ML20235A457
Text
_ - _ _ - _ _
i 4
).p
.[
.w --- : u c. = =
=1
- : = : rtzu.,....-. -
A w : =
,y (LcE:EMI2[*Kef4TNDNAM4dd[eDIoEl s
"5ELa5m
- .;;;72. :
..c
,.c,...o 5 sa n a n.is w, <..a a n ni, m:.s 1
v.
,,,,u h.a1<m
- -,,.... ;;,,... ::::.; ~
- 7-'
=: ": ::...
, }~t! 'C: '
July 20, 1964 CO.~.
AIR MAIL l
rg, Y,
V. S. Atomic Energy Commission 4
Washin6 ton, D. C. 205h5 g'i r.A-.' g c
O w
Attention:
Director, Divj sion of Ih g 'j l h tj4 * }
Licensing and Regulation
\\$
em steun r.on at Re:
Docket No. 50-205 gue Amendment No. 8
'\\
a co Gentlemen:
Enclosed for filing are three signed md y
h-frVA.
fifty-five conformed oopies of Amendment No. P to 4M
\\
the Company's application for a license coverin.-
Unit No.1 of its Bodega Bay Atomic Paric.
Also en-p
' (~
closed is a certificate covering service of tido material on Mr. E. J. Guidotti, Chairman cf the Leard of Supervisors of Sonoma County.
Kindly aclcr.owlcdge receipt of thic man ~
rial on the enclosed copy of this letter and return it to me in the enclooed addressed envelope.
Yours very truly, C Sto-( h.;lc
.~. A. 4c m PAC:'"C Enclosures e
s
-;;\\
/
.1
'l S1217 9
kh 6
?
-7 m-g a
4 s
s e
r
(
?
g E M E.RY m mmour consonmou m $ H I P M E N T g
I cw n' NON NEGOTIABLE
' -Qp FORWARDER AIRBILL.) o - M J' JulT be 19h pee pal [F FROM SHIPPit AOQ3g$$
ClfY & ifAIE
[ilPKCI GbdhiD-ELur d
W -~'24fMAREf' STREF-SAN-FRANCISC0;-CALIF--
COLLECT TO CONilONES ADDRESS CITY & STAft TLM_ ATOMIC ENEROY~dDMMishidW 4915~S7;-~EIN0'Avs.
BETIESDATMLAND OfMER ACCOUNI OP qAnucAms owtv wwree Canasoes Aas so es Paso er scansous ornes veiam snares os CONMoNEE) l l
DECLAtt0 VALui IAtt i
LON FOR 1.A.F. U54 ONLV l
i if 15 MUfuAttY AGREED THAT THE GOODS HEREIN DESCR18ED Att ACCEPTED IN APPAttNT 0000 ORDie (EXCEPT Al NOftD) FOR TRANSPOff ATION Al SPECiritD HttilN. SU51tCT TO OOVERN.
ING RUlt5 CLA551FICAfiONS & TAtlFFS. IN IFFECT A5 OF THE DATE HEREOF. WHICH Att FILED
$gg*g tN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. S AID RULES, CLA55fFICATIONS, AND TAtlFF5. Corffs OF WHICH
""*"*'"D" ARE AVAILABLE FOR W5PtCilON. ARE Httf BY INCORPOR Af tD INTO AND MADS PART OF THl$
CONTRACT. IF THE CAttlAGE HittuNDLt INVolvtl AN ULTIM ATE DESTINATION 04 STOP IN A gagi,E,D,,I AIR FREIGHT (
)
sf f
00 a
)
FOttlGN COUNTRY, THE WAt1AW CONVENflON MAY BE APPLICABLE. AND THIS CONVENTION og sacn pogno ou wMicM Cnasoas are Assessro j
CovtRN5 AND IN SOME CA$ts lluffs THE LIAtluTY OF THE FORWARDit 708 LOS$ OF OR g
DAMAGE TO CARGO.
umas4 & Hs0HG8 VALUE Is De PICKUP l
A CLAero A*so am*A$li CHA805 PalO THfff084 SIGNEQ FOR SHIPPER 8Y Diff. OR ORDER NO.
DEUVERY fi!\\
- )
e i
NO PIECES DE5C IIPTiON AND MARF5 WEfGHT AT DESTINATION 2
Printed matter nf(,OR
)
Cartons l
VALUATION CHARGE i
sPECIAL INSTRUCTION 5 Time Of de Very and ture
- Sted UI"" (naadi h.nhaaf humi.
i MQ8nM4MDNM SAA? NM MEO EIIk sHierEnsk h.@. I M N N N RICI&7v ThU en TuliGHT Ah
'"s'A' Mt't"1"At R
'"f,'ti'N"!"~5R
.tygs.ee
' M' f* - Pfp h
//A 1 0'> ALh.(
C.OS. FEE LINGT H WIDTH HinGHf CUeltINCHE5 DIMENSIONAL wtaGHI }
' TOTAL CHARGES I
x x
=
=
l g
v co m m n con FOR. _,,R_,~ U.m l
t l
{
4
. - m n.77.
p _
.,.,-._n_-_-
m m-
I l
.l I
5 l
s' e
e.
l
\\
- mm 4<
~'"w+
~= ~
twef-
,K w
^^
..;;w.. M-w '
- t, ~". ;.
W.O. f,.)VERNMENT PRINTING,OFFICEg p S64 7 7 25 't l
DATE RECEl(p ND,i l
FROM.
DATE OF DOCUMENT:
m cIFIo GLS &)tIscDtIC C0KFENT 7M 7-21-.6h ',.
38h3 i
nuOni Orsen.
Riahard L poterson on.
- MEuO, K
10, ORIO.a CC:
OTHERi E
NcunaENcE O
DATE ANSWERED, D12', DM Actios NECEssaaY O
pOMMENT O
8v.
)
NO ACTION NECESSARY O 1
Docke/
cussw...
Fosi omcE ntE cOoti t 50-205 U
ecc. No C15calPisON: (Must Be Undessthod)
REFEaRED to DATE RECEIVED 8Y DATE j
Ltr. tranos Boyd:-
7-22 1s/2 cys of 112'
{
1 l
- '"""'(57 eye-notarized 7. 20-6h) all extras c r the Amend. forwarded earlier. l AENDMENT NO. 8 TO LIC APPL, which is responsive to questions set forth in 1t rs.
1 dtd 5-194h and 7-8-6h.
m1 Mre 18 for ACRS cn die-patch desk.
/
~
Distribution: 1 - fo e
g
/&
1~M f'E' M 9}
- [<
i 1 - SAN PDR 1 - Eb ohe, /
/
g1-liS!*g16-
~
~~
' - ~
~
U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY CdMMISSION ' LAlt CONTROL FORM roRM Acc.326s (840)
I l
l f
' *?"
'"~"q y l ~=
1.* %
- '?
- m,9 p, pop +-+..,sy 7
e c
1
{
I, ;
i u.
{
l
- n., :.. -..
JUL 8 1964 j
SI?-).O.s Mr. C. C. Whelchel p
Vice-President Pacific Cas and Electric Company 245 Market Street San Francisco, California
Dear Mr. Whelchel:
Question #4 of our letter of May 19, 1964 referred to the need for clarification of the procedures and criteria Pacific Gas and Electric Company proposes to use in the design of the structures and components to withstand oscillations and vibrations from major earthquakes. At
)
the meeting on June 17, 1964 between representatives of the company, of the ACRS and of our staff, we attempted to i
amplify this question and its relation to Question #1 of our previous letter.
As we pointed out at the meeting, the opinion is held by j
some that the spectrum of ground motions in case of another 1
major earthquake on the San Andreas fault may be more severe j
than that which occurred in the.El Centro earthquake.
- Further, i
auch an earthquake might be accompanied by shear dispiscement up to a possible 3 feet, and would likely be followed by aftershocks which might be as large as the El Centro earth-quake of 1940.
Against the possibility of earthquakes of these dimensions, we would like to explore the design arrangements and their feasibility in protecting the plant against damage which would result in harards to the health and safety of the public.
At the meeting, we requested Pacific Cas and Electric Company to consider these questions j
1 0FT!CE >
SURNAME >
DATE >
Imran AEC-Stu (Ret.9-33) e, s. sovse==ses peensine oerice 1r,-4001-3
c, '.9 i
i Mr. C. C. Whelchel JUL 8 1964
{
1.
Assume an earthquake having a vibration spectrum
'similar to that of El Centro but with maximum acceleration of 2/3 g*; velocities.up to 2 ft./sec.; ground displacements up to 3 ft.; shear displacement-(faulting) of 2 ft. in the.
i foundations of the plant, and with the occurrence of an after-shock equal to El Centro before remedial action could be taken.
What plant arrangn==nts, design criteria and procedures could be developed to prevent impairment of functions of structures, equipment and systems important to. safety?
This should include method of analysis-indicating the margins to i
allowable stress or deformation limits.
2.
Assume an earthquake having a vibration spectrum similar to that of El Centro but with accelerations generally up *to 2/3 g plus intermittent pulses of acceleration up to 1 g ; velocities up to 2i ft./sec.; ground displacements up to 3 ft.; shear displace==nt (faulting) in the plant founda-tions of 3 ft.;.and with'the occurrence of an aftershock equal to El Centro before remedial action could be taken.
What plant arrangements, design criteria and procedures could be-developed which would' assure shutdown and maintenance of the plant in safe shutdown condition?
Sincerely yours,
-T tigne'd )' Harord C Price
^
Harold L. Price
[Md
//
Director of Regulation f.K.9k, w
W e
The maxinana of(acceleration, velocity and displacement would not occur for the same periods of-vibrations, h
Jj
~~* R i
f A
7 OFTICE >
SURhAMEk DATE 6m ac....>...
.......,-m,,,
s e
a m -.,-- 7,pv~,eme~v.qy y~~&7&rr~**
m T*'~v~':im "q 7~~~ ~~T"M "N""~TT'W" M' '
,