ML20235A033
Text
,
f
~
MEMO ROUTE SLIP 5******"*a-Fw cacuda -e.
Fw setion.
i rorm A r.c.se <n2,. w., is iun Note and e. turn.
For ligastura.
E For leformxp[f "j
TO (Name and unit)
INTULS KEMAKK5 CV Joe Feuchard, News Service Br.
Here Bodega Clips:
DFI, 30
- 1. 8.F. Chronicle 3723764
- 2. s.F. Raaminer 3/23/64
() ' [g (
~
oar:
rold t-TO (Name and unit ~,
puTI A4.$
AEM KS
}
Robert Lowenstein f
/
3
.k;Ik f
o,1, F. K. Fittman,
(
J 4 r-DRD, BQ
(
g S,~'IN TO (Nam. and unit)
INiinALS AEMAAKS s'
J. D. Lyman R,/
b
Dtl, RQ s
_i cars i
~
R. W. Smith s
Z/
l Camp 1.
V.,
SAN i3
- k
/'
FROM (Name and unit)
RE M AAKS j,
Rodney L. Southwick
'M.
?/
r s.
,/
Assistant to the Manager 0/jj','1 f/
4 for Public Informati;r.
SAN l
"f/23/64 1
l usE ornEn sion ron nooirioaat nEMaaKs u s covan==rav eniariac arrica. iw+22ac I
I l
.ef.
l i
8709230109 6 ghh-66S PDN g y p~a,w, cc
- spy,
> i 1
l
5
(.
g.*
S P Wi4./.2.1/(q -
0
@lif s.i cu@a@ ? Q 1
i SAFLTY I Another geologist. Dr. Wd-
'. They concluded that the liam Qualde, of the National Aeronautics and Space Ad-Two more geolog. ts have question of safety "need not ministrabon at Moffett' Field.i is joined in the controversy concern itself with disputes agree the geologic objectionsi over the safety of Pacific among geologists as to the to the plant were slim, butl Gas & Electric Co.'s pro, nature of movement along posed atomic power plant the San Andreas Fault, but da oral quest!
t Bod B
They c ive e I an "unsol-only with the likelihood of hefai the site itself being dis-Iciled" report to PG&E that chance of danger," he asked, said "we see rio reasonable turbed.
"should we go ah e a d and I
objection to the site."
There has never been any
- l build the plant?"hvo government ;eo1 The two are Drs. Garniss earth displacement of conse-II. Curtiss and Jack F. Ev.
quence at the site, declared ernden of the geology and Curtiss and Evernden, and
- W ly warned
- cophysics department of the no minor displacements for That the plant would be "vul-University of California at at least 40,000 years.
nerable" to earthquakes, and Ecrkeley.
It seems unlikely. they
- Dr. Joel lied;peth, director Curtiss and Evernden con-added. than any will occur of the Pacific Marine Station ceded they were recommend.
riuring the "00 year hfe of of the University of the Pa-ing PG&E take a " calculated the power plant but' they risk" and build' the plant, "nould not dangerously af-
but the risk seems so small feet the reactor if they did cific, urged the plant be de-as to be insignificant "
cecur."
!ayed liending further geolo-
.They said they inspected The two geologists nid UC MudC8-
@ 'ns g,eological testimo-the site and reviewed,all the their assessment of ths ny is cpeckd to be reviewed reports of other geologists be-rituation was influenced by by. the Atolaic Energy Com-fore offermg their opinion, the proposed design of the Both said they were "emo. I power plant. The plant's tionally biased,' against the i
reactor ves:el would be free-mission later this year before proposed plant before their standing within the structure t grants final approval to investigation but "we can no longer maintain an attitude M"Clf-
'the plant.
The site could undergo The latest opinions-lhose of antagonism toward use of two to four inches of shear of Curtiss and Etcrnden -
the alte by PG&E."
Th eir investigation, they displacement without damage were contained in a letter a to the reactor vessel," their said, was aimed st determin, report said.
9 i
ing whether or not the nu.
The views of Curt,iss and month ago to TGE: chle' clear plant tvould pose a Evernden are similar to engineer F. F. Mautz. who a
e o m m u n i t y hazard by its those of their colleague, Dr.
made it public yesterday.
proximity to the San Andreas Don Tocher, the UC scis-Earthquake Fault.,
mologist, and of Sacramento geologist Elmer C. Marliave, and Dr. Ilugo Benioff, pro-fessor of scismology at Cali-fornia Institute of Technology.
GEOLOGY All agreed th ere la no sound geological basis for re-garding the proposed power plant as a menace.
_ - - - - - - - -.. ~. _ _ _
e y
_(.
- (
)
, i.
- /
1-Two Xew ' unsolicited' Views on Bodesra Wead
.7, 4, @ N. w.:
'3 'h. 3 '[:./
i l
Two geologists who didn't physics. They'said they had old. The rocks hs.ve ~ been like the idea of an atomic been " emotionally biased" given major jolls, they said.
~
power plant on Bodega !!ead against the PG&E project be...only a few times within the
]
decided tolook for themselves fore they saw for themselves.
past f,0 m.!! ion years...
-and changed their minds.
The $G1 million project on They continued, "'ih,; evid, Their observations w e r e the scenic Sonoma County volunteered to the Pacific headland is oppot d vi;;ornus, dence in tbc f:cid makes A l
G af. & Electric Co.. which ly by conservation groups v.ho c! car to us that no majorf promptly decided to reprint contend, among other things. displacement has ever taken!'
in earthquakes alem'4 the near.
and none is to be expected inthat the reactor won't be f.afe place within the site arcs!
j the letter in the forthcoming issue of a monthly publication sent to all customers of the by San Andreas Fault Line.
the near future."
j-big utility company.
A crack in the granito rock The two ' geologists hava' "We can see no reasonable under the site has bene re-made exter.sive studies of objection to the site." said Dr. graded as a 'pombic carth-carth movement along the i
Garniss II. Curtiss and Dr. quake fault by some geolo San Andreas Fault. They are Jack F. Evernden, gists-hut not by Curtiss and noted for developing a potas.
Both are' members of the Evernden.
sium argon process for meas-University of California De-In any case. thev said the urement of ' rock age, the I
Ipartment of Geology and Geo crack is at least lo,tm 3 cars PG&l' said.
pa m ai m. e a r....n.m...
I 1
-l 1
I I
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _