ML20234D491

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Details Conversations W/A Grendon & J Terrill on 630508 & 17,respectively,re Geological Suitability of Bodega Head Site.Memo Dictated Following Receipt of J Terrill 630516 & 20 Ltrs Concerning Util Application
ML20234D491
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Bodega Bay
Issue date: 05/31/1963
From: Lowenstein R
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20234A767 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709220106
Download: ML20234D491 (2)


Text

_

=. '. -

(

(

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum To

Files

^* MAY 31 1963 r

NOM

' Robert Lvenstein, Director Division of Licensing & Regulat on SUDJECT: PACIFIC GAS AND ELECIRIC C0(PANY - BODDGA BAY During the course of dinner in the evening of the first day of the meeting held with Agreement States, Wednesday, May 8, ?dr. Alex Grendon told me that he personany had made a thorough review of the geological-seismological g

aspects of the Bodega Bay site and was satisfied as to its adequacy. He told me that there were no specialized agencies in California who had reviewed the suitability of the site. He added that Mr. Terrin had visited quite a number of people and agencies in California to discuss the geological suitability of Bodega Head and had informed him, Alex Grendon, as well as others that Public Health Service was undertaking a review of the geologic suita-bility of Bodega Head at the request of the Atomic Energy s

Commission. I told Mr. Grendon that we h vi made no specific requests to Public Health Service but had forwarded to PHS the application and amendments thereto, as is customary, for such comment as PHS vishes to make.

neiwu On Friday, May 17, James Terrin stopped in my office apparently just to chat since he had been in Germantown to attend the hearing on N.S. Savannah; among other things discussion turned to Bodega Head site. Mr. Terrill indi-cated that one of the principal questions for decision is the suitability of the Bodega Head from a geolog1 cal point of view and I told him that we have been and win be spending a great deal of time on this question; that we have consultants in the various disciplines involved in this aspect of our evaluation as well as acnistance from Geological Survey personnel. Mr. Terri u said that he was glad to hear this because he had understood from a meeting with the IHAR staff in early April that expert assistanc'e in this area vould not be obtained. I expressed surprise to Mr. Terrill upon hearing this and said that the facts were to the contrary.

This memore+im was dictated following receipt of his letters dated May 16 and May 20 on the IU&E application.

l l

8709220106 851217 PDR FOIA FIRESTD85-665 PDR 1

~

(

(

..,4 o

j ygy 311988 l

Files 4

Robert Iowenstein, DLrector Division of Licensing 8 Regulation I

PACIFIC GAS AND Ef2MEIC C(BIPAEf - Ban 3A BAf During the course.of dinner in the evening of the firct day of the meeting held with Agreement Statu,' Wednesday, aksr 8, Mr. Alex Grendan told me that he per=="y had made m thorough review of the geological-seismological; aspects of the Bodega Boy site and was ' satisfied, as to '

its adequacy.- He told me that there were no specialized agencies in California who had reviewed the suitability.

of the site. He 'added that 'Mr. Terrill had visited a an=hav of people and' agencies)in ' California to' dis,quite,

onas the geological suitability of. Bodega Esad,and'hadfisformed him, Alex Grendon, as well as others that Public Esalth Service was undertaking a review of the geologie' suits-bility of Bodaga Head at the request of the Atomic Bnergy Commission.

I. told Mr., Omndon that we had made no specifie _

requests to Public Esaith Service but had forwarded to 758 the application and

=====*==nts thereto, as is customary, am. ;.

7 -

for such.ocument,as PES wishes,te make. wenf;Nmedwa,c aa t %4: e x-1 On Friday, May 17, James Terrill stopped in aqr offiar.,e apparently just to chat since he ha' been in Germentown j

to attend the hearing ca N.B. Savannah; among other things discussion turned to Bodaga Head site. Mr. Terri11Eindi-cated that one of the pr*=4M L geestions for decision is e !

,,p the suitability of h Bodega Reed facet a geslagical: point

". eA of view and I told him that we have been and will be i

sp-d4== a great deal of time on this geestion; that we have consultants in the various disciplines involved in

,. u.-

this aspect of our evaluation as well as assistance from G -1 ~4 cal Survey personnel. Mr. Terrill said that he was 61ad to hear this booanse he had understood front a meeting with the IEAR staff in early April that esport

. assistance in this ama would not be obtained. I expressed q

surprise to, Mr.,Terrill impon hearing this and'on14 that the facts-were to the contrary..

/

This samarandma was dictated #"=*==

receipt of his I

1etters dated May 16 and May 20 on the 70&E Ji F

'j DIAR j

omer >

/_. _,QQ

~

SURNAME > MMlaV

. 5/8/k3-

-- --. m

'j om >

]

$i

h 7

,