ML20244E031

Forwards Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Tech Spec Improvement Program.Evaluation of Consistency of Proposed FSAR Submittal & Final Draft Tech Specs Complete

ML20244E031
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook, 05000000
Issue date:	06/27/1986
From:	Benaroya V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Nerses V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20235T530	List: ML20235T528 ML20235T579 ML20235T663 ML20235T691 ML20235U003 ML20235U602 ML20235X083 ML20244B841 ML20244B906 ML20244C358 ML20244C416 ML20244D120 ML20244D121 ML20244D168 ML20244D171 ML20244D239 ML20244D261 ML20244D328 ML20244D408 ML20244D460 ML20244D746 ML20244D756 ML20244D811 ML20244D814 ML20244D823 ML20244D839 ML20244D840 ML20244D862 ML20244D876 ML20244D880 ML20244D951 ML20244D982 ML20244D989 ML20244D992 ML20244E001 ML20244E005 ML20244E016 ML20244E024 ML20244E031 ML20244E069 ML20244E099 ML20244E103 ML20244E155 ML20244E178 ML20244E229 ML20244E232 ML20244E238 ML20244E242 ML20244E344 ML20244E356 ... further results
References
FOIA-87-51 NUDOCS 8607080027
Download: ML20244E031 (3)

Text

_ _ _ _ _

____-----------y 1

JUN 2 71986 i Docket No. 50-443 MEMORANDUM FOR: i Victor Nerses Senior Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #5 Division of PWR Licensing-A )

j FROM:

Victor Benaroya, Chief Facilities Operations Branch Division of PWR Licensing-A

SUBJECT:

SUPPLEMENT SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT, TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ,

Plant Name: Seabrook Station, Unit 1 Utility:

Docket No.: Public Service of New Hampshire 50-443 Responsible Branch: PD#5/DPL-A Project Manager: Victor Nerses Review Branch: F0B/DPL-A i

Review Status: Complete cation Improvement Program. Enclosed is our safety evaluation of the SeabI This report completes our evaluation of the consistency of the proposed FSAR submittal and the Final Draft Technical Specifications.

Victor Benaroya, Chief Facilities Operations Branch  !

Division of PWR Licensing-A

Enclosure:

As stated cc: T. Novak V. Noonan B. Clayton C. Moon D. Vassallo ,

i W. Regan E. Butcher

Contact:

C. Moon x29605 Distribution Docket File PWR-A A/D l F0B-A r/f F08-A p/f PWR-A: FOB PWR-A:F0B PWR-A:F0B CMoon:bjp BClayton VBenJroya 6/s7/86 6/ty86 6/2ft/86 i f

,. h Y0 c

_s - - - - __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _

SAFETY EVALUATION SEABROOK STATION, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-443 13 Technical Specifications During the preparation of Technical Specifications for Seabrook Station, Unit 1, the applicant proposed a Technical Specification Improvement Program.

The results of the staff's review of several items in that program were reported in a letter to the applicant on May 20, 1986. The staff concluded '

that certain technical specifications requirements could be eliminated from l the Technical Specifications if the applicant (1) developed acceptable procedures for control of operations, (2) developed acceptable procedures for f

controlling changes to those procedures, and (3) identified in the FSAR and the ODCM the operations that will be subjected to these controls.

By letter of June 17, 1986, the applicant transmitted the Seabrook Station Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). Included in the ODCM are the following tables:

Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Analysis Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples By letter of June 23, 1986, the applicant transmitted information for in-l corporation in the FSAR that would be subjected to the alternative controls.

l This information is as follows:

l

l

.. j 1

1 Reactor Trip System Instrumentation Response Times

)

Engineered Safety Feature Activation System Instrumentation Response Times l

~~

1.oose Part Detection System Reactor Vessel Material Irradiation Specimens i

Snubbers - Inservice Inspection Program Containment Isolation Valves Fire Hose Stations Yard Fire Hydrants and Hydrant Hose Stations Containment Penetration Conductor Overcurrent Protection Motor Operated Valves Themal Overload Protection l We have detemined that this list of items is consistent with our approvals for removal of items from the Technical Specifications.  !

In the June 23, 1986 letter, the applicant also included the administrative j controls for the Seabrook Station Technical Specification Improvement Program.

We find that the applicant has included the items removed from the Technical Specifications as the ODCM and FSAR and has provided the requisite controls.

We, therefore, conclude that the portions of the Technical Specification Improvement Program found acceptable in our May 20, 1986 letter, are appro-priately documented and acceptable for implementation.