ML18037A699: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18037A699
| number = ML18037A699
| issue date = 01/02/2018
| issue date = 01/02/2018
| title = Comment (108) from Anonymous Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft Nureg
| title = Comment (108) from Anonymous Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/9/18 11 :42 AM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pg-m52k Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0109 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 *--* ----*----* --------------*----*-.. -----* --------------*-------------------* --------------------*----------*---------------~-------------------*---------*------------Submitter Information f:l ,c-~ bo29'9t; Name: Anonymous Anonymous 11 /;s /;it:)11 General Comment It's pretty obvious that Wdison wants to wash their hands of this as soon as possible by designing inadequate containers that are not safe enough to store nuclear waste for the next thousands of years. I quiver at the thought of toxic waste being buried in the ocean with no regard for our precious planet, and all life in and around it! Please do the right thing! I do not want to be another statistic! SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 . Add= Jer~fk..y' 51,_;*,-{w ( J~SJJ https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/ getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90a66&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018}}
{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/9/18 11 :42 AM Received:
January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pg-m52k Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document:
NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0109 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734  
*--* ----*----* ------------
--*----*-.. -----* --------------*-----
--------------*  
--------------------*----------*--
-------------~----------
---------*---
------*------------Submitter Information f:l ,c-~ bo29'9t; Name: Anonymous Anonymous 11 /;s /;it:)1 1 General Comment It's pretty obvious that Wdison wants to wash their hands of this as soon as possible by designing inadequate containers that are not safe enough to store nuclear waste for the next thousands of years. I quiver at the thought of toxic waste being buried in the ocean with no regard for our precious planet, and all life in and around it! Please do the right thing! I do not want to be another statistic!
SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 . Add= Jer~fk..y' 51,_;*,-{w ( J~SJJ https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/
getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90a66&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018}}

Latest revision as of 23:24, 13 September 2018

Comment (108) from Anonymous Regarding Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG
ML18037A699
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/2018
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00108, NRC-2017-0211
Download: ML18037A699 (1)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:As of: 1/9/18 11 :42 AM Received: January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pg-m52k Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document: NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0109 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734

  • --* ----*----* ------------

--*----*-.. -----* --------------*-----


*


*----------*--


~----------


*---


*------------Submitter Information f:l ,c-~ bo29'9t; Name: Anonymous Anonymous 11 /;s /;it:)1 1 General Comment It's pretty obvious that Wdison wants to wash their hands of this as soon as possible by designing inadequate containers that are not safe enough to store nuclear waste for the next thousands of years. I quiver at the thought of toxic waste being buried in the ocean with no regard for our precious planet, and all life in and around it! Please do the right thing! I do not want to be another statistic!

SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 . Add= Jer~fk..y' 51,_;*,-{w ( J~SJJ https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/ getcontent?objectld=0900006482d90a66&format=xml&showorig=false 01/09/2018}}