297: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:BC Input to OC 2008-07 TdýE 410 F]~~~IN ~COVER LETTER Mr. Charles G. Pardee Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) and Senior Vice President Exelon Generation | ||
Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348 SUBJECT: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING | |||
STATION -NRC LICENSE RENEWAL FOLLOW-UP | |||
INSPECTION | |||
REPORT 05000219/2008007 | |||
Dear Mr. Pardee On December 23, 2008, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory | |||
Commission (NRC) completed | |||
an inspection | |||
at your Oyster Creek Generating | |||
Station. The enclosed report documents | |||
the inspection | |||
results, which were discussed | |||
on December 23, 2008, with Mr. T. Rausch, Site Vice President, Mr. M. Gallagher, Vice President | |||
License Renewal, and other members of your staff.The inspection | |||
examined activities | |||
conducted | |||
under your license as they relate to safety and compliance | |||
with the Commission's | |||
rules and regulations | |||
and with the conditions | |||
of your license.In addition, an appeal of a licensing | |||
board decision regarding | |||
the Oyster Creek application | |||
for a renewed license is pending before the Commission. | |||
The NRC staff concluded | |||
Oyster Creek should not enter the extended period of operation | |||
without directly observing | |||
continuing | |||
license renewal activities | |||
at Oyster Creek. Therefore, the NRC staff performed | |||
an inspection | |||
using Inspection | |||
Procedure (IP) 71003 "Post-Approval | |||
Site Inspection | |||
for License Renewal" and observed Oyster Creek license renewal activities | |||
during the last refuel outage prior to entering the period of extended operation. | |||
IP 71003 verifies license conditions | |||
added as part of a renewed license, license renewal commitments, selected aging management | |||
programs, and license renewal commitments | |||
revised after the renewed license was granted, are implemented | |||
in accordance | |||
with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFP Part 54, "Requirements | |||
for the Renewal of Operating I icn.,P.s fnr Nuclear Power Plants."[_ (b)(5)(b)(5)(b)(5) )"he inspectors | |||
reviewed selected procedures | |||
ana recoras, ooserveo activities, and intervie ed personnel. | |||
The enclosed report records the inspector's | |||
observations, absent any conclusions | |||
of adequacy, pending the final decision of the Commissioners | |||
on the appeal of the renewed license.] -T, ___ | |||
it thOf re domd w of IM w ac0rac with | |||
of Infoffnadoo | |||
ACL ,O M -- 00 1/-r 0 "7 Q AlIA7 | |||
BC Input to OC 2008-07 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS IR 05000219/2008007; | |||
10/27/2008 | |||
-12/23/2008; | |||
Exelon, LLC, Oyster Creek Generating | |||
Station; License Renewal Follow-up The report covers a multi-week | |||
inspection | |||
of license renewal follow-up | |||
items. It was conducted by five region based engineering | |||
inspectors | |||
and the Oyster Creek resident inspector. | |||
The inspection | |||
was conducted | |||
in accordance | |||
with Insoection | |||
Procedure | |||
71003 "Post-Approval | |||
Site In.-ni.r.tinn | |||
fnr I ir.pnse Renewal.'E (b)(5)(b)((5)(b)(5) "]In accordance | |||
with the NRC's agreement | |||
with the State of New Jersey, state engineers-bbserved | |||
portions of the NRC's staff review. The report documents | |||
inspection | |||
observations, absent any conclusions | |||
of adequacy, pending the final decision of the Commissioners | |||
on the appeal of the renewed license. | |||
BC Input to OC 2008-07 BODY OF REPORT -- SAMPLE SELECTION | |||
PROCESS 1. Inspection | |||
Sample Selection | |||
Process This inspection | |||
was conducted | |||
in order to observe AmerGen's | |||
continuing | |||
license renewal activities | |||
during the last refueling | |||
outage prior to Oyster Creek (OC) entering the extended period of operation. | |||
The inspection | |||
team selected a number of inspection | |||
samples for review, using the NRC accepted guidance based on their importance | |||
in the license renewal a~j~lication | |||
process, as an opportunity | |||
to make observations | |||
on license renewal activitie | |||
s( (b)(5)(b)(5) -Accordingly, the inspectors | |||
recorded observations, without any assessment | |||
of implementation | |||
adequacy or safety significance. | |||
Inspection | |||
observations | |||
were considered, in light of pending 10 CFR 54 license renewal commitments | |||
and license conditions, as documented | |||
in NUREG-1875, "Safety Evaluation | |||
Report (SER) Related to the License Renewal of Oyster Creek Generating | |||
Station," as well as programmatic | |||
performance | |||
under on-going implementation | |||
of 10 CFR 50 current licensing | |||
basis (CLB)requirements. | |||
The reviewed SER proposed commitments | |||
and license conditions | |||
were selected based on several attributes | |||
including: | |||
the risk significance | |||
using insights gained from sources such as the NRC's "Significance | |||
Determination | |||
Process Risk Informed Inspection | |||
Notebooks," revision 2; the extent and results of previous license renewal audits and inspections | |||
of aging management | |||
programs; | |||
the extent or complexity | |||
of a commitment; | |||
and the extent that baseline inspection | |||
programs will inspect a system, structure, or component (SSC), or commodity | |||
group.For each commitment | |||
and on a sampling basis, the inspectors | |||
reviewed supporting | |||
documents | |||
including | |||
completed | |||
surveillances, conducted | |||
interviews, performed | |||
visual inspection | |||
of structures | |||
and components | |||
including | |||
those not accessible | |||
during power operation, and observed selected activities | |||
described | |||
below. The inspectors | |||
also reviewed selected corrective | |||
actions taken as a consequence | |||
of previous license renewal inspections. | |||
At the time of the inspection, AmerGen Energy Company, LLC was the licensee for Oyster Creek Generating | |||
Station. As of January 8, 2009, the OC license was transferred | |||
to Exelon Generating | |||
Company, LLC by license amendment | |||
No. 271 (ML082750072). | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 21:50, 20 August 2019
ML091980297 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oyster Creek |
Issue date: | 06/17/2009 |
From: | Division of Reactor Safety I |
To: | Pardee C Exelon Generation Co |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2009-0070 | |
Download: ML091980297 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000219/2008007
Text
BC Input to OC 2008-07 TdýE 410 F]~~~IN ~COVER LETTER Mr. Charles G. Pardee Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO) and Senior Vice President Exelon Generation
Company, LLC 200 Exelon Way Kennett Square, PA 19348 SUBJECT: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING
STATION -NRC LICENSE RENEWAL FOLLOW-UP
INSPECTION
REPORT 05000219/2008007
Dear Mr. Pardee On December 23, 2008, the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) completed
an inspection
at your Oyster Creek Generating
Station. The enclosed report documents
the inspection
results, which were discussed
on December 23, 2008, with Mr. T. Rausch, Site Vice President, Mr. M. Gallagher, Vice President
License Renewal, and other members of your staff.The inspection
examined activities
conducted
under your license as they relate to safety and compliance
with the Commission's
rules and regulations
and with the conditions
of your license.In addition, an appeal of a licensing
board decision regarding
the Oyster Creek application
for a renewed license is pending before the Commission.
The NRC staff concluded
Oyster Creek should not enter the extended period of operation
without directly observing
continuing
license renewal activities
at Oyster Creek. Therefore, the NRC staff performed
an inspection
using Inspection
Procedure (IP) 71003 "Post-Approval
Site Inspection
for License Renewal" and observed Oyster Creek license renewal activities
during the last refuel outage prior to entering the period of extended operation.
IP 71003 verifies license conditions
added as part of a renewed license, license renewal commitments, selected aging management
programs, and license renewal commitments
revised after the renewed license was granted, are implemented
in accordance
with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFP Part 54, "Requirements
for the Renewal of Operating I icn.,P.s fnr Nuclear Power Plants."[_ (b)(5)(b)(5)(b)(5) )"he inspectors
reviewed selected procedures
ana recoras, ooserveo activities, and intervie ed personnel.
The enclosed report records the inspector's
observations, absent any conclusions
of adequacy, pending the final decision of the Commissioners
on the appeal of the renewed license.] -T, ___
it thOf re domd w of IM w ac0rac with
of Infoffnadoo
ACL ,O M -- 00 1/-r 0 "7 Q AlIA7
BC Input to OC 2008-07 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS IR 05000219/2008007;
10/27/2008
-12/23/2008;
Exelon, LLC, Oyster Creek Generating
Station; License Renewal Follow-up The report covers a multi-week
inspection
of license renewal follow-up
items. It was conducted by five region based engineering
inspectors
and the Oyster Creek resident inspector.
The inspection
was conducted
in accordance
with Insoection
Procedure
71003 "Post-Approval
Site In.-ni.r.tinn
fnr I ir.pnse Renewal.'E (b)(5)(b)((5)(b)(5) "]In accordance
with the NRC's agreement
with the State of New Jersey, state engineers-bbserved
portions of the NRC's staff review. The report documents
inspection
observations, absent any conclusions
of adequacy, pending the final decision of the Commissioners
on the appeal of the renewed license.
BC Input to OC 2008-07 BODY OF REPORT -- SAMPLE SELECTION
PROCESS 1. Inspection
Sample Selection
Process This inspection
was conducted
in order to observe AmerGen's
continuing
license renewal activities
during the last refueling
outage prior to Oyster Creek (OC) entering the extended period of operation.
The inspection
team selected a number of inspection
samples for review, using the NRC accepted guidance based on their importance
in the license renewal a~j~lication
process, as an opportunity
to make observations
on license renewal activitie
s( (b)(5)(b)(5) -Accordingly, the inspectors
recorded observations, without any assessment
of implementation
adequacy or safety significance.
Inspection
observations
were considered, in light of pending 10 CFR 54 license renewal commitments
and license conditions, as documented
in NUREG-1875, "Safety Evaluation
Report (SER) Related to the License Renewal of Oyster Creek Generating
Station," as well as programmatic
performance
under on-going implementation
of 10 CFR 50 current licensing
basis (CLB)requirements.
The reviewed SER proposed commitments
and license conditions
were selected based on several attributes
including:
the risk significance
using insights gained from sources such as the NRC's "Significance
Determination
Process Risk Informed Inspection
Notebooks," revision 2; the extent and results of previous license renewal audits and inspections
programs;
the extent or complexity
of a commitment;
and the extent that baseline inspection
programs will inspect a system, structure, or component (SSC), or commodity
group.For each commitment
and on a sampling basis, the inspectors
reviewed supporting
documents
including
completed
surveillances, conducted
interviews, performed
visual inspection
of structures
and components
including
those not accessible
during power operation, and observed selected activities
described
below. The inspectors
also reviewed selected corrective
actions taken as a consequence
of previous license renewal inspections.
At the time of the inspection, AmerGen Energy Company, LLC was the licensee for Oyster Creek Generating
Station. As of January 8, 2009, the OC license was transferred
to Exelon Generating
Company, LLC by license amendment
No. 271 (ML082750072).