ML20234F310
Text
_
f I
- /
~
Files July 16, 1963
.(
Te Edson G. Case, Assistant Director for Facilities Licensing, DL4R
-5v -
i BODEGA BAY i
~~]
On July 15, 1963, I received a telephone call from a l
Mr. Reynolds who identified himself as sa assistaat to i
Representative Don H. Clausen of California. He asked l
ubether the Bodega Bay hearing had been scheduled and J
whether we had received the geological report free the Department of Interior.
l l
l I infereed his that we had met received the geological report and that PG4E had regnested tlat the bearing met be scheduled util the report had been received.
5.Z,#
1 indicated that there was a distinct possibility that the geological report weald met cantain definitive conclusions,- since discussions with' the Survey people involved in the investigations' indicated that they did not believe that firm conc 1msions could be reached antil the site had been excavated to bedrock. I told yy him that PG4E had indicated that they weald reach this
-P<
point around the first of September. He observed that a -
ander these circumstances ad the 30-day notice reqaire.
g seat for a hearing that the hearing probably would met 4
be held in early September as he had been provisasty
[@f infereed (by persans makaown to me).
I '-
He seemed to be satisfied and thanked me for the informaties.
a cci H. L. Price, REG R. Lowenstein DL4R R, L Dawa, EL f
, y -. :;
B709230087 851217 j', ~..
b w"
'i '. -
FIRESTOB5-665 PDR (4
OmCE >.k sun m E
.. E.
i 7
/63 DATE >
....L........
Wrm ABC-818 (Rev. 9. 63)
- s. s..ovannesn enenine omes te.-ar7et-e
c g,;4= =
)
f
~
,.. g UNITED STATES GObnRNMENT Memorandum To
- Files DATE:
July 16, 1963
]
r FROM : Edson C
e,-
sistant Director i
for Facil Licensing, DL6R
SUBJECT:
BODEGA BAY On July 15, 1963, I received a telephone call from a Mr. Reynolds who identified himself as an assistant to i
Representative Don H. Clausen of California. He asked whether the Bodega Bay hearing had been scheduled and whether we had received the' geological report from the Department of Interior.
I informed him that we had not receivephe geological
~
report and that PG6E had requested that the hearing
~'"
not be scheduled until the report had been received.
l.?'
I indicated that there was a distinct possibility that
)
the geological report would not contain definitive conclusions, since' discussions with the Survey people j
involved in the investigations indicated that they did -
~~
not believe that firm conclusions could be rcached i
~
until the site had been excavated to bedrock.
I told
@Y' him that PGGE. had indicated that they would. reach this j
point around the first of September. He observed that 1
under these circumstances and the 30-day notice require-ment for a hearing that the hearing probably would not
. Q~ Q be held in early September as he had been previously i
~;
informed (by persons unknown to me).
1 He seemed to be satisfied and thanked me for the information.
'i cc:
H. L. Price, REG R. Lowenstein, DL6R R. X. Donovan, OCL 3
e s
2209280$$P
.a
.Jg.
________________-__________W