ML070660279

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Pd_Email from Fred Mogolesko, Entergy, Dtd 8/22/06 Pilgrim AMP Review
ML070660279
Person / Time
Site: Pilgrim
Issue date: 08/22/2006
From: Mogolesko F
Entergy Corp
To: Meyer G
Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
Mogolesko, F
References
Download: ML070660279 (2)


Text

From: "Mogolesko, Fred" <fmogole@entergy.com>

To: "Glenn Meyer" <GWM@nrc.gov>

Date: 08/22/2006 7:36:13 AM

Subject:

Pilgrim AMP Review I have some thoughts based on our conversation of yesterday. We have developed a report: LRPD-02-Aging Management Program Evaluation Report that fed into the LRA that you are reviewing. For each program we discuss the 10 attributes from NUREG-1800, Appendix A, Table A.1-1.

After discussing each attribute, a Summary is presented and compliance with the governing expectation is stated and exceptions/enhancements are also identified.

The report identifies new programs or activities credited, existing programs or activities credited, and includes attachments for one-time inspection activities, periodic surveillance and preventative maintenance activities, structures monitoring program general criteria, and PNPS response to BWRVIP applicant action items.

We also have a training module for our staff defining the aging management program. Lastly, we have a License Renewal Inspection Handbook where each system within the scope for aging management is identified with an owner.

I wonder whether forwarding these documents electronically would be beneficial. Please advise.

Fred CC: "Mogolesko, Fred" <fmogole@entergy.com>

Mail Envelope Properties (44EAEC12.874 : 23 : 10356)

Subject:

Pilgrim AMP Review Creation Date 08/22/2006 7:35:08 AM From: "Mogolesko, Fred" <fmogole@entergy.com>

Created By: fmogole@entergy.com Recipients nrc.gov kp1_po.KP_DO GWM (Glenn Meyer)

Post Office Route kp1_po.KP_DO nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1103 08/22/2006 7:35:08 AM TEXT.htm 3284 Mime.822 6872 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled