ML20244E178

Discusses Review of Final Draft Tech Specs.No Substantive Deviations from STS Found Other than Deviations Addressed in Author 860411 Memo.Addl Item Re Treatment of Valves Requires Change

ML20244E178
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook, 05000000
Issue date:	08/07/1986
From:	Russell W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Rossi E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20235T530	List: ML20235T528 ML20235T579 ML20235T663 ML20235T691 ML20235U003 ML20235U602 ML20235X083 ML20244B841 ML20244B906 ML20244C358 ML20244C416 ML20244D120 ML20244D121 ML20244D168 ML20244D171 ML20244D239 ML20244D261 ML20244D328 ML20244D408 ML20244D460 ML20244D746 ML20244D756 ML20244D811 ML20244D814 ML20244D823 ML20244D839 ML20244D840 ML20244D862 ML20244D876 ML20244D880 ML20244D951 ML20244D982 ML20244D989 ML20244D992 ML20244E001 ML20244E005 ML20244E016 ML20244E024 ML20244E031 ML20244E069 ML20244E099 ML20244E103 ML20244E155 ML20244E178 ML20244E229 ML20244E232 ML20244E238 ML20244E242 ML20244E344 ML20244E356 ... further results
References
FOIA-87-51 NUDOCS 8608180275
Download: ML20244E178 (1)

Text

-

August 7, 1986 V

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Ernie Rossi, Assistant Director for PWR-A Division of PWR Licensing-A, NRR FROM:

William T. Russell, Director Division of Human Factors Technology, NRR

SUBJECT:

DHFT REVIEW 0F SEABROOK FINAL DRAFT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Comments arising from our review of proposed deviations of the Seabrook l

Technical Specifications from the Standard Technical Specifications were 4

transmitted with my earlier April 11, 1986 memo to you on this subject.

These comments have been discussed at the working level before and after transmittal. Our audit of the Seabrook Final Draft Technical Specifications showed it is consistent with the DHFT position except snubbers were not deleted from TS and station staff qualifications were. We were informed of these exceptions in advance.

It is our understanding that these exceptions were reviewed and determined to be acceptable on a plant specific basis.

We also understand that the Seabrook TS had no substantive deviations from the Standard TS other than those comented on in my memo of April 11, 1986.

Accordingly, we conducted only a limited audit of the Final Draft.

The one additional item we identified as requiring change is the treatment of valves which perform more than one safety-related function, e.g., containment isolation and safety injection. Such valves have been called dual function valves.

The need for TS changes for dual function valves was documented by the enclosed memo from H. Denton to J. Heltemes.

Possible changes hue been discussed informally with each F0B in connection with NT0Ls. The issue has also been broached with some applicants, e.g.

Vogtle. We will continue working with the F0Bs to develop a consensus p,osition that can be incorporated into all NT0L TS before issuance of the full power licenses.

d W T.[055<AA-William T. Russell, Director Division of Human Factors Technology, NRR

Enclosure:

Memo from Derttodo Heltemes, d

May 13, 19if3 bm ny 4 CONTACT: David Langford, NRR (49-24906)

Distribution:

TSCB:DHFT:NRR C:

FT:NRR F0B Branch Chiefs CMoon DLangford:dl E

PMcKee, IE RPerch 08/ 5 /86 08/5 6

TSCB Members GPlumlee TSCB R/F CSchulten A:DD:DHFT:

R D:DHFT:NRR Central Files TNovak BBoger WTRussell 1

Conran/Capra, ED0 FMiraglia 08/(,/86 08/f /86 Russell /Rowsome RBernero DCrutchfield Glainas (TSCB7 - memo to rossi from russell)

(

- - - - -