ML11154A134: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 21: Line 21:


==Reference:==
==Reference:==
: 1. Letter from NSPM to NRC, L-PI-1 1-020, "License Amendment Request (LAR) to Revise the Physical Security Plan", dated March 18, 2011.2. Letter from NSPM to NRC, L-PI-11-021, "Technical Evaluation and Supporting Information in Support of License Amendment Request (LAR)to Revise the Physical Security Plan", dated March 18, 2011.3. Letter from NSPM to NRC, L-PI-11-50, "Supplement to License Amendment Request (LAR) to Revise the Physical Security Plan", dated May, 4, 2011.In References 1 and 2, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy (hereafter "NSPM"), requested an amendment to the Operating License for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP) to revise the PINGP Physical Security Plan. Reference 3 then provided supplemental information as requested by NRC in an email dated April 26, 2011.The NRC staff subsequently made NSPM aware of errors in Reference  
: 1. Letter from NSPM to NRC, L-PI-1 1-020, "License Amendment Request (LAR) to Revise the Physical Security Plan", dated March 18, 2011.2. Letter from NSPM to NRC, L-PI-11-021, "Technical Evaluation and Supporting Information in Support of License Amendment Request (LAR)to Revise the Physical Security Plan", dated March 18, 2011.3. Letter from NSPM to NRC, L-PI-11-50, "Supplement to License Amendment Request (LAR) to Revise the Physical Security Plan", dated May, 4, 2011.In References 1 and 2, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy (hereafter "NSPM"), requested an amendment to the Operating License for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP) to revise the PINGP Physical Security Plan. Reference 3 then provided supplemental information as requested by NRC in an email dated April 26, 2011.The NRC staff subsequently made NSPM aware of errors in Reference
: 3. In addition, NSPM identified that a staffing decision made subsequent to the initial submittal (Reference 1 and 2) affected the Security Plan page submitted in Reference 2.Therefore for purposes of clarity this corrected supplement supersedes Reference 3 in its entirety.
: 3. In addition, NSPM identified that a staffing decision made subsequent to the initial submittal (Reference 1 and 2) affected the Security Plan page submitted in Reference 2.Therefore for purposes of clarity this corrected supplement supersedes Reference 3 in its entirety.
The substantive changes made to the enclosures relative to Reference 3 are identified with colored text and sidebars as appropriate.
The substantive changes made to the enclosures relative to Reference 3 are identified with colored text and sidebars as appropriate.
WHEN SEPARATED FROM THE ENCLOSURES 2 AND 3 THIS LETTER MAY BE DECONTROLLED.
WHEN SEPARATED FROM THE ENCLOSURES 2 AND 3 THIS LETTER MAY BE DECONTROLLED.
S F UII SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION pac SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Document Control Desk Page 2 Subsequent to making the original submittal (Reference  
S F UII SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION pac SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Document Control Desk Page 2 Subsequent to making the original submittal (Reference
: 1) NSPM reconsidered the proper basis for categorical exclusion of this amendment request from environmental review. Enclosure 1, "Revised Environmental Consideration" replaces the Environmental Considerations and the basis for categorical exclusion from environmental review provided in Section 5 of Enclosure 1 to Reference 1.Enclosure 2 includes an additional page of the PINGP Security Plan affected by the proposed change and the proposed rewording.
: 1) NSPM reconsidered the proper basis for categorical exclusion of this amendment request from environmental review. Enclosure 1, "Revised Environmental Consideration" replaces the Environmental Considerations and the basis for categorical exclusion from environmental review provided in Section 5 of Enclosure 1 to Reference 1.Enclosure 2 includes an additional page of the PINGP Security Plan affected by the proposed change and the proposed rewording.
Enclosure 3 provides additional information describing the effects of the proposed change at the request of the NRC staff.NSPM submits this submittal in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.90.The information provided in this letter does not impact the conclusions of the Determination of No Significant Hazards Consideration presented in the March 18, 2011 submittal.
Enclosure 3 provides additional information describing the effects of the proposed change at the request of the NRC staff.NSPM submits this submittal in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.90.The information provided in this letter does not impact the conclusions of the Determination of No Significant Hazards Consideration presented in the March 18, 2011 submittal.

Revision as of 14:31, 30 April 2019

Supplement to License Amendment Request (LAR) to Revise the Physical Security Plan
ML11154A134
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/02/2011
From: Schimmel M A
Xcel Energy, Northern States Power Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-PI-11-54, TAC ME5897, TAC ME5898
Download: ML11154A134 (3)


Text

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant U XcelEnergy 1717 Wakonade Drive East Welch. MN 55089 June 2, 2011 L-PI-1 1-54 10 CFR 50.90 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 Dockets 50-282 and 50-306 License Nos. DPR-42 and DPR-60 Supplement to License Amendment Request (LAR) to Revise the Physical Security Plan (TAC Nos. ME5897 and ME5898)

Reference:

1. Letter from NSPM to NRC, L-PI-1 1-020, "License Amendment Request (LAR) to Revise the Physical Security Plan", dated March 18, 2011.2. Letter from NSPM to NRC, L-PI-11-021, "Technical Evaluation and Supporting Information in Support of License Amendment Request (LAR)to Revise the Physical Security Plan", dated March 18, 2011.3. Letter from NSPM to NRC, L-PI-11-50, "Supplement to License Amendment Request (LAR) to Revise the Physical Security Plan", dated May, 4, 2011.In References 1 and 2, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, doing business as Xcel Energy (hereafter "NSPM"), requested an amendment to the Operating License for the Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant (PINGP) to revise the PINGP Physical Security Plan. Reference 3 then provided supplemental information as requested by NRC in an email dated April 26, 2011.The NRC staff subsequently made NSPM aware of errors in Reference
3. In addition, NSPM identified that a staffing decision made subsequent to the initial submittal (Reference 1 and 2) affected the Security Plan page submitted in Reference 2.Therefore for purposes of clarity this corrected supplement supersedes Reference 3 in its entirety.

The substantive changes made to the enclosures relative to Reference 3 are identified with colored text and sidebars as appropriate.

WHEN SEPARATED FROM THE ENCLOSURES 2 AND 3 THIS LETTER MAY BE DECONTROLLED.

S F UII SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION pac SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Document Control Desk Page 2 Subsequent to making the original submittal (Reference

1) NSPM reconsidered the proper basis for categorical exclusion of this amendment request from environmental review. Enclosure 1, "Revised Environmental Consideration" replaces the Environmental Considerations and the basis for categorical exclusion from environmental review provided in Section 5 of Enclosure 1 to Reference 1.Enclosure 2 includes an additional page of the PINGP Security Plan affected by the proposed change and the proposed rewording.

Enclosure 3 provides additional information describing the effects of the proposed change at the request of the NRC staff.NSPM submits this submittal in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 50.90.The information provided in this letter does not impact the conclusions of the Determination of No Significant Hazards Consideration presented in the March 18, 2011 submittal.

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91, NSPM is notifying the State of Minnesota of this LAR supplement by transmitting a copy of this letter (without safeguards information) to the designated State Official.Enclosure 2 to this letter, "Additional Affected Page" and Enclosure 3 "Additional Supporting Information", contain Safeguards Information.

Therefore, NSPM requests that these enclosures be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 73.22.If there are any questions or if additional information is needed, please contact Leonard Sueper at 612-330-6917.

Summary of Commitments This letter contains no new commitments and no revisions to existing commitments.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.Executed on-Mark A. Schimme Site Vice President, Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant Northern States Power Company -Minnesota Enclosures (3)SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION Document Control Desk Page 3 cc: Administrator, Region III, USNRC NRR Project Manager, PINGP, USNRC (without safeguards information)

Resident Inspector, PINGP, USNRC (without safeguards information)

State of Minnesota (without safeguards information)

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION