ML20235C372
Text
li
(
(
f6 205 i
s m _*
- a e w m a r
Northern California Association
\\
To Preserve Bodega Head and Harbor n
., /v///
....WT'". ?2 Berkeleyk Colifornia I
, 2820 Tehegraph A enue UY v
ADVISOR $
, y '
Anse! Adams t
David Brower John Emmons October 28,1%4
(
Harold Gilliam Joel Gustafson Weldon F. Heald Mr. Harold Price, Director Joel Hedgpeth Division of Licensing and Regulation U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Francis Herring Washington 25, D.C.
D. B. Luton Willsom Penn Mott, Jr.
Dear Mr. Price:
Thomas Parkinson Per our telephone conversation today, enclosed is the notice of the hearing on November 13th issued by T E"5 8'Ya*'d*
the California Assembly Rules Committee.
David E. Pesonen Ezecutive Secretary Sincerely,
-m
. a],.
~. ~ < x a,,x a r <,...c.
./
David E. Pesonen Executive Secretary a
/
.<_ /,
p' c
, /c.
7,w.s
~
e
/
/
, f-x f j l' ( '
- ,'s f
,v
- (j [
t_,
/
?
c i ;,j f/,.c
']
~ '
r
/
l' i
Q,-
O.i L '
~t 3,,,,.-</a w
/
sR m
z
. m. 3 o,
c.
y.r r
~
i n,,
p.7
,o c.
i c
SC V'
2d/N --
I 051217 B7099%
PDR 1i.
/ 2 II # /M-- -
'N
- i
=
hRESTD95M g g,,_
/
g l
2 Purpose; to work for preservation of the scense and historic heodlands of Bodego Boy and to ins ure the ecological integrity of the surrounding marine environenent A Cahfornia Non proht Corporation
-_-__-__------D
e j
e,* *'j
~
d w
i 1 s MCMCERS MEMOEa6 w.
NI e &
M Y
JAMcs R. MtLLs
+
LCU C AA?! avl ~M Jtrowg R. WALDs J AM M L. i'cu.t E4 s
,. dOEM d hil I.1NNN f00 Roou 3173. start capitol TOM BANE CH Ath M AN l
l l
l 9
\\
September 11, 1964 i
NOTICE OF HEARING The Assembly Committee on Rules will hold a hearing November 13th on HR No. 585 of the 1963 Session, relative to a study of the feasibility of the power plant on Bodega Bay. The Committee will meet in Room 2117 of the Capitol Annex in Sacramento at 10:00 A. M.
Those who wish to appear before the Committee should notify the Assembly Rules Committee in writing by October 30the Notification should
' be sent to Room 3173, State Capitol, Sacramento.
Oral presentations will be limited and therefore, it is requested that those wishing to present evidence to the Committee do so in writing. Any written presentation should be sent to the Committee by October 23rd.
V e
14A-Press Democret., Scmts Rose, Calif. Sun., Oct. I I,1964 One of these asked the com.:
The August quesdons ai s 4,;
j pany to postulate a total sk*-
picked up c statement in the '
O a
S' eaM q ing motion of the rock "i earlier amendment that "a de-
==r itae aa t= =ar air caea
'*"*d dr"a=>c *a ir i iti de in the foundation," of as much made" for certain vital pieces l AEC Hea
)er the structure and the leak.! for a full description of the ac l as three feet, and asked wheth-of equipnent, and asked PG&Et l tightness of the reactor contains celeration to be used in the' On bay A,,,,PI AALe
'ti he I ment building would remain ind analysis.Th tact.
f PG1E pointed out that it s: fy a marfynum acceleration of:
modified des!gn calls for the re l me times the forc a
actor containment structure to where PG&E has insisted that' missim a experts probe moreling the possibility of such aAs the Atomic Energ sit centered in the containment e of.
deeply into the controversialllarge inovement and at 'accels l, the Intensity of an earthquake around it.
aAl to build the Bodegs erauons of up to one times thelcgfg,*ip((g strue ur
' force uclear la force of gravity.
. e and Without conceding t h a t af yetr have all but vanished.
! walls of the pit would be filled ground acceleration of more
- Flont' Desi n with water, and the structure it, than a th PG&E has submitted a major' selected sand of known charac-self sit on a "
, credible,,ird of a gravity is I
Ad there has been public spec.
the company a re-tdation that the AEC may be design modification that would ply concludes generally that th trying to, warn off' iteristics which will permit hori.
precise nature of the strain in-e Pacific float ' the reactor vessel on a! zontal movements of up to three v Gas & Electric Co.
, layer of sand (to accomodate feet without impairing the fune ce De utility, which nearly two large displacements) and in theri y ac-years ago asked the AEC for latest amendment sa
. tem would have "ys the sysd uon of the containment struc 1 mined after final permission to build the plant, substantial ture, although the struc t u r margins of safety" against fail might be shifted or mtated...,el plant.
doesn't buy that. Rather, the But it ssys the, company's; company subscribes to the stre with the one-gravity figureJ
%ere will be "no rigid struc-I " proposed design criteria f o r' theory that the AEC is merely It insists, however, t h a t wel btecomecum between critical stmetres, equipment
!t doing its homework before go-ground acceleration of mor e any major component," the and systems,,. contains sub-ing to public hearing.
than a third of one gravity is amendment says, and connec-s:antial margins of s a f e t y Last week the AECs Advisory " incredible "
- tions between the reactor con-against failure" for a one-grav-Committee On Reactor Safe.
ne extended AEC PG&E!tainment structure and other ity force.
guard considered the I a t e s t dialogue on the earthquake! parts of the plant wul "have suf-A final AEC question posed PG&E answer to the query for more detail on a tion Nuclear Industry to sayj threelatest question prompted t in Augast asked what would critical point-the earthquake that the " extreme conditions as ' ment.', feet of rela Ive move-happen in the event of a three-safety of the plant.
foot fault motion elsewhere at~
sumed by some of the AEC'.d That of course,is only a par-ation-which might be a report 'ary demands on design whichResults of the AC
'and only one segment of the an- ;ure.
to the AEC on its findings, or a,those questions imply h a v e swer.
query for more information naturally lead ' to speculation PG&E rep!!cd that those pip-rren't expected to be made pubJ that the AEC is warning PG&E But the AEC returned in late l ing connections'in the p1a n!
!!c for a week or so.
August with more questions
'that the plant will not be ap-; bearmg on the problem, which area "necessary for a safet ing aclentista and engineers a she."Re ACRS, composed of lead-proved for the Bodega Bay li finally produced Arnend m en t shutdown of the reactor" wouldt Nine, filed by the company Sept.
be made flex!b're enoust andi year and a half ago gave p,re l
!!minary, conditional approval!the magazine says, "is that be.And alternative explanation,16.
given protection to accommod date the motion.
All of which indicates the{
to the plant desjgn.
AEC fleply I
' fore the AEC walks into a pub..
magn!tude of quesJons b eIng One of the conditions h a sllle hearing in this case whichi excerpt above, the AEC wonder-In a discus point of emphasis - that thelcontroversy, it simply wants tolof flexibility t rabed in canedon with h cetroversial plant proposal,
... reactor and buildings notjestablish that every credible or motions corresponding to a fault Whethcr the latest amend-be located on an active faultrincredible situation has been in..lmonon of up to th line "
i vestigated."
,f strenrh to resist the forces ac i bwn s%'. Peably to satWy & ACRS wH1 be
. Subsequent excavation byq PG&E of the hole that would companying the dynamic re' AEC staff members could still PG&E View lb house the reactor turned up A PGLE spokesman says thel ration.,o the earthquake vi-ask some more, which would sponse t what some geologists have said latter is the company's view-
"It has not been clearly further delay the date for the f
is an active fault r u n n in gl that the gamu*t of questions thatl shown.. " the AEC said "how public hearicg' through the pit-i PG&E's consultants hne in ;with the controversial plant prom ments for these two sources ofha Eventually - but probably i
sisted the fault is inactive, and some Ome ak me Erst of b posal is to be run by the AEC, strain wi]! be achieved."
year--the Bodega case wHI get f
that any movement " exceeding (t before the public hearing.
a fractlon of an inch is ex-The company replied that[ to the heartr4 stage by the An idea of the order of cram.I " pre!nninary design.. assures, AEC.
tremely unlikely," and that ofitnation ta which the proposed! that a practical design can bel It has said more than a foot " practically l plant is now being subjected l deseloped to protect the pipingling impossible "
!can be gained from a few points against fallare Curvey. however, concluded that;" amendments" of its originalj th an that.
movements of the rock of up to; application to the AEC.
three feet in any direction mightl
- sponse resultmg from the ac i De hearing promises to be In Amendment Eight, submit.. celebrations," and goes on to give largely a technical show, M be expected.,
ya m a o e-
^
i
h -kOS I
l Fa' action.
F a' caac u"*a---
f S" * * *ut ta'*-
F or informatloa.
MEMO ROUTE SLIP
, F or signature.
. Note and return.
Wnn AFC-n3 mev. May H. lWn RLMARES INITI Al.S TQ (Name ano unit)
_ A**- " ' ars_clipst-1, line Freaciese Chronicle,10/*9/64 ! " Atom Plant Joe Feueberd, biose Servise Br.
can c.seF a n a tw,--.. <
DFI, MQ "AFC Groups Split Escold Price, RSS, gg
- 2. las Angeles Tissas, 10/24/ M:
a,... u s _. e a -,=.
"'"T.' Ba** Ilesa Press Democrat,10/23/M,14ttee to Robert 1mwenstein, rag, SQ
.u us,, g, w,
,.,,. g.,,,, p.
iNm^"
To (u....nounni m
.I 9
y,g g3
,<.m.
f INmm 1o <~....no uno, E. W. Smith, Comp 1. V.,
S&N kb L
EE 1
p%
noums i nou (s....no unit, Rodney L. Southwick Asst. to the Manager for Public Informatie3 SAN DATE J
PHONC NG 10/29/u o s coo me,,,,-,, o.,u m,-o..u usc om, not ro.oomo.t et 4,,a
.&N.%uw.ew,- (.4m eh (
(
Atom Plant Safety Again in Dlspute
/ Of7 im i
Tile ATO.LC ENEltGY Comnus.uon (AECi is now in receipt of conflicting professional opin-jon concerning the safety of a proposed nuclear power plant 'on Bodega Head.
Its Advisory Committee on Reactor Safe-l l
guards te!!s it that there is " reasonable assur-ance" that the facility can be constructed on the site "without undue hazard to publi:. health and safety." But its Division of Nuclear Licensing advises that " Bodega Head is not a suitable loca-tion" because of its proximity to the San Andreas fault and the possibility of earthquake damage to "a pioneering construction effoM. based on unveri-fied engineering principles" 5
Though these expert opinions are confusing to the lay mind because of their direct contracic-tion, they offer unmistakable tesdmory that the prime question of the site's safety is s.111 open to doubt. Throughout the Bodega Head controversy, this newspaper has urged both the Pacific Gas
& Electric Co. and the AEC to defer ar.y irrevcca-ble decision on this project at this lor"Sn until its safety is assured and there.s c'
aty that it involves no more risk e.an a.mna. ecojectat some other site.
At this time, we renew tha: uarnian and add the reminder that the public will now i:nd it in-creasingly difficult to agree-in the absence of umfied professional assurance-cons:ruction of the plant at Bodega IIead is in its b(st mter2st.
lj
- "
- m n';' 'O T
- 2 0; 7 /Q "3 1
- .. _ a
e
[
t. A h. 4.6 2.
IVirs. Ccf ney Questions PG6E EDITOR: I. PG&E hadn't l
been 30 ins er.t whei the, I
n first cantacted me about buy.
y% ing my land. : hat the) didn't small baad tryingto save Do.
want.he publ.c to know that dega Heads for the pubiic h they wanted it as a tite for when it should be the whole
% a power plant. I would never public roaring to save it for Q have thought of calling it to themselves not leave it to just the few. The Northern Cali-the attention of the public via the ne wspapers. I learred ear.
fornia Association to Preserve ly in bfe that when the local Bodega Heads anci Harbor is kids came around and whis-trying to save Bodega Heads pered. "Ixt's do so and so, f r the public. PG&E wants but don't tell your ma," it a f r their stockholders.
was sure to be found out, and If nuclear powered plants I't: get a good rpankirg.
are so safe, why are safety Under much the same cir.
zones so necessary? W h e n cumstances.
v-h e n PG&E PG&E takes visitors to Vale.
whispered. "Doni tell the pub.
citos. wnges it uke three lic" I was su c there was graduat.r engineers to escort something wrong witn t h e
'The visi ora around-~the' plant deal, and the public should Githliger causters?'When
~
know about it. And there is the Geyer counters start to sull too much wrong about cTcQQoF~aw'aFI'ar the whole rnatter tnd that e.nourn to snence that chck-PG&E is franticar.y trying to inWn?
hide.
~If u:ere is no danger from Only for the Save Bodega radiation, why did Rrssia.
Heads campq.n, anj its de-Engia.ic. and the United laying actions, the po ver plant States ign a t.ut ban treaty, on &>dega Heads would be to kee*. Inc ai' from b a;n-neming cortpletion, d not in ing co.taminated by cv. ppcl.
. actual operEtion. If Plan No.
lauon? Why U.e worbide I was so safe, why has PG&E dismay over ChLna's re s '. car had to char.ge th<ir plans tes
some nine times since their
!Y '
.a the p_t.uc,,: Le oripnal plans for de plant, in*ere::ed in anaers to.ne.,e 1: Eey wer so saf(? And if ruest. n i
No. 4 is w.1uch a r thr.n
.Wis. ROE 5. GAF7NEY Pla. L.1. can wt be sure Po>ega BO that P an Ac. 20 wu be any safer than their orig.nal plan?
Can any plan, built astride an earthquake fault, be safe?
It would be of great inter-est to the public if it could kncw precsely what it is costing PGLE to oppose the opposition... what it is cost-ing the puthe throt;gh PG&E services that the pablic pays for to get this plant rammed down our throats, so to speak.
And the angels of heavens must be w"epmc le see our
p f d-J78 S a u, n. q
- u. u s nI6 ~
(
-'{
7155 5. FIRST ST., SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 3202-64-47 CYPRESS 7 3000 1
ll "OR IMMEDIATE RELEASE i
THF GENERAL ELECTRIC Company stated today that it sees absolutely no l
)
- the Pacific Gas and Electric Company's decision to withdraw its 1
I 1
- :1. :: ion for the Bodega Bay Atomic Power Plant should slow the inter-f 1
national impetus of nuclear power.
I l
j t
i George White, General Manager of General Electric 's Atomic Power j
i Equipment Department, underlined that the same good reasons for applying n-. clear power prevail.
"The decision on Bodega Bay hinged on the cuestion of the proximity c: the plant to one of the world's best known zones of I
l reistic activity, the San Andreas Fault."
White continued, " General 1
Electric, PGLE and their consultants, the Advisory Committee on Reactor i
Safeguarcs, and the Atomic Energy Commission all found the plant and its 1
features would have provided for operation without undue hazard to the health and safety of the public."
White pointed out that the only doubt expressed by the AEC concerned the ability of the structure to withstand a hypothetical th ree-foo t shear movement brought on by earthquake, and the inability to provide any experi-mental or experier.c> proof-test of the novel design to V.eep the structure
.' tact.
PG&E found t!' L s ::tinor t ty view to be sufficient cause to withdraw their application.
r,
/-
(
(
I-
_2_
l White noted PG&E's comments on the.need for nuclear power in Calif-E
-ornia as a basic reason why nuclear power would be applied at sites other than Bodega Head.
"The Bodega site was the specific problem in.this case," he said.
"With California one of the nation's two highest fuel-cost areas, with the State running out of hydro-electric power sites, with the growing scarcity of fossil fuals in California, and the fact that nuclear power plants emit no combustion products, there is no question but that nuclear power will l
be applied to California's need for_more and more electric energy." )
1 I
i L
i I
~
l J.6.T LEG l6,LA fl.3 E.CS ET
]
...,..L 7
Cc,. r Fs g
$4 M Av. sO J. C ALIFORNie
- t. a t e r rrie s
-,,...se a.......
MessigePA6 A.c C,o..fv g**
oevaa
.c.
$m'd sDSg 14. CALIF 0F Nie yy t e
..s, s ai.s ave
{
r F.....,,,u..,..
y
'li;IIDrlim hBg19 21I11rB
.I 4
,,(
l u6 m
l ALFRED E. ALQUIST s,,
R j
l l
j
- l= y mgw or n oF at. tun' v, twsNTY.FDW ATM DistplCf
, -, =.
1
- 'n =
.ci l
1
.h ki N
S5N S
.n October 28, 1964 W2
- M C
i Q
4 l
G a
.~
u l
Mr. Thomas Nolan, Director United States Geological Survey
[ g - h6 (-
Department of the Interior V
Washington 25, D. C.
l b
Dear Mr. Nolan,
On November 13, 1964, in Room 2117 of the State Capitol in Sacramento, the California Assembly Rules Committee will hold a hearing " relative to a study of the feasibility of the power plant on Bodega Bay."
This hearing stems from a reso-f lution which I introduced during the last general session of the Legislature and concerns specifically the proposed nuclear power plant at Bodega Head in l
Sonoma County, California.
An application for a construction permit for this installation is now pending before the Atomic Energy the AEC Commission and it is my understanding that has retained the U. S. Geological Survey to consult on the geologic and seismologic adequacy of the site.
Two reports -- TEI-837 (September 1963) and EEI-344 (December 1963) -- have so f ar been released.
l The authors of these studies were Mr. Julius Schlock-
{
er and Mr. Manuel G. Bonilla from your office in and Dr. Jerry P. Eaton and Mr. Alfred j
l Menlo Park, Clebsch, Jr.
l
)
In the interests of a complete record at the forth-I would coming Assembly Rules Committee hearing, S.
like to request that the above named U. S. G.
personnel appear at the hearings to present their including any findings they findings on this matter, 1
I
- p.. Price- - -
--~~~~
- 8. Beck -
Rec'd Ofi'
., o p i
Date_ _!d_1, y ~'~
((. Mann 1.owenstein
- ~
Time __./f'{/ 3ll]~,
j Beth.
____t _
/Wendersan--
~~
y__
~..
I
, /
^
(
e o
i"
.f i
2-f may have made subsequent to the above listed reports.
He have been informally advised by Mr. Harold Price, Director of the Division of Licensing and Regulation, that the' Atomic Energy Commission han no objection to such an appearance or to the release of findings made in the persuit of U. S.
'G.
S. Work for the Commission on this project.
I An early reply would be appreciated.
i Sincerely,
, (.
d-
/
, ;i v.
ALFRED E. ALOUIST w.
AEA:ew cc: Mr. Paul C. Bateman, Geologist in' Charge U. S. Geological Survey I
345 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, California i
Mr. Harold Price, Director Division of Licensing and Regulation U.
S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington 25, D. c.
/
I Mr. James Lane, Executive Director Assembly Rules Committec
)
Room 3173, State Capit.ol
{
Sacramento 14, California i
1 1
I
)
i y
L
A y
w s
.a -
/
v v
'p'
, N
-p 1
A-Plant on Quake Site t
A Splits Two AEC Groups t 9e 4
Continued irem First Fege
'E whose repert. releaseu nt th*
m,,*,
same Mme, said the safe'y:
W.A3 O
a J,j features wouM be adegate.;
W
.l,' M 1* % -
There was *reasor.able ab, fg j-
/ I,? 4 4(
4 su-ance."
t'te committ**
A
- M
- vd. tMt > FMegt p: ant,gg.pg and ot'eyr< { 3Ay r.,.
N/
e rhi a )
d (j
'h,,
}
be t n t y? cut usue Nurt 'j p.,.e p
q, / y.y
/,
V1 wit N
j c
T j
fublic lietring Ncrt'rd
' j 6
b I g, tar TU.*
3C0 m'vrd by t/e A,uf e !T-The spih rm "
rhr h.h g:n,.(. t i K"' a i u nic.
( -
- befera rendem: a otes.m l (
(-
t m r.: hold a }'.,*e l.cartn: i
,i fr. t'onttT C.1.1/1' after which a pM.m', y f.'. g.Pl.A dT $1TI, MU,1 nt' A
,, g w w - s<m er.*
ciecision wi;; be meCe n
.g safety and beena.ns kwr
% g 9.,,
W.U P MTON i)
.:e~cy co-W The hearing date, wie IP'.! g,,, yy,gj~,,g, g
g g,,
,,.n. q 41 yet set,is egected te be es" 4-en
% bui;* in the Jy next year, j
i.an pener a..ya,
,e The Q.$ ed!be plant 1. 3 nyt *bnuS generate 3A000 ki:rwatts e.f least one maNr -eth sS A"ea pt pke. prnras psor. HM, Caht T'e une e;eetricity has been a high Y during es Met 9 c.
3 controvers;alissue b North Th, Ayc, heu;ng Ov4 o inD nnrth " 49 b,a Ne fraq r em California smee it w
,g y,,q., y epp,y eaw rn en.
g icy pga
.'.y
% 'e 9a f repmed two yeart ago. ;We ph ca-
,M 6p acic Gas & Electr:e Co.
rj a:
O re.
w amn
. e A y c's rieaeiat The site is abert 1000 fe y r---; mv+ - '
wert of the edge of he a:twe GeCU cuF. Mc-mm.
3 synst co* ct'ct on San Andrus ear? cn'.
"D.r exce; tion is the 'tr.
, e not y duputcl % .
fault tone, Novereent a:e y certgry ei s hether ue
-urg. *no saus I exper;.
F *c d ca x
the fault produced the grc et1906 quake wnich was g ng,;en n, a,. ".al m extmet ce W' ge 7 n pp
- redici rg t e u1 mag' j spontble im the f i r e thatj, g.n ;aun td avociat.
's terw wgr arc llte,
devastated Ean Frarcisco. ted wl.h a major quake, it y
a nr t t. p'a it nor, co',equent; y,,,g,,,g,,,
said.
t ty, whe'.hr prepoa >/. sa.W,,
% $nund Basis
- plures wnuld he ade@a'e '
Somi e rrta e th
'It is almost (erta:n that Bodega plant as a tett ca.ici for stanic facitxs nea;rt'e site Mllte subjected te Drs! 9te De*ial earthquake regionr.
,one or more severe se3'nie,
' %c % eel methd* p*M s
a tn e.. e cuerd 'he rear-Dr. John raton o' the P ;d:sturNnces du-mg the !.fe.
i wr My wwk. the 49E terior Department, after d.me e' the p'aE* the raontt
= we said *** Mere is crefen'.'y to W 't M nN study that warned s')out t>dsoun.d exte:"mwa! or ex-
.rce,irt sa'<:
..w. 3 ynyt n *M h uld P61' seismic dangers s' Bode:' Head, said n win be " e
]
'br med eat u <l F A #:0 nwiear p%er rc'" F -
ing!y d!!ficult to raject aryithe crent of damage that 9
be meted oy the l
proposed future rra on tle m;ghtcari - reafter cordacrent wesente
, Ts.4 f%v r
s~ue-J ty - f w rye the divMon grounds of extremauake risk" ;f D.3 sJe J Pp tu"e a l crert-ncy r<4 n,u.
ran' cas cred t. aqu
'p j
>. temr ncrAed emmt t l
pgapw '
WM<
teprosed by t'ce AK i
.,m t ve.cre a ygrro;nh 83 Subsequendy, tt At excb o 88ff'7 ' O'"T'##.
NC
- "7 I
gw p i+ hp mi td @w*
tieu at the v.te focad a fa / ss"d '+ *aWuart-J ' P l
e m?f m tre runrccJ; (i. rect'y under l' a p'
}rrm W r l
p; ant area. T Nt' ' it is n. N'T D d#' f " E
/
} ett friht '* I 15 enp.Newe t 11 e or nn'.* n ber i W i
W t> r
~
e,, etly W h Gy e
..o un v ssmtu t
,4,w.d. 6. ' a e a~
'r-QC' g, hu
- 3 o
"av
$ = f.-
- s'-
r, Depam ee*anothir 19Nfg E
c:ared that saed quake wouhi.a p,k tNgg, g,g.M*r t ' uj m*t that wi;t wrick, ytan.e T4ra to Ps. Tt. Cot f!
e.
..:,,,,,e Fisiety 7 clors A hied, j,. e es. r * *m. awe l
l The AEf'A artvw y & heel a tJ ernercc n ce w a
r tuled. it condeu i
mittee, in t*s favru aW.e re rnent pert. said it vas cMnnast ni"w e h not b.pese that a er writ'-
the fau:?. v uns th pow er '!arge m clear p&cr* af 7 compwy. 6e d that $.ae com shouki he the e cawrtrro' e'
pany has "eder m ed
'r teen e 9 plant to.rfr'. rnore @
fan 6 d n't t ive-t'-". e etw : rnm a. "*:t.
t a-s to p r1 ar -
s ~ s% ; f t. e *rty apy ny te b'p 7. i, ' y $3; A
p: ant dd' > Qr t
'r*
'i f
a
/
h
_ _ _ _ _ - ~ - - - - - - - - - -. - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _