ML20236T777
Text
_____-_--_-- - - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ . _ _ - - _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - - _ _ - ._ - - -
\
N
!{ '
- ~ 0 jf j ,
gq r
pa ntCoq[o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION UNITED $TATES
!;{ / /
( y' e REGION ll
) , 0
' ' A' r ,.
EI S.,
f ATL ANT A, GEoHGI A 30323
- %,,'7,.p JAN 0 01987 i
,/ MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard E. Cunningham, Director l
/; , , , Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety '
?
% FROM: J. Philip Stohr, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards 4
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR CONCURRENCE ON COMMISSION PAPER: QUALITY ASSURANCE f
AND PENALTIES FOR NEGLIGENCE (YOUR MEMO, 12/24/86)
/
- i In response to your referenced request, we concur with the subject paper as
- ,I <
written.
. .i%,,,
It is obvious that substantial evaluation and analysis effort has been applied to the various aspects of this issue. Another simple approach (which may have
' _. already been evaluated) was expressed in our December 8, 1986 memo on this subject, i.e., a "mi sadmi ni strati or." would be a violation of regulatory u) requirements, and as such, licensees would of necessity employ quality assurance programs to prevent them.
Ve appreciate the opportunity to comment on this matter.
)
.. a ' ' /
)
,'i J./Phili Sichr 91 ),; s !
, I ,
i / ,\
k t,
.. .) ' ; r'
.)
,<5
)
s
?'
h i
f f
(J
\
( ~ \,
. [v 8712O20083 871201 < ,
!A A , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _
y .q ;- _ _ y" , . , _ __ ___ _ ..,_,_
'2 -
'd id101: 2 'd. '80 Pl.t.8/90/10 d1Ndlid-2 '938 WOdd' M
/
.y n 9 t
q F uNino srAns . a-g
. [g. m g'o o 1, Qy-
!,y! ) NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g1
.I 0' 'E RtGloN il .
j L, ,h 101 MMuf T1 A STHitT,N.W.
j g AT t. ANT A.Cf omCI A 30323 g '< 1 t}(f
'6lt ' J AN 061987 -
.g$.y% h.
a ! ,' S q' PEM3PM DUM FOR: Richard E.LCunningham, Director 1 5' Division of Fuel cycle and.hterial Safety '
... N .,
FROM: J.PhilipStohr, Director l ~,
Division of Radiation Safety a.od Safeguards
SUBJECT:
'REQUEd 'f0R' CONCURRENCE ON COMMISSION PAPER:. QUALITY ASSURANCE
.MD PENKLTIES FOUNEGtJGENCE (YOUR MEMO, 12/24/86) oo 's i
[s e 4 i
In response to your ref erenced request, we concur with the subject paper as l- ' writtem It is obvious that substantial evaluation and analysis ef fort has been applied
, 'a ' to the various .nspects of thir, issue. Anott.her simple approacW (which may have already been evaluated) was " expressed in "c'ur; December 8, 1986 memo on this subject, i .n . a "misada. ministration" would' te a violation of regulatory requirements, andias such, licensees sould of necussity employ quality assurance l-m programs to prevent them, 7 le A,; f .
We appreciate the c4portunity to cottnents on this matter.
' ~
'jf ,
(6 w' f
J' >
i I *.
- 4- ilI ;S o it i
3 .
- ,5 i i g u.
[ \
s
'/
![ ,
? x. : s
ix '
- y ,
[,
', : i
,( $e' '
g
)
/
y ,
ib ,3
'g:,;
%g , g fp/.vl*4p#J x <
- sy,g
- w l4 A. e. ,
,