ML070660279: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/22/2006
| issue date = 08/22/2006
| title = Pd_Email from Fred Mogolesko, Entergy, Dtd 8/22/06 Pilgrim AMP Review
| title = Pd_Email from Fred Mogolesko, Entergy, Dtd 8/22/06 Pilgrim AMP Review
| author name = Mogolesko F J
| author name = Mogolesko F
| author affiliation = Entergy Corp
| author affiliation = Entergy Corp
| addressee name = Meyer G W
| addressee name = Meyer G
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/EB1
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/EB1
| docket = 05000293
| docket = 05000293

Revision as of 05:07, 13 July 2019

Pd_Email from Fred Mogolesko, Entergy, Dtd 8/22/06 Pilgrim AMP Review
ML070660279
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 08/22/2006
From: Mogolesko F
Entergy Corp
To: Meyer G
Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
Mogolesko, F
References
Download: ML070660279 (2)


Text

From: "Mogolesko, Fred" <fmogole@entergy.com>To:"Glenn Meyer" <GWM@nrc.gov>Date: 08/22/2006 7:36:13 AM

Subject:

Pilgrim AMP ReviewI have some thoughts based on our conversation of yesterday. We havedeveloped a report: LRPD-02-Aging Management Program Evaluation Report that fed into the LRA that you are reviewing. For each program we discuss the 10 attributes from NUREG-1800, Appendix A, Table A.1-1.

After discussing each attribute, a Summary is presented and compliance with the governing expectation is stated and exceptions/enhancements are also identified.

The report identifies new programs or activities credited, existingprograms or activities credited, and includes attachments for one-time inspection activities, periodic surveillance and preventative maintenance activities, structures monitoring program general criteria, and PNPS response to BWRVIP applicant action items.

We also have a training module for our staff defining the agingmanagement program. Lastly, we have a License Renewal Inspection Handbook where each system within the scope for aging management is identified with an owner.

I wonder whether forwarding these documents electronically would bebeneficial. Please advise.

Fred CC:"Mogolesko, Fred" <fmogole@entergy.com>

Mail Envelope Properties (44EAEC12.874 : 23 : 10356)

Subject:

Pilgrim AMP ReviewCreation Date 08/22/2006 7:35:08 AMFrom: "Mogolesko, Fred" <fmogole@entergy.com>Created By:fmogole@entergy.comRecipientsnrc.gov kp1_po.KP_DO GWM (Glenn Meyer)Post OfficeRoute kp1_po.KP_DOnrc.govFilesSizeDate & Time MESSAGE110308/22/2006 7:35:08 AM TEXT.htm3284 Mime.8226872 Options Expiration Date:

None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested:

No Return Notification:

None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: StandardJunk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk MailJunk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal a ddress books is not enabled Block List is not enabled