ML062860247: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/21/2005
| issue date = 02/21/2005
| title = E-Mail from Gibbs to Trocine, ??S EA-04-131 Cooper
| title = E-Mail from Gibbs to Trocine, ??S EA-04-131 Cooper
| author name = Gibbs R A
| author name = Gibbs R
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO
| addressee name = Trocine L
| addressee name = Trocine L
Line 32: Line 32:
SDR LNo Fx Yes Assessment  
SDR LNo Fx Yes Assessment  
~ X ren ]w te E M Nov []l [es D o Wrongf~h doig ý' No Lj1Yes O Ref. Date 0I RpL No.: ,-0-:._ 01 Rpt Date: -.*-DOJ Referral?
~ X ren ]w te E M Nov []l [es D o Wrongf~h doig ý' No Lj1Yes O Ref. Date 0I RpL No.: ,-0-:._ 01 Rpt Date: -.*-DOJ Referral?
NoNo Yes Ref. Date .-..cn-Ded" .cce Additional 01 Status 0l OI Investigating  
NoNo Yes Ref. Date .-..cn-Ded" .cce Additional 01 Status 0l OI Investigating
[]-01 needs to be notified b O-IVOE dispute memo needed E Addifional coordination needed E Awaiting DOi E Needs coordination with DOJ s c a I a CA t io n ---:fl65 Consequence:
[]-01 needs to be notified b O-IVOE dispute memo needed E Addifional coordination needed E Awaiting DOi E Needs coordination with DOJ s c a I a CA t io n ---:fl65 Consequence:
E]Actual []Potential El Reg. impact [- Willfulness Prior Esc. Action? -No 5- Yes EA: Date: ID Credit? E]No M Yes [:1 TBD SIDE CACredit?  
E]Actual []Potential El Reg. impact [- Willfulness Prior Esc. Action? -No 5- Yes EA: Date: ID Credit? E]No M Yes [:1 TBD SIDE CACredit?
[lNo [lYes [iT3D .cP? E] No CP El Base Double Base 5 Other"j -et-'" j ' % No D Yes Expain:-Dis cret on -0 Mtero -9 ]Conference?  
[lNo [lYes [iT3D .cP? E] No CP El Base Double Base 5 Other"j -et-'" j ' % No D Yes Expain:-Dis cret on -0 Mtero -9 ]Conference?
[j]No ElYes 5 Open Q Closed Additional Action? 5-No Vlolaton H 5 PEC Letter Choice Iefter c c SI. NOV toRe-cau=s
[j]No ElYes 5 Open Q Closed Additional Action? 5-No Vlolaton H 5 PEC Letter Choice Iefter c c SI. NOV toRe-cau=s
] Region Issue Es. Action -Full Package Review by HO B DERRevew cissi Disage NCV Particpants:
] Region Issue Es. Action -Full Package Review by HO B DERRevew cissi Disage NCV Particpants:

Revision as of 10:28, 13 July 2019

E-Mail from Gibbs to Trocine, ??S EA-04-131 Cooper
ML062860247
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/21/2005
From: Russell Gibbs
NRC/NRR/ADRO
To: Trocine L
NRC/OE
References
EA-04-131, FOIA/PA-2006-0007
Download: ML062860247 (4)


Text

6 From: To: Date:

Subject:

Russell Gibbs'Leigh Trocine s-j" Thu, Feb 24, 2005 8:02 AM Re: ??s EA-04-131 Cooper>>> Leigh Trocine 02/23/05 11:35AM >>>Thanks for the feedback Gary and Russ.I've also attached a draft strategy form upd clarification and document the process cha or concerns.Thanks a gain for all of your patience.Leigh>>> Garv.anborn 02/23/05 08:15AM >>>>ate FYI. The changes are highlighted in yellow. They provide.nge.. Please let me know if you have any questions comments lGary Section IV.5.a, "Violations Associated witi Policy states: h Findings'f Very Low Safety Significance," of the Enforcement"Violations associated with findings that the SDP evaluates as having very low safety significance (i.e., green) will normally'be described In inspection reports as Non-Cited Violations (NCVs). The finding will be'categorized by the assessment process within the licensee response band. However, a Notice of Violation (NOV) will be issued if the issue meets one of the three applicable exceptions in Section VI.A.1.Section VI (DISPOSITION OF VIOLATIONS).A (Non-Cited Violations).1 (Power Reactor Licensees) of the Enforcement Policy further states in part: "Severity Level IV violations and violations associated with green SDP findings are normally dispositioned as NCVs. ... Any one of the following circumstances will result in consideration of an NOV requiring a formal written response from a licensee." a. The licensee failed to restore c\Information In this record was deleted in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, exemptions-, 5-FOIA- "0"'" 7:ompliance within a reasonable time after a violation was/

identified.

b. The licensee did not place the violation into a corrective action program to address recurrence.
c. The violation is repetitive as a result of inadequate corrective action, and was identified by the NRC. NOTE: This exception does not apply to violations associated with green SDP findings."ý4ýI Your help on this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Leigh>>> Russell Gibbs n2/22IO/n n4APM m S S 000 NOTFORP!SDPIEA REQUEST & STRATEGY FORM C a s e Dat a 'Disputed: -I Related Cases:=um7p: TOM Docket No.: 71iO OO9 Request Date: 10P23jo5 Region: ;IVS Case Type:; R .Small Entity.F No LYes Ucensee: ..Public ow btrct Facility/

I ityooe Ucense No.: DPR-46 Last Day of Insp.: O_7_2 i -Insp.Rpt No.: Keywords:

I/ ~ S LL Facts Failure tprelyresto6e to its normal configuration folloWng routine maintenance t that the licenseei (Edid not realgn. th glandwater following se__rvyce

_w r maintenance.Tý..hTe faIueld to realign the t Ind water was attrbutel to7 (ET) ind hteuate :n- th-ectiona-he "inaeut 6 ntutosl't h rs oncino gadwtrrsligi oso evc Discussion (if required):

OneGREEN findin asso te- volation of Criterion V for for retoinng serveater to operable status following maintenance:

SDR LNo Fx Yes Assessment

~ X ren ]w te E M Nov []l [es D o Wrongf~h doig ý' No Lj1Yes O Ref. Date 0I RpL No.: ,-0-:._ 01 Rpt Date: -.*-DOJ Referral?

NoNo Yes Ref. Date .-..cn-Ded" .cce Additional 01 Status 0l OI Investigating

[]-01 needs to be notified b O-IVOE dispute memo needed E Addifional coordination needed E Awaiting DOi E Needs coordination with DOJ s c a I a CA t io n ---:fl65 Consequence:

E]Actual []Potential El Reg. impact [- Willfulness Prior Esc. Action? -No 5- Yes EA: Date: ID Credit? E]No M Yes [:1 TBD SIDE CACredit?

[lNo [lYes [iT3D .cP? E] No CP El Base Double Base 5 Other"j -et-'" j ' % No D Yes Expain:-Dis cret on -0 Mtero -9 ]Conference?

[j]No ElYes 5 Open Q Closed Additional Action? 5-No Vlolaton H 5 PEC Letter Choice Iefter c c SI. NOV toRe-cau=s

] Region Issue Es. Action -Full Package Review by HO B DERRevew cissi Disage NCV Particpants:

Region Gary Sanborn OE Doug Starkey and Leigh Trocine OGCIOi Program Office Russ Giibbs Other Remarks/Comments/Lessons Learned: 02123A)5 UPDATE -.This update provides clariicati.

'i IM.Aother Ca 'i~t ~ B~ ...T 1tior s oi at'dd with th Gan caucus w.as.ot held..-The vlat a wthe GREEN nd he~ *0*i bf tl-ir acKaq p orl toi~tinm Is otndhcessaA 02/03/05 UPDATE -One GREEN finding and violation of Crftedon V for inadequate written Instructions for restoring serice water to operable Approved, Dir. OE: status following maintenance.

During the final significance determination, the SERP members did not rearh consensus on the final risk significance Date: of the performance deficiency.-Consensus among all members was not 000oo NO L OF ECIX1Z 0/2l1/04 CAUCUS -Caucus members met for a brief status update. The licensee obtained new information at a Regulatory Conferenc6 and is currently in the process of re-evaluating its risk assessment Another caucus will be held when the licensee completes its risk assessment 07/1 5/4 PANEL -One >green finding and violation of Criterion V for inadequate written instructions for restoring service water to operable status following maintenance.

Significance to be initially characterized as > green.ii