ML20210U726
| ML20210U726 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/1985 |
| From: | Chandler L NRC |
| To: | Schierling H NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210U520 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-86-197 NUDOCS 8610100164 | |
| Download: ML20210U726 (1) | |
Text
.
June 10, 1985 Note to: Hans Schierling
SUBJECT:
COMMENTS ON DIABLO CANYON SH0LLY PACKAGES As requested, I have reviewed the two Diablo Canyon Sholly packages.
In the very limited time allowed for OELD review of these documents (about one working day), I obviously have not been able to review each of the over 300 proposed changes to assure that each corresponds to the "no significant hazards consideration" example cited in the notice; I trust that you and George Knighton and/or Harry Rood have done such review and are satisfied that the correlation of proposed change and example is correct.
In the Sholly package for Unit 1, I have noted a number of additional typos.
Oft substantive concern, however, the phrase " provide additional operational flexibility" should be deleted on page 58, line 9.
As currently written, this sentence, in the context of the full paragraph, implies that this type of change is encompassed in example (i); it is not. The phrase may be appropriate in the following paragraphs, however, which address changes 38, 90, 91, and 177.
The Sholly package for Unit 2 does not appear to be necessary at all any longer. While this notice would have been necessary had there continued to be a gap between issuance of the amendments and the likely issuance of the full power license (thus, the changes would be needed to permit continued operation of Unit 2), time seems to have overtaken the need to Sholly these changes which can be made in connection with the full power licensing of the Unit without the need for a separate notice. Clearly, if these changes can await the 30-day notice period, they can await issuance of the full power license anticipated before the expiration of that period. Such action would l
be consistent with the traditional " cradle-to-grave" approach applied by the l
staff to these types of changes.
Based on my review, and with the comments made, I have noted that there is l
no legal objection to issuance of the notice for Unit 1; in light of the l
above, I have not signed off on the notice for Unit 2.
l M
Lawrence J. Chandler cc: J. Scinto 8610100164 860930 PDR FOIA HOLiFS86-197 PDR
=
0