TSTF-08-13, TSTF-426, Revision 1, Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry Into LCO 3.0.3 - RITSTF Initiatives 6b & 6c: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 269: | Line 269: | ||
The Topical Report and this Traveler implement Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force (RITSTF) Initiatives 6b, "Provide Conditions in the LC Os for Those Levels of Degradation Where No Condition Currently Exists to Preclude Entry Into LCO 3.0.3" and 6c, "Provide Specific Times in the LCO For Those Conditions That Require Entry Into LCO 3.0.3 Immediately." | The Topical Report and this Traveler implement Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force (RITSTF) Initiatives 6b, "Provide Conditions in the LC Os for Those Levels of Degradation Where No Condition Currently Exists to Preclude Entry Into LCO 3.0.3" and 6c, "Provide Specific Times in the LCO For Those Conditions That Require Entry Into LCO 3.0.3 Immediately." | ||
2.0 Proposed Change The Traveler revises the following Specifications in NUREG-1432 to preclude immediate entry into LCO 3.0.3: | |||
Change The Traveler revises the following Specifications in NUREG-1432 to preclude immediate entry into LCO 3.0.3: | |||
: 1. TS 3.4.9, Pressurizer, for the condition of the required pressurizer heaters inoperable, 2. TS 3.4.11, Pressurizer PORVs, for the condition of two inoperable PORVs that cannot be manually cycled, 3. TS 3.5.1, Safety Injection Tanks (SITs), for the condition of two or more SITs inoperable, 4. TS 3.5.2, Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) - Operating, for the conditions of two Low Pressure Safety Injection (LPSI) trains inoperable, 5. TS 3.6.6.A, Containment Spray and Cooling Systems, for the conditions of two containment spray trains inoperable and for two containment spray and two containment cooler trains inoperable, 6. TS 3.6.6.B, Containment Spray and Cooling Systems, for the condition of two containment spray and two containment cooler trains inoperable, 7. TS 3.6.8, Shield Building Exhaust Air Cleanup System (SPEACS), for the condition of two SBEACS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4, 8. TS 3.6.10, Iodine Cleanup System (ICS), for the condition of two ICS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4, 9. TS 3.7.11, Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup System (CREACS), for the condition of two CREACS trains inoperable in Modes 1, 2, 3, and 4, 10. TS 3.7.12, Control Room Emergency Air Temperature Control System (CREATCS), for the condition of two CREATCS trains inoperable in Modes 1, 2, 3, and 4, 11. TS 3.7.13, ECCS Penetration Room Exhaust Air Cleanup System (PREACS), for the condition of two ECCS PREACS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4, and TSTF-426, Rev. 1 12. TS 3.7.15, PREACS, for the condition of two PREACS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4. The Bases are modified to reflect the changes to the Specifications. | : 1. TS 3.4.9, Pressurizer, for the condition of the required pressurizer heaters inoperable, 2. TS 3.4.11, Pressurizer PORVs, for the condition of two inoperable PORVs that cannot be manually cycled, 3. TS 3.5.1, Safety Injection Tanks (SITs), for the condition of two or more SITs inoperable, 4. TS 3.5.2, Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) - Operating, for the conditions of two Low Pressure Safety Injection (LPSI) trains inoperable, 5. TS 3.6.6.A, Containment Spray and Cooling Systems, for the conditions of two containment spray trains inoperable and for two containment spray and two containment cooler trains inoperable, 6. TS 3.6.6.B, Containment Spray and Cooling Systems, for the condition of two containment spray and two containment cooler trains inoperable, 7. TS 3.6.8, Shield Building Exhaust Air Cleanup System (SPEACS), for the condition of two SBEACS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4, 8. TS 3.6.10, Iodine Cleanup System (ICS), for the condition of two ICS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4, 9. TS 3.7.11, Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup System (CREACS), for the condition of two CREACS trains inoperable in Modes 1, 2, 3, and 4, 10. TS 3.7.12, Control Room Emergency Air Temperature Control System (CREATCS), for the condition of two CREATCS trains inoperable in Modes 1, 2, 3, and 4, 11. TS 3.7.13, ECCS Penetration Room Exhaust Air Cleanup System (PREACS), for the condition of two ECCS PREACS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4, and TSTF-426, Rev. 1 12. TS 3.7.15, PREACS, for the condition of two PREACS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4. The Bases are modified to reflect the changes to the Specifications. | ||
| Line 278: | Line 277: | ||
The intent of the proposed modifications to the plant TS is to enhance overall plant safety by: | The intent of the proposed modifications to the plant TS is to enhance overall plant safety by: | ||
(a) Avoiding unnecessary plant shutdowns. | |||
(b) Minimizing plant transitions and associated transition and realignment risks. | |||
(c) Providing for increased flexibility in scheduling and performing maintenance and surveillance activities. | |||
(d) Providing explicit guidance where none currently exists. | |||
4.0 Technical Analysis Topical Report WCAP-16125 (Reference 1) provides a deta iled technical analysis of the justification for revising the TS Actions to allow continued operation for a finite period of time when system or function is unavailable. The justification considered both deterministic and risk-informed evaluations and compared the results to the relevant regulatory guidan ce. That justification will not be repeated here. | |||
Analysis Topical Report WCAP-16125 (Reference 1) provides a deta iled technical analysis of the justification for revising the TS Actions to allow continued operation for a finite period of time when system or function is unavailable. The justification considered both deterministic and risk-informed evaluations and compared the results to the relevant regulatory guidan ce. That justification will not be repeated here. | |||
In addition to proposing changes to the TS Actions to preclude entry into LCO 3.0.3, the Topical Report in some cases proposed changes to the TS "end states," i.e., the final Mode or other specified Condition specified in the Required Actions to which the plant must be brought if the LCO is not met. | In addition to proposing changes to the TS Actions to preclude entry into LCO 3.0.3, the Topical Report in some cases proposed changes to the TS "end states," i.e., the final Mode or other specified Condition specified in the Required Actions to which the plant must be brought if the LCO is not met. | ||
| Line 354: | Line 351: | ||
The Topical Report also justified a change in the end state from Mode 5 to Mode 4. | The Topical Report also justified a change in the end state from Mode 5 to Mode 4. | ||
The Bases are revised to reflect the changes to the TS. | The Bases are revised to reflect the changes to the TS. | ||
5.0 Regulatory Analysis 5.1 No Significant Hazards Consideration The TSTF has evaluated whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involved with the proposed generic change by focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92, "Issuance of amendment," as discussed below: | |||
TSTF-426, Rev. 1 | |||
Analysis 5.1 No Significant Hazards Consideration The TSTF has evaluated whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involved with the proposed generic change by focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92, "Issuance of amendment," as discussed below: | |||
TSTF-426, Rev. 1 | |||
: 1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated? | : 1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated? | ||
Response: No. | Response: No. | ||
| Line 365: | Line 360: | ||
conditions under which the existing Technical Specifications require a plant shutdown to begin within one hour in accordance with Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.0.3. Entering into Technical Specification Actions is not an initiator of any accident previously evaluated. As a result, the probability of an accident previously evaluated is not significantly increased. The consequences of any accident previously evaluated that may occur during the proposed Completion Times are no different from the consequences of the same accident during the existing one hour allowance. As a result, the consequences of any accident previously evaluated are not significantly increased. | conditions under which the existing Technical Specifications require a plant shutdown to begin within one hour in accordance with Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.0.3. Entering into Technical Specification Actions is not an initiator of any accident previously evaluated. As a result, the probability of an accident previously evaluated is not significantly increased. The consequences of any accident previously evaluated that may occur during the proposed Completion Times are no different from the consequences of the same accident during the existing one hour allowance. As a result, the consequences of any accident previously evaluated are not significantly increased. | ||
Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. | Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. | ||
: 2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated? | : 2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated? | ||
| Line 372: | Line 367: | ||
No new or different accidents result from utilizing the proposed change. The changes do not involve a physical alteration of the plant (i.e., no new or different type of equipment will be installed) or a change in the methods governing normal plant operation. In addition, the changes do not impose any new or different requirements. The changes do not alter assumptions made in the safety analysis. | No new or different accidents result from utilizing the proposed change. The changes do not involve a physical alteration of the plant (i.e., no new or different type of equipment will be installed) or a change in the methods governing normal plant operation. In addition, the changes do not impose any new or different requirements. The changes do not alter assumptions made in the safety analysis. | ||
Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated. | Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated. | ||
: 3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety? | : 3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety? | ||
| Line 383: | Line 378: | ||
Based on the above, the TSTF concludes that the proposed change presents no significant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), and, accordingly, a finding of "no significant hazards consideration" is justified. | Based on the above, the TSTF concludes that the proposed change presents no significant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), and, accordingly, a finding of "no significant hazards consideration" is justified. | ||
TSTF-426, Rev. 1 5.2 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria Regulatory requirements are not specific regarding the actions to be followed when Technical Specification requirements are not met. Therefore, the proposed change to the Technical Specification Actions do not affect regulatory requirements. In conclusion, based on the considerations discussed above, (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the approval of the proposed change will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public. | TSTF-426, Rev. 1 5.2 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria Regulatory requirements are not specific regarding the actions to be followed when Technical Specification requirements are not met. Therefore, the proposed change to the Technical Specification Actions do not affect regulatory requirements. In conclusion, based on the considerations discussed above, (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the approval of the proposed change will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public. | ||
6.0 Environmental Consideration A review has determined that the proposed change would change a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area, as defined in 10 CFR 20, or would change an inspection or surv eillance requirement. However, the proposed change does not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) a significan t change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released offsite, or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. Accordingly, the proposed change meets the eligibility criterion for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the proposed change. | |||
Consideration A review has determined that the proposed change would change a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area, as defined in 10 CFR 20, or would change an inspection or surv eillance requirement. However, the proposed change does not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) a significan t change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released offsite, or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. Accordingly, the proposed change meets the eligibility criterion for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the proposed change. | |||
7.0 References | |||
: 1. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | : 1. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | ||
Pressurizer 3.4.9 CEOG STS 3.4.9-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS) | Pressurizer 3.4.9 CEOG STS 3.4.9-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS) | ||
3.4.9 Pressurizer | |||
LCO 3.4.9 The pressurizer shall be OPERABLE with: | LCO 3.4.9 The pressurizer shall be OPERABLE with: | ||
: a. Pressurizer water level < [60]% and | : a. Pressurizer water level < [60]% and | ||
: b. [Two groups of] pressurizer heaters OPERABLE with the capacity [of each group] [150] kW [and capable of being powered from an emergency power supply]. | : b. [Two groups of] pressurizer heaters OPERABLE with the capacity [of each group] [150] kW [and capable of being powered from an emergency power supply]. | ||
| Line 411: | Line 404: | ||
6 hours | 6 hours | ||
[12] hours B. One [required] group of pressurizer heaters inoperable. | |||
B.1 Restore [required] group of pressurizer heaters to OPERABLE status. | B.1 Restore [required] group of pressurizer heaters to OPERABLE status. | ||
72 hours C. [Two] [required] groups of pressurizer heaters inoperable. | 72 hours C. [Two] [required] groups of pressurizer heaters inoperable. | ||
| Line 461: | Line 454: | ||
[12] hours | [12] hours | ||
SITs 3.5.1 CEOG STS 3.5.1-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 | SITs 3.5.1 CEOG STS 3.5.1-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.5 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS (ECCS) | ||
CORE COOLING SYSTEMS (ECCS) | |||
3.5.1 Safety Injection Tanks (SITs) | |||
Injection Tanks (SITs) | |||
LCO 3.5.1 [Four] SITs shall be OPERABLE. | LCO 3.5.1 [Four] SITs shall be OPERABLE. | ||
| Line 497: | Line 486: | ||
D.1 Enter LCO 3.0.3. Immediately | D.1 Enter LCO 3.0.3. Immediately | ||
ECCS - Operating 3.5.2 CEOG STS 3.5.2-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 | ECCS - Operating 3.5.2 CEOG STS 3.5.2-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.5 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS (ECCS) | ||
CORE COOLING SYSTEMS (ECCS) | |||
3.5.2 ECCS - Operating | 3.5.2 ECCS - Operating | ||
| Line 568: | Line 554: | ||
Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) 3.6.6A CEOG STS 3.6.6A-1 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS | Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) 3.6.6A CEOG STS 3.6.6A-1 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS | ||
3.6.6A Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) | 3.6.6A Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) | ||
(Credit taken for iodine removal by the Containment Spray System) | |||
LCO 3.6.6A Two containment spray trains and two containment cooling trains shall be OPERABLE. | LCO 3.6.6A Two containment spray trains and two containment cooling trains shall be OPERABLE. | ||
| Line 623: | Line 609: | ||
In accordance with the Inservice Testing Program | In accordance with the Inservice Testing Program | ||
SR 3.6.6A.6 Verify each automatic containment spray valve in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, actuates to the correct position on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | SR 3.6.6A.6 Verify each automatic containment spray valve in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, actuates to the correct position on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | ||
[18] months | |||
SR 3.6.6A.7 Verify each containment spray pump starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | SR 3.6.6A.7 Verify each containment spray pump starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | ||
[18] months | [18] months | ||
SR 3.6.6A.8 Verify each containment cooling train starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | SR 3.6.6A.8 Verify each containment cooling train starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | ||
[18] months | [18] months | ||
| Line 638: | Line 624: | ||
AND 10 years SBEACS (Dual) 3.6.8 CEOG STS 3.6.8-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS | AND 10 years SBEACS (Dual) 3.6.8 CEOG STS 3.6.8-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS | ||
3.6.8 Shield Building Exhaust Air Cleanup System (SBEACS) (Dual) | |||
Building Exhaust Air Cleanup System (SBEACS) (Dual) | |||
LCO 3.6.8 Two SBEACS trains shall be OPERABLE. | LCO 3.6.8 Two SBEACS trains shall be OPERABLE. | ||
| Line 658: | Line 643: | ||
31 days Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) 3.6.6B CEOG STS 3.6.6B-1 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS | 31 days Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) 3.6.6B CEOG STS 3.6.6B-1 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS | ||
3.6.6B Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) | 3.6.6B Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) | ||
(Credit not taken for iodine removal by the Containment Spray System) | |||
LCO 3.6.6B Two containment spray trains and two containment cooling trains shall be OPERABLE. | LCO 3.6.6B Two containment spray trains and two containment cooling trains shall be OPERABLE. | ||
| Line 718: | Line 703: | ||
In accordance with the Inservice Testing Program | In accordance with the Inservice Testing Program | ||
SR 3.6.6B.6 Verify each automatic containment spray valve in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, actuates to its correct position on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | SR 3.6.6B.6 Verify each automatic containment spray valve in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, actuates to its correct position on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | ||
[18] months | |||
SR 3.6.6B.7 Verify each containment spray pump starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | SR 3.6.6B.7 Verify each containment spray pump starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | ||
[18] months | [18] months | ||
SR 3.6.6B.8 Verify each containment cooling train starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | SR 3.6.6B.8 Verify each containment cooling train starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal. | ||
[18] months | [18] months | ||
| Line 735: | Line 720: | ||
3.6.10 Iodine Cleanup System (ICS) (Atmospheric and Dual) | 3.6.10 Iodine Cleanup System (ICS) (Atmospheric and Dual) | ||
LCO 3.6.10 | LCO 3.6.10 | ||
[Two] ICS trains shall be OPERABLE. | [Two] ICS trains shall be OPERABLE. | ||
| Line 811: | Line 796: | ||
protection mode. | protection mode. | ||
OR D.2 Suspend movement of | OR D.2 Suspend movement of | ||
[recently] irradiated fuel assemblies. | [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies. | ||
| Line 824: | Line 809: | ||
OR One or more CREACS trains inoperable due to | OR One or more CREACS trains inoperable due to | ||
E.1 Suspend movement of | E.1 Suspend movement of | ||
[recently] irradiated fuel assemblies. | [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies. | ||
| Line 863: | Line 848: | ||
met [in MODE 5 or 6, or] | met [in MODE 5 or 6, or] | ||
during movement of | during movement of | ||
[recently] irradiated fuel assemblies. | [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies. | ||
D C.1 Place OPERABLE CREATCS train in operation. | D C.1 Place OPERABLE CREATCS train in operation. | ||
OR D C.2 Suspend movement of | OR D C.2 Suspend movement of | ||
[recently] irradiated fuel assemblies. | [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies. | ||
Immediately | Immediately | ||
| Line 878: | Line 863: | ||
irradiated fuel assemblies. | irradiated fuel assemblies. | ||
E D.1 Suspend movement of | E D.1 Suspend movement of | ||
[recently] irradiated fuel assemblies. | [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies. | ||
| Line 967: | Line 952: | ||
The Surveillance is satisfied when the power supplies are demonstrated to be capable of producing the minimum power and the associated pressurizer heaters are verified to be at their design rating. (This may be | The Surveillance is satisfied when the power supplies are demonstrated to be capable of producing the minimum power and the associated pressurizer heaters are verified to be at their design rating. (This may be | ||
done by testing the power supply output and by performing an electrical check on heater element continuity and resistance.) The Frequency of | done by testing the power supply output and by performing an electrical check on heater element continuity and resistance.) The Frequency of | ||
[18] months is considered adequate to detect heater degradation and has been shown by operating experience to be acceptable. | [18] months is considered adequate to detect heater degradation and has been shown by operating experience to be acceptable. | ||
[ SR 3.4.9.3 | |||
This SR is not applicable if the heaters are permanently powered by 1E power supplies. | This SR is not applicable if the heaters are permanently powered by 1E power supplies. | ||
| Line 1,018: | Line 1,003: | ||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued) | SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued) | ||
The Note modifies this SR to allow entry into and operation in MODE 3 prior to performing the SR. This allows the test to be performed in MODE 3 under operating temperature and pressure conditions, prior to entering MODE 1 or 2. [In accordance with Reference 4, administrative controls require this test be performed in MODE 3 or 4 to adequately simulate operating temperature and pressure effects on PORV operation.] | The Note modifies this SR to allow entry into and operation in MODE 3 prior to performing the SR. This allows the test to be performed in MODE 3 under operating temperature and pressure conditions, prior to entering MODE 1 or 2. [In accordance with Reference 4, administrative controls require this test be performed in MODE 3 or 4 to adequately simulate operating temperature and pressure effects on PORV operation.] | ||
[ SR 3.4.11.3 | |||
Operating the solenoid air control valves and check valves on the air accumulators ensures the PORV control system actuates properly when called upon. The Frequency of [18] months is based on a typical refueling cycle and the Frequency of the other surveillances used to demonstrate PORV OPERABILITY. ] | Operating the solenoid air control valves and check valves on the air accumulators ensures the PORV control system actuates properly when called upon. The Frequency of [18] months is based on a typical refueling cycle and the Frequency of the other surveillances used to demonstrate PORV OPERABILITY. ] | ||
[ SR 3.4.11.4 This Surveillance is not required for plants with permanent 1E power supplies to the valves. The test demonstrates that emergency power can be provided and is performed by transferring power from the normal supply to the emergency supply and cycling the valves. The Frequency of [18] months is based on a typical refueling cycle and industry accepted practice. ] | |||
REFERENCES 1. NUREG-0737, Paragraph II, G.I, November 1980. | REFERENCES 1. NUREG-0737, Paragraph II, G.I, November 1980. | ||
: 2. Inspection and Enforcement (IE) Bulletin 79-05B, April 21, 1979. | : 2. Inspection and Enforcement (IE) Bulletin 79-05B, April 21, 1979. | ||
: 3. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | : 3. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | ||
| Line 1,042: | Line 1,027: | ||
SR 3.5.1.2 and SR 3.5.1.3 | SR 3.5.1.2 and SR 3.5.1.3 | ||
SITs B 3.5.1 CEOG STS B 3.5.1-10 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 | SITs B 3.5.1 CEOG STS B 3.5.1-10 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 | ||
: 7. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | : 7. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | ||
| Line 1,089: | Line 1,074: | ||
Periodic inspection of the containment sump ensures that it is unrestricted and stays in proper operating condition. The 18 month Frequency is based on the need to perform this Surveillance under the conditions that apply during an outage, on the need to have access to the location, and on the potential for unplanned transients if the Surveillance were performed with the reactor at power. This Frequency is sufficient to detect abnormal degradation and is confirmed by operating experience. | Periodic inspection of the containment sump ensures that it is unrestricted and stays in proper operating condition. The 18 month Frequency is based on the need to perform this Surveillance under the conditions that apply during an outage, on the need to have access to the location, and on the potential for unplanned transients if the Surveillance were performed with the reactor at power. This Frequency is sufficient to detect abnormal degradation and is confirmed by operating experience. | ||
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 35. | REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 35. | ||
: 2. 10 CFR 50.46. | : 2. 10 CFR 50.46. | ||
: 3. FSAR, Chapter [6]. | : 3. FSAR, Chapter [6]. | ||
: 4. NRC Memorandum to V. Stello, Jr., from R. L. Baer, "Recommended Interim Revisions to LCOs for ECCS Components," | : 4. NRC Memorandum to V. Stello, Jr., from R. L. Baer, "Recommended Interim Revisions to LCOs for ECCS Components," | ||
December 1, 1975. | December 1, 1975. | ||
: 5. IE Information Notice No. 87-01, January 6, 1987. | : 5. IE Information Notice No. 87-01, January 6, 1987. | ||
: 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | : 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | ||
| Line 1,148: | Line 1,133: | ||
Verifying a service water flow rate of [2000] gpm to each cooling unit provides assurance that the design flow rate assumed in the safety analyses will be achieved (Ref. 2). Also considered in selecting this Frequency were the known reliability of the Cooling Water System, the two train redundancy, and the low probability of a significant degradation of flow occurring between surveillances. | Verifying a service water flow rate of [2000] gpm to each cooling unit provides assurance that the design flow rate assumed in the safety analyses will be achieved (Ref. 2). Also considered in selecting this Frequency were the known reliability of the Cooling Water System, the two train redundancy, and the low probability of a significant degradation of flow occurring between surveillances. | ||
[ SR 3.6.6A.4 | |||
Verifying that the containment spray header piping is full of water to the | Verifying that the containment spray header piping is full of water to the | ||
[100] ft level minimizes the time required to fill the header. This ensures that spray flow will be admitted to the containment atmosphere within the time frame assumed in the containment analysis. The 31 day Frequency is based on the static nature of the fill header and the low probability of a significant degradation of water level in the piping occurring between surveillances. ] | [100] ft level minimizes the time required to fill the header. This ensures that spray flow will be admitted to the containment atmosphere within the time frame assumed in the containment analysis. The 31 day Frequency is based on the static nature of the fill header and the low probability of a significant degradation of water level in the piping occurring between surveillances. ] | ||
| Line 1,161: | Line 1,146: | ||
B 3.6.6A CEOG STS B 3.6.6A-12 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES | B 3.6.6A CEOG STS B 3.6.6A-12 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES | ||
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 38, GDC 39, GDC 40, GDC 41, GDC 42, and GDC 43. | REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 38, GDC 39, GDC 40, GDC 41, GDC 42, and GDC 43. | ||
: 2. FSAR, Section [ ]. | : 2. FSAR, Section [ ]. | ||
: 3. FSAR, Section [ ]. | : 3. FSAR, Section [ ]. | ||
: 4. FSAR, Section [ ]. | : 4. FSAR, Section [ ]. | ||
: 5. FSAR, Section [ ]. | : 5. FSAR, Section [ ]. | ||
: 6. CE NPSD-1045-A, "CEOG Joint Application Report for Modification to the Containment Spray System Technical Specifications," March 2000. | : 6. CE NPSD-1045-A, "CEOG Joint Application Report for Modification to the Containment Spray System Technical Specifications," March 2000. | ||
: 7. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | : 7. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | ||
8 7. ASME Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants. | 8 7. ASME Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants. | ||
| Line 1,215: | Line 1,200: | ||
Verifying a service water flow rate of [2000] gpm to each cooling unit provides assurance the design flow rate assumed in the safety analyses will be achieved (Ref. 2). Also considered in selecting this Frequency were the known reliability of the cooling water system, the two train redundancy, and the low probability of a significant degradation of flow occurring between surveillances. | Verifying a service water flow rate of [2000] gpm to each cooling unit provides assurance the design flow rate assumed in the safety analyses will be achieved (Ref. 2). Also considered in selecting this Frequency were the known reliability of the cooling water system, the two train redundancy, and the low probability of a significant degradation of flow occurring between surveillances. | ||
[ SR 3.6.6B.4 | |||
Verifying the containment spray header is full of water to the [100] ft level minimizes the time required to fill the header. This ensures that spray flow will be admitted to the containment atmosphere within the time frame assumed in the containment analysis. The 31 day Frequency is based on the static nature of the fill header and the low probability of a significant degradation of the water level in the piping occurring between surveillances. ] | Verifying the containment spray header is full of water to the [100] ft level minimizes the time required to fill the header. This ensures that spray flow will be admitted to the containment atmosphere within the time frame assumed in the containment analysis. The 31 day Frequency is based on the static nature of the fill header and the low probability of a significant degradation of the water level in the piping occurring between surveillances. ] | ||
| Line 1,223: | Line 1,208: | ||
B 3.6.6B CEOG STS B 3.6.6B-10 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES | B 3.6.6B CEOG STS B 3.6.6B-10 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES | ||
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 38, GDC 39, GDC 40, GDC 41, GDC 42, and GDC 43. | REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 38, GDC 39, GDC 40, GDC 41, GDC 42, and GDC 43. | ||
: 2. FSAR, Section [ ]. | : 2. FSAR, Section [ ]. | ||
: 3. FSAR, Sections [ ]. | : 3. FSAR, Sections [ ]. | ||
: 4. FSAR, Section [ ]. | : 4. FSAR, Section [ ]. | ||
: 5. FSAR, Section [ ]. | : 5. FSAR, Section [ ]. | ||
: 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | : 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | ||
| Line 1,260: | Line 1,245: | ||
with the Regulatory Guide 1.52 (Ref. | with the Regulatory Guide 1.52 (Ref. | ||
4 5) guidance. | 4 5) guidance. | ||
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 41. | REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 41. | ||
: 2. FSAR, Section [ ]. | : 2. FSAR, Section [ ]. | ||
: 3. FSAR, Section [ ]. | : 3. FSAR, Section [ ]. | ||
: 4. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | : 4. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | ||
5 4. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision [2]. | 5 4. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision [2]. | ||
| Line 1,269: | Line 1,254: | ||
B 3.6.10 CEOG STS B 3.6.10-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | B 3.6.10 CEOG STS B 3.6.10-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | ||
ACTIONS (continued) | ACTIONS (continued) | ||
: b. The fact that, even with no ICS train in operation, almost the same amount of iodine would be removed from the containment | : b. The fact that, even with no ICS train in operation, almost the same amount of iodine would be removed from the containment | ||
atmosphere through absorption by the Containment Spray System, and | atmosphere through absorption by the Containment Spray System, and | ||
: c. The fact that the Completion Time is adequate to make most repairs. | : c. The fact that the Completion Time is adequate to make most repairs. | ||
B.1 and B.2 If two ICS trains are inoperable, at least one ICS train must be returned to OPERABLE status within 24 hours. In addition, at least one train of containment spray must be verified to be OPERABLE within 1 hour. In the event of an accident, containment spray reduces the potential radioactive release from the containment, which reduces the consequences of the inoperable ICS trains. These Required Actions are not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable. The Completion Time is based on Reference 5 which demonstrated that the 24 hour Completion Time is acceptable based on the low frequency of the potential challenge and the small incremental risk associated with continued operation. | B.1 and B.2 If two ICS trains are inoperable, at least one ICS train must be returned to OPERABLE status within 24 hours. In addition, at least one train of containment spray must be verified to be OPERABLE within 1 hour. In the event of an accident, containment spray reduces the potential radioactive release from the containment, which reduces the consequences of the inoperable ICS trains. These Required Actions are not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable. The Completion Time is based on Reference 5 which demonstrated that the 24 hour Completion Time is acceptable based on the low frequency of the potential challenge and the small incremental risk associated with continued operation. | ||
| Line 1,289: | Line 1,274: | ||
Surveillance when performed at the [18] month Frequency. Therefore, the Frequency was concluded to be acceptable from a reliability standpoint. Furthermore, the Frequency was developed considering that the system equipment OPERABILITY is demonstrated on a 31 day Frequency by SR 3.6.10.1. | Surveillance when performed at the [18] month Frequency. Therefore, the Frequency was concluded to be acceptable from a reliability standpoint. Furthermore, the Frequency was developed considering that the system equipment OPERABILITY is demonstrated on a 31 day Frequency by SR 3.6.10.1. | ||
[ SR 3.6.10.4 The ICS filter bypass dampers are tested to verify OPERABILITY. The dampers are in the bypass position during normal operation and must reposition for accident operation to draw air through the filters. The | |||
[18] month Frequency is considered to be acceptable based on the damper reliability and design, the mild environmental conditions in the vicinity of the dampers, and the fact that operating experience has shown that the dampers usually pass the Surveillance when performed at the | [18] month Frequency is considered to be acceptable based on the damper reliability and design, the mild environmental conditions in the vicinity of the dampers, and the fact that operating experience has shown that the dampers usually pass the Surveillance when performed at the | ||
[18] month Frequency. ] | [18] month Frequency. ] | ||
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 41, GDC 42, and GDC 43. | REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 41, GDC 42, and GDC 43. | ||
: 2. FSAR, Section [ ]. | : 2. FSAR, Section [ ]. | ||
: 3. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision [2]. | : 3. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision [2]. | ||
: 4. FSAR, Section [ ]. | : 4. FSAR, Section [ ]. | ||
: 5. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | : 5. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | ||
| Line 1,311: | Line 1,296: | ||
Condition B. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Condition B. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
If the control room boundary is inoperable in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4, the CREACS trains cannot perform their intended functions. Actions must be taken to restore an OPERABLE control room boundary within 24 hours. During the period that the control room boundary is inoperable, appropriate compensatory measures (consistent with the intent of GDC | If the control room boundary is inoperable in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4, the CREACS trains cannot perform their intended functions. Actions must be taken to restore an OPERABLE control room boundary within 24 hours. During the period that the control room boundary is inoperable, appropriate compensatory measures (consistent with the intent of GDC | ||
: 19) should be utilized to protect control room operators from potential hazards such as radioactive contamination, toxic chemicals, smoke, temperature and relative humidity, and physical security. Preplanned measures should be available to address these concerns for intentional and unintentional entry into the condition. The 24 hour Completion Time is reasonable based on the low probability of a DBA occurring during this time period, and the use of compensatory measures. The 24 hour Completion Time is a typically reasonable time to diagnose, plan and possibly repair, and test most problems with the control room boundary. | : 19) should be utilized to protect control room operators from potential hazards such as radioactive contamination, toxic chemicals, smoke, temperature and relative humidity, and physical security. Preplanned measures should be available to address these concerns for intentional and unintentional entry into the condition. The 24 hour Completion Time is reasonable based on the low probability of a DBA occurring during this time period, and the use of compensatory measures. The 24 hour Completion Time is a typically reasonable time to diagnose, plan and possibly repair, and test most problems with the control room boundary. | ||
| Line 1,359: | Line 1,344: | ||
CREACS B 3.7.11 CEOG STS B 3.7.11-8 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | CREACS B 3.7.11 CEOG STS B 3.7.11-8 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | ||
REFERENCES 1. FSAR, Section [9.4]. | REFERENCES 1. FSAR, Section [9.4]. | ||
: 2. FSAR, Chapter [15]. | : 2. FSAR, Chapter [15]. | ||
: 3. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | : 3. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | ||
4 3. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Rev. [2]. | 4 3. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Rev. [2]. | ||
| Line 1,375: | Line 1,360: | ||
CB.1 and CB.2 In MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4, when one or more CREATCS trains Required A ction A.1 cannot be completed restored to OPERABLE status within the required Completion Time, the unit must be placed in a MODE that minimizes the accident risk. To achieve this status, the unit must be placed in at least MODE 3 within 6 hours, and in MODE 5 within 36 hours. The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required unit conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging unit systems. | CB.1 and CB.2 In MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4, when one or more CREATCS trains Required A ction A.1 cannot be completed restored to OPERABLE status within the required Completion Time, the unit must be placed in a MODE that minimizes the accident risk. To achieve this status, the unit must be placed in at least MODE 3 within 6 hours, and in MODE 5 within 36 hours. The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required unit conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging unit systems. | ||
CREATCS B 3.7.12 CEOG STS B 3.7.12-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 | CREATCS B 3.7.12 CEOG STS B 3.7.12-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 | ||
[ DC.1 and DC.2 In MODE 5 or 6, or during movement of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies, when Required Action A.1 cannot be completed within the required Completion Time, the OPERABLE CREATCS train must be placed in operation immediately. This action ensures that the remaining train is OPERABLE, that no failures preventing automatic actuation will occur, and that any active failure will be readily detected. | |||
An alternative to Required Action D C.1 is to immediately suspend activities that could result in a release of radioactivity that might require isolation of the control room. This places the unit in a condition that minimizes the accident risk. This does not preclude the movement of fuel assemblies to a safe position. ] | An alternative to Required Action D C.1 is to immediately suspend activities that could result in a release of radioactivity that might require isolation of the control room. This places the unit in a condition that minimizes the accident risk. This does not preclude the movement of fuel assemblies to a safe position. ] | ||
| Line 1,382: | Line 1,367: | ||
CREATCS B 3.7.12 CEOG STS B 3.7.12-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | CREATCS B 3.7.12 CEOG STS B 3.7.12-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | ||
ACTIONS (continued) | ACTIONS (continued) | ||
[ ED.1 In [MODE 5 or 6, or] during movement of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies, with two CREATCS trains inoperable, action must be taken immediately to suspend activities that could result in a release of radioactivity that might require isolation of the control room. This places the unit in a condition that minimizes the accident risk. This does not preclude the movement of fuel to a safe position. ] | |||
E.1 If both CREATCS trains are inoperable in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4, the CREATCS may not be capable of performing the intended function and the unit is in a condition outside the accident analysis. Therefore, LCO 3.0.3 must be entered immediately. | E.1 If both CREATCS trains are inoperable in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4, the CREATCS may not be capable of performing the intended function and the unit is in a condition outside the accident analysis. Therefore, LCO 3.0.3 must be entered immediately. | ||
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.7.12.1 REQUIREMENTS This SR verifies that the heat removal capability of the system is sufficient to meet design requirements. This SR consists of a combination of testing and calculations. An [18] month Frequency is appropriate, since significant degradation of the CREATCS is slow and is not expected over this time period. | SURVEILLANCE SR 3.7.12.1 REQUIREMENTS This SR verifies that the heat removal capability of the system is sufficient to meet design requirements. This SR consists of a combination of testing and calculations. An [18] month Frequency is appropriate, since significant degradation of the CREATCS is slow and is not expected over this time period. | ||
| Line 1,411: | Line 1,396: | ||
SR 3.7.13.2 | SR 3.7.13.2 | ||
This SR verifies that the required ECCS PREACS testing is performed in accordance with the [Ventilation Filter Testing Program (VFTP)]. The | This SR verifies that the required ECCS PREACS testing is performed in accordance with the [Ventilation Filter Testing Program (VFTP)]. The | ||
[VFTP] includes testing HEPA filter performance, charcoal adsorber efficiency, minimum system flow rate, and the physical properties of the activated charcoal (general use and following specific operations). Specific test frequencies and additional information are discussed in detail in the [VFTP]. | [VFTP] includes testing HEPA filter performance, charcoal adsorber efficiency, minimum system flow rate, and the physical properties of the activated charcoal (general use and following specific operations). Specific test frequencies and additional information are discussed in detail in the [VFTP]. | ||
| Line 1,418: | Line 1,403: | ||
SR 3.7.13.4 | SR 3.7.13.4 | ||
This SR verifies the integrity of the ECCS pump room enclosure. The ability of the ECCS pump room to maintain a negative pressure, with respect to potentially uncontaminated adjacent areas, is periodically tested to verify proper function of the ECCS PREACS. During the post accident mode of operation, the ECCS PREACS is designed to maintain a slight negative pressure in the ECCS pump room with respect to adjacent areas to prevent unfiltered LEAKAGE. The ECCS PREACS is designed to maintain this negative pressure at a flow rate of [20,000] cfm from the ECCS pump room. The Frequency of | This SR verifies the integrity of the ECCS pump room enclosure. The ability of the ECCS pump room to maintain a negative pressure, with respect to potentially uncontaminated adjacent areas, is periodically tested to verify proper function of the ECCS PREACS. During the post accident mode of operation, the ECCS PREACS is designed to maintain a slight negative pressure in the ECCS pump room with respect to adjacent areas to prevent unfiltered LEAKAGE. The ECCS PREACS is designed to maintain this negative pressure at a flow rate of [20,000] cfm from the ECCS pump room. The Frequency of | ||
[18] months is consistent with the guidance provided in the NUREG-0800, Section 6.5.1 (Ref. | [18] months is consistent with the guidance provided in the NUREG-0800, Section 6.5.1 (Ref. | ||
7 6). This test is conducted with the tests for filter penetration; thus, an [18] month Frequency, on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS is consistent with other filtration SRs. | 7 6). This test is conducted with the tests for filter penetration; thus, an [18] month Frequency, on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS is consistent with other filtration SRs. | ||
[ SR 3.7.13.5 Operating the ECCS PREACS filter bypass damper is necessary to ensure that the system functions properly. The OPERABILITY of the bypass damper is verified if it can be closed. An [18] month Frequency is consistent with that specified in Reference 4. ] | |||
ECCS PREACS B 3.7.13 CEOG STS B 3.7.13-7 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | ECCS PREACS B 3.7.13 CEOG STS B 3.7.13-7 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | ||
REFERENCES 1. FSAR, Section [6.5.1]. | REFERENCES 1. FSAR, Section [6.5.1]. | ||
: 2. FSAR, Section [9.4.5]. | : 2. FSAR, Section [9.4.5]. | ||
: 3. FSAR, Section [15.6.5]. | : 3. FSAR, Section [15.6.5]. | ||
: 4. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Rev. [2]. | : 4. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Rev. [2]. | ||
: 5. 10 CFR 100.11. | : 5. 10 CFR 100.11. | ||
: 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | : 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | ||
| Line 1,446: | Line 1,431: | ||
PREACS B 3.7.15 CEOG STS B 3.7.15-6 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | PREACS B 3.7.15 CEOG STS B 3.7.15-6 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | ||
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued) | SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued) | ||
[ SR 3.7.15.4 | |||
This SR verifies the integrity of the penetration room enclosure. The ability of the penetration room to maintain negative pressure, with respect | This SR verifies the integrity of the penetration room enclosure. The ability of the penetration room to maintain negative pressure, with respect | ||
to potentially uncontaminated adjacent areas, is periodically tested to verify proper function of the PREACS. During the post accident mode of operation, PREACS is designed to maintain a slightly negative pressure at a flow rate of [3000] cfm in the penetration room with respect to adjacent areas to prevent unfiltered LEAKAGE. The Frequency of | to potentially uncontaminated adjacent areas, is periodically tested to verify proper function of the PREACS. During the post accident mode of operation, PREACS is designed to maintain a slightly negative pressure at a flow rate of [3000] cfm in the penetration room with respect to adjacent areas to prevent unfiltered LEAKAGE. The Frequency of | ||
[18] months is consistent with the guidance provided in NUREG-0800, Section 6.5.1 (Ref. | [18] months is consistent with the guidance provided in NUREG-0800, Section 6.5.1 (Ref. | ||
7 6). ] [ The minimum system flow rate maintains a slight negative pressure in the penetration room area and provides sufficient air velocity to transport particulate contaminants, assuming only one filter train is operating. | 7 6). ] [ The minimum system flow rate maintains a slight negative pressure in the penetration room area and provides sufficient air velocity to transport particulate contaminants, assuming only one filter train is operating. | ||
| Line 1,464: | Line 1,449: | ||
This test is conducted with the tests for filter penetration; thus, an [18] month Frequency on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS consistent with other filtration SRs. ] | This test is conducted with the tests for filter penetration; thus, an [18] month Frequency on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS consistent with other filtration SRs. ] | ||
[ SR 3.7.15.5 Operating the PREACS filter bypass damper is necessary to ensure that the system functions properly. The OPERABILITY of the PREACS filter bypass damper is verified if it can be closed. An [18] month Frequency is consistent with that specified in Reference 4. ] | |||
PREACS B 3.7.15 CEOG STS B 3.7.15-7 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | PREACS B 3.7.15 CEOG STS B 3.7.15-7 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES | ||
REFERENCES 1. FSAR, Section [6.5.1]. | REFERENCES 1. FSAR, Section [6.5.1]. | ||
: 2. FSAR, Section [9.4.5]. | : 2. FSAR, Section [9.4.5]. | ||
: 3. FSAR, Section [15.6.5]. | : 3. FSAR, Section [15.6.5]. | ||
: 4. Regulatory Guide 1.52 Rev. [2]. | : 4. Regulatory Guide 1.52 Rev. [2]. | ||
: 5. 10 CFR 100.11. | : 5. 10 CFR 100.11. | ||
: 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | : 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007. | ||
7 6. NUREG-0800, Section 6.5.1.}} | 7 6. NUREG-0800, Section 6.5.1.}} | ||
Revision as of 09:36, 12 July 2019
| ML082180283 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Technical Specifications Task Force |
| Issue date: | 08/05/2008 |
| From: | David Bice, Gambrell R, Joseph Messina, Yates B BWR Owners Group, PWR Owners Group, Technical Specifications Task Force |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| TSTF-08-13, TSTF-426, Rev 1 | |
| Download: ML082180283 (81) | |
Text
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TASK FORCE A JOINT OWNERS GROUP ACTIVIT Y TSTF August 5, 2008 TSTF-08-13 PROJ0753
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk
Washington, DC 20555-0001
SUBJECT:
TSTF-426, Revision 1, "R evise or Add Actions to Pr eclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3 -
RITSTF Initiatives 6b & 6c"
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed for NRC review is Revision 1 of TSTF-426, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3 - RITSTF Initiatives 6b & 6c."
TSTF-426, Revision 0 was submitted to the NRC on August 30, 2004 (ADAMS Accession No. ML052990318). On November 13, 2004, the NRC provided an RAI on the TSTF to which the
TSTF responded on April 27, 2005. The Notice for Comment on TSTF-426, Revision 0, was published in the Federal Register on July 20, 2006 and the TSTF provided comments on August 21, 2006. In a public meeting held on January 18, 2007 between the NRC and the TSTF, it was
agreed that, based on comments received, TSTF-426 should be revised to resolve differences
between the Traveler and Re vision 0 of WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specificat ions for Conditions Leading to Exigent plant Shutdown." WCAP-16125-NP, Revision 1, was submitted to the NRC on January 7, 2008.
Revision 1 of TSTF-426 is consis tent with the Topical Report.
Revision 0 of TSTF-426 was not a ssessed NRC review fees. We request that NRC review of the
Revision 1 of TSTF-426 also be granted a fee waiver pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 170.11. Specifically, the re quest is to support NRC generic regulatory improvements (risk management technical specifications), in accordance with 10 CFR 170.11(a)(1)(iii). This request is consistent with the NRC letter to A. R. Pietrangelo on this subject dated January 10, 2003.
The TSTF requests that the Traveler be made available under the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process.
11921 Rockville Pike, Suite 100, Rockville, MD 20852 Phone: 301-984-4400, Fax: 301-984-7600 Email: tstf@excelservices.com Administered by EXCEL Services Corporation
TSTF 08-13 August 5, 2008 Page 2 Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Bert Yates (PWROG/W) John Messina (BWROG)
David Bice (PWROG/CE) Reene' Gambrell (PWROG/B&W)
Enclosure
cc: Robert Elliott, Technical Specifications Branch, NRC Matthew Hamm, Technical Sp ecifications Branch, NRC TSTF-426, Rev. 1CEOG-165, Rev. 0NUREGs Affected:Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3 - RITSTF Initiatives 6b & 6cTechnical Specification Task Force Improved Standard Technical Specifications Change Traveler14301431143214331434Classification1) Technical ChangeRecommended for CLIIP?:Industry Contact:Dana Millar, (601) 368-5445, DMILLAR@entergy.comYesCorrection or Improvement:Im provementNRC Fee Status:ExemptBenefit: Avoids a Plant Shutdown See attached.Revision HistoryOG Revision 0Revision Status:ClosedOriginal issue.Revision Descri ption:Revision Proposed by:CEOGOwners Group Review InformationDate Originated by OG:30-May-04Owners Group Comments(No Comments)Date:01-Jun-04Owners Group Resolution:ApprovedTSTF Review InformationTSTF Received Date:01-Jun-04Date Distributed for Review25-Jun-04TSTF Comments:(No Comments)Date:26-Aug-04TSTF Resolution:ApprovedOG Review Completed:BWOG CEOGWOG BWROGNRC Review InformationNRC Received Date:30-Aug-04Notice for Comment issued on 7/20/06. TSTF provided comments on 8/31/06.On 11/13/06, the NRC requested revsions.NRC Comments:Date of NRC Letter:13-Nov-0605-Aug-08Traveler Rev. 3. Copyright (C) 2006, EXCEL Services Corporation. Use by EXCEL Services associates, utility clients, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is granted. All other use without written permission is prohibited.
TSTF-426, Rev. 1CEOG-165, Rev. 0 Affected Technical SpecificationsOG Revision 0Revision Status:Closed13-Nov-06NRC Requests Changes: TSTF Will ReviseFinal Resolution:Final Resolution Date:TSTF Revision 1Revision Status:ActiveNRC approved the Topical Report in July 2004NRC issued the Notice for Comment for TSTF-426 on July 20, 2006In November, 2006, the NRC stated that they want changes to the Traveler, Topical, or Implementation Guidance.PWROG withdrew the Topical Report.
In January 2008, the PWROG submitted a revised Topical Report.TSTF-426, Rev. 1 is a complete replacement of Rev. 0 to reflect the revised Topical Report.Revision Descri ption:Revision Proposed by:CEOGOwners Group Review InformationDate Originated by OG:06-Jun-08Owners Group Comments(No Comments)Date:28-Jun-08Owners Group Resolution:ApprovedTSTF Review InformationTSTF Received Date:29-Jun-08Date Distributed for Review29-Jun-08TSTF Comments:(No Comments)Date:02-Aug-08TSTF Resolution:ApprovedOG Review Completed:BWOG CEOGWOG BWROGNRC Review InformationNRC Received Date:05-Aug-08Ref. 3.4.9 Bases Relabeled DChange
Description:
PressurizerAction 3.4.9.CNew ActionChange
Description:
Pressurizer05-Aug-08Traveler Rev. 3. Copyright (C) 2006, EXCEL Services Corporation. Use by EXCEL Services associates, utility clients, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is granted. All other use without written permission is prohibited.
TSTF-426, Rev. 1CEOG-165, Rev. 0Action 3.4.9.C Relabeled DChange
Description:
PressurizerAction 3.4.9.C BasesNew ActionChange
Description:
PressurizerAction 3.4.9.C Bases Relabeled DChange
Description:
PressurizerRef. 3.4.11 BasesPressurizer PORVsAction 3.4.11.EPressurizer PORVsAction 3.4.11.E BasesPressurizer PORVsAction 3.4.11.FNew ActionChange
Description:
Pressurizer PORVsAction 3.4.11.F Relabeled GChange
Description:
Pressurizer PORVsAction 3.4.11.F BasesNew ActionChange
Description:
Pressurizer PORVsAction 3.4.11.F Bases Relabeled GChange
Description:
Pressurizer PORVsAction 3.4.11.G Relabeled HChange
Description:
Pressurizer PORVsAction 3.4.11.G Bases Relabeled HChange
Description:
Pressurizer PORVsSR 3.4.11.1 BasesPressurizer PORVsRef. 3.5.1 BasesSITsAction 3.5.1.CNew ActionChange
Description:
SITsAction 3.5.1.C Relabeled DChange
Description:
SITsAction 3.5.1.C Bases Relabeled DChange
Description:
SITsAction 3.5.1.C BasesNew ActionChange
Description:
SITsAction 3.5.1.D DeletedChange
Description:
SITsAction 3.5.1.D Bases DeletedChange
Description:
SITs05-Aug-08Traveler Rev. 3. Copyright (C) 2006, EXCEL Services Corporation. Use by EXCEL Services associates, utility clients, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is granted. All other use without written permission is prohibited.
TSTF-426, Rev. 1CEOG-165, Rev. 0Ref. 3.5.2 BasesECCS - OperatingAction 3.5.2.A BasesECCS - OperatingAction 3.5.2.BNew ActionChange
Description:
ECCS - OperatingAction 3.5.2.B Relabeled CChange
Description:
ECCS - OperatingAction 3.5.2.B BasesNew ActionChange
Description:
ECCS - OperatingAction 3.5.2.B Bases Relabeled CChange
Description:
ECCS - OperatingAction 3.5.2.C Relabeled DChange
Description:
ECCS - OperatingAction 3.5.2.C Bases Relabeled DChange
Description:
ECCS - OperatingAction 3.5.2.DECCS - OperatingAction 3.5.2.D BasesECCS - OperatingRef. 3.6.6A BasesContainment Spray and Cooling SystemsRef. 3.6.6B Bases DeletedChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.B DeletedChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.B Bases DeletedChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.CRenamed BChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.C NewChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.C BasesRenamed BChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.C Bases NewChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.DContainment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.D BasesContainment Spray and Cooling Systems05-Aug-08Traveler Rev. 3. Copyright (C) 2006, EXCEL Services Corporation. Use by EXCEL Services associates, utility clients, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is granted. All other use without written permission is prohibited.
TSTF-426, Rev. 1CEOG-165, Rev. 0Action 3.6.6B.F Relabeled GChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.F NewChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.F Relabeled GChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.F Bases NewChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.F Bases Relabeled GChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6B.F Bases Relabeled GChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.G DeletedChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6B.G DeletedChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6B.G Bases DeletedChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsAction 3.6.6A.G Bases DeletedChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsSR 3.6.6B.5 Bases DeletedChange
Description:
Containment Spray and Cooling SystemsSR 3.6.6A.5 BasesContainment Spray and Cooling SystemsRef. 3.6.8 BasesSBEACSAction 3.6.8.B Relabeled CChange
Description:
SBEACSAction 3.6.8.B NewChange
Description:
SBEACSAction 3.6.8.B Bases Relabeled CChange
Description:
SBEACSAction 3.6.8.B Bases NewChange
Description:
SBEACSSR 3.6.8.5 BasesSBEACSLCO 3.6.10ICSRef. 3.6.10 BasesICS05-Aug-08Traveler Rev. 3. Copyright (C) 2006, EXCEL Services Corporation. Use by EXCEL Services associates, utility clients, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is granted. All other use without written permission is prohibited.
TSTF-426, Rev. 1CEOG-165, Rev. 0Action 3.6.10.B Relabeled CChange
Description:
ICSAction 3.6.10.B NewChange
Description:
ICSAction 3.6.10.B Bases NewChange
Description:
ICSAction 3.6.10.B Bases Relabeled CChange
Description:
ICSRef. 3.7.11 BasesCREACSAction 3.7.11.C DeletedChange
Description:
CREACSAction 3.7.11.C Bases DeletedChange
Description:
CREACSAction 3.7.11.FCREACSAction 3.7.11.F BasesCREACSSR 3.7.11.3 BasesCREACSSR 3.7.11.4 BasesCREACSRef. 3.7.12 BasesCREATCSAction 3.7.12.B Relabeled CChange
Description:
CREATCSAction 3.7.12.B Bases Relabeled CChange
Description:
CREATCSAction 3.7.12.C Relabeled DChange
Description:
CREATCSAction 3.7.12.C Bases Relabeled DChange
Description:
CREATCSAction 3.7.12.D Relabeled EChange
Description:
CREATCSAction 3.7.12.D Bases Relabeled EChange
Description:
CREATCSAction 3.7.12.E Relabeled BChange
Description:
CREATCSAction 3.7.12.E Bases Relabeled BChange
Description:
CREATCS05-Aug-08Traveler Rev. 3. Copyright (C) 2006, EXCEL Services Corporation. Use by EXCEL Services associates, utility clients, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is granted. All other use without written permission is prohibited.
TSTF-426, Rev. 1CEOG-165, Rev. 0Ref. 3.7.13 BasesECCS PREACSAction 3.7.13.C NewChange
Description:
ECCS PREACSAction 3.7.13.CRelabled DChange
Description:
ECCS PREACSAction 3.7.13.C BasesRelabled DChange
Description:
ECCS PREACSAction 3.7.13.C Bases NewChange
Description:
ECCS PREACSSR 3.7.13.4 BasesECCS PREACSRef. 3.7.15 BasesPREACSAction 3.7.15.CNew ActionChange
Description:
PREACSAction 3.7.15.C Relabeled DChange
Description:
PREACSAction 3.7.15.C BasesNew ActionChange
Description:
PREACSAction 3.7.15.C Bases Relabeled DChange
Description:
PREACSSR 3.7.15.4 BasesPREACS05-Aug-08Traveler Rev. 3. Copyright (C) 2006, EXCEL Services Corporation. Use by EXCEL Services associates, utility clients, and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is granted. All other use without written permission is prohibited.
TSTF-426, Rev. 1 1.0 Description Topical Report WCAP-16125, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent plant Shutdown," (Ref. 1) justifies modifications to various Technical Specification (TS) Action Statements for conditions that result in a loss of safety function related to a system or component included within the scope of the plant TSs. It revises the current Required Actions from either a default or explicit LCO 3.0.3 entry to a risk-informed action based on the system's risk significance. In most instances, a Completion Time (CT) of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> is justified.
The Topical Report and this Traveler implement Risk Informed Technical Specification Task Force (RITSTF) Initiatives 6b, "Provide Conditions in the LC Os for Those Levels of Degradation Where No Condition Currently Exists to Preclude Entry Into LCO 3.0.3" and 6c, "Provide Specific Times in the LCO For Those Conditions That Require Entry Into LCO 3.0.3 Immediately."
2.0 Proposed Change The Traveler revises the following Specifications in NUREG-1432 to preclude immediate entry into LCO 3.0.3:
- 1. TS 3.4.9, Pressurizer, for the condition of the required pressurizer heaters inoperable, 2. TS 3.4.11, Pressurizer PORVs, for the condition of two inoperable PORVs that cannot be manually cycled, 3. TS 3.5.1, Safety Injection Tanks (SITs), for the condition of two or more SITs inoperable, 4. TS 3.5.2, Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) - Operating, for the conditions of two Low Pressure Safety Injection (LPSI) trains inoperable, 5. TS 3.6.6.A, Containment Spray and Cooling Systems, for the conditions of two containment spray trains inoperable and for two containment spray and two containment cooler trains inoperable, 6. TS 3.6.6.B, Containment Spray and Cooling Systems, for the condition of two containment spray and two containment cooler trains inoperable, 7. TS 3.6.8, Shield Building Exhaust Air Cleanup System (SPEACS), for the condition of two SBEACS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4, 8. TS 3.6.10, Iodine Cleanup System (ICS), for the condition of two ICS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4, 9. TS 3.7.11, Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup System (CREACS), for the condition of two CREACS trains inoperable in Modes 1, 2, 3, and 4, 10. TS 3.7.12, Control Room Emergency Air Temperature Control System (CREATCS), for the condition of two CREATCS trains inoperable in Modes 1, 2, 3, and 4, 11. TS 3.7.13, ECCS Penetration Room Exhaust Air Cleanup System (PREACS), for the condition of two ECCS PREACS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4, and TSTF-426, Rev. 1 12. TS 3.7.15, PREACS, for the condition of two PREACS trains inoperable. In addition, the end state is revised from Mode 5 to Mode 4. The Bases are modified to reflect the changes to the Specifications.
3.0 Background
In response to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC's) initiative to improve plant safety by developing risk-informed TSs, the Industry has undertaken a program for defining and obtaining risk-informed TS modifications. WCAP-16125 provides technical justification for the modification of various TSs to define and/or modify Actions to extend the time required to initiate a plant shutdown from 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> in accordance with LCO 3.0.3 to a risk-informed time varying from 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. In addition, the report proposes the modification of some of the TS Actions to allow a Mode 4 vice Mode 5 end state when the Required Actions and associated Completion Times cannot be met.
The intent of the proposed modifications to the plant TS is to enhance overall plant safety by:
(a) Avoiding unnecessary plant shutdowns.
(b) Minimizing plant transitions and associated transition and realignment risks.
(c) Providing for increased flexibility in scheduling and performing maintenance and surveillance activities.
(d) Providing explicit guidance where none currently exists.
4.0 Technical Analysis Topical Report WCAP-16125 (Reference 1) provides a deta iled technical analysis of the justification for revising the TS Actions to allow continued operation for a finite period of time when system or function is unavailable. The justification considered both deterministic and risk-informed evaluations and compared the results to the relevant regulatory guidan ce. That justification will not be repeated here.
In addition to proposing changes to the TS Actions to preclude entry into LCO 3.0.3, the Topical Report in some cases proposed changes to the TS "end states," i.e., the final Mode or other specified Condition specified in the Required Actions to which the plant must be brought if the LCO is not met.
The Topical Report proposes changes to plant TS on Boration Systems. This system does not appear in the Improved Standard Technical Specifications and, therefore, the proposed changes do not appear in this Traveler.
TS 3.4.9, Pressurizer TS 3.4.9 does not contain a Condition for all [required] groups of pressurizer heaters inoperable. As a result, this condition would require immediate entry in to LCO 3.0.3. A new Condition is being added for all [required] groups of pressurizer heaters inoperable which requires restoration of all but one pressurizer heater to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
TS 3.4.11, Pressurizer PORVs TS 3.4.11, Condition E, states that with two PORVs inoperable and not capable of being manually cycled, close and remove power from the associated block valves within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> and be in Mode 3 in 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and Mode 4 in [12] hours. Condition E is modified to add new Required Actions to verify that LCO 3.7.5, TSTF-426, Rev. 1 "Auxiliary Feedwater," is met within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> and to restore at least one PORV to OPERABLE status within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />. A new Condition F is added which applies if the Required Actions and associated Completion Times of Condition E are not met. Condition F requires being in Mode 3 in 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and Mode 4 in [12] hours. Condition F, now Condition G, is modified to allow 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> instead of 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> to restore one block valve to OPERABLE status when both block valves are inoperable. Subsequent Actions are renumbered.
The Topical Report refers to "PORVs that are not expected to be isolable following a demand." This is equivalent to the TS condition of "not capable of being manually cycled."
The Topical Report states that the changes to Condition E are not applicable to PORVs that are leaking, and that cannot be isolated by block valves, or to PORVs that are not expected to be isolable following a demand. As discussed in the Topical Report, the LCO Bases state that a leaking PORV is inoperable. Therefore, Actions B or E would apply. Both Actions require closing the associated block valve. If the block valve cannot be closed, an immediate plant shutdown is required. Therefore, the TS enforce the Topical Report conditions that in order to apply the revised Actions, a leaking PORV must be isolated by a block valve and that an inoperable PORV be isolable following a demand.
TS 3.5.1, Safety Injection Tanks (SITs)
TS 3.5.1, Condition D, states that with two or more SITs inoperable, enter LCO 3.0.3 immediately. The Conditions are modified to allow 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to restore all but one SIT to OPERABLE status provided that LCO 3.5.2, "ECCS - Operating," is verified to be met within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. The order of the Conditions is revised so that if the Required Actions and associated Completion Times of any Actions are not met, the plant must be in Mode 3 in 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and pressurizer pressure must be reduced to < [700] psia within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in order to exit the Applicability of the TS.
TS 3.5.2, Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) - Operating TS 3.5.2 requires two ECCS trains to be OPERABLE. The Bases define an ECCS train as a LPSI subsystem and a HPSI subsystem. The Topical Report justifies a new Condition B for two LPSI subsystems inoperable for up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> provided that it is verified that LCO 3.5.1, "Safety Injection Tanks" is met within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.
The existing Condition D, which applies when there is less than 100% of the ECCS flow equivalent to a single OPERABLE train and requires immediate entry into LCO 3.0.3, is revised to exclude the new Condition B for two LPSI subsystems inoperable.
The Bases are revised to reflect the changes to the TS. The order of two references is revised so that the references are numbered in order of appearance.
TS 3.6.6.A, Containment Spray and Cooling Systems NUREG-1432 contains two containment spray and cooling system TS - one for plants that credit containment sprays for iodine removal (3.6.6.A) and one that plants that do not (3.6.6.B).
Specification 3.6.6.A is revised to add a new Condition C for two Containment Spray trains inoperable with a Required Action to restore at least one train within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. A new Condition F is added to address two containment spray trains and two containment cooling trains inoperable with a Required Action to restore at least one train of containment spray or containment cooling within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
Conditions B and G are eliminated and Condition F (now G) are revised to provide a shutdown track for all other Conditions.
TSTF-426, Rev. 1 The Bases are revised to reflect the changes to the TS. The order of two references is revised so that the references are numbered in order of appearance.
TS 3.6.6.B, Containment Spray and Cooling Systems NUREG-1432 contains two containment spray and cooling system TS - one for plants that credit containment sprays for iodine removal (3.6.6.A) and one that plants that do not (3.6.6.B).
A new Condition F is added to address two containment spray trains and two cont ainment cooling trains inoperable with a Required Action to restore at least one train of containment spray or containment cooling within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
Condition G is eliminated and Condition F (now G) are revised to provide a shutdown track for all other Conditions.
The Bases are revised to reflect the changes to the TS. The order of two references is revised so that the references are numbered in order of appearance.
The Topical Report notes that the impact of loss of recirculation cooling provided by containment spray and cooling is mitigated by procedures to refill the RWST. Licensees have such procedures through implementation of Severe Accident Management Guidance and no additional action is necessary.
TS 3.6.8, Shield Building Exhaust Air Cleanup System (SBEACS)
A new Condition B is added which applies when two SBEACS trains are inoperable and allows 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to restore at least one SBEACS train to OPERABLE status.
Condition C, which applies when the Required Actions and associated Completion Times are not met, is modified to have a Mode 4 end state instead of a Mode 5 end state.
The Bases are revised to reflect the changes to the TS. The order of two references is revised so that the references are numbered in order of appearance.
TS 3.6.10, Iodine Cleanup System (ICS)
A new Condition B is added which applies when two ICS trains are inoperable and allows 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to restore at least one ICS train to OPERABLE status provided that it is verified within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> that at least one train of containment spray is Operable.
Condition C, which applies when the Required Actions and associated Completion Times are not met, is modified to have a Mode 4 end state instead of a Mode 5 end state.
An editorial change is made to the LCO. The LCO requires "[Two]" ICS trains to be OPERABLE. The brackets around "Two" are removed. The Bases describe a two train system and WCAP-16125 describes a two train system. It does not appear that the number of systems should be bracketed and removing the brackets allows addition of an unambiguous action for two trains inoperable.
The Bases are revised to reflect the changes to the TS.
TS 3.7.11, Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup System (CREACS)
TS 3.7.11, Condition F, applies when two CREACS trains are inoperable due to any reason other than an inoperable control room boundary in Modes 1, 2, 3, or 4 and requires entering LCO 3.0.3 immediately. The Topical Report justifies a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time for two CREACS trains inoperable for any reason provided that mitigating actions are implemented and it is verify that LCO 3.4.16, RCS Specific TSTF-426, Rev. 1 Activity," is met within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. Condition F is revised to require restoring one CREACS train to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and moves Condition F to Condition C. Existing Condition C, now Condition F, which requires entering Mode 3 in 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and Mode 5 in 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />, is modified to apply to the new Condition C.
The Bases are revised to reflect the changes to the TS. The Topical Report discusses the Required Action to take mitigating actions and states that the mitigating actions will be contained in administrative controls. This is consistent with the treatment of mitigating actions required by the current Condition B.
TS 3.7.12, Control Room Emergency Air Temperature Control System (CREATCS)
TS 3.7.1.2, Action E, applies when two CREATCS trains are inoperable in Mode 1, 2, 3, or 4 and requires entering LCO 3.0.3 immediately. The Topical Report justifies a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time for two CREATCS trains inoperable for any reason. Condition E is revised to require restoring one CREATCS train to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> and moves Condition E to Condition B. Existing Condition B, now Condition C, which requires entering Mode 3 in 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and Mode 5 in 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />, is modified to apply to the new Condition B.
The Bases are revised to reflect the changes to the TS. The Topical Report states that administrative guidance should be in place for alternate means of establishing temporary control room cooling, such as normal (i.e., non-safety) ventilation systems, opening cabinet doors, use of fans or ice vests, and opening CR doors or ventilation paths. These types of actions are already established at plants and no additional action is required. This Tier 3 recommendation is not discussed in the proposed Bases.
TS 3.7.13, ECCS Penetration Room Exhaust Air Cleanup System (PREACS)
The Topical Report justifies a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time when two ECCS PREACS trains are inoperable provided that at least one train of Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup System is verified to be Operable within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. A new Condition C is added. The subsequent Actions are renumbered.
The Topical Report also justified a change in the end state from Mode 5 to Mode 4.
The Bases are revised to reflect the changes to the TS. As noted in the Bases, the ECCS and pH control requirements can reduce radiological releases during severe accidents. Administrative guidance will be provided in the maintenance rule procedures to note the importance of LCO 3.5.2, "ECCS Operating" and LCO 3.5.5, "Trisodium" when in this ECCS PREACS condition.
TS 3.7.15, PREACS The Topical Report justifies a 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time when two PREACS trains are inoperable provided that at least one train of containment spray is verified to be Operable within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. A new Condition C is added. The subsequent Actions are renumbered.
The Topical Report also justified a change in the end state from Mode 5 to Mode 4.
The Bases are revised to reflect the changes to the TS.
5.0 Regulatory Analysis 5.1 No Significant Hazards Consideration The TSTF has evaluated whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involved with the proposed generic change by focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92, "Issuance of amendment," as discussed below:
TSTF-426, Rev. 1
- 1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed change provides a short Completion Time to restore an inoperable system for
conditions under which the existing Technical Specifications require a plant shutdown to begin within one hour in accordance with Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.0.3. Entering into Technical Specification Actions is not an initiator of any accident previously evaluated. As a result, the probability of an accident previously evaluated is not significantly increased. The consequences of any accident previously evaluated that may occur during the proposed Completion Times are no different from the consequences of the same accident during the existing one hour allowance. As a result, the consequences of any accident previously evaluated are not significantly increased.
Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
- 2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
No new or different accidents result from utilizing the proposed change. The changes do not involve a physical alteration of the plant (i.e., no new or different type of equipment will be installed) or a change in the methods governing normal plant operation. In addition, the changes do not impose any new or different requirements. The changes do not alter assumptions made in the safety analysis.
Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
- 3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?
Response: No.
The proposed change increase the time the plant may operate without the ability to perform an assumed safety function. The analyses in WCAP-16125, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent plant Shutdown," Revision 0, September 2003, demonstrated that there is an accep tably small increase in risk due to a limited period of continued operation in these conditions and that this risk is balanced by avoiding the risks associated with a plant shutdown. As a result, the change to the margin of safety provided by requiring a plant shutdown within one hour is not significant.
Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
Based on the above, the TSTF concludes that the proposed change presents no significant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), and, accordingly, a finding of "no significant hazards consideration" is justified.
TSTF-426, Rev. 1 5.2 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria Regulatory requirements are not specific regarding the actions to be followed when Technical Specification requirements are not met. Therefore, the proposed change to the Technical Specification Actions do not affect regulatory requirements. In conclusion, based on the considerations discussed above, (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the approval of the proposed change will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
6.0 Environmental Consideration A review has determined that the proposed change would change a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area, as defined in 10 CFR 20, or would change an inspection or surv eillance requirement. However, the proposed change does not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) a significan t change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released offsite, or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. Accordingly, the proposed change meets the eligibility criterion for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the proposed change.
7.0 References
- 1. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
Pressurizer 3.4.9 CEOG STS 3.4.9-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS)
3.4.9 Pressurizer
LCO 3.4.9 The pressurizer shall be OPERABLE with:
- a. Pressurizer water level < [60]% and
- b. [Two groups of] pressurizer heaters OPERABLE with the capacity [of each group] [150] kW [and capable of being powered from an emergency power supply].
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, and 3.
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME
A. Pressurizer water level not within limit.
A.1 Be in MODE 3 with reactor trip breakers open.
AND A.2 Be in MODE 4.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />
[12] hours B. One [required] group of pressurizer heaters inoperable.
B.1 Restore [required] group of pressurizer heaters to OPERABLE status.
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> C. [Two] [required] groups of pressurizer heaters inoperable.
C.1 Restore [at least one group of] [required] pressurizer heaters to OPERABLE status. 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> C D. Required Action and associated Completion
Time of Condition B or C not met. C D.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND C D.2 Be in MODE 4.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> [12] hours
Pressurizer PORVs 3.4.11 CEOG STS 3.4.11-2 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 ACTIONS (continued)
CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME
C.2 Restore block valve to OPERABLE status.
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> D. Required Action and associated Completion
Time of Condition A, B, or C not met.
D.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND D.2 Be in MODE 4.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />
[12] hours
E. Two PORVs inoperable and not capable of being manually cycled.
E.1 Close associated block valves.
AND E.2 Remove power from associated block valves.
AND E.3 Verify LCO 3.7.5, "Auxiliary Feedwater System," is met.
AND E.4 Restore at least one PORV to OPERABLE status.
E.3 Be in MODE
- 3. AND E.4 Be in MODE 4.
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 1 hour 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> [12] hours F. Required Actions and Associated Completion Times of Condition E not met. F.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND F.2 Be in MODE 4.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> [12] hours G F. Two block valves inoperable.
G F.1 Restore at least one block valve to OPERABLE status.
8 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> Pressurizer PORVs 3.4.11 CEOG STS 3.4.11-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04
H G. Required Action and associated Completion Time of Condition G F not met. H G.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND H G.2 Be in MODE 4.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />
[12] hours
SITs 3.5.1 CEOG STS 3.5.1-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.5 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS (ECCS)
3.5.1 Safety Injection Tanks (SITs)
LCO 3.5.1 [Four] SITs shall be OPERABLE.
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1 and 2, MODE 3 with pressurizer pressure [700] psia.
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME
A. One SIT inoperable due to boron concentration
not within limits.
OR One SIT inoperable due to the inability to verify
level or pressure.
A.1 Restore SIT to OPERABLE status.
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> B. One SIT inoperable for reasons other than
Condition A.
B.1 Restore SIT to OPERABLE status. 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> C. Two or more SITs inoperable.
Operating," is met.
AND C.2 Restore all but one SIT to OPERABLE status.
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> D C. Required Action and associated Completion
Time of Condition A or B not met. D C.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND D C.2 Reduce pressurizer pressure to < [700] psia.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> SITs 3.5.1 CEOG STS 3.5.1-2 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME D. Two or more SITs inoperable.
D.1 Enter LCO 3.0.3. Immediately
ECCS - Operating 3.5.2 CEOG STS 3.5.2-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.5 EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS (ECCS)
3.5.2 ECCS - Operating
LCO 3.5.2 Two ECCS trains shall be OPERABLE.
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1 and 2, MODE 3 with pressurizer pressure [1700] psia.
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME
REVIEWER'S NOTE-----
The adoption of this Condition is contingent upon implementation of a program to perform a contemporaneous assessment of the overall
impact on safety of
proposed plant configurations prior to performing and during
performance of maintenance activities that remove
equipment from service. --------------------------------------
A. One LPSI subsystem inoperable.
A.1 Restore LPSI subsystem to OPERABLE status.
7 days B. Two LPSI subsystems inoperable.
B.1 Verify LCO 3.5.1, "Safety Injection Tanks," is met.
AND B.2 Restore at least one LPSI subsystem to OPERABLE status. 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> B C. One or more ECCS trains inoperable for reasons other than
B C.1 Restore ECCS train(s) to OPERABLE status.
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> ECCS - Operating 3.5.2 CEOG STS 3.5.2-2 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME Condition A or B. C D. Required Action and associated Completion Time not met.
C D.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND C D.2 Reduce pressurizer pressure to < [1700] psia.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />
12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> ECCS - Operating 3.5.2 CEOG STS 3.5.2-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 ACTIONS (continued)
CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME D E. Less than 100% of the ECCS flow equivalent to
a single OPERABLE train available for reasons other than Condition B. D E.1 Enter LCO 3.0.3.
Immediately
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY
SR 3.5.2.1 [ Verify the following valves are in the listed position with power to the valve operator removed [and key locked in position].
Valve Number Position Function [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]
12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> ]
SR 3.5.2.2 Verify each ECCS manual, power operated, and automatic valve in the flow path, that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, is in the correct position.
31 days SR 3.5.2.3 [ Verify ECCS piping is full of water.
31 days ]
SR 3.5.2.4 Verify each ECCS pump's developed head at the test flow point is greater than or equal to the required developed head.
In accordance
with the Inservice Testing Program SR 3.5.2.5 [ Verify each charging pump develops a flow of [36] gpm at a discharge pressure of [2200] psig.
In accordance with the Inservice Testing Program ]
Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) 3.6.6A CEOG STS 3.6.6A-1 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
3.6.6A Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
(Credit taken for iodine removal by the Containment Spray System)
LCO 3.6.6A Two containment spray trains and two containment cooling trains shall be OPERABLE.
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, and [4].
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME
A. One containment spray train inoperable.
A.1 Restore containment spray train to OPERABLE status.
[7] days
B. Required Action and associated Completion Time of Condition A not met. B.1 Be in MODE 3. AND B.2 Be in MODE
- 5. 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> 84 hours9.722222e-4 days <br />0.0233 hours <br />1.388889e-4 weeks <br />3.1962e-5 months <br /> B C. One containment cooling train inoperable.
B C.1 Restore containment cooling train to OPERABLE status. 7 days C. Two containment spray trains inoperable.
C.1 Restore at least one containment spray train to OPERABLE status.
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> D. One containment spray train and one containment cooling train inoperable.
D.1 Restore containment spray train to OPERABLE status.
OR D.2 Restore containment cooling train to OPERABLE status.
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) 3.6.6A CEOG STS 3.6.6A-2 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 ACTIONS (continued)
CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME E. Two containment cooling trains inoperable.
E.1 Restore one containment cooling train to OPERABLE status.
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> F. Two containment spray trains and two containment cooling trains inoperable.
F.1 Restore at least one containment spray train to OPERABLE status.
OR F.2 Restore at least one containment cooling train to OPERABLE status.
12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> G F. Required Action and associated Completion Time of Condition C, D, or E not met. G F.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND G F.2 Be in MODE 5.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />
36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> G. Two containment spray trains inoperable.
OR Any combination of three or more trains inoperable.
G.1 Enter LCO 3.0.3. Immediately
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY
SR 3.6.6A.1 Verify each containment spray manual, power operated, and automatic valve in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position is in the correct position.
31 days Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) 3.6.6A CEOG STS 3.6.6A-4 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.6A.4 [ Verify the containment spray piping is full of water to the [100] ft level in the containment spray header.
31 days ]
SR 3.6.6A.5 Verify each containment spray pump's developed head at the flow test point is greater than or equal to the required developed head.
In accordance with the Inservice Testing Program
SR 3.6.6A.6 Verify each automatic containment spray valve in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, actuates to the correct position on an actual or simulated actuation signal.
[18] months
SR 3.6.6A.7 Verify each containment spray pump starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal.
[18] months
SR 3.6.6A.8 Verify each containment cooling train starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal.
[18] months
SR 3.6.6A.9 Verify each spray nozzle is unobstructed.
[ At first refueling ]
AND 10 years SBEACS (Dual) 3.6.8 CEOG STS 3.6.8-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
3.6.8 Shield Building Exhaust Air Cleanup System (SBEACS) (Dual)
LCO 3.6.8 Two SBEACS trains shall be OPERABLE.
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. One SBEACS train inoperable.
A.1 Restore train to OPERABLE status.
7 days B. Two SBEACS trains inoperable.
B.1 Verify at least one train of containment spray is OPERABLE. AND B.2 Restore at least one SBEACS train to OPERABLE status.
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> C B. Required Action and Associated Completion Time not met.
C B.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND C B.2 Be in MODE 5 4. 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> 12 3 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.8.1 Operate each SBEACS train for [ 10 continuous hours with the heaters operating or (for systems
without heaters) 15 minutes].
31 days Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) 3.6.6B CEOG STS 3.6.6B-1 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
3.6.6B Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
(Credit not taken for iodine removal by the Containment Spray System)
LCO 3.6.6B Two containment spray trains and two containment cooling trains shall be OPERABLE.
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, and [4].
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME
A. One containment spray train inoperable.
A.1 Restore containment spray train to OPERABLE status.
7 days
B. One containment cooling train inoperable.
B.1 Restore containment cooling train to OPERABLE status.
7 days C. Two containment spray trains inoperable.
C.1 Restore at least one containment spray train to OPERABLE status.
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> D. One containment spray train and one
containment cooling train inoperable.
D.1 Restore containment spray train to OPERABLE status.
OR D.2 Restore containment cooling train to OPERABLE status.
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) 3.6.6B CEOG STS 3.6.6B-2 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 ACTIONS (continued)
CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME E. Two containment cooling trains inoperable.
E.1 Restore one containment cooling train to OPERABLE status.
72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> F. Two containment spray trains and two containment cooling trains inoperable.
F.1 Restore at least one containment spray train to OPERABLE status.
OR F.2 Restore at least one containment cooling train to OPERABLE status.
12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> G F. Required Action and associated Completion Time of Condition A, B, C, D, or E not met. G F.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND G F.2 Be in MODE 5.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />
36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> G. Any combination of three or more trains inoperable.
G.1 Enter LCO 3.0.3. Immediately
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.6B.1 Verify each containment spray manual, power operated, and automatic valve in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position is in the correct position.
31 days SR 3.6.6B.2 Operate each containment cooling train fan unit for 15 minutes.
31 days SR 3.6.6B.3 Verify each containment cooling train cooling water
31 days Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual) 3.6.6B CEOG STS 3.6.6B-4 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.6B.4 [ Verify the containment spray piping is full of water to the [100] ft level in the containment spray header.
31 days ]
SR 3.6.6B.5 Verify each containment spray pump's developed head at the flow test point is greater than or equal to the required developed head.
In accordance with the Inservice Testing Program
SR 3.6.6B.6 Verify each automatic containment spray valve in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, actuates to its correct position on an actual or simulated actuation signal.
[18] months
SR 3.6.6B.7 Verify each containment spray pump starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal.
[18] months
SR 3.6.6B.8 Verify each containment cooling train starts automatically on an actual or simulated actuation signal.
[18] months
SR 3.6.6B.9 Verify each spray nozzle is unobstructed.
[ At first refueling ]
AND 10 years ICS (Atmospheric and Dual) 3.6.10 CEOG STS 3.6.10-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS
3.6.10 Iodine Cleanup System (ICS) (Atmospheric and Dual)
[Two] ICS trains shall be OPERABLE.
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. One ICS train inoperable.
A.1 Restore ICS train to OPERABLE status.
7 days B. Two ICS trains inoperable.
B.1 Verify at least one train of containment spray is OPERABLE. AND B.2 Restore at least one ICS train to OPERABLE status.
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> C B. Required Action and associated Completion Time not met.
C B.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND C B.2 Be in MODE 5 4.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />
3 6 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.10.1 Operate each ICS train for [ 10 continuous hours with heaters operating or (for systems without
heaters) 15 minutes].
31 days SR 3.6.10.2 Perform required ICS filter testing in accordance
In accordance CREACS 3.7.11 CEOG STS 3.7.11-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.7 PLANT SYSTEMS
3.7.11 Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup System (CREACS)
LCO 3.7.11 Two CREACS trains shall be OPERABLE.
NOTE--------------------------------------------
The control room envelope (CRE) boundary may be opened intermittently under administrative control. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, [5, and 6,]
During movement of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies.
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. One CREACS train inoperable for reasons other than Condition B.
A.1 Restore CREACS train to OPERABLE status.
7 days B. One or more CREACS trains inoperable due to inoperable CRE boundary in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4.
B.1 Initiate action to implement mitigating actions.
AND B.2 Verify mitigating actions ensure CRE occupant exposures to radiological, chemical, and smoke hazards will not exceed limits.
AND B.3 Restore CRE boundary to OPERABLE status.
Immediately
24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />
90 days C. Required Action and associated Completion Time of Condition A or B not met in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4. C.1 Be in MODE
- 3. AND C.2 Be in MODE
- 5. 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> CREACS 3.7.11 CEOG STS 3.7.11-2 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 ACTIONS (continued)
CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME C. Two CREACS trains inoperable in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4 for reasons other than Condition B.
C.1 Initiate action to implement mitigating actions.
AND C.2 Verify LCO 3.4.16, "RCS Specific Activity," is met.
AND C.3 Restore at least one CREACS train to OPERABLE status.
Immediately 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> D. Required Action and associated Completion
Time of Condition A not
met [in MODE 5 or 6, or]
during movement of
[recently] irradiated fuel assemblies.
D.1 ---------------NOTE-------------- Place in toxic gas protection mode if automatic transfer to toxic
gas protection mode is inoperable. -------------------------------------
Place OPERABLE CREACS train in
emergency radiation
protection mode.
OR D.2 Suspend movement of
[recently] irradiated fuel assemblies.
Immediately
Immediately
E. Two CREACS trains inoperable [in MODE 5
or 6, or] during movement of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies.
OR One or more CREACS trains inoperable due to
E.1 Suspend movement of
[recently] irradiated fuel assemblies.
Immediately CREACS 3.7.11 CEOG STS 3.7.11-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 an inoperable CRE
boundary [in MODE 5 or 6, or] during movement
of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies.
F. Two CREACS trains inoperable in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4 for reasons other than Condition B.
F.1 Enter LCO 3.0.3. Immediately F. Required Action and associated Completion Time of Condition A, B, or C not met in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4.
F.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND F.2 Be in MODE 5.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.7.11.1 Operate each CREACS train for [ 10 continuous hours with heaters operating or (for systems without
heaters) 15 minutes].
31 days
CREATCS 3.7.12 CEOG STS 3.7.12-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.7 PLANT SYSTEMS
3.7.12 Control Room Emergency Air Temperature Control System (CREATCS)
LCO 3.7.12 Two CREATCS trains shall be OPERABLE.
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, [5, and 6,]
During movement of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies.
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. One CREATCS train inoperable.
A.1 Restore CREATCS train to OPERABLE status.
30 days B. Two CREATCS trains inoperable in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4.
B.1 Restore at least one CREATCS train to OPERABLE status.
24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> C B. Required Action and associated Completion
Time of Condition A or B not met in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4. C B.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND C B.2 Be in MODE 5.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br /> D C. Required Action and associated Completion Time of Condition A not
met [in MODE 5 or 6, or]
during movement of
[recently] irradiated fuel assemblies.
D C.1 Place OPERABLE CREATCS train in operation.
OR D C.2 Suspend movement of
[recently] irradiated fuel assemblies.
Immediately
Immediately
E D. Two CREATCS trains inoperable [in MODE 5
or 6, or] during movement of [recently]
irradiated fuel assemblies.
E D.1 Suspend movement of
[recently] irradiated fuel assemblies.
Immediately CREATCS 3.7.12 CEOG STS 3.7.12-2 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 ACTIONS (continued)
CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME E. Two CREATCS trains inoperable in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4. E.1 Enter LCO 3.0.3. Immediately
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY
SR 3.7.12.1 Verify each CREATCS train has the capability to remove the assumed heat load.
[18] months
ECCS PREACS 3.7.13 CEOG STS 3.7.13-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.7 PLANT SYSTEMS
3.7.13 Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) Pump Room Exhaust Air Cleanup System (PREACS)
LCO 3.7.13 Two ECCS PREACS trains shall be OPERABLE.
NOTE--------------------------------------------
The ECCS pump room boundary may be opened intermittently under administrative control. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. One ECCS PREACS train inoperable.
A.1 Restore ECCS PREACS train to OPERABLE status.
7 days B. Two ECCS PREACS trains inoperable due to inoperable ECCS pump room boundary.
B.1 Restore ECCS pump room boundary to OPERABLE status.
24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> C. Two ECCS PREACS trains inoperable for reasons other than Condition B.
C.1 Verify at least one train of [Control Room Emergency Air Cleanup System] is OPERABLE. AND C.2 Restore at least one ECCS PREACS train to OPERABLE status.
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> D C. Required Action and associated Completion Time not met.
D C.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND D C.2 Be in MODE 4 5.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />
12 3 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> PREACS 3.7.15 CEOG STS 3.7.15-1 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 3.7 PLANT SYSTEMS
3.7.15 Penetration Room Exhaust Air Cleanup System (PREACS)
LCO 3.7.15 Two PREACS trains shall be OPERABLE.
NOTE--------------------------------------------
The penetration room boundary may be opened intermittently under administrative control. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4.
ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME
A. One PREACS train inoperable.
A.1 Restore PREACS train to OPERABLE status.
7 days B. Two PREACS trains inoperable due to inoperable penetration room boundary.
B.1 Restore penetration room boundary to OPERABLE status.
24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> C. Two PREACS trains inoperable for reasons other than Condition C.
C.1 Verify at least one train of containment spray is OPERABLE. AND C.2 Restore at least one ECCS PREACS train to OPERABLE status.
1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> D C. Required Action and associated Completion Time not met.
D C.1 Be in MODE 3.
AND D C.2 Be in MODE 4 5.
6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />
12 3 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> Pressurizer B 3.4.9 CEOG STS B 3.4.9-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
Six hours is reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach MODE 3 from full power in an orderly manner and without challenging plant systems. Further pressure and temperature reduction to MODE 4 brings the plant to a MODE where the LCO is not applicable. The 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> time to reach the nonapplicable MODE is reasonable based on operating experience for that evolution.
B.1 If one [required] group of pressurizer heaters is inoperable, restoration is required within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The Completion Time of 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> is reasonable considering that a demand caused by loss of offsite power would be unlikely in this period. Pressure control may be maintained during this time using normal station powered heaters.
C.1 If [both] [required] groups of pressurizer heaters are inoperable, restoration of at least one group to OPERABLE status is required within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. This Required Action is not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable. If [both] [required] groups of pressurizer heaters are inoperable, the pressurizer heaters will not be available to help maintain subcooling in the RCS loops during a natural circulation cooldown following a loss of offsite power. A lower risk alternative should be considered to this Required Action if plant pressure and level cannot be controlled within operating bounds, such as when both the safety and non-safety pressurizer heaters are unavailable. The inoperability of all [required] pressurizer heaters during the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time has been shown to be acceptable based on the low frequency of the potential challenge and the small incremental effect on plant risk (Ref. 2).
C D.1 and DC.2 If one or more [required] group of pressurizer heaters is inoperable and cannot be restored within the allowed Completion Time s of Required Action B.1, the plant must be brought to a MODE in which the LCO does not apply. To achieve this status, the plant must be brought to MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and to MODE 4 within [12] hours. The Completion Time of 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> is reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach MODE 3 from full power in an orderly manner and without challenging safety systems. Similarly, the Completion Time of [12] hours is reasonable, Pressurizer B 3.4.9 CEOG STS B 3.4.9-6 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
REVIEWER'S NOTE-----------------------------------
The frequency for performing pressurizer heater capacity testing shall be either 18 months or 92 days, depending on whether or not the plant has dedicated safety-related heaters. For dedicated safety-related heaters, which do not normally operate, 92 days is applied. For non-dedicated safety-related heaters, which normally operate, 18 months is applied.
The Surveillance is satisfied when the power supplies are demonstrated to be capable of producing the minimum power and the associated pressurizer heaters are verified to be at their design rating. (This may be
done by testing the power supply output and by performing an electrical check on heater element continuity and resistance.) The Frequency of
[18] months is considered adequate to detect heater degradation and has been shown by operating experience to be acceptable.
This SR is not applicable if the heaters are permanently powered by 1E power supplies.
This Surveillance demonstrates that the heaters can be manually transferred to and energized by emergency power supplies. The Frequency of [18] months is based on a typical fuel cycle and industry accepted practice. This is consistent with similar verifications of emergency power. ]
REFERENCES 1. NUREG-0737, November 1980.
- 2. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
Pressurizer PORVs B 3.4.11 CEOG STS B 3.4.11-5 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
valve is based upon the Completion Time for restoring an inoperable PORV in Condition B since the PORVs are not capable of automatically mitigating an overpressure event when placed in manual control. If the block valve is restored within the Completion Time of 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />, the power will be restored and the PORV restored to OPERABLE status.
D.1 and D.2
If the Required Action cannot be met within the associated Completion Time, the plant must be brought to a MODE in which the requirement does not apply. To achieve this status, the plant must be brought to at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and to MODE 4 within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required plant conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging plant systems.
E.1, E.2, E.3, and E.4
If more than one PORV is inoperable and not capable of being manually cycled, it is necessary to either restore at least one valve within the Completion Time of 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> and 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> or isolate the flow path by closing and removing the power to the associated block valves within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. In the event of a loss of feedwater, the PORVs would be used to remove core heat. In order to minimize the consequences of a loss of feedwater while two PORVs are inoperable, Required Action E.3 requires that LCO 3.7.5, "Auxiliary Feedwater System," be met to ensure AFW is available. These Required Actions are not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable.
The Completion Time of 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> is reasonable based on the small potential for challenges to the system during this time and provides the operator time to correct the situation. The inoperability of two PORVs during the 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> Completion Time has been shown to not have a significant contribution to plant risk (Ref. 3).
If one PORV is restored and one PORV remains inoperable, then the plant will be in Condition B with the time clock started at the original declaration of
having two PORVs inoperable.
F.1 & F.2 If two PORVs are inoperable and not are capable of being manually cycled and are not If no PORVs are restored within the Completion Time, then the plant must be brought to a MODE in which the LCO does not Pressurizer PORVs B 3.4.11 CEOG STS B 3.4.11-6 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 apply. To achieve this status, the plant must be brought to at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and to MODE 4 within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. The Completion Time of 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> is reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach MODE 3 from full power in an orderly manner and without challenging plant systems. Similarly, the Completion Time of 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> to reach MODE 4 is reasonable, considering that a plant can cool down within that time frame on one safety system train. In MODES 4 and 5, maintaining PORV OPERABILITY may be required. See LCO 3.4.12.
Pressurizer PORVs B 3.4.11 CEOG STS B 3.4.11-7 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
GF.1 If two block valves are inoperable, it is necessary to restore at least one block valve to OPERABLE status within 8 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />. The Completion Time is reasonable based on the small potential for challenges to the system during this time and provides the operator time to correct the situation.
HG.1 and HG.2 If the Required Actions and associated Completion Times of Condition F E or G F are not met, then the plant must be brought to a MODE in which the LCO does not apply. The plant must be brought to at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and to MODE 4 within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. The Completion Time of 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> is reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach MODE 3
from full power in an orderly manner and without challenging safety systems. Similarly, the Completion Time of 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> to reach MODE 4 is reasonable considering that a plant can cool down within that time frame on one safety system train. In MODES 4 and 5, maintaining PORV OPERABILITY may be required. See LCO 3.4.12.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.4.11.1 REQUIREMENTS Block valve cycling verifies that it can be closed if necessary. The basis for the Frequency of [92 days] is the ASME Code (Ref.
4 3).
This SR is modified by two Notes. Note 1 modifies this SR by stating that this SR is not required to be performed with the block valve closed in accordance with the Required Actions of this LCO. Opening the block valve in this condition increases the risk of an unisolable leak from the RCS since the PORV is already inoperable. Note 2 modifies this SR to allow entry into and operation in MODE 3 prior to performing the SR.
This allows the test to be performed in MODE 3 under operating temperature and pressure conditions, prior to entering MODE 1 or 2. [In accordance with Reference 5 4, administrative controls require this test be performed in MODE 3 or 4 to adequately simulate operating temperature and pressure effects on PORV operation.]
SR 3.4.11.2 requires complete cycling of each PORV. PORV cycling demonstrates its function. The Frequency of [18] months is based on a typical refueling cycle and industry accepted practice.
Pressurizer PORVs B 3.4.11 CEOG STS B 3.4.11-8 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
The Note modifies this SR to allow entry into and operation in MODE 3 prior to performing the SR. This allows the test to be performed in MODE 3 under operating temperature and pressure conditions, prior to entering MODE 1 or 2. [In accordance with Reference 4, administrative controls require this test be performed in MODE 3 or 4 to adequately simulate operating temperature and pressure effects on PORV operation.]
Operating the solenoid air control valves and check valves on the air accumulators ensures the PORV control system actuates properly when called upon. The Frequency of [18] months is based on a typical refueling cycle and the Frequency of the other surveillances used to demonstrate PORV OPERABILITY. ]
[ SR 3.4.11.4 This Surveillance is not required for plants with permanent 1E power supplies to the valves. The test demonstrates that emergency power can be provided and is performed by transferring power from the normal supply to the emergency supply and cycling the valves. The Frequency of [18] months is based on a typical refueling cycle and industry accepted practice. ]
REFERENCES 1. NUREG-0737, Paragraph II, G.I, November 1980.
- 2. Inspection and Enforcement (IE) Bulletin 79-05B, April 21, 1979.
- 3. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
3 4. ASME Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants. [ 4 5. Generic Letter 90-06, "Resolution of Generic Issue 70, 'Power-Operated Relief Valve and Block Valve Reliability,' and Generic Issue 94, 'Additional Low-Temperature Overpressure for Light-Water Reactors,' Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)," June 25, 1990.
]
SITs B 3.5.1 CEOG STS B 3.5.1-7 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
C.1 and C.2 If more than one SIT is inoperable, the unit is in a condition outside the accident analysis. However, Reference 7 demonstrates that the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is acceptable based on the low frequency of the potential challenge, the small incremental effect on plant risk, and the confirmation that all ECCS trains are OPERABLE, which will limit the impact of SIT unavailability. This Required Action is not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable. DC.1 and DC.2 If the SIT (s) cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the associated Completion Time, the plant must be brought to a MODE in which the LCO does not apply. To achieve this status, the plant must be brought to at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and pressurizer pressure reduced to < 700 psia within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required plant conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging plant systems.
D.1 If more than one SIT is inoperable, the unit is in a condition outside the accident analyses. Therefore, LCO 3.0.3 must be entered immediately.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.5.1.1 REQUIREMENTS Verification every 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> that each SI T isolation valve is fully open, as indicated in the control room, ensures that SITs are available for injection and ensures timely discovery if a valve should be partially closed. If an isolation valve is not fully open, the rate of injection to the RCS would be reduced. Although a motor operated valve should not change position with power removed, a closed valve could result in not meeting accident analysis assumptions. A 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> Frequency is considered reasonable in view of other administrative controls that ensure the unlikelihood of a mispositioned isolation valve.
SR 3.5.1.2 and SR 3.5.1.3
SITs B 3.5.1 CEOG STS B 3.5.1-10 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04
- 7. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
ECCS - Operating B 3.5.2 CEOG STS B 3.5.2-5 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
APPLICABILITY In MODES 1 and 2, and in MODE 3 with RCS pressure 1700 psia, the ECCS OPERABILITY requirements for the limiting Design Basis Accident (DBA) large break LOCA are based on full power operation. Although reduced power would not require the same level of performance, the accident analysis does not provide for reduced cooling requirements in the lower MODES. The HPSI pump performance is based on the small break LOCA, which establishes the pump performance curve and has less dependence on power. The charging pump performance requirements are based on a small break LOCA. The requirements of MODES 2 and 3, with RCS pressure 1700 psia, are bounded by the MODE 1 analysis.
The ECCS functional requirements of MODE 3, with RCS pressure < 1700 psia, and MODE 4 are described in LCO 3.5.3, "ECCS -
Shutdown."
In MODES 5 and 6, unit conditions are such that the probability of an event requiring ECCS injection is extremely low. Core cooling requirements in MODE 5 are addressed by LCO 3.4.7, "RCS Loops - MODE 5, Loops Filled," and LCO 3.4.8, "RCS Loops - MODE 5, Loops Not Filled." MODE 6 core cooling requirements are addressed by LCO 3.9.4, "Shutdown Cooling (SDC) and Coolant Circulation - High Water Level," and LCO 3.9.5, "Shutdown Cooling (SDC) and Coolant Circulation - Low Water Level."
ACTIONS A.1 With one LPSI subsystem inoperable, action must be taken to restore OPERABLE status within 7 days. In this condition, the remaining OPERABLE ECCS train is adequate to perform the heat removal function. However, the overall reliability is reduced because a single failure to the remaining LPSI subsystem could result in loss of ECCS function. The 7 day Completion Time is reasonable to perform corrective maintenance on the inoperable LPSI subsystem. The 7 day Completion Time is based on the findings of the deterministic and probabilistic analysis in Reference 7 6. Reference 6 7 concluded that extending the Completion Time to 7 days for an inoperable LPSI train provides plant operational flexibility while simultaneously reducing overall plant risk.
This is because the risks incurred by having the LPSI train unavailable for a longer time at power will be substantially offset by the benefits associated with avoiding unnecessary plant transitions and by reducing risk during plant shutdown operations.
ECCS - Operating B 3.5.2 CEOG STS B 3.5.2-6 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
B.1 and B.2 If two LPSI subsystems are inoperable, at least one LPSI subsystem must be returned to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. The Completion Time is based on Reference 6 which demonstrated that the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is acceptable based on the low frequency of the potential challenge, the small incremental risk associated with continued operation, and on Required Action B.1, which verifies the OPERABILITY of the SITs within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. Note that Condition E applies if one or more HPSI subsystems are inoperable concurrent with two inoperable LPSI subsystems. These Required Actions are not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable.
B C.1 If one or more trains are inoperable except for reasons other than Condition A or B (one or two LPSI subsystem s inoperable) and at least 100% of the ECCS flow equivalent to a single OPERABLE ECCS train is available (otherwise, Condition E applies), the inoperable subsystems(s) components must be returned to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Completion Time is based on an NRC study (Ref. 4) using a reliability evaluation and is a reasonable amount of time to effect many repairs.
An ECCS train is inoperable if it is not capable of delivering the design flow to the RCS. The individual components are inoperable if they are not capable of performing their design function, or if supporting systems are not available.
The LCO requires the OPERABILITY of a number of independent subsystems. Due to the redundancy of trains and the diversity of subsystems, the inoperability of one component in a train does not render the ECCS incapable of performing its function. Neither does the inoperability of two different components, each in a different train, necessarily result in a loss of function for the ECCS. This allows increased flexibility in plant operations when components in opposite trains are inoperable.
An event accompanied by a loss of offsite power and the failure of an emergency DG can disable one ECCS train until power is restored. A reliability analysis (Ref. 4) has shown that the impact with one full ECCS train inoperable is sufficiently small to justify continued operation for 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />.
ECCS - Operating B 3.5.2 CEOG STS B 3.5.2-8 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
DC.1 and DC.2 If the inoperable train (s) cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the associated Completion Time, the plant must be brought to a MODE in which the LCO does not apply. To achieve this status, the plant must be brought to at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and pressurizer pressure reduced to < 1700 psia within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required unit conditions from full power in an orderly manner and without challenging unit systems.
ED.1 Condition B E is applicable with one or more trains inoperable for reasons other than Condition B. The allowed Completion Time is based on the assumption that at least 100% of the ECCS flow equivalent to a single OPERABLE ECCS train is available. With less than 100% of the ECCS flow equivalent to a single OPERABLE ECCS train available, the facility is in a condition outside of the accident analyses. Therefore, LCO 3.0.3 must be entered immediately.
One inoperable HPSI subsystem concurrent with two inoperable LPSI subsystems will result in less than 100% of the ECCS flow equivalent to a single OPERABLE ECCS train.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.5.2.1 REQUIREMENTS Verification of proper valve position ensures that the flow path from the ECCS pumps to the RCS is maintained. Misalignment of these valves could render both ECCS trains inoperable. Securing these valves in position by removing power or by key locking the control in the correct position ensures that the valves cannot be inadvertently misaligned or change position as the result of an active failure. These valves are of the type described in Reference 5, which can disable the function of both ECCS trains and invalidate the accident analysis. A 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> Frequency is considered reasonable in view of other administrative controls ensuring that a mispositioned valve is an unlikely possibility.
Verifying the correct alignment for manual, power operated, and automatic valves in the ECCS flow paths provides assurance that the proper flow paths will exist for ECCS operation. This SR does not apply to valves that are locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, since these valves were verified to be in the correct position prior to locking,
ECCS - Operating B 3.5.2 CEOG STS B 3.5.2-11 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SR 3.5.2.10
Periodic inspection of the containment sump ensures that it is unrestricted and stays in proper operating condition. The 18 month Frequency is based on the need to perform this Surveillance under the conditions that apply during an outage, on the need to have access to the location, and on the potential for unplanned transients if the Surveillance were performed with the reactor at power. This Frequency is sufficient to detect abnormal degradation and is confirmed by operating experience.
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 35.
- 2. 10 CFR 50.46.
- 3. FSAR, Chapter [6].
- 4. NRC Memorandum to V. Stello, Jr., from R. L. Baer, "Recommended Interim Revisions to LCOs for ECCS Components,"
December 1, 1975.
- 5. IE Information Notice No. 87-01, January 6, 1987.
- 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
7 6. CE NPSD-995, "Low Pressure Safety Injection System AOT Extension," May 1995.
Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.6A CEOG STS B 3.6.6A-5 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
APPLICABILITY In MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4, a DBA could cause a release of radioactive material to containment and an increase in containment pressure and temperature, requiring the operation of the containment spray trains and containment cooling trains.
In MODES 5 and 6, the probability and consequences of these events are reduced due to the pressure and temperature limitations of these MODES. Thus, the Containment Spray and Containment Cooling systems are not required to be OPERABLE in MODES 5 and 6.
ACTIONS A.1
REVIEWER'S NOTE----------------------------------- Utilization of the 7 day Completion Time for Required Action A.1 is dependent on the licensee adopting CE NPSD-1045-A (Ref. 6) and meeting the requirements of the Topical Report and the associated Safety Evaluation. Otherwise, a 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Completion Time applies. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With one containment spray train inoperable, the inoperable containment spray train must be restored to OPERABLE status within [7] days. In this Condition, the remaining OPERABLE spray and cooling trains are adequate to perform the iodine removal and containment cooling functions. The [7] day Completion Time takes into account the redundant heat removal capability afforded by the Containment Spray System, reasonable time for repairs, and the findings of Ref. 6.
B.1 and B.2 If the inoperable containment spray train cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the required Completion Time, the plant must be brought to a MODE in which the LCO does not apply. To achieve this status, the plant must be brought to at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and to MODE 5 within 84 hours9.722222e-4 days <br />0.0233 hours <br />1.388889e-4 weeks <br />3.1962e-5 months <br />. The allowed Completion Time of 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> is reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach MODE 3 from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging plant systems. The extended interval to reach MODE 5 allows additional time for the restoration of the containment spray train and is reasonable when considering that the driving force for a release of radioactive material from the Reactor Coolant System is reduced in MODE
- 3.
Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.6A CEOG STS B 3.6.6A-6 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
B.1 With one required containment cooling train inoperable, the inoperable containment cooling train must be restored to OPERABLE status within 7 days. The components in this degraded condition are capable of providing greater than 100% of the heat removal needs (for the condition of one containment cooling train inoperable) after an accident. The 7 day Completion Time was developed based on the same reasons as those for Required Action A.1.
C.1 With two required containment spray trains inoperable, at least one of the required containment spray trains must be restored to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The components in this degraded condition are capable of providing greater than 100% of the heat removal needs after an accident. The 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Completion Time was developed taking into account the redundant heat removal capabilities afforded by combinations of the Containment Spray System and Containment Cooling System and the low probability of a DBA occurring during this period.
C.1 With one required containment cooling train inoperable, the inoperable containment cooling train must be restored to OPERABLE s tatus within 7 days. The remaining OPERABLE containment spray and cooling components provide iodine removal capabilities and are capable of providing at least 100% of the heat removal needs after an accident. The 7 day Completion Time was developed taking into account the redundant heat removal capabilities afforded by combinations of the Containment Spray System and Containment Cooling System and the low probability of a DBA occurring during this period.
D.1 and D.2
With one containment spray train and one containment cooling train inoperable, one of the required containment cooling trains must be restored to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The components in this degraded condition provide iodine removal capabilities and are capable of providing at least 100% of the heat removal needs after an accident. The 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Completion Time was developed taking into account the redundant heat removal capabilities afforded by combinations of the Containment Spray System and Contai nment Cooling System, the iodine Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.6A CEOG STS B 3.6.6A-7 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 removal function of the Containment Spray System, and the low probability of a DBA occurring during this period.
E.1 With two required containment cooling trains inoperable, one of the required containment cooling trains must be restored to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The components in this degraded condition provide iodine removal capabilities and are capable of providing at least 100% of the heat removal needs after an accident. The 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Completion Time was developed taking into account the redundant heat removal capabilities afforded by combinations of the Containment Spray System and Containment Cooling System, the iodine removal function of the Containment Spray System, and the low probability of a DBA occurring during this period.
Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.6A CEOG STS B 3.6.6A-8 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
F.1 and F.2 With two required containment spray trains inoperable and two required containment cooling trains inoperable, at least one of the inoperable trains must be restored to OPERABLE status within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. This Required Action is not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable. The Completion Time is based on Reference 7 which demonstrated that the 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is acceptable because it does not make a significant contribution to plant risk.
GF.1 and F G.2 If the Required Actions and associated Completion Times of Condition C, D, or E of this LCO are not met, the plant must be brought to a MODE in which the LCO does not apply. To achieve this status, the plant must be brought to at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and to MODE 5 within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />. The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required plant conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging plant systems.
G.1 With two containment spray trains or any combination of three or more Containment Spray System and Containment Cooling Syste m trains inoperable, the unit is in a condition outside the accident analysis.
Therefore, LCO 3.0.3 must be entered immediately.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.6.6A.1 REQUIREMENTS Verifying the correct alignment for manual, power operated, and automatic valves in the containment spray flow path provides assurance that the proper flow paths will exist for Containment Spray System operation. This SR does not apply to valves that are locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position since these were verified to be in the correct position prior to being secured. This SR also does not apply to valves that cannot be inadvertently misaligned, such as check valves.
This SR does not require any testing or valve manipulation. Rather, it involves verifying that those valves outside containment and capable of potentially being mispositioned are in the correct position.
Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.6A CEOG STS B 3.6.6A-10 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SR 3.6.6A.3
Verifying a service water flow rate of [2000] gpm to each cooling unit provides assurance that the design flow rate assumed in the safety analyses will be achieved (Ref. 2). Also considered in selecting this Frequency were the known reliability of the Cooling Water System, the two train redundancy, and the low probability of a significant degradation of flow occurring between surveillances.
[ SR 3.6.6A.4
Verifying that the containment spray header piping is full of water to the
[100] ft level minimizes the time required to fill the header. This ensures that spray flow will be admitted to the containment atmosphere within the time frame assumed in the containment analysis. The 31 day Frequency is based on the static nature of the fill header and the low probability of a significant degradation of water level in the piping occurring between surveillances. ]
SR 3.6.6A.5
Verifying that each containment spray pump's developed head at the flow test point is greater than or equal to the required developed head ensures that spray pump performance has not degraded during the cycle. Flow and differential pressure are normal tests of centrifugal pump performance required by the ASME Code (Ref.
8 7). Since the containment spray pumps cannot be tested with flow through the spray headers, they are tested on recirculation flow. This test confirms one point on the pump design curve and is i ndicative of overall performance. Such inservice inspections confirm component OPERABILITY, trend performance, and detect incipient failures by indicating abnormal performance. The Frequency of this SR is in accordance with the Inservice Testing Program.
Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.6A CEOG STS B 3.6.6A-12 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 38, GDC 39, GDC 40, GDC 41, GDC 42, and GDC 43.
- 2. FSAR, Section [ ].
- 3. FSAR, Section [ ].
- 4. FSAR, Section [ ].
- 5. FSAR, Section [ ].
- 6. CE NPSD-1045-A, "CEOG Joint Application Report for Modification to the Containment Spray System Technical Specifications," March 2000.
- 7. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
8 7. ASME Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants.
Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.6B CEOG STS B 3.6.6B-5 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
Completion Time was developed taking into account the redundant heat removal capabilities afforded by combinations of the Containment Spray System and Containment Cooling System and the low probability of a DBA occurring during this period.
B.1 With one required containment cooling train inoperable, the inoperable containment cooling train must be restored to OPERABLE status within 7 days. The components in this degraded condition are capable of providing greater than 100% of the heat removal needs (for the condition of one containment cooling train inoperable) after an accident. The 7 day Completion Time was developed based on the same reasons as those for
Required Action A.1.
C.1 With two required containment spray trains inoperable, at least one of the required containment spray trains must be restored to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The components in this degraded condition are capable of providing greater than 100% of the heat removal needs after an accident. The 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Completion Time was developed taking into account the redundant heat removal capabilities afforded by combinations
of the Containment Spray System and Containment Cooling System and the low probability of a DBA occurring during this period.
D.1 and D.2
With one required containment spray train inoperable and one of the required containment cooling trains inoperable, the inoperable containment spray train or the inoperable containment cooling train must be restored to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The components in this degraded condition are capable of providing at least 100% of the heat removal needs after an accident. The 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Completion Time was developed based on the same reasons as those for Required Action C.1.
Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.6B CEOG STS B 3.6.6B-6 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
E.1 With two containment cooling trains inoperable, one of the required containment cooling trains must be restored to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. The components in this degraded condition are capable of providing greater than 100% of the heat removal needs after an accident.
The 72 hour8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> Completion Time was developed based on the same reasons as those for Required Action C.1.
F.1 and F.2 With two required containment spray trains inoperable and two required containment cooling trains inoperable, at least one of the inoperable trains must be restored to OPERABLE status within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. This Required Action is not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable. The Completion Time is based on Reference 6 which demonstrated that the 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is acceptable because it does not make a significant contribution to plant risk.
GF.1 and GF.2 If any of the Required Actions and associated Completion Times of this LCO are not met, the plant must be brought to a MODE in which the LCO does not apply. To achieve this status, the plant must be brought to at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and to MODE 5 within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />. The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required plant conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging plant systems.
G.1 With any combination of three or more Containment Spray System and Containment Cooling System trains inoperable, the unit is in a condition outside the accident analysis. Therefore, LCO 3.0.3 must be entered immediately.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.6.6B.1 REQUIREMENTS Verifying the correct alignment for manual, power operated, and
automatic valves, excluding check valves, in the Containment Spray System provides assurance that the proper flow path exists for Containment Spray System operation. This SR also does not apply to Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.6B CEOG STS B 3.6.6B-8 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SR 3.6.6B.2
Operating each containment cooling train fan unit for 15 minutes ensures that all trains are OPERABLE and that all associated controls are functioning properly. It also ensures that blockage, fan or motor failure, or excessive vibration can be detected for corrective action. The 31 day Frequency was developed considering the known reliability of the fan units and controls, the two train redundancy available, and the low probability of a significant degradation of the containment cooling train occurring between surveillances.
SR 3.6.6B.3
Verifying a service water flow rate of [2000] gpm to each cooling unit provides assurance the design flow rate assumed in the safety analyses will be achieved (Ref. 2). Also considered in selecting this Frequency were the known reliability of the cooling water system, the two train redundancy, and the low probability of a significant degradation of flow occurring between surveillances.
[ SR 3.6.6B.4
Verifying the containment spray header is full of water to the [100] ft level minimizes the time required to fill the header. This ensures that spray flow will be admitted to the containment atmosphere within the time frame assumed in the containment analysis. The 31 day Frequency is based on the static nature of the fill header and the low probability of a significant degradation of the water level in the piping occurring between surveillances. ]
SR 3.6.6B.5 Verifying that each containment spray pump's developed head at the flow test point is greater than or equal to the required developed head ensures that spray pump performance has not degraded during the cycle. Flow and differential pressure are normal tests of centrifugal pump performance required by the ASME Code (Ref.
7 6). Since the containment spray pumps cannot be tested with flow through the spray headers, they are tested on recirculation flow. This test confirms one point on the pump Containment Spray and Cooling Systems (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.6B CEOG STS B 3.6.6B-10 Rev. 3.1, 12/01/05 BASES
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 38, GDC 39, GDC 40, GDC 41, GDC 42, and GDC 43.
- 2. FSAR, Section [ ].
- 3. FSAR, Sections [ ].
- 4. FSAR, Section [ ].
- 5. FSAR, Section [ ].
- 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
7 6. ASME Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants.
SBEACS (Dual)
B 3.6.8 CEOG STS B 3.6.8-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
APPLICABILITY In MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4, a D BA could lead to fission product release to containment that leaks to the shield building. The large break LOCA, on which this system's design is based, is a full power event. Less severe LOCAs and leakage still require the system to be OPERABLE throughout these MODES. The probability and severity of a LOCA decrease as core power and Reactor Coolant System pressure decrease. With the reactor shut down, the probability of release of radioactivity resulting from such an accident is low.
In MODES 5 and 6, the probability and consequences of a DBA are low due to the pressure and temperature limitations in these MODES. Under these conditions, the Filtration System is not required to be OPERABLE.
ACTIONS A.1 With one SBEACS train inoperable, the inoperable train must be restored to OPERABLE status within 7 days. The components in this degraded condition are capable of providing 100% of the iodine removal needs after a DBA. The 7 day Completion Time is based on consideration of such factors as the availability of the OPERABLE redundant SBEACS train and the low probability of a DBA occurring during this period.
B.1 and B.2 If two SBEACS trains are inoperable, at least one SBEACS train must be returned to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. In addition, at least one train of containment spray must be verified to be OPERABLE within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. In the event of an accident, containment spray reduces the potential radioactive release from the containment, which reduces the consequences of the inoperable SBEACS trains. These Required Actions are not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant sy stems or components being inoperable.
The Completion Time is based on Reference 4 which demonstrated that the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is acceptable based on the low frequency of the potential challenge and the small incremental risk associated with continued operation.
CB.1 and CB.2 If the SBEACS train cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the required Completion Time, the plant must be brought to a MODE in which the LCO does not applyplant risk is minimized. To achieve this status, the plant must be brought to at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and to MODE 5 4 within 12 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />. Remaining within the Applicability of the LCO is acceptable because the plant risk in MODE 4 is similar to or lower SBEACS (Dual)
B 3.6.8 CEOG STS B 3.6.8-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 than MODE 5 (Ref. 4) and because the time spent in MODE 4 to perform the necessary repairs to restore the system to OPERABLE status will be short. In MODE 4 there are more accident mitigation systems available and there is more redundancy and diversity in core heat removal mechanisms than in MODE 5. However, voluntary entry into MODE 5 may be made as it is also an acceptable low-risk state.
The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required plant conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging plant systems.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.6.8.1 REQUIREMENTS Operating each SBEACS train for 15 minutes ensures that all trains are OPERABLE and that all associated controls are functioning properly. It also ensures that blockage, fan or motor failure, or excessive vibration can be detected for corrective action. For systems with heaters, operation with the heaters on (automatic heater cycling to maintain
temperature) for 10 continuous hours eliminates moisture on the adsorbers and HEPA filters. Experience from filter testing at operating units indicates that the 10 hour1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br /> period is adequate for moisture SBEACS (Dual)
B 3.6.8 CEOG STS B 3.6.8-6 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
The SBEACS train flow rate is verified [ ] cfm to ensure that the flow rate is adequate to "pull down" the shield building pressure as required.
This test also will verify the proper functioning of the fans, dampers, filters, absorbers, etc., when this SR is performed in conjunction with SR 3.6.11.4.
The [18] month on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS Frequency is consistent
with the Regulatory Guide 1.52 (Ref.
4 5) guidance.
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 41.
- 2. FSAR, Section [ ].
- 3. FSAR, Section [ ].
- 4. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
5 4. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision [2].
ICS (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.10 CEOG STS B 3.6.10-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
- b. The fact that, even with no ICS train in operation, almost the same amount of iodine would be removed from the containment
atmosphere through absorption by the Containment Spray System, and
- c. The fact that the Completion Time is adequate to make most repairs.
B.1 and B.2 If two ICS trains are inoperable, at least one ICS train must be returned to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. In addition, at least one train of containment spray must be verified to be OPERABLE within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. In the event of an accident, containment spray reduces the potential radioactive release from the containment, which reduces the consequences of the inoperable ICS trains. These Required Actions are not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable. The Completion Time is based on Reference 5 which demonstrated that the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is acceptable based on the low frequency of the potential challenge and the small incremental risk associated with continued operation.
CB.1 and CB.2 If the ICS train (s) cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the required Completion Time, the plant must be brought to a MODE in which plant risk is minimized the LCO does not apply. To achieve this status, the plant must be brought to at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and to MODE 4 5 within 12 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />. Remaining within the Applicability of the LCO is acceptable because the plant risk in MODE 4 is similar to or lower than MODE 5 (Ref. 5) and because the time spent in MODE 4 to perform the necessary repairs to restore the system to OPERABLE status will be short. In MODE 4 there are more accident mitigation systems available and there is more redundancy and diversity in core heat removal mechanisms than in MODE 5. However, voluntary entry into MODE 5 may be made as it is also an acceptable low-risk state.
The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required plant conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging plant systems.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.6.10.1 REQUIREMENTS ICS (Atmospheric and Dual)
B 3.6.10 CEOG STS B 3.6.10-5 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
The automatic startup test verifies that both trains of equipment start upon receipt of an actual or simulated test signal. The [18] month Frequency is based on the need to perform this Surveillance under the conditions that apply during a plant outage and the potential for an unplanned transient if the Surveillance were performed with the reactor at power. Operating experience has shown that these components usually pass the
Surveillance when performed at the [18] month Frequency. Therefore, the Frequency was concluded to be acceptable from a reliability standpoint. Furthermore, the Frequency was developed considering that the system equipment OPERABILITY is demonstrated on a 31 day Frequency by SR 3.6.10.1.
[ SR 3.6.10.4 The ICS filter bypass dampers are tested to verify OPERABILITY. The dampers are in the bypass position during normal operation and must reposition for accident operation to draw air through the filters. The
[18] month Frequency is considered to be acceptable based on the damper reliability and design, the mild environmental conditions in the vicinity of the dampers, and the fact that operating experience has shown that the dampers usually pass the Surveillance when performed at the
[18] month Frequency. ]
REFERENCES 1. 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, GDC 41, GDC 42, and GDC 43.
- 2. FSAR, Section [ ].
- 3. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision [2].
- 4. FSAR, Section [ ].
- 5. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
CREACS B 3.7.11 CEOG STS B 3.7.11-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
ACTIONS A.1 With one CREACS train inoperable, action must be taken to restore OPERABLE status within 7 days. In this Condition, the remaining OPERABLE CREACS subsystem is adequate to perform control room radiation protection function. However, the overall reliability is reduced because a single failure in the OPERABLE CREACS train could result in loss of CREACS function. The 7 day Completion Time is based on the low probability of a DBA occurring during this time period, and the ability of the remaining train to provide the required capability.
B.1 , B.2, and B.3
REVIEWER'S NOTE-----------------------------------
Adoption of Condition B is dependent on a commitment from the licensee to have written procedures available describing compensatory measures to be taken in the event of an intentional or unintentional entry into
Condition B. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the control room boundary is inoperable in MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4, the CREACS trains cannot perform their intended functions. Actions must be taken to restore an OPERABLE control room boundary within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. During the period that the control room boundary is inoperable, appropriate compensatory measures (consistent with the intent of GDC
- 19) should be utilized to protect control room operators from potential hazards such as radioactive contamination, toxic chemicals, smoke, temperature and relative humidity, and physical security. Preplanned measures should be available to address these concerns for intentional and unintentional entry into the condition. The 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is reasonable based on the low probability of a DBA occurring during this time period, and the use of compensatory measures. The 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is a typically reasonable time to diagnose, plan and possibly repair, and test most problems with the control room boundary.
C.1 and C.2 If the inoperable CREACS or control room boundary cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the associated Complet ion Time in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4, the unit must be placed in a MODE that minimizes the accident risk. To achieve this status, the unit must be placed in at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, and in MODE 5 within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />. The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required unit conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging unit systems.
CREACS B 3.7.11 CEOG STS B 3.7.11-5 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
C.1, C.2, and C.3 If both CREACS trains are inoperable in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4 for reasons other than an inoperable control room boundary (i.e., Condition B), the CREACS may not be capable of performing the intended function and the unit is in a condition outside the accident analyses. This Required Action is not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable. During the period that the CREACS trains are inoperable, action must be initiated to implement mitigating actions to lessen the effect on CRE occupants from potential hazards while both trains of CREACS are inoperable. In the event of a DBA, the mitigating actions will reduce the consequences of radiological exposures to the CRE occupants.
Specification 3.4.16, "RCS Specific Activity," allows limited operation with the reactor coolant system (RCS) acti vity significantly greater than the LCO limit. This presents a risk to the plant operator during an accident when all CREACS trains are inoperable. Therefore, it must be verified within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> that LCO 3.4.16 is met. This Required Action does not require additional RCS sampling beyond that normally required by LCO 3.4.16. At least one CREACS train must be returned to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. The Completion Time is based on Reference 3 which demonstrated that the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is acceptable based on the low frequency of the potential challenge and the small incremental risk associated with continued operation.
D.1 and D.2
Required Action D.1 is modified by a Note indicating to place the system in the emergency radiation protection mode if the automatic transfer to emergency mode is inoperable.
In MODE 5 or 6, or during movement of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies, if Required Action A.1 cannot be completed within the required Completion Time, the OPERABLE CREACS train must be immediately placed in the emergency mode of operation. This action ensures that the remaining train is OPERABLE, that no failures preventing automatic actuation will occur, and that any active failure will be readily detected.
An alternative to Required Action D.1 is to immediately suspend activities that could result in a release of radioactivity that might require isolation of CREACS B 3.7.11 CEOG STS B 3.7.11-6 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 the control room. This places the unit in a condition that minimizes the accident risk. This does not preclude the movement of fuel assemblies to a safe position.
E.1 When [in MODES 5 and 6, or] during movement of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies, with two CREACS trains inoperable, action must be taken immediately to suspend activities that could result in a release of radioactivity that might require isolation of the control room. This places the unit in a condition that minimizes the accident risk. This does not preclude the movement of fuel to a safe position.
F.1 If both CREACS trains are inoperable in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4 for reasons other than an inoperable control room boundary (i.e., Condition B), the CREACS may not be capable of performing the intended function and the unit is in a condition outside the accident analyses. Therefore, LCO 3.0.3 must be entered immediately.
F.1 and F.2 If the inoperable CREACS or control room boundary cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the associated Completion Time in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4, the unit must be placed in a MODE that minimizes the accident risk. To achieve this status, the unit must be placed in at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, and in MODE 5 within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />. The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required unit conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging unit systems.
CREACS B 3.7.11 CEOG STS B 3.7.11-7 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.7.11.1 REQUIREMENTS Standby systems should be checked periodically to ensure that they function properly. Since the environment and normal operating conditions on this system are not severe, testing each train once every month provides an adequate check on this system.
Monthly heater operations dry out any moisture accumulated in the charcoal from humidity in the ambient air. [Systems with heaters must be operated for 10 continuous hours with the heaters energized. Systems without heaters need only be operated for 15 minutes to demonstrate the function of the system.] The 31 day Frequency is based on the known reliability of the equipment, and the two train redundancy available.
This SR verifies that the required CREACS testing is performed in accordance with the [Ventilation Filter Testing Program (VFTP)]. The [VFTP] includes testing HEPA filter performance, charcoal adsorber efficiency, minimum system flow rate, and the physical properties of the activated charcoal (general use and following specific operations).
Specific test frequencies and additional information are discussed in detail in the [VFTP].
This SR verifies each CREACS train starts and operates on an actual or simulated actuation signal. The Frequency of [18] months is consistent with that specified in Reference 4 3.
This SR verifies the integrity of the control room enclosure and the assumed inleakage rates of potentially contaminated air. The control room positive pressure, with respect to potentially contaminated adjacent areas, is periodically tested to verify proper function of the CREACS.
During the emergency radiation state of the emergency mode of operation, the CREACS is designed to pressurize the control room [0.125] inches water gauge positive pressure with respect to adjacent areas in order to prevent unfiltered inleakage. The CREACS is designed to maintain this positive pressure with one train at an emergency
ventilation flow rate of [3000] cfm. The Frequency of [18] months on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS is consistent with the guidance provided in NUREG-0800, Section 6.4 (Ref.
5 4).
CREACS B 3.7.11 CEOG STS B 3.7.11-8 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
REFERENCES 1. FSAR, Section [9.4].
- 2. FSAR, Chapter [15].
- 3. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
4 3. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Rev. [2].
5 4. NUREG-0800, Section 6.4, Rev. 2, July 1981.
CREATCS B 3.7.12 CEOG STS B 3.7.12-2 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
APPLICABILITY In MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, [5, and 6,] and during movement of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies [(i.e., fuel that has occupied part of a critical reactor core within the previous [X] days)], the CREATCS must be OPERABLE to ensure that the control room temperature will not exceed equipment OPERABILITY requirements following isolation of the control room. In MODES 5 and 6, CREATCS may not be required for those facilities which do not require automatic control room isolation.
ACTIONS A.1 With one CREATCS train inoperable, action must be taken to restore OPERABLE status within 30 days. In this Condition, the remaining OPERABLE CREATCS train is adequate to maintain the control room temperature within limits. The 30 day Completion Time is reasonable, based on the low probability of an event occurring requiring control room isolation, consideration that the remaining train can provide the required capabilities, and the alternate safety or nonsafety related cooling means that are available.
B.1 If both CREATCS trains are inoperable in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4, the CREATCS may not be capable of performing the intended function and the unit is in a condition outside the accident analysis. This Required Action is not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable. At least one CREATCS train must be returned to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. The Completion Time is based on Reference 2 which demonstrated that the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is acceptable based on the low frequency of the potential challenge and the small incremental risk associated with continued operation.
CB.1 and CB.2 In MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4, when one or more CREATCS trains Required A ction A.1 cannot be completed restored to OPERABLE status within the required Completion Time, the unit must be placed in a MODE that minimizes the accident risk. To achieve this status, the unit must be placed in at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, and in MODE 5 within 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />. The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required unit conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging unit systems.
CREATCS B 3.7.12 CEOG STS B 3.7.12-3 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04
[ DC.1 and DC.2 In MODE 5 or 6, or during movement of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies, when Required Action A.1 cannot be completed within the required Completion Time, the OPERABLE CREATCS train must be placed in operation immediately. This action ensures that the remaining train is OPERABLE, that no failures preventing automatic actuation will occur, and that any active failure will be readily detected.
An alternative to Required Action D C.1 is to immediately suspend activities that could result in a release of radioactivity that might require isolation of the control room. This places the unit in a condition that minimizes the accident risk. This does not preclude the movement of fuel assemblies to a safe position. ]
CREATCS B 3.7.12 CEOG STS B 3.7.12-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
[ ED.1 In [MODE 5 or 6, or] during movement of [recently] irradiated fuel assemblies, with two CREATCS trains inoperable, action must be taken immediately to suspend activities that could result in a release of radioactivity that might require isolation of the control room. This places the unit in a condition that minimizes the accident risk. This does not preclude the movement of fuel to a safe position. ]
E.1 If both CREATCS trains are inoperable in MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4, the CREATCS may not be capable of performing the intended function and the unit is in a condition outside the accident analysis. Therefore, LCO 3.0.3 must be entered immediately.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.7.12.1 REQUIREMENTS This SR verifies that the heat removal capability of the system is sufficient to meet design requirements. This SR consists of a combination of testing and calculations. An [18] month Frequency is appropriate, since significant degradation of the CREATCS is slow and is not expected over this time period.
REFERENCES 1. FSAR, Section [6.4].
- 2. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
ECCS PREACS B 3.7.13 CEOG STS B 3.7.13-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
If the ECCS pump room boundary is inoperable, the ECCS PREACS trains cannot perform their intended functions. Actions must be taken to restore an OPERABLE ECCS pump room boundary within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
During the period that the ECCS pump room boundary is inoperable, appropriate compensatory measures [consistent with the intent, as applicable, of GDC 19, 60, 64 and 10 CFR Part 100] should be utilized to protect plant personnel from potential hazards such as radioactive contamination, toxic chemicals, smoke, temperature and relative humidity, and physical security. Preplanned measures should be available to address these concerns for intentional and unintentional entry into the condition. The 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is reasonable based on the low probability of a DBA occurring during this time period, and the use of compensatory measures. The 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is a typically reasonable time to diagnose, plan and possibly repair, and test most
problems with the ECCS pump room boundary.
C.1 and C.2 With two ECCS PREACS trains inoperable for reasons other than an inoperable boundary, action must be taken to restore at least one ECCS PREACS train to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. In addition, at least one train of [Control Room Emergen cy Air Cleanup System (CREACS)] must be verified to be OPERABLE within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. In the event of an accident, the [CREACS] will filter contaminated air leaked from the ECCS pump rooms before it can enter the control room. This Required Action is not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable. The Completion Time is based on Reference 6 which demonstrated that the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is acceptable based on the low frequency of the potential challenge and the small incremental risk associated with continued operation.
DC.1 and DC.2 If the ECCS PREACS train or ECCS pump room boundary cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the associated Completion Time, the unit must be in a MODE in which the LCO does not apply. To achieve this status, the unit must be placed in at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, and in MODE 4 5 within 12 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />. Remaining within the Applicability of the LCO is acceptable because the plant risk in MODE 4 is similar to or lower than MODE 5 (Ref. 6) and because the time spent in MODE 4 to perform the necessary repairs to restore the system to OPERABLE status will be short. In MODE 4 there are more accident mitigation systems ECCS PREACS B 3.7.13 CEOG STS B 3.7.13-5 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 available and there is more redundancy and diversity in core heat removal mechanisms than in MODE 5. However, voluntary entry into MODE 5 may be made as it is also an acceptable low-risk state.
The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required unit conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging unit systems.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.7.13.1 REQUIREMENTS Standby systems should be checked periodically to ensure that they function properly. Since the environment and normal operating conditions on this system are not severe, testing each train once a month provides an adequate check on this system. Monthly heater operations dry out any moisture that may have accumulated in the charcoal from humidity in the ambient air. [Systems with heaters must be operated for 10 continuous hours with the heaters energized. Systems without heaters need only be operated for 15 minutes to demonstrate the function of the system.] The 31 day Frequency is based on the known reliability of equipment, and the two train redundancy available.
ECCS PREACS B 3.7.13 CEOG STS B 3.7.13-6 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
This SR verifies that the required ECCS PREACS testing is performed in accordance with the [Ventilation Filter Testing Program (VFTP)]. The
[VFTP] includes testing HEPA filter performance, charcoal adsorber efficiency, minimum system flow rate, and the physical properties of the activated charcoal (general use and following specific operations). Specific test frequencies and additional information are discussed in detail in the [VFTP].
SR 3.7.13.3 This SR verifies that each ECCS PREACS train starts and operates on an actual or simulated actuation signal. The [18] month Frequency is consistent with that specified in Regulatory Guide 1.52 (Ref. 4).
This SR verifies the integrity of the ECCS pump room enclosure. The ability of the ECCS pump room to maintain a negative pressure, with respect to potentially uncontaminated adjacent areas, is periodically tested to verify proper function of the ECCS PREACS. During the post accident mode of operation, the ECCS PREACS is designed to maintain a slight negative pressure in the ECCS pump room with respect to adjacent areas to prevent unfiltered LEAKAGE. The ECCS PREACS is designed to maintain this negative pressure at a flow rate of [20,000] cfm from the ECCS pump room. The Frequency of
[18] months is consistent with the guidance provided in the NUREG-0800, Section 6.5.1 (Ref.
7 6). This test is conducted with the tests for filter penetration; thus, an [18] month Frequency, on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS is consistent with other filtration SRs.
[ SR 3.7.13.5 Operating the ECCS PREACS filter bypass damper is necessary to ensure that the system functions properly. The OPERABILITY of the bypass damper is verified if it can be closed. An [18] month Frequency is consistent with that specified in Reference 4. ]
ECCS PREACS B 3.7.13 CEOG STS B 3.7.13-7 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
REFERENCES 1. FSAR, Section [6.5.1].
- 2. FSAR, Section [9.4.5].
- 3. FSAR, Section [15.6.5].
- 4. Regulatory Guide 1.52, Rev. [2].
- 5. 10 CFR 100.11.
- 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
7 6. NUREG-0800, Section 6.5.1, Rev. 2, July 1981.
PREACS B 3.7.15 CEOG STS B 3.7.15-4 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
ACTIONS (continued)
C.1 and C.2 With two PREACS trains inoperable for reasons other than an inoperable boundary, action must be taken to restore at least one PREACS train to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. In addition, at least one train of containment spray must be verified to be OPERABLE within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />. In the event of an accident, containment spray reduces the potential radioactive release from the containment which reduces the consequences of the inoperable PREACS trains. This Required Action is not intended for routine voluntary removal of redundant systems or components from service in lieu of other alternatives that would not result in redundant systems or components being inoperable. The Completion Time is based on Reference 6 which demonstrated that the 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Completion Time is acceptable based on the low frequency of the potential challenge and the small incremental risk associated with continued operation.
DC.1 and DC.2 If the inoperable PREACS train or penetration room boundary cannot be restored to OPERABLE status within the associated Completion Time, the unit must be placed in a MODE in which overall plant risk is minimized the LCO does n ot apply. To achieve this status, the unit must be placed in at least MODE 3 within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />, and in MODE 4 5 within 12 36 hours4.166667e-4 days <br />0.01 hours <br />5.952381e-5 weeks <br />1.3698e-5 months <br />. Remaining within the Applicability of the LCO is acceptable because the plant risk in MODE 4 is similar to or lower than MODE 5 (Ref. 6) and because the time spent in MODE 4 to perform the necessary repairs to restore the system to OPERABLE status will be short. In MODE 4 there are more accident mitigation systems available and there is more redundancy and diversity in core heat removal mechanisms than in MODE 5. However, voluntary entry into MODE 5 may be made as it is also an acceptable low-risk state. The allowed Completion Times are reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach the required unit conditions from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging unit systems.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.7.15.1 REQUIREMENTS Standby systems should be checked periodically to ensure that they function properly. As the environment and normal operating conditions on this system are not severe, testing each train once every month provides an adequate check on this system.
Monthly heater operation dries out any moisture that may have accumulated in the charcoal as a result of humidity in the ambient air.
PREACS B 3.7.15 CEOG STS B 3.7.15-6 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
This SR verifies the integrity of the penetration room enclosure. The ability of the penetration room to maintain negative pressure, with respect
to potentially uncontaminated adjacent areas, is periodically tested to verify proper function of the PREACS. During the post accident mode of operation, PREACS is designed to maintain a slightly negative pressure at a flow rate of [3000] cfm in the penetration room with respect to adjacent areas to prevent unfiltered LEAKAGE. The Frequency of
[18] months is consistent with the guidance provided in NUREG-0800, Section 6.5.1 (Ref.
7 6). ] [ The minimum system flow rate maintains a slight negative pressure in the penetration room area and provides sufficient air velocity to transport particulate contaminants, assuming only one filter train is operating.
The number of filter elements is selected to limit the flow rate through any individual element to about [1000] cfm. This may vary based on filter housing geometry. The maximum limit ensures that flow through, and pressure drop across, each filter element is not excessive.
The number and depth of the adsorber elements ensures that, at the maximum flow rate, the residence time of the air stream in the charcoal bed achieves the desired adsorption rate. At least a [0.125] second residence time is necessary for an assumed [99]% efficiency.
The filters have a certain pressure drop at the design flow rate when clean. The magnitude of the pressure drop indicates acceptable performance, and is based on manufacturer's recommendations for the filter and adsorber elements at the design flow rate. An increase in pressure drop or decrease in flow indicates that the filter is being loaded
or is indicative of other problems with the system.
This test is conducted with the tests for filter penetration; thus, an [18] month Frequency on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS consistent with other filtration SRs. ]
[ SR 3.7.15.5 Operating the PREACS filter bypass damper is necessary to ensure that the system functions properly. The OPERABILITY of the PREACS filter bypass damper is verified if it can be closed. An [18] month Frequency is consistent with that specified in Reference 4. ]
PREACS B 3.7.15 CEOG STS B 3.7.15-7 Rev. 3.0, 03/31/04 BASES
REFERENCES 1. FSAR, Section [6.5.1].
- 2. FSAR, Section [9.4.5].
- 3. FSAR, Section [15.6.5].
- 4. Regulatory Guide 1.52 Rev. [2].
- 5. 10 CFR 100.11.
- 6. WCAP-16125-NP, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent Plant Shutdown," Revision 1, December 2007.
7 6. NUREG-0800, Section 6.5.1.