Letter Sequence Approval |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20245A4481986-09-30030 September 1986 Revised Draft Conformance to Generic Ltr 83-28 Item 2.1 (Part 1) Equipment Classification Hope Creek,Peach Bottom 2 & 3,Perry 1 & 2 & Pilgrim 1 Project stage: Draft Other ML20212M5271987-03-0303 March 1987 Amend 99 to License DPR-35,revising Tech Spec Requirements for Certain Instrument Channel Test & Calibr Frequencies to Once Per Operating Cycle During Refueling Outages Project stage: Other ML20206G8031987-03-26026 March 1987 Forwards Safety Evaluation Granting Inservice Insp Program Relief Requests PRR-8 Re Surface & Volumetric Exam of RHR Sys HX Nozzles & PRR-9 Re Exam of 100% of Required Vol for nozzle-to-vessel Welds,Per Util 860415 & 1212 Ltrs Project stage: Approval ML20214Q4191987-06-0101 June 1987 Forwards Summary of Nrr/Util 870521 Meeting Re Licensing Issues for Plant.List of Attendees Also Encl Project stage: Meeting ML20207A5801987-08-0505 August 1987 Forwards SER & SALP Input Re Util 870401 Request for Exemption from 10CFR50,App R,Section Iii.J Requirement to Install 8 H Battery Powered Lighting in Outside Yard Area. Exemption Should Be Granted Project stage: Approval BECO-87-195, Submits Current Status of Improvements Being Implemented in Response to NUREG-0737,Item II.F.2 & Generic Ltr 84-23. Improvements Include Instrumentation for Reactor Water Level Sys & Installation of Analog Trip Sys1987-12-0808 December 1987 Submits Current Status of Improvements Being Implemented in Response to NUREG-0737,Item II.F.2 & Generic Ltr 84-23. Improvements Include Instrumentation for Reactor Water Level Sys & Installation of Analog Trip Sys Project stage: Other ML20237B1351987-12-10010 December 1987 Summary of 871124 Meeting W/Util & Member of Public Re Fire Protection Issues at Plant.Meeting Agenda,List of Attendees & Summary of Significant Matters Discussed Encl Project stage: Meeting ML20205F0051988-02-0505 February 1988 Discusses Resolution of Fire Protection Licensing Actions Project stage: Other ML20150C7401988-03-0808 March 1988 Provides Info Re Status of Inservice Insp & Augmented IGSCC Insp Programs for Plant 1987 Refueling Outage Project stage: Other ML20150C7641988-03-0808 March 1988 Advises That 860922 & 870506 Details of Inservice Insp & Augmented IGSCC Insp Program for 1987 Refueling Outage Meets Guidelines of Generic Ltr 84-11 & Acceptable Project stage: Other ML20207B0121988-06-0303 June 1988 Forwards SER Re Util Request for Exemption from Specific Technical Requirements of Section Iii.G of App R to 10CFR50. Exemption Should Be Granted.Salp Input Also Encl Project stage: Approval 1987-03-03
[Table View] |
Text
fML66/kM o f :scvq%
8 UNITED STATES i\\, m,' j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g
E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e
\\, N '..... /
Augnt 5,1987 Docket No. 50-293 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Victor Nerses, Acting Project Director Proiect Directorate I-3 Division of Reactor Projects I/II FROM:
John W. Craig, Chief Plant Systems Branch Division of Engineering and Systems Technology, NRR SUE' JECT:
SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT CONCERNING LICENSEES REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FOR DUPLICATE YARD LIGHTING PER SECTION III.J OF APPENDIX R - PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION (TAC NO. 65076)
Our Safety Evaluation Report of the licensee's request for exemption from the technical requirements of Section III.J of Appendix R to 10 CFR 50 to install 8-hour battery powered lighting in the outside yard area is enclosed (Enclosure 1).
The yard area in question is outside the reactor building and is the access route to alternative shutdown stations located in the emergency diesel rooms, the reactor building auxiliary bay, and other portions of the reactor building that are not involved in the fire.
Section III.J of Appendix R requires that, "Emergency lighting units with at least an 8-hour battery power supply shall be provided in all areas needed for operation of safe shutdown equipment and in access and egress routes thereto."
The rationale for the request is that the entire yard area (including this portion of the yard that constitutes access and egress routes to alternative safe shutdown panels) is already provided with adequate lighting from the installed security lighting.
In addition, emergency power for these lights is assured from a separate security diesel-generator unit.
We have reviewed the licensee's requested exemption and the technical information they have supplied in support of their request.
We agree that the security lighting already installed in the yard area satisfies the requirements in Section III.J of Appendix R to 10 CFR 50 for emergency lighting in thst por-tion of the outside yard area which constitutes access and egress routes to i
alternative safe shutdown equipment located in the emergency diesel rooms and in other locations outside the reactor building.
This request for exemption i
should be granted.
l l
'b i
T/d I
t Our SALP input is provided in Enclosure 2.
We consider our efforts on TAC No. 65076 to be complete.
I L John W. Craig, Chief Plant Systems Branch Division of Engineering and Systems Technology
Enclosures:
As stated
Contact:
D. P. Notley x29421