ML20235C811
Text
-
~.
50-205.
g l
- l DCi.
..u i
t Mr. David 5. Pesomen l
Rancutive secretary Northern Calidernia Aa>asciaties to i
Preserve Bodega mead and garber I
ag2s Telegneph Aveems Bestesley'4, Ca1Liernia near nr. ressmen This replias to your letter of October 8,1963 to cbsisman seabeas esoneraies the mestear poser remotor proposed by posific Cas & Electric
.e sy for es.str.eu at godega. gey.
The asiamological and geplegical aka ma**eistics of the pr J :-f Bodega mead site, as you kaos, are essential a1===e= in the na==4=atan.'s evaluatism of the guayany's b**
^
_ 8er a constructica permit. The report rossived by the w==*=
from the Department of the Interior early this samth reflasted the statue of emeavaties work being eendested by 3Ges as of June 6,1963. asteegeant to that date, havover, further i
excavatism disetened a fonts think esteeds into bedrock at the locatima of the proposed seester. The gamesentes, therefore, regunstad a further report on the geslagia aspects of the fanit. Chaiseen seaboss's letter i
of October 3,1963 to Asties secretary carver stated:
"It is met yet koess ubether, is a geological sense, the fenit would be seasidered to be active er inactive.
work is==**==ing in en attempt to dete mine approzi-
]
mately how tees ege movement last escurred alens the inmit. Indesmetten on this point will be layertant is ear d=*a=4==*1a= ef the significanes of the fault, and we theredeos ask that you f==esh as a further report on the geslagis aspects of the fault."
A espy of the w=i='s publis magarding this iW meet and the regnest Ser a Sarther report is emelseed. gotil that report has been resetved, together with all other data relating to the geological
- ami seismolestaat sha=**=-1=**me of the ette, no decaseinstise will be made by the n===8==Imm,as to the e**t hy of the site.
omer >
SURNAME >
DATE >
Pbem AEC-SIS (Rn. 9-63)
FIRESTDB5-665 PDR Ql
as Mr. David E. Paeomen
2
your letter also refers to the use of concrete by the Company at the site. De state that this esmetitutes esostmastion anther than geological exploration and that it appears te violate section 50.10(b) of part 50 of the Osumissima's a _-*=*' n.
With respost to this matter, the enclosed letter of July 23, 1963 from the commissima's Constal Coonest to the Company may be haleful to yes. I as atos enclosing a espy of the letter dated July 26, 1963 from the Director, Division of Licensing and Ensulation to the company and a espy of the company's letter dated August 8, 1963 relating therete.
Sincerely yours.
( M U. -
- 5. L. Price Director of Regulation
Enclosures:
1.
Public A - -
- 2.
Cpy Ltr dtd 7/22/63 3.
cpy Ler 4td 7/26/63 4.
Cry Ltr 4td s/a/63 bec:
H. L. Price R. Lowenstein l
OGC 1
A t
(( M 'DLR REG D
omct,
ERPri skm SURNAMI>
~
10/,1/63 Id[ / /63 10/p 63 10/3a/63 2
m3 rorm u:c sin an.e-so
.......,,........,m, i._.m,
]
71 I
m.