ML20234E375
Text
.......
i e
s s
.n..
.~.-. -
.. ~.
. - ~ -~... -.. ~.. - * - ~ ~ -
R.D
~
a ma noun sur.
_. s.. ~ - y, y_
p~
< -. ~.
va n 8 Form Alr.C-98 (Rev. May14,19477 Note an. reture.
For signature.
For informstlen.
w TO (Name and WMQ IMmAO RIMAAKS J
F.e.hard6sse t ar.
h~-
m --.
an,
- t. s
- t. m.= Fr = n m s, s/t a s/s/ u un s4tter, a and 3/s/64
/maml an mriN....... o x
a
...m v,,.f
- y vv
/.
L w t.t., ar e, W}
i xl V "n ' \\
c a q>
[l
- r. x. rtte
, aan, og y
w m.m.... -u J. s w
, art, se
/
/"D
- /
\\
- a. w. s.t a, s.,t. v,, = =
w un w
F ROM (N.m. and unlO RIMAAK3 x=
modney Le seethetek c-.J Asst to the Mgr. der
. ?u Fabits Enfer sties r.-
A sas p... g 1
un /4/64 van na s
...,t
=
usE OTHta SIDE Folt ado (TioNAL REMARKS EPO #9 14 7749 e 1
- - - g
~
..e.a,m"'.-
__m_..
',. _. 2.
g. g, g74...{ '. '..,..
e 'm('
.".g,~@.. _.s ',,uen. 'Q Q.w. ;_.. '.
,3.,.
.,., ; eg ' T.e J'".
.,....-*-=.b
.."S......"
,g,
.a.
j.
[
.[',~,..
,g.g,~-h j y,,,,,,.
y.-~
w ~. 9 J 4,,,
' ' ' [
acre.,;,".g o,y;n.s,.a,m' a(M h q)r ;pW.g.n;;,.n.v n.9:.~.z ;pK%[ gm.
,am..',~ r.ge:w
,~. w.
.M. [: '...
w.g;QT.7q,q" C_,g%.n :-Q~..m.g:.=2 em:g u.
m 'a" &
g:..--
.Y-f s-y; y
. - \\.v,.,.-
. ~,;!~m ~
.;.y&q); -g:-'. &,,r.: - m-S..
.c,:M. T..
- ~c.a..., a..-~~ ; ~: ~ F : g. -* n c ;;W,.~ ;
- 7p
.=.. -
.I
.x.
- .~
i-a.
u
-.-Q -
w
^ y.=. ' ~.%...,z W u.d.-n._- k
.a.
a an
.t..
. 3 h, y; ~ m,..,_p.i%._:1 y -k..,. a-h:; j;~.%_ ". ; w.n %_=%'d..j:%4 -W.s.r.Qz.
. - ~ ~,...
. % ~ f, eQ.,., -.,.
--. Jf.".
~
su
,~
-m_._
..,.m.
2..*.-*
DM 7
Nw
. n."_M
_ hY,
'*3 M'
.
- sam.
.. _..g, 5%..
~~.,,p ; 7 2. s.-- y y,' c& f*.
.., m.
w
%,.., s.*. g. s vw. 47..+-o-
.:. =. &...,~;..',r.' :e s a : e.-+ mq. ;;g. w..yj...<..y.+..,,~.,y~,-,
-. 24..
-7.,*
.e.e-w y.,
pn.,w...~. cw.,-.
4 4
g.
'IM $..,
s~
7.,m og ', gg
~3
.hg g.
.m.
'T-,' g r.y75'...H !w'
~..
. q - L. n :.,
~. -
a,- ;.~u g =. n.:.. ~~-.- -
n ;_;. 3.,.
,...,.=...
- - a..
y
,.a.
~ ;; w -
- ~. ~
-.c.
So-in
. ema
..e..,.e,*.
.-E P gf,.%.,,,.6
.g
.9
,,g - og,*,.,,.E=+
- f,.-.gn..(
- ,,,,6A,,g,.
,e.
g [,.g., y g,,1 ;-
=,p*,
d, e.*
~~..
g
..n e -.
.,,.3 El m
JMSm as-66s eon y
e
1
+
e
~
.a u
f
-t O
D
~
3;Lt ea,Au-%. 9/W UFG&E Chief 1
Defends
\\
. Plant Site
.~,. v -. o. _.e en= 3172l
- THE PRESS DEMOCRAT g
Cas and Electric Co. that bed.
PAGE 4A SUNDAY, MAY 3,1904 107TH YEAR rock at the proposed Bodega i
b I Head atomic power plant "has 1
withstood, without perceptible EDITORIAL I
k!
rupture, every movement of the l
i E~
8, San Andreas Fault for at least a
- i f9iMG 40.000 years, including perhaps 200 to 00 earthquakes of the Ind'_.,
j b
cG m* W
- a general magnitude c! the 1906 u-U:
San Francisco earthquake."
THE PUBLIC interest would be better served, b(
The quoted statement ap.
it seems to The Press Democrat, if a few other peared in a letter sent Wednes-national and state officials adopted the attitude i
g_ j<
day by Robert H. G e rd e s,
[E.,
of Governor Edmund G. " Pat" Brown concerning p,e.
construction of a nuclear reactor power plant at i
nor en e on, in answer to Mr. Anderson's Bodega Head.
i publicized ictter of April 15 call.
The Governor was asked at a press conference ing on PG&E to abandon the for his views concerning safety of a nuclear plant J
W Bodega project. The PG&E pres-there.
b~
ident also told Mr. Anderson "I'm inclined to leave that to the Atomic Energy he h
coif $rm t satc y and Commissicn, and whatever they say I'm willing p rts suitability of the Bodega Head to go along," he replied.
site P
desi "'
8 h
, p nt ' He dv th r nde MR. BROWN, of course, has no more scient!!ic
]
k~1 son personally to visit Bodega or engineering capability to form a sound opinion 7
Bay "so we can explain to you on this question than have Lt. Gov. Glenn Ander.
La in detail why we believe this son or Secretary of Interior Udall, both of whom l
p[s project will be safe and why it have sounded off despite having no more technical I
will improve, rather than de-competence than the Governor - or The Press N
$*gNn.
Democrat, for that ' natter.
he Bodega B ay The opinions of the PG&E The scientists and engir.eers of the Atomic w
consultants and the offer of a Energy Commission have the body of knowledge N
personal tour of Bodega are in to reach a dispassionate conclusion, p
j response to Lieutent.nt Gover-They should be allowed to do so without political nor Anderson's statements ex-interference.
pressing concern over potential y
g earthquake dangers and a pos-sible defacing of Bodega Head.
The PG&E president's letter pointed out that since PG&E huilt an access road and for g
- the first time permitted the pub.
8."
g lic to enter the area, almost E>
'230,000 persons have visited the ge5 S<:
r
):te. Mr. Gerdes' letter stated 5;;S
~
m that on the basis of sampling p.M Ch S
public opinion among these vist-m g --
O tors, " opinion cppears to run g09
-i overwhelmingly in favor of our c-no M
o proposed development."
E[
g, d o b
j A;
m.
. ~.,
77 y
m w..... ~ W.,
.j.~
. 1 -..
i a
j-
)
,t
- w s,
1 L,
t)
.J j,
s r
4 L
p.A m A % $sy g.u..~.p.w j
A Plant Delay P.D. Editorial Arc Commended
' Egg on FcCe'"
l EDITOR: I've been ponder-EDITOR. Once again,' edi.
ing a couple of items that
' torially the P.D has. wound.
have appeared in recent is-up with egg on hs face!
sucs of The Presa Democrat. -
In your eagerrer,s to call One describes a resolution i
anention to an cryr of loca-9 passed by the Greater Santa tion in 'a reschnfou to the l
1 Rosa Chamber of Commerce Board of Supervisors,d San and the other tells of a letter -
Francisco (introduced by the -
e f4 written by the Sonoma Coun-Hon. Jack Morrison), you've ty Taxpayers Association, made a very big mistake a
1 Both of these organizations yourself.
I F
have asked the San Francisco Harry W. Graham, manager '
j Board of Supervisors to stay of the Sonoma County Tax-F' 1 out of the Bodega Head-PG&E
. payer's Association did not N
controversy.
appear before the San Fran-r
. l Each of these organizations cisco County Board of Super-i H.1 has expressed a concern about visorJ: your April g6th Edf-rP the cost to the taxpayers of torial says he appeared before 1.. ?
Sonoma County because of de-them last week. I attended the lays in plant construction. If meeting of April.16th; Mr.
1 O,
they really wanted to benefit Gtdam was in the audience i
F.R taxpayers of this County, why
'but did not speak or make j
t haven't they protested the de-any kind of presentation be '
1 Fi vlous re. zoning of the PG&E fore the Board. Either come '
]
property on Bodega Head to one has told you sn untruth agricultural, the lowest tax-
. hat you are repeating, or-j U
i-
'ivou've deliberately r:rade an' O
3, rated zoning? If we have to, I might comm:nt, also, on!
~\\
-mtrue statement..
t.; r have the malevolence of a-j your statement in the April 26 PG&E ' facility on Bodega '
editorial, *What should bi
$c,3.J Head, I think these so-inter *1 an engineerft p.j ested groups should see that decision %g and scientific l
already been
~
. the taxpayers of S o n o m a thorough muddled up by h,*
County have the tax benefits poligges 4,,7, that industrial zoning would Just remember, the issue of.
gIr.1 bring.
.the pmposed PG&E atomic m9 Greater Santa Rosa Area plant on Bodega Head was de-Fa Chamber of Commerce de-filed from its very incepti:;n fj piores cost to taxpayers of by the condact of a poluica!
delays caused by hearings on body, the Sonoma County 7, "l the PG&E mattet. They Board of Supervisors.
)
should cons; der, however, that MARION RUEBEL during this period of delay
- Sodega Bay e
B PG&E has amended its orw-nal plans seven times, each in (Editor's note: We'll ulpe -
part or entirely to do with the c;1g off this way: Mr.
\\
safety. This would indicate to Graham appeared, was intro.
me that seven times they've duced, and, for the lack of found. they had been wrong time, submitted his rem:rks to some degrec, if, by mis. -
In written form to the San, fortune, the atomic plant is Franelseo Board of Super-permitted o'n Bodega Head, at TI30f8-)
least those of us who have
./
been responsible for delays, will by the same token be responsible for a safer plant than would have been con-structed from original plans BERT K. BEAN Bodega Bay l
L' a
4
.