ML20236U483

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Supports Need for Advance Notice of Proposed Rule Re Radiation Therapy QA & Penalties for Negligence.Development of Simple Prohibition of Therapy Misadministrations within 10CFR35 Coupled W/Enforcement Sanction Encouraged
ML20236U483
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/08/1986
From: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Jennifer Davis
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
Shared Package
ML20235F951 List: ... further results
References
FRN-52FR36942, RULE-PR-35 AC65-1-068, AC65-1-68, NUDOCS 8712030091
Download: ML20236U483 (1)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

/jcA 8800q'o UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

'Y

[

REGloN il

(

o

, j 101 MARIETTA STRE ET, N.W.

4 t

ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323

% s 3

)T(Jh,A DEC 0 81986 4

MEMORANDUM FOR: John Davis, Director y

Office of, Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards FROM:

J. Nelson Grace Regional Administrator, RII'

SUBJECT:

COMMENTARY ON ADVANCED NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAXING

" RADIATION THERAPY QUALITY ASSURANCE AND PENALTIES FOR NEGLIGENCE" (MEMO, R. CUNNINGHAM TO J. GRACE, DATED 11/24/86)

We support the need for rulemaking in this area. We feel actions are needed in order to lessen the likelihood of therapeutic misadministration.

Instead of a quality. assurance approach as alluded to in the advance notice of rulemaking, we suggest consideration of rulemaking which prohibits therapeutic misadministration be developed.

Such rulemaking would be consistent with the approach taken in 10 CFR 20.101 and 20.103 which prohibit exposure to excessive levels of radiation and radioactive material.

The prohibition of therapy misadministration coupled with appropriate enforcement sanctions derived # rom an augmented enforcement policy should provide additional incentive for licensee improvement in this area.

This regulatory approach should be used without the need for a finding of negligence. We believe that making a finding of~ negligence would be difficult under our regulatory (administrative law) process.

Further, extensive inspection or investigative efforts in trying to establish a finding of negligence may be counterproductive to obtaining acknowledgement of the problem on the part of the l hensee and receiving prompt remedial actions.

In summary, we support an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking but encourage development of a simple " prohibition" of therapy misadministration within 10 CFR 35 coupled with an appropriate enforcement sanction, rather than tying the penalties to proof of negligence.

J. Nelson Grace 8712030091 871201 PDR PR

__i_

_