ML20235C372

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards 641111 Notice of 641113 State of CA Assembly Rules Committee Hearing Re Feasibility of Power Plant on Bodega Bay.Related Info Encl
ML20235C372
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Bodega Bay
Issue date: 10/28/1964
From: Pesonen D
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE BODEGA
To: Price H
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20234A767 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709240431
Download: ML20235C372 (11)
v • d • e


Text

- _ - _ _

li i

(

s m _*

  • ar e w m a

( f6 205 Northern California Association To Preserve Bodega Head and Harbor

\

.. . .WT'".n ?2 Berkeleyk Colifornia

. , /v///

ADVISOR $

, 2820 Tehegraph Avenue , I

, y '

UY '

Anse! Adams t David Brower

  • John Emmons October 28,1%4 (

Harold Gilliam Joel Gustafson Weldon F. Heald Mr. Harold Price, Director Joel Hedgpeth Division of Licensing and Regulation Francis Herring U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington 25, D.C.

D. B. Luton Willsom Penn Mott, Jr.

Dear Mr. Price:

Thomas Parkinson

    • ""*'"""" Per our telephone conv ersation today, enclosed is T E"5 8'Ya*'d* the notice of the hearing on November 13th issued by the California Assembly Rules Committee.

David E. Pesonen Ezecutive Secretary Sincerely,

-m -

, . a], . ,,

~ . ~ < x a ,,x

./

a r < ,. . .c. <

David E. Pesonen Executive Secretary a

/

.<_ /, , p'

, c

, /c . ~

7,w.s e

/ /

  • ,'s

, f- x f j l' ( ' f

- _' - (j [

, ,v #

t_,

? /

c ir ;,j -

f/,.c /  !. '] ~ '

i

,' Q,- O .i L ' l' 3,,,,.-</a w ~t '

/

.' s m

- Rz o,

. m.

y .r r 3 c.

~ ._

p .7

c. ,o i icn,,

SC V' '"

051217 '._ 2d/N -- I B7099% PDR 1i. / 2 II # /M-- -

=

'N - i hRESTD95M g g ,,_ / g ,,

l 2 > -

Purpose; to work for preservation of the scense and historic heodlands of Bodego ure the Boy and to ins ecological integrity of the surrounding marine environenent A Cahfornia Non proht Corporation

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_-__-__------D

e j

~

e ,* *'j -

w . _ _ . . . . . - . . . i

  • ... -- d 1 s MCMCERS

- w. MEMOEa6 JAMcs R. MtLLs e &

NI M Y

+ LCU C AA?! avl ~M Jtrowg R. WALDs J AM M L. i'cu.t E4 s

,. dOEM d hil I.1NNN f00 Roou 3173. start capitol TOM BANE CH Ath M AN l

l l

l 9

\

September 11, 1964 i

NOTICE OF HEARING -

The Assembly Committee on Rules will hold a hearing November 13th on HR No. 585 of the 1963 Session, relative to a study of the feasibility of the power plant on Bodega Bay. The Committee will meet in Room 2117 of the Capitol Annex in Sacramento at 10:00 A. M.

Those who wish to appear before the Committee should notify the Assembly Rules Committee in writing by October 30the Notification should

' be sent to Room 3173, State Capitol, Sacramento.

Oral presentations will be limited and therefore, it is requested that those wishing to present evidence to the Committee do so in writing. Any written presentation should be sent to the Committee by October 23rd.

V _ _ ___-____-_-__ -

e 14A-Press Democret., Scmts Rose, Calif. Sun., Oct. I I,1964 One of these asked the com.: The August quesdons ai s 4,;

j pany to postulate a total sk*-

a S' eaM O

q ing motion of the rock "i

==r itae aa t= =ar air caea '*"*d in the foundation," of as much picked up c statement in the '

earlier amendment that "a de-dr"a=>c *a ir i iti de

  • made" for certain vital pieces l AEC Hea as three feet, and asked wheth- of equipnent, and asked PG&Et

)er the structure and the leak.! for a full description of the ac l

  • l" tightness of the reactor contains celeration to be used in the' On bay A,,,,PI 'ti AALe he f I tact.

ment building would remain ind analysis.The PG1E pointed out that it s: fy a marfynum acceleration of:

a modified des!gn calls for the re l me times the forc actor containment structure to where PG&E has insisted that' missim a experts probe moreling thesit possibility centered in the containment of such aAs the Atomic e of.

Energ deeply into the controversialllarge inovement and ataround 'accels it.

l, the Intensity of an earthquake aAl to build the Bodegs ' ' force '

uclear la erauons of force of gravity.up to one times thelcgfg,*ip((g . e and strue ur Without conceding t h a t af

! walls of the pit would be filled ground acceleration of more yetr have all but vanished. -

  • Flont' DesiIn with water, and the structure it, than a th Ad there has been public spec. , credible,,ird of a gravity is tdation that the AEC may be design PG&E has submitted modification that would a major' selected sand ply knownthe of concludes company charac-self a re-sit on a "

trying to , warn off' Pacific iteristics which will permit hori. precise nature of the strain in-e generally that th Gas & Electric Co. float ' the reactor vessel on a! zontal movements of upy to three v layer of sandand(to accomodate feet without impairing theac-fune ce De utility, which nearly two large i

displacements) in ther years ago asked the AEC for latest amendment sa permission to build the plant, . tem would have "ys theture, sysd uon of although the the struccontainment tur struc 1 mined after final substantial doesn't buy that. Rather, the margins of safety" against fail might be shifted or mtated . . .,el plant.

company subscribes to the stre with the one-gravity figureJ %ere will be "no rigid struc- But it ssys the , company's; theory that the AEC is merely It insists, however, I " proposed design criteria f o r'

!t t h a t wel btecomecum between critical stmetres, equipment doing its homework before go- ground acceleration of mor e any major component," the and systems , , . contains sub-ing to public hearing.

than a third of one gravity is amendment says, and connec- s:antial margins of s a f e t y Last week the AECs Advisory " incredible "  ;

tions between the reactor con- against failure" for a one-grav-Committee On Reactor Safe. ne extended AEC PG&E!tainment structure and other guard considered the I a t e s t dialogue ity force.

on the earthquake! parts of the plant wul "have suf-PG&E answer to the A final AEC question posed query for more detail on a tion Nuclear Industryoftorelasayj threelatestin Augastquestion Ive move- happen in the event of a three-asked what would prompted th critical point-the earthquake that the " extreme conditions as ' ment.', feet safety of the plant.

sumed by some of the AEC'.d That of course,is only a par- foot fault motion elsewhere at~

ation-which might be a report 'ary demands on design whichResults of the AC

'and only one segment of the an- ;ure.

to the AEC on its findings, or a,those questions imply h a v e query for more information naturally lead ' to speculation swer.  :

PG&E rep!!cd that those pip-rren't expected to be made pubJ that the AEC is warning PG&E But the AEC returned in late l ing connections'in the p1a n!

!!c for a week or so. August with more questions

'that the plant will not be ap-; bearmg on the problem, which area "necessary for a safet ing aclentista and engineers a she."Re ACRS, shutdown of the reactor" wouldt proved for the Bodega Bay licomposed finally produced Nine, filed by the company Sept.

of lead-Arnend m en t be made flex!b're enoust andi year and a half ago gave p,re l given protection to accommod

!!minary, conditional approval!the magazine says, "is that to the plant desjgn.

be.And alternative AEC fleply explanation,16.

date the motion.

I

' fore the AEC walks into a pub.. All of which indicates the{

One of the conditions h a sllle hearing in this case whichi excerpt above, magn!tude the AEC of quesJons wonder-In b eIng a discus rabed in canedon with h point of emphasis - that thelcontroversy, it simplycetroversial

  • wantsplanttolof proposal,flexibility t

. . . reactor and buildings notjestablish that every credible or motions corresponding Whethcr to the a fault latest amend-be located on an active faultrincredible situation has been in..lmonon of up to th line "

i vestigated." to satWy & ACRS wH1 be

. Subsequent excavation byq ,f strenrh to resist the forces ac i bwn s%'. Peably '

PG&E of the hole that would PG&E View companying the dynamic re' AEC staff members could still house the reactor turned up A PGLE spokesman sayssponse t what some geologists have said lbthel ration. ,o the earthquake askvi- some more, which would '

latter is the company's view- "It has not been clearly further delay the date for the is throughan active the pit- fault r u n n in gl that the gamu*t of questions thatl shownpublic ,

. . "hearicg' the AEC said "how i f

Eventually - but probably  :

PG&E's consultants hne in sisted the fault is inactive, and ;with the controversial plant prom mentssome for these Ome ak me two sources Erst of b ofha i

posal is to be run by the AEC, strain wi]! be achieved." year--the Bodega case wHI get f that a fractlon anyof movement an inch is ex- "Anexceeding (t before The the public company idea of the order of cram.I " pre!nninary design . . assures, AEC.

hearing.

replied that[ to the heartr4 stage by the tremely unlikely," and that ofitnation ta which the proposed! that a practical design can bel It has said -

more than impossible " a foot " practically l plant is now being subjected l deseloped to protect the pipingling

!can be gained from a few points against fallare ,

Curvey. however, concluded that;" amendments" movements of the rock of up to; application to the AEC. ,

an that. of its originalj th three feet in any direction mightl  : sponse resultmg from the ac i De hearing promises to be be expected. , ya Inm Amendment a o Eight,'-submit..'" celebrations," and goes on to give largely a technical show, M e- ^ i

I F a' caac u"*a---

h -kOS l Fa' action.

' f S" * * *ut ta'*- F or informatloa.

, F or signature.

MEMO ROUTE SLIP . Note and return.

Wnn AFC-n3 mev. May H. lWn INITI Al.S RLMARES TQ (Name ano unit) " ' ars_clipst-Joe Feueberd, biose Servise Br. _ A**- 1, line Freaciese Chronicle,10/*9/64 ! " Atom Plant DFI, MQ can c.seF a n a tw ,--.. <

"AFC Groups Split Escold Price, RSS, gg 2. las Angeles Tissas, 10/24/ M:

a, ... u s _. e a - ,=.

iNm^" "'"T.' Ba** Ilesa Press Democrat,10/23/M,14ttee

.u us ,, g, w, ,.,, . g .,, ,, p . to To (u....nounni _

Robert 1mwenstein, rag, SQ m

.I 9 ,

INmm

,<.m. y,g g3 f 1o <~....no uno, S&N E. W. Smith, Comp 1. V.,

EE kb L 1

p%

noums i nou (s... .no unit, Rodney L. Southwick _

Asst. to the Manager _ _ _ _

for Public Informatie3 __

SAN PHONC NG DATE o s coo me, ,,,-,, o .,u m,-o..u J 10/29/u usc om, not ro .oomo .t et 4,,a

(

.&N.%uw.ew,- (.4m eh (

Atom Plant Safety *

/ Of7 im Again in Dlspute i Tile ATO.LC ENEltGY Comnus.uon (AECi is now in receipt of conflicting professional opin-jon concerning the safety of a proposed nuclear

power plant 'on Bodega Head.

Its Advisory Committee on Reactor Safe-l l guards te!!s it that there is " reasonable assur-ance" that the facility can be constructed on the site "without undue hazard to publi:. health and safety." But its Division of Nuclear Licensing

advises that " Bodega Head is not a suitable loca-tion" because of its proximity to the San Andreas fault and the possibility of earthquake damage to "a pioneering construction effoM. based on unveri-fied engineering principles" 5 Though these expert opinions are confusing to the lay mind because of their direct contracic-tion, they offer unmistakable tesdmory that the prime question of the site's safety is s.111 open to doubt. Throughout the Bodega Head controversy, this newspaper has urged both the Pacific Gas

& Electric Co. and the AEC to defer ar.y irrevcca-ble decision on this project at this lor"Sn until

, its safety is assured and there .s c' aty that it involves no more risk e.an a .mna. ecojectat some other site.

At this time, we renew tha: uarnian and add the reminder that the public will now i:nd it in-creasingly difficult to agree-in the absence of umfied professional assurance-cons:ruction of the plant at Bodega IIead is in its b(st mter2st.

lj

"
m n';' 'O T
2 0; 7 /Q "3 1
. . _ a

e

  • [

t IVirs.

. A h.Ccf 4.6 2.

ney Questions PG6E EDITOR: I. PG&E hadn't l been 30 ins er.t whei the, I n first cantacted me about buy.

small baad tryingto save Do.

y% ing my land. : hat the) didn't want .he publ.c to know that dega Heads for the pubiic h they wanted it as a tite for when it should be the whole

% a power plant. I would never public roaring to save it for Q have thought of calling it to themselves not leave it to just the attention of the public via the few. The Northern Cali-the ne wspapers. I learred ear. fornia Association to Preserve ly in bfe that when the local Bodega Heads anci Harbor is kids came around and whis- trying to save Bodega Heads pered. "Ixt's do so and so, f r the public. PG&E wants but don't tell your ma," it a f r their stockholders.

was sure to be found out, and If nuclear powered plants I't: get a good rpankirg. are so safe, why are safety Under much the same cir. zones so necessary? W h e n cumstances. v- h e n PG&E PG&E takes visitors to Vale.

whispered. "Doni tell the pub. citos. wnges it uke three lic" I was su c there was graduat.r engineers to escort something wrong witn t h e 'The visi ora around-~the' plant

~

deal, and the public should Githliger causters?'When know about it. And there is the Geyer counters start to sull too much wrong about cTcQQoF~aw'aFI'ar the whole rnatter tnd that e.nourn to snence that chck-inWn?

PG&E is franticar.y trying to hide. ~If u:ere is no danger from Only for the Save Bodega radiation, why did Rrssia.

Heads campq.n, anj its de- Engia.ic. and the United laying actions, the po ver plant States ign a t.ut ban treaty, on &>dega Heads would be to kee*. Inc ai' from b a;n- .

neming cortpletion, d not in ing co .taminated by cv. ppcl.

. actual operEtion. If Plan No. lauon? Why U.e worbide I was so safe, why has PG&E dismay over ChLna's re s '. car had to char.ge th<ir plans tes

some nine times since their !Y ' .a the p_t.uc , ,: Le oripnal plans for de plant, in*ere::ed in anaers to .ne.,e 1: Eey wer so saf(? And if ruest. n i

No. 4 is w .1uch a r thr.n .Wis. ROE 5. GAF7NEY Pla . L.1. can wt be sure Po>ega BO that P an Ac. 20 wu be any ._ _

safer than their orig.nal plan?

Can any plan, built astride an earthquake fault, be safe?

It would be of great inter-est to the public if it could kncw precsely what it is costing PGLE to oppose the opposition . . . what it is cost-ing the puthe throt;gh PG&E services that the pablic pays for to get this plant rammed down our throats, so to speak.

And the angels of heavens must be w"epmc le see our

p f d-J78 S a u, n. q . u. u s nI6 ~

( -'{

7155 5. FIRST ST., SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 3202-64-47 CYPRESS 7 3000 1

ll "OR IMMEDIATE RELEASE i

THF GENERAL ELECTRIC Company stated today that it sees absolutely no l

)

the Pacific Gas and Electric Company's decision to withdraw its 1 I
:1. :: ion for the Bodega Bay Atomic Power Plant should slow the inter-1 f

1 national impetus of nuclear power. I l

t j

i George White, General Manager of General Electric 's Atomic Power j i

Equipment Department, underlined that the same good reasons for applying n-. clear power prevail. "The decision on Bodega Bay hinged on the cuestion of the proximity c: the plant to one of the world's best known zones of I l

reistic activity, the San Andreas Fault." White continued, " General 1

Electric, PGLE and their consultants, the Advisory Committee on Reactor i Safeguarcs, and the Atomic Energy Commission all found the plant and its features would have provided for operation without undue hazard to the 1

health and safety of the public."

White pointed out that the only doubt expressed by the AEC concerned the ability of the structure to withstand a hypothetical th ree- foo t shear movement brought on by earthquake, and the inability to provide any experi-mental or experier.c> proof-test of the novel design to V.eep the structure

.' tact. PG&E found t!' L s ::tinor t ty view to be sufficient cause to withdraw their application.

r, _ . _ _ . _ ,

/-

( (

I-

_2_

l E White noted PG&E's comments on the.need for nuclear power in Calif-

-ornia as a basic reason why nuclear power would be applied at sites other than Bodega Head.

"The Bodega site was the specific problem in.this case," he said.

"With California one of the nation's two highest fuel-cost areas, with the State running out of hydro-electric power sites, with the growing scarcity of fossil fuals in California, and the fact that nuclear power plants emit no combustion products, there is no question but that nuclear power will l

be applied to California's need for_more and more electric energy."

)

1 i I L

i I

~ -. .. -. . - . . . - . . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ . . _... _ _ - - ,

l

...,..L ]

7 J.6.TCc, LEG

. rl6,LA Fs fl.3 E.CS ET g

$4 M Av . sO J. C ALIFORNie

t. a t e r

-,,.. .se. . a. ......

rrie s

, MessigePA6.c.

oevaa A.c C,o..fv g**

$m'd sDSg 14. CALIF 0F Nie t e ..s, s ai.s ave yy ,

r .... .... .....

F.....,,,u..,.. {

,,( , y ,

4

'li;IIDrlim hBg19 -

21I11rB

.I u

l 6 m l l

ALFRED E. ALQUIST s,, R j j

l mgw or n oF at . tun'. v, twsNTY.FDW ATM DistplCf ;l= y ,

l ,::'n

- , == . .ci 1

1 '

N ki .h S5N .n S October 28, 1964 W2 -M C i 4

! Q l G

.~

a u

l Mr. Thomas Nolan, Director -

United States Geological Survey [ g - h6 V(-

Department of the Interior Washington 25, D. C.

l

Dear Mr. Nolan,

b On November 13, 1964, in Room 2117 of the State Capitol in Sacramento, the California Assembly Rules Committee will hold a hearing " relative to a study of the feasibility of the power plant on Bodega Bay." This hearing stems from a reso-f lution which I introduced during the last general session of the Legislature and concerns specifically the proposed nuclear power plant at Bodega Head in l

Sonoma County, California.

An application for a construction permit for this installation is now pending before the Atomic Energy Commission and it is my understanding that the AEC has retained the U. S. Geological Survey to consult on the geologic and seismologic adequacy of the site. Two reports -- TEI-837 (September 1963) and l EEI-344 (December 1963) -- have so f ar been released.

The authors er and of these Mr. Manuel G.studies Bonillawere fromMr. yourJulius office Schlock-in {

j Menlo Park, and Dr. Jerry P. Eaton and Mr. Alfred l Clebsch, Jr. l

)

In the interests of a complete record at Ithe forth-would coming Assembly Rules Committee hearing, like to request that the above named U. S. G. S.

personnel appear at the hearings to present their findings on this matter, including any findings they 1

I

--~~~~

p. . Price- - - -'

Rec'd Ofi' . , o p

8. Beck - i Date_ _!d_1 , y ~'~

- ~

((.1.owenstein Mann ~~ Time Beth. ____t__./f'{/

_ 3ll]~, j

/Wendersan--

~ .. y__

I

, /

e .

^

(

o i"

.f i

- 2- ,

f may have made subsequent to the above listed reports.

He have been informally advised by Mr. Harold Price, Director of the Division of Licensing and Regulation, that the' Atomic Energy Commission han no objection to such an appearance or to the release of findings made in the persuit of U. S.

'G . S. Work for the Commission on this project.

I An early reply would be appreciated.

i Sincerely,

/d-

, (. ..

_ v.

"- ;i ALFRED E. ALOUIST w.

AEA:ew cc: Mr. Paul C. Bateman, Geologist in' Charge U. S. Geological Survey I

345 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, California i

Mr. Harold Price, Director

- Division of Licensing and Regulation U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington 25, D. c.

/

I Mr. James Lane, Executive Director Assembly Rules Committec )

Room 3173, State Capit.ol {

Sacramento 14, California i

1

, 1 I

)

i y

- - _ _ L _ _ _

A -. - _

y _

w

.a - ,

,. s

/ v v .

'p' ,N -p 1*

A-Plant on Quake Site t A Splits Two AEC Groups t 9e 'E 4

Continued irem First Fege whose repert. releaseu nt th*

W.A3 m , ,*,

O same Mme, said the safe'y:

a J ,j features wouM be adegate.;

W j- /4

.l ,' M 1* % - There was *reasor.able ab, fg I,? 4 4( *M

  • su-ance." t'te committ** ,gg.pg A

N/ e vd. tMt > FMegt p: ant and ot'eyr< { 3Ay d r.,.

%%; (j

'h , , rhi } a) y?

be t n t ,

/ y .y wit cut usue Nurt 'j p.,.e V1 ,,

/, q, ,

p N j c T j .

fublic lietring Ncrt'rd 6 ' j The spih rm " b I g , tar TU.* 3C0

(-*

rhr h.h g:n, .( . t i K"' a i t

m'vrd by t/e A ,ufu enic!T-befera rendem: a otes.m l(-(

, m r.: hold a }'. ,*e l.cartn: i MU,1 i fr. t'onttT C.1.1/1' nt' A w w - s<m er .* *' after ciecisionwhich a pM.m',

wi;; be meCe n y.gf.'. g.Pl.A ,, gdT $1TI, W.U P MTON safety and beena.ns kwr  % g 9.,,

i) .:e~cy co- W g g ,,

, , .n . q 41

  • en The hearing date, yet set,is egected te be es" 4-wie IP'.! g ,,, yy,gj~

g

,,g, a ..ya, ,e i .an pener Jy next year, j

% bui;* in the The Q.$ ed!be plant 1. 3 nyt *bnuS pke . prnras A"ea pt generate 3A000 ki:rwatts e.f least one maNr -eth sS 3

psor. HM, Caht T'e une e;eetricity has been a high Y during es Met 9 c.

b,a o inDNennrth " 49 fraq r eaw controvers;alissue b North Th, Ayc , heu;ng Ov4 y epp,y rn en. .'.y  % 'e 9a f em California smee it w ,g y , ,q., ,M 6p g icy pga repmed two yeart ago . ;We ph ca-O

. e A y c's rieaeiat acic Gas & Electr:e Co.

The site is abert 1000 fe w amn rj a: re.

y r---; mv+ - ' mm.

3 synst co* ct'ct on wert of the edge of he a:twe GeCU "D.r exce; cuF.tion Mc- is the 'tr.

, e not y duputcl % . San Andrus ear? cn'. -

, fault tone, Novereent a:e y certgry ei s hether ue x

-urg. *no saus I exper;. F *c d ca pp gquake ng,;enwnich n, a,. ".al m extmet ce W' the fault produced the grc ge 7 et1906n was

's *redici rg t e u1 mag' j spontble im the f i r e thatj, g.n ;aun td avociat.

a y terw wgr arc llte , devastated Ean Frarcisco. ted wl.h a major quake, it nr t t . p'a it nor, co',equent; t ty, whe'.hr prepoa >/. sa.W ,,

y,,,g,,,g,,, said.

% $nund Basis

  • plures wnuld he ade@a'e ' Somi e rrta e th Bodega plant as a tett ca.ici 'It is almost (erta:n that Drs! 9te De*ial for stanic facitxs nea;rt'e site Mllte subjected te s

i ' %c % eel methd* p*M earthquake regionr. ,one or more severe se3'nie, Dr. John raton o' the P ;d:sturNnces du-mg the !.fe.

= we a tn e.. e cuerd 'he rear-wr My wwk. the 49E terior Department, after d.me saide'*** the p'aE* the raontt

.rce,irt sa'<: W 't M nN study that warned s')out t>dsoun.d exte:"mwa! or ex-Mere is crefen'.'y to

..w. 3 ynyt n *M h uld P61' 9 'br med eat u <l F A #:0 seismic dangers s' Bode:' Head, said n win be " ]e  :

nwiear p%er rc'" F - ing!y d!!ficult to raject aryithe crent be meted of damage oy thethat l r wesente

, Ts.4 f%v proposed future rra on tle m;ghtcari - reafters~ue- cordacrentJ ty - f w rye the divMon 'p j grounds of extremauake a lD.3 crert-ncy r<4 n,u.

> . temr ncrAed emmt pgapw ' WM< t te ran' cas cred t. aqu tu"e risk" ;f sJe J Pp l

,. prosed by t'ce AK i

. ,m t ve .cre a ygrro;nh 83 88ff'7NC' O'"T'## .

gw p i+ hp mi td @w*

Subsequendy, tt At excb o * "7 I tieu at the v.te focad a fa / ss"d '+ *aWuart-J ' P l

}rrm W r e m?f m tre runrccJ; (i. rect'y under l' a p' l

} ett15 enp.Newe t friht '* I e ,, etly W h Gy e W t> r p; ant area. T Nt' 11 e or nn'.* n ber i 'r-

,4,w.d. 6. ' a e a~

W ~

d#' f " E

' it is n . N'T D

"' /

i

. .o un v ssmtu t o

    • s'- r, Depam ee* *3 QC' g, hu "av $ = f .-

c:ared that anothir 19Nfg E ytan.e T4ra to Ps. Tt. Cot f! that wi;t wrick,

e. - - - - - saed quake wouhi.a p,k tNgg, g,g .M*r t ' uj m*th

. :,,,, . .:, , ,, ,e es. r * *m. awe l Fisiety 7 clors A hied , j ,. e a l

The AEf'A artvw r y & heel a tJ ernercc n ce w tuled. it condeu i mittee, in t*s favru aW.e re rnent pert. said it vas cMnnast ni"w e h not b.pese er writ'- that a the fau:?. v uns th pow er '!arge m clear p&cr* af 7 compwy. 6e d that $.ae com shouki he the e cawrtrro' e' pany has "eder m ed 'r teen e 9 plant to .rfr'. rnore @ fan 6 d n't t ive-t'-". a . "*:t.

e t a-s to p r1 ar - etw  : rnm s ~ s% ; f t. e *rty apy ny te b'p 7 A. i , ' y $3; *

'i p: ant dd' > Qr t 'r* ..

f a

/

h

--- _ _ _ _ _ - ~ - - - - - - - - - - . - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20235C372&oldid=3192480"