ML12159A453: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML12159A453
| number = ML12159A453
| issue date = 06/11/2012
| issue date = 06/11/2012
| title = Calvert Cliffs, Nine Mile Point and Ginna Nuclear Power Plant - Review of 60-Day Response for Jld Recommendation 9.3
| title = Nine Mile Point and Ginna Nuclear Power Plant - Review of 60-Day Response for Jld Recommendation 9.3
| author name = Thadani M C
| author name = Thadani M C
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-1

Revision as of 14:12, 4 April 2019

Nine Mile Point and Ginna Nuclear Power Plant - Review of 60-Day Response for Jld Recommendation 9.3
ML12159A453
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs, Nine Mile Point, Ginna  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/11/2012
From: Thadani M C
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Spina J A
Constellation Energy Nuclear Group
Thadani M
References
TAC ME8739, TAC ME8740, TAC ME8741, TAC ME8742, TAC ME8743
Download: ML12159A453 (6)


Text

UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 11, 2012 Mr. James A. Spina Vice President Corporate Site Operations 100 Constellation Way, Suite 200C Baltimore, MD 21202 RE: CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2, AND GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT-REVIEW OF 60-DAY RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RECOMMENDATION 9.3, OF THE NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RELATED TO THE FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ACCIDENT (TAC NOS.ME8739, ME8740, ME8742, ME8743, AND ME8741)

Dear Mr. Spina:

By letter dated March 12, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) issued a Request for Information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section SO.S4(f) which included the Near Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP). Specifically, licensees were requested to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged Station Blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing study to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event. If a licensee could not meet the requested 90-day response, then that licensee was required to provide a response within 60 days of the issuance of the letter describing an alternative course of action and estimated completion date. By letter dated May 11, 2012, Constellation Energy submitted its 60-day response proposing an alternative course of action based upon the higher priority to complete the implementation of the revised EP Rule. As discussed in the enclosed NRC staff evaluation, the licensee's alternative approach outlined in its 60-day response letter is consistent with the guidance of industry document Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 12-01, "Guidance for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities,,,1 and the direction of the Commission.

In addition, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee provided an adequate basis for its proposed alternative to responding to the SO.S4(f) Request for Information regarding communications and staffing for NTTF Recommendation 9.3. 1 NRC staff determined NE112-01 to be an acceptable approach in letter dated 05-15-2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12131A043).

-2 If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1476 or via e-mail at mohan. thadani@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Mohan Thadani, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-317, 50-318,50-220,50-410, and 50-244

Enclosure:

Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv Mr. George Gellrich, Vice Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power 1650 Calvert Cliffs Lusby, MD Mr. Ken Landon, Vice Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 & P.O. Box Lycoming, NY Mr. Joseph E. Pacher, Vice President R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power 1503 Lake Ontario, NY UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STAFF EVALUATION INFORMATION REQUEST MADE UNDER 10 CFR REGARDING NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-53 RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DOCKET NOS. 50-317 AND NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT NOS. 1 AND FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NOS, DPR-63 AND DOCKET NOS, 50-220 AND R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, R.E. GINNA NUCLEAR POWER FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DOCKET NO. By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 12073A348.), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) issued a Request for Information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), paragraph 50.54(f) which included the Near-Term Task Force (NTTF) Recommendation 9.3 for Emergency Preparedness (EP). Specifically, licensees were requested to assess their means to power communications equipment onsite and offsite during a prolonged Station Blackout (SBO) event and to perform a staffing study to determine the staff required to fill all necessary positions in response to a multi-unit event. If a licensee could not meet the requested 90-day response, then that licensee was required to provide a response Enclosure within 60 days of the issuance of the letter describing an alternative course of action and estimated completion date. By letter dated May 3, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 1212SA41 0), the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) submitted NEI 12-01, "Guideline for Assessing Beyond Design Basis Accident Response Staffing and Communications Capabilities," Revision 0, May 2012. The NRC staff reviewed NEI 12-01 and found it to be an acceptable method for licensees to use when responding to the NRC's 10 CFR SO.S4(f) Request for Information regarding communications and staffing for EP. This staff evaluation is focused specifically on the licensee's response to the 10 CFR SO.S4(f) letters and not on the associated Orders. By letter dated May 11,2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 12136A231), as supplemented on June 6,2012 Constellation Energy submitted its 60-day response to the 10 CFR SO.S4(f) Request for Information proposing an alternative course of action based upon the higher priority to complete the implementation of the revised EP Rule. The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's proposed alternative against the guidance contained in NEI 12-01. In addition, the NRC staff also considered the direction given by the Commission in the Staff Requirements Memorandum (SRM) to SECY 12-002S, "Proposed Orders and Requests for Information in Response to Lessons Learned from Japan's March 11, 2011, Great Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami," dated March 9, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 120690347).

This SRM stated, in part, that Completing implementation activities associated with the rule we have already promulgated has greater safety significance and also involves the coordinated actions of our partners in State and local governments.

Substantial public credibility benefits accrue from continuing these activities as a priority.

The NRC staff considers the existing EP framework and regulations provide a reasonable assurance of adequate protection of public health and safety in the event of a radiological emergency.

The revised EP rule that was promulgated on November 23, 2011, initiated a number of activities that will enhance EP programs, including conducting a staffing analysis and enhancing public notification systems. The implementation of the EP rule was given priority by the Commission and the NTTF recommendations should not displace ongoing work that has greater safety benefit, higher priority, or is necessary for continued safe operation of nuclear power plants. The NTTF Report concluded that continued operation and continued licensing activities do not pose an imminent risk to the public health and safety and are not inimical to the common defense and security.

The phased approach to responding to the 10 CFR SO.S4(f) letters, combined with the definition of new response requirements associated with Fukushima NTTF Recommendation 4.2, as subsequently modified by the NRC staff and issued as NRC Order EA-12-049 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 120S4A 736), will ensure that enhancements will be made to staffing and communications by licensees.

It should be noted that the 10 CFR SO.S4(f) letter and implementation of the Order includes completion of actions related to response assignments, staffing changes, issuance of new or revised procedures or guidelines, and training.

Activities are ongoing by both the NRC and industry to initiate interim actions as a result of lessons learned from the events which will be provided in the 90-day response such as:

-* Methods to access the site

  • Notification of staff
  • Interim actions taken to date Given the above and that the licensee's approach was found to be consistent with the guidance of NEI 12-01 and the direction of the Commission, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee has provided an adequate basis for its proposed alternative responding to the 10 CFR 50.54(f) letters regarding communications and staffing for Recommendation 9.3.

-2 If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-1476 or via e-mail at mohan.thadani@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, IRAJ Mohan Thadani, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 1-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-317, 50-318, 50-220, 50-410, and 50-244 Safety Evaluation cc w/encl: Distribution via listserv cc Mr. George Gellrich, Vice President Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Lusby, MD 20657-4702 Mr. Ken Landon, Vice Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit Nos. 1 &P.O. Box Lycoming, NY Mr. Joseph E. Pacher, Vice President R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power 1503 Lake Ontario, NY DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsNrrPMGinna Resource RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsRgn1 MailCenter Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1 Resource CMurray, NSIR RidsNrrLAKGoldsteinResource JShea, NRR/JLD RidsNrrPMCalvert Cliffs Resource JKratchman, NRR/JLD RidsNrrPMNine Miles Point Resource RidsNsirDpr Resource RidsOgcRp Resource ADAMS Accession No ML 12159A453

  • concurrence via email OFFICE NRR/DORULPL 1-1/PM NRR/DORULPL 1-1/LA NSIR/DPR/DDEPE/NRLB/BC NAME MThadani KGoldstein CMurray* DATE 06/11/12 06111112 06/06112 OFFICE NRR/JLD/PMB/BC NRR/DORULPL 1-1/BC NRR/DORULPL 1-1/PM NAME RPascarelli GWilson MThadani DATE 06111/12 06/11/12 06/11/12 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY