ML20234D275

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Ltr to Editor from 630805 Santa Rosa Press Democrat Re Proposed Bodega Reactor
ML20234D275
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Bodega Bay
Issue date: 08/08/1963
From: Cook D
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Fouchard J
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20234A767 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709220034
Download: ML20234D275 (2)


Text

91 7

a.

y I

V L Joe Fouchard,' News Service Branch August 8, 1963 Division of Public Information, Headquarters Dale J. Cook, Assistant Information Officer, SAN LETTER TO EDITOR - BODEGA MI:DJC

.56 -2 c 5 i

Enclosed is a 14tter to the Editor from the Santa Rosa Press Democrat of August 5 on the proposed Bodega reactor.

1 Enclosed:

As stated I

CC:[.HaroldPrice, REG,,HQ,w/ enc 1.

Robert lowenstein, DIAR, HQ, w/ enc 1.

F. K. Pittman, DRD, HQ, w/ enc 1.

Howard Shapar, 000, w/ enc 1.

l J

R. W. Smith, Comp 1. V., SAN, w/ enc 1.

l D,%

4

%[ ' -

t

),,

<D 0

l l

h

]h i

  • ~ \\

c.

j

' y/

L

?-

1 Rec'd Of, Dir. of Regn.

d Date ____ _

__k_h ___

h.

<? 2'

s..

.s

..S

\\

l

\\

I

//l A.C o

T,i m e _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

H ST __________

1 1

l J

? ?

l l

/

a70922OO34 851217 Ly PDR FOIA FIRESTOBS-665 PDR j

t M'

u = mm-.__,.. _ _ _

_u__

t

(

-..e dL' 4

D2dw(,a Pro l $s14 l' 4dPlant by.. Y Ad Disputed:

d EDITOR: It is stuprising that a

Paul Golis has gotten so far in I the ' business workl and in the

  • Democratic party, for he is 'not an entirely accurate person. Once-befom, I had occasion to write to your column calling attention to his deviation from fact.

)

Sonoma County Association for has boca our experience that the Development of Bodega Bay PG&E gives not a whit for (Mr. Golis) placed a large ad in public opinion.

your July 26 papor. At least two 1 just can't tuxlerstand why an of the paragraphs therein con-Mlligent p would not realize Wad inaccuracies:

he cannot rely on distortions of k

1 "%a Bodega Bay Atomic Park tmth to secure support. Neither will supply electrical power for all of Nodhcrn Califor.

can I understand why some peo.

nia....."

ple have such large dollars signs This is not t r u e. We have in their eyes that they are blinded PG&E's word that tho* stomic to the. charm and beauty and plant would not serve this area:

sdcty d Mga Bay wie devd-it would supply the Bay Area. not Jdi of Nodhorn California, opment foi much-needed recrea.

~4 2 Comment on,the second para.

tion - without that monstrosity,.

i graph: %e plant itself will the proposed PG&E nuclear fueled.

not alone make it possible to power plant. '

soundly develop the Bodega MRS. MARION RUEBEL Bay area. More than the plant, Bodega Bay it would take men of wislom, integrity and -vision. If Mr.

' ~ -

Golis is using Rohnert Park as a guide to what he proposes doing to Bodega Bay, I can only say it uvuld not be logi-calland use for this area.

Ilis tax quoteof "from $1 mil.

lion to 37 m!Ilion a ycx" is i

a guess. Since.1he PG&E property on Bodega Head has J

b c e n zoned Agricultural",

tlwre's no telling at this time just how much taxes they a

would pay.

"This is Imm 12 per cent to 50 por cent of our present,

assessed valuation". That word "present" is significant. We i

have gone to pains to learn from other. areas just what,

happened to, taxes after in -

stallation 9 a PG&E'phuit f

in thole county: Assesed val-untions ballooned and as a result. Individuals are paying.

greater taxes than before tle PG&E installation.

j "We will lose it unless the ;

people say that they. wa n t f

.it". his is too 'ridiculo6s 'to ? *

+

deserve comment. 'Dus is not a popularity contest, and it 1 J

1 st.

4

.-____-___-xe~_.

-=-=~=_v_-

. ~ -

-- ~ - ~

1