ML20234C968
Text
'
/J)L:., j L
Ms
.i i
Joe Fenshard, Nous Service treach Aegest 22,190' Divistem of Sublic Indesmetten, 4 Rodney L. h*wak, Assistent to the Manager for Stablis Iedeemetten, SAN ADDITIcel&L aceegt akt aEACTER CLIPS
-)0
- 70.5~
MK ELS atteshed ese asas slips en serismo a peet of the Fela pc.:::e pesar reester at Bodege Emed, insluding a heartag boisse the maria Commty neerd er aspervisers (the ette in semens cedaty)s setten by the northese c=Id8=nais a==ae=neta er; 8-**
3 and adds and ends.
Ate-h e:
- 1. Santa ases Press temosset, 8/21/M
- 2. s.F. Chromiale, S/22/ G
- 3. 1 meter to Editor, S.R. Press Demooret, 8/20/M
}5sesid Fries. M O. 30. is/=**-*
u CC:
ambert "
='-
MER. 4,tu/ettsche.
F.E. Pittame, M. Et, Wa**maha Besord shaper,.SW, Ell, Wetteshe.
- a. w. match, Ceept. v., a45, s/etteshe.
a_.,~
l
- ~'
l
.\\ f ~'$s i.?;
/ '
-i
. f.{!
.~ l l
'.'\\
b r.
Ihj
,I j
-\\
6
\\
i
' C'
<4.
~
. /,y j
Ci y'
1 f
' jo xx
[
SolmtWICK:st i
8/22/M
~
g709210472 051217 PDR FOIA PDR i
0.FIRESTOBS-665 c
. i ve1 gg' 4
5%_
~
r
a 4
1 t
164 M MVN, HERRING (h,(
-..sD."*bh%T.'O
)
~
~
i J.cr+.r w kem Oct-,l h u..y" the plant wi!! he farther than iro
[.
7[ " y f
1 f *.* ~ y j
n l
- feet from 6:e near point e.f the
{
^
f L
'. =
San Andreas Fauh @c Wh4 j
w w g "a g
figure given by PG&E to the AEC j
was " extremely con.scrvative"i.
4.k c], f Supinisu Eck O s3M.Ms 9fM8 i P r"Y"1 @ '
I 8
N N w$ d diU[ D i. M.2,N Interest in the plan! stems from g
"esscatiaUy geologic and scismic, g
l By DON ENGDAllL' to oppose the proposal. said hoy considerations,' rcised viith Mr.
d P.D. Staff Writer thinks they shed wait a week ori Mautz a scrics of queshon.1 tbcut '
SAN RAFAEL - Marin County so before making a decisic the proximity of the San A:v.!rcas Supervisors listened yesterday to' The Marin hearing was uhed g quaMy d rd W wM de ;
Fauk b de @ de d N three and a half hours of argu. uled July 31 when the board ac !!
j ment over the nuclear-fueled pow-is a be p l
cepted on offer from Paul Golis.it reac er plant proposed Dr Bodega Bay lawyer. Rohnert Park devciopati i
in Sonoma County'
'and secreary of the Sonoma Counyl l.0^,0-foot distanco from the fauk l
It was a spirited affair, with ty Association For Deve'opment of za}"'.tEC ny PG&E.is "cxtremely.
edge to the plant site ;iven i
. anti-plant speakers far outnum-Bodega Bay to bring cem argu,
g l
vdd* as for foundation.
I barm; those favoring the Pacific ments in favor of the pkr.t.
4
).4 1.ad Qu Ge reacta will Gas & Electric Co. proposal-and He turned out yesterd y to be ".nh he x;.id in "colid ros," ar.d with ^
.. county speakers m the the minority, with PGiE chiefP the re:.d turbine and cther map o civil engineer P. F.
h.tz the only other speaker favoring th*f structures 'will be on " residual The Marin board took no stand;
.la!" th:.t la better than most Supervisor Peter H. Behr, who in plant.
foundation mr.tcril.
1 the past has urged his coueagues (Contfaued on Page 12, Cal. D Mr. hhr h,uad h'msd "trou-I'cd" by dctnitions of " solid -
)
Sixteen other speakers-six of The " false impressicas" have C
them from Marin County-waded done gre:t damage to be co.nty a{[,
.f
'{Y ;
j gy 3 trto the utility company's proposal image. Mr. Go!!s said. As for sa-4g,'
ori a w!de variety of grounds.
pervisors, he declared, "I know 8
f'"{,"Q,.Mdby Mr. Golis said his organizadon-they ncre not m co.hu udh which he said has more than 2.000 PGLE.,
Mr. Mautz cet "certt.:r is r.ot a f;de rock is,;olid.
c, o mcmbers-wants to correct " false Supervisors, he said were told Mautz [
)
mpressions" about the plant and by-PGLE of power nuds in the about Sonoma County raised by are;, thst Eodega ficad was the said in that it has, nr.ted no.'
d&
h.ds of i 4,M i
opponents.
most economical s!!e and that The plant has support of the PG&E wanted to build an atomic P ant there.
A h'x 4 A. S.
. ~& e d '
l
" people of Bodega Bay and of So.
noma County as a whole," Mr. Go.
He found,,no questh.., t,=.,.aH Mill Va!!:y, uh.; said ;:. a a pro-i fe,sional go; tut, su a 31nks
}
I hs declared. As for questions of other thbgs being equa, tne 50-th: Bodegr. head k.... is a k m
plant safety he said, his organiza.
n ma supenkes uq have Py "pu c.c," cr.; rd.c. 2r, are uon "bclieves that the Atomic En-ferred to keep the beac!and in prH p7oug a im twg. Mts rur.-
o y
vate wnership or devekp a,t as a j
ergy Commission (which must ap.
4. throu p.x p b/ :ocr. ion
{
prove the proposaD is a responsi-park w marbe laws 4 ari "may my we" ;q me
- 4
{
ble agency an
- d#8'0"'. d wi!! make the prop-i non.gwk;c opp acnmeep' 8 Care lhfiat're was that of La Wtta.w. Cotati, The Rohnert Park developer also i
The power plant can provide lashed out at opponents who have'-
former pzz trurnpcter ci now a' enck et Sonema Cot 2 :icipital. !
tax money for development of the
. distributed "a tremer.doas amount' bay. he said, including solution of scare literature" about possilde I,ht Watters said PGi:S has had:
";:,od huntin;," for power plant,
of tha sewage disposal prob!cm contamination of milk in the So.
l there. The one year delay the pro-r.oma and Marin dairylands,in the' sites :!ong the Cahforrua coast..
hat "Codega licad is r.at yet in '
posal has a.rcady suffered.has area of the plant.
cost the coumy is a whole $1 mil-p3tg3 e -- 1 gy" lion in wx revenue, he said.
Dairyn)ca have taken a "veryl responsible etutude" in the situa-i Mr. Go!is showed a blueprint of the couaty's plan for bay develop.
tion, he said, have investi;ated !
I and determined that "they can i ment, oudined the projects pro-7 live with this thing."
posed but said the Sonoma County PG&E engiaer Mautz told the t supervisors have been "hard put" supervisors that his company's i
~,
to find money to develop the area.
studies showed the Bodega loca I Mi. Colis flayed opponents who tion to be "the best and most i he said have created the impres.
economical site for a plant in the sion that the people of Sonoma arca where a new generating Coumy are "a bunch of rubes...
source is required."
ignorant and corrupt.. " and He outlined the company's back-that there was a "gigande con; ground in* nuclear energy which !
spiracy between PG&E 'and the he said has convinced it.that l Board of Supenisors" in ' initial aiomic power is " safe and eco-sta;cs of plant approval, namical..."
4 o et '. %..,g fg g
[*
- i f m._
__[ _ _-
(
4 12-Press Democrat, Santo Rosa, Calif., Wed., Aug. 21,1963 i
Opponents, Proponent
[
3 9 r q h 10 A',
r,cw m s - L ac a n [ m.;' %] 'h M '
M
~7 M',.
i
~. 7~')
i D """d I"" I#E' lic was not yeahiag '!n duoy, gation of Sonoma Couray twherc{
supervisors declined to hcld a; I
hearing) or PG&E." he skid, but "Pubile Uninformed" Ceorge Wheehvright, Marin coast "if our form of ;;overr. mint,s to!
Ho ' called 'it " madness" and.
rancher, declared that the public survive, amateurs muot make dei
-c sions on the advice of exn has been deliberacly been kept "lo!!y" to locate the plant near-
. uninformed about the proposal.
gris
- but shou:s "quc.dm; the fault zone, but said muc of the upcris."
He said new milk contracts giv9 Present in the audicace during the opposition to 'the propos1 stems from a desire to orescrt en Sonoma County farmers. con-most of the hearing was one S04 the headland in its nature eie..
tain a clau.se " stating at any time numa County Superviaor - Lc!gh!'
Ma;;rita Klassen, Sonorna, t.-
their milk shows measurable ra--
ordinator of the county chapter of.
bioactivity they will receive no Shoemaker. Petaluma. who favored [
some requests for Scauma Countyf l
the Northern California Associa..
payment for the milk" and asked -
hearings and who cast the icnc '
tion to Preserve Bodega Head and for a." satisfactory answer" why' dissenting vote when de PG&S!
Harbor, the principal opponent of that is done "if it is safe to release (
use permit for the Bedega Her.r.,
radioactive gases into toe air."
the plant. envisioned damage to site was granted more than threci-Mr. Wheelwright spoke for an informed pubye albwed i. say in]
the twocounty milk industry and years ago.
said that could far out. weigh tax revenue from the plant..
" future environmem and th.t end Pt/C Denial gets which naw devc!c;acents may la env.hcr development oa an~
Projections against radiation l bring."Ec (and othere pointed to cier fect 10 the bc!!}.; comic-hazards are " defective " shei charged, and regulations control-the reccat apprehension over the versy, the g;s PabDc Utilities hn; emission of radioactive ma-use of ins.:cticidos in which ex-Co.nmissic 4 her yesterday do.
pcrts " honestly motivated said n!cd.w.t.e pn:.!n for re hear.
terial from' the plant are "only, there was no dan;;cr."
Ins the f,b.2 ccA 30r57-paper security."
g Charles Gooddale. Marin Sonoma The deci:.. - M '
UC, Pres,.
o ranchcr, said he is no expert but dent 'E!!ir.m L:na CRscaf,; a found it "not good br,rsa sense to
. was een u
, i ~ "un set it..you mi;;ht say Northern Ce A
- j&fa R ri;;ht on the fault.
. Preserve hodm I:m.
- 1 u He raised his fears over what faction in the t.e amme Coar{.
the plant " fallout" wi!! ta to his!
lin an attemp; to facce :. ccw property values. Mr. Cocddale' lhcaring.
praised the Marin sup:.rvisors-as did others-for " accepting your responsibility" to !! sten to argu.
ments.
Ilarold Sirap;on. San Francisco, chairman of the San Francisco
. Council for Contemporary issucs, urged a go-slow approach on the plant proposal, as cid H. A. Sum-j mers. Kentlic!d civ!: engiccer.
Mr. Summers said he be!!evo the plant siting.to be a rir,k,-"q l
,i
- and "very detrimental to the arca's!
r inatural beauty."
f As the meeting c osed near 6
'p.m.. Supervisr,r Echt concluded it was a " fruitful hearing'... and.
PG&E sht,uh! consider it as such."1 I
F
?...
erJ.qha.m.
esm emek
=-ss%D...eeam sa A-,
za d.m~e4a-<mu e-a:.6
.a.a1-.ar.__.-
,.m-
..._w.-_
-2:%..
m.
---_.-___.mm_.---__m.
1.
s
~
I
. $ p A.,
3' r 63
. Demos ' -ight
]
A-Plant-i g
j AtBodega
[p The weigh 1 of thsl E.
l AgN)i] C ! U J. ';. '.
- Northern California Dem.
,, f. - -
f n,,
'ocratic organization was
?,
C.i
/
thrown yesterday against to hold extensiI.
- plans by the Pacific Gas l From l' axe !
man 3"
.j bearings in Sonoma county
,and E!cetric Company 10'1
,to study the 1;odega contro.: " *" ':ssue.
)
- build a nueIear power versy.
[ plant on Bodega Day.
"It v o.ad seem 'that thero;". A PG&E spokesman s:iid,.
,is a greater riA to adjacent Mr Xcnt's statement isv3 i
Roger K e n t, northern
- chairman of the Califor-land in this car,e heavily pop 2 diff urent from others 'n'la3E it.hted, area in locating a recenut."
~ -:
nia Democratic State Cen-
- nuclear power plant near ca.
..it covcca points whic$ ~the
' tral Committee, strongly j San Andreas fault or otheri AEC will hcar in Santa RxS protested the plans in a eae. quake areas' than out i and we ht,p; the date for thLt i
'Id" *# *""h *###5'" h" '^Id"I soon.ng wil? be annoused l
beari letter to Glenn Seabore ent urgad 2 AEC chair-
,5
' chairman of the AtomYc
' Energy Commission.
ItISK j
Kent urged Seaborg not to be swayed by the amount of
' money the utility company already has spent on the project because the expendi-i I ures were. "made at the i
t 1
! risk" of Pacific Gas and
',EIcctric without the required l authority t,f the commission.
! "We tmanimously oppose jany industrial development
.of this unique and beautiful
' part of California's.. shore-line, but are well aware of the limitations of your juris-L
' diction," Kent wrote.
L STL*DY l
Kent is chairman of a spc-clat committee appointed by l
o the State Central Committee
{
See Page 7, Col. 7 4
8 6
l l
6
~:
l 4
9 9
s i
9 Q
._;___1
-