ML20204A025

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Record of 860422 Telcon W/J Brammer,S Hou,S Long, T Robertson,M Powell,W Watson & P Kadambi Re Pipe Break Screening Criteria.Jet Load Calculations Will Not Be Performed w/NUREG/CR-2913 Methodology
ML20204A025
Person / Time
Site: South Texas  STP Nuclear Operating Company icon.png
Issue date: 04/22/1986
From: Powell M
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
To:
References
RTR-NUREG-CR-2913 NUDOCS 8605090283
Download: ML20204A025 (3)


Text

--

HOUSTON UGHTING G POWER COMPANY y;-

SOtffH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION

TELEPHONE MINUTES M. R. Wisenburg ORRENDENCE SERIAL NUMBER TO
ST-HL-HL-35551 FROM: SUBJECT FILE NUMBERS April 22, 1986 DATE OF CALL: PRIMARY: C25/N3.8.10 SECONDARY -

Pipe Break Screening Criteria

SUBJECT:

TELECON PARTICIPANTS: J. Brammer (USNRC) T. Roberson (HIAP)

S. Hou (VSNRC) M. Powell (HIAP) bRGAN ZATION OF EACH) h W. Watson 1 3 S. Long (USNRC) PAGE OF On April 22, 1986, the above participants were involved in a conference call to discuss a proposed screening criteria for jet impingement evaluations.

Specifically, HL&P and Bechtel personnel informed the NRC that NUREC/CR 2913 and Draft ANSI /ANS-58.2 (December 1985) address jet impingement loading from breaks in pipes containing saturated steam and subcooled water (with saturation pressures between 870 and 2460 psia). As noted in NUREC/CR 2913, the jet impingement loads decrease significantly with distance from the break for such two phase flows. This phenomena has been used as the basis for development of screening criteria used on some recent plants.

I We stated that a screening criteria of 10 pipe diameters downstream from the break location has been used on Byron (SSER 6) to limit the review to those jets which could be actual concerns. The screening criteria considered components to be unda= aged by jet loads if they are located more than a distance of 10 diameters of the broken pipe away from the jet source. Components within 10 pipe diameters were assumed to fail.

We stated thac the South Texas Project (STP) intends to utilize the same screening criteria in verifying the previous High Energy Line Break Analysis (HELBA) work and completing the remaining work. Jet load calculations, however, will not be performed with the NUREC/CR 2913 methodology. The jet load calculations will use the methodology committed to in the STP FSAR Section 3.6.2.3.1 which follows the methodology of ANSI /ANS-58.2 (1980) as described in BN-TOP-2 (References 3.6-5 &

()fD 3.6-9 in FSAR Section 3.6). V

\ ,.

L1/Telmin/pb 8605090283 860422 8 i PDR ADOCK 0500 A STP-103 (6-79)

HOUSTON UGHTING & POWER COMPANY

'. SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION TELEPHONE MINUTES I

. . ise burg CORRESPONDENCE SERI AL NUMBER i TO: ST-HL-HL-35551 FROM: SUBJECT FILE NUMBERS April 22, 1986 G25/N3.8.10

OATE OF CALL
PRIMARY SECONDARY -

Pipe Break Screening Criteria i

SUBJECT:

ammer ( ) T. Roberson ( M )

! TELECON PARTICIPANTf*.

(INCLUDE NAME AND *

. . atson ORGANIZATION OF EACH) S. Long (USNRC) PAGE 2 OF 3 In addition, we stated that the FSAR Section 3.6 would be revised to include in Section 3.6.1.1-Design Bases a statement similar to the following:

15. For jet impingement evaluations the following apply for piping:
a. Components within 10 pipe diameters of the broken pipe downstream of the break are assumed to fail. Specific jet load calculations will be done only in those instances where failure of the components, when combined with the single activa failure, could adversely affect safe shutdown capability.
b. Components greater than 10 pipe diameters of the broken pipe downstream of the break are considered undamaged by the jet.

Lastly, we stated that within the next two (2) weeks. HIAP would be submittine a letter to the NRC to formally submit on the docket the proposed screening criteria and the annotated FSAR pages.

The NRC indicated that the proposed screening criteria is acceptable. The NRC questioned if the environmental qualification design would be changed in light of the proposed screening cr.iteria? W. Watson stated that the environmental qualification design bases would not be changed and the FSAR Section 3.11 will not be changed as a result of the implementation of the screening criteria. The NRC personnel indicated that this was acceptable and that the HIAP submittal should clearly state thist.

MEP/yd L1/Telmin/ob STP-103(6-79)

HOUSTON UGHTING & POWER COMPANY SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION l

TELEPHONE MINUTES

. . i burg COR NESPONDENCE SERIAL NUM8ER TO: ST-HL-HL-35551 f FROM: SUBJECT FILE NUMBERS April 22, 1986 C25/N3.8.10 DATE OF CALL: PRIMARY, SECONDARY -

Pipe Break Screening Criteria

SUBJECT:

TELECON PARTICIPANTS.J. Brammer (USNRC) T. Roberson (HIAP) onc 0ENA E AN S. Hou (USNRC) M. E. Powell (HIAP) g ,, O 9 PEACH) P. Kadambi (USNRC) W. Watson S. Long (USNRC) 3 PAGE OF 3 cc: E. W. Dotson J. N. Bailey C. Purdon A. W. Harrison A. B. Poole K. Siedle M. A. McBurnett D. Ashton (SEC)

P. C. Trudel (BEC)

Participants STP RMS (2)

L1/Telmin/ob STP-103 (6-79)

--