|
|---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20195E9011998-11-0404 November 1998
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule Re Reporting Requirements in 10CFR72.Concurs with NRC Conclusion That Test Rept & Subsequent Holding Period,Unnecessary
ML20195B3551998-11-0303 November 1998
Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 140 Re Financial Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20198Q4531998-01-13013 January 1998
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 140 Re Financial Protection Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20198Q6311998-01-13013 January 1998
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 70 Re Criticality Accident Requirements. Trojan Staff Recommends Proposed Rule Be Revised to Clarify Applicability for Plants That Received NRC Staff Actions
ML20136D5481997-03-0606 March 1997
Order Approving Application Re Planned Merger of Portland General Corp,Parent Holding Company for Portland General Electric,W/Enron Corp
ML20134L3401997-01-22022 January 1997
Resolution 96-R-85, Resolution Supporting Merger of Centerior Energy Corp & Ohio Edison Under New Holding Co Called Firstenergy
ML20058L5881993-11-19019 November 1993
Exemption from 10CFR50.120 Training Rule Requirements
ML20058A6101993-11-17017 November 1993
Exemption from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.54(w) Which Requires Licensee to Obtain & Maintain Min of $1.06 Billion of Decontamination Insurance Coverage
ML20058M7001993-09-30030 September 1993
Exemption from 10CFR73.55 Requirements Re Physical Protection in Nuclear Power Reactors for Plant
ML20057D9931993-09-30030 September 1993
Exemption to Portions of 10CFR50.54(q) That Apply to Operating Plants & Sections of 10CFR50.47(b) & 10CFR50 App E.Exemption Will Become Effective When Permanently Defueled Emergency Plan Implemented
ML20126H4641992-12-29029 December 1992
Exemption from 10CFR50 App E (IV)(F)(2) to Defer Licensee Conducting Its Annual Emergency Plan Exercise Scheduled for 921215 Until First Quarter of 1993
ML20198D3231992-05-0707 May 1992
Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,Appendix J,Section III.d.2.(b)(ii) Re Containment Air Lock Pressure Test
ML20246K1221989-07-0505 July 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. NRC Guidance on Subj of Procurement Would Be More Appropriate than New Regulations
ML20235S5401989-02-24024 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Questions Ability of Proposed Rule to Achieve Objective
ML20235R6861989-02-21021 February 1989
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Rule Should Not Be Implemented Until Realistic Determination of Impact of Rule on Industry Has Been Made
ML20206M8271988-11-21021 November 1988
Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Numarc Recommendation That Proposed 300% Sample Size Excessive & That 100% Annual Sample Size Will Be Sufficient Supported
ML20195E8711988-10-31031 October 1988
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Disposal of Waste Oil by Inceneration.Urges Commission to Finalize Rulemaking in Present Form & Ensure That Limited Capacity of Low Level Waste Disposal Sites Be Used Efficiently
ML20155D5391988-10-0303 October 1988
Temporary Exemption from Schedular Requirements of Property Insurance Rule Effective 881004 (10CFR50.54)
ML20150A9001988-07-0404 July 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology.Further Use of Subj Technology for ECCS Would Reduce Safety Assurances & Safety Benefits.Experience Shows That pipe-thinning Progresses Faster than Expected
ML20150F1391988-07-0202 July 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Expansion of Applicability of Leak Before Break Technology to Functional & Performance Requirements for ECCS & Environ Qualification
ML20150A9051988-06-30030 June 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology for safety-related Equipment.Nrc Reliance on leak-before-break Is Irrational Response to Very Real Safety Problem.Nrc Should Implement Mandatory Piping Insp
ML20153F6071988-04-29029 April 1988
Application for Amend to Indemnity Agreement B-78.Util Changing Business Name & Merging W/Up&L Merging Corp
ML20153F6371988-02-24024 February 1988
Rebuttal Testimony of Jd Tucker Re Application of Pacificorp for Consent to Transfer of Licenses
ML20153F7831988-02-24024 February 1988
Rebuttal Testimony of Jh Landon Re Application of Pacificorp for Consent to Transfer of Licenses
ML20153F6561988-02-24024 February 1988
Rebuttal Testimony of Dp Steinberg Re Application of Pacificorp for Consent to Transfer of Licenses
ML20153F7351988-02-24024 February 1988
Rebuttal Testimony of Vr Topham Re Application of Pacificorp for Consent to Transfer of Licenses
ML20153F7001988-02-24024 February 1988
Rebuttal Testimony of OT Colby Re Application of Pacificorp for Consent to Transfer of Licenses
ML20153F6681988-02-24024 February 1988
Rebuttal Testimony of RM Boucher Re Application of Pacificorp for Consent to Transfer of Licenses
ML20153F6281988-01-0808 January 1988
Testimony of Jh Landon Re Application of Pacificorp for Consent to Transfer of Licences
ML20153F6461988-01-0808 January 1988
Prefiled Testimony of Jd Tucker Re Application of Pacificorp to Consent to Transfer of Licenses
ML20153F7171988-01-0808 January 1988
Prefiled Testimony of Fd Reed Re Pacificorp for Consent to Transfer of Licenses
ML20153F7631988-01-0808 January 1988
Testimony of OT Colby Re Application of Pacificorp for Consent to Transfer of Licenses
ML20153F9761988-01-0808 January 1988
Prefiled Testimony of Dp Steinberg Re Application of Pacificorp for Consent to Transfer of Licenses
ML20153F6821988-01-0808 January 1988
Testimony of RM Boucher Re Application of Pacificorp for Consent to Transfer of Licenses
ML20236S2891987-11-12012 November 1987
Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2 Re Fire Protection of Safe Shutdown Cables & Equipment Located Inside Containment Bldg
ML20212N2471986-11-0303 November 1986
Partially Withheld Petition to Suspend OL Due to Util Failure to Disclose Conditions That Undermine Safety in Case of Seismic Event.Directors Should Issue Order Under 2.206 to Show Cause Why OL Should Not Be Suspended
ML20126H5251981-04-0303 April 1981
Notification of New Address for Coalition for Safe Power. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20062J5401980-10-22022 October 1980
Brief in Support of Exceptions to ASLB 800711 Initial Decision & to Aslab 800904 Order.Urges That Decision Be Modified to Include Accelerated Reporting Conditions & That Oral Argument Be Held Re Exceptions.W/Certificate of Svc
ML20126D1541980-04-0303 April 1980
Transcript of 800403 Evidentiary Hearing,Phase 2,in Portland,Or.Pp 4,454-4,497
ML20126D0281980-04-0101 April 1980
Transcript of Phase Two Evidentiary Hearing in Portland,Or. Pp 3913-4123
ML20126D2461980-03-22022 March 1980
Response to NRC Third Set of Interrogatories,Phase II of Control Bldg Proceeding.Expresses Concerns Re Effect of Noise in Work Areas & Effect of Vibration on Instruments,Not Mentioned in SER
ML20126C0331980-03-11011 March 1980
Transcript of 800311 Hearing in Portland,Or.Pp 3,451-3,590
ML20126A8641979-12-29029 December 1979
Transcript of 791229 Hearing in Portland,Or.Pp 3426-3450
ML20244A6471979-04-17017 April 1979
Licensees' Response to 790402 Request of PA Public Util Commission for Hearing & Petition to Intervene Re 790313 Show Cause Order.Urges NRC to Hold Ruling in Abeyance. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20148J1371978-12-18018 December 1978
Intervenor ST of Or'S Motion for an Extension of Time in Which to File Exceptions to the 781005 Order of Aslb. Motion Granted 781023
ML20147J2331978-12-14014 December 1978
Transcript of Hearing on 781214 in Saleam or in the Matter of Portland Gen Elec.Pp 2883-2996
ML20147J2301978-12-13013 December 1978
Transcript of Hearing on 781213 in the Matter of Portland Gen Elec at Salem,Or.Pp 2739-2882
ML20150E7821978-12-12012 December 1978
Transcript of Hearing on 781212 at Salem,Or.Pp 2574-2738
ML20147E1261978-12-11011 December 1978
Transcript of 781211 Hearing in Salem,Or.Pp 2390-2573
ML20062E0271978-11-20020 November 1978
Proposed Findings Submitted by St of or Per ASLB Request of 781103.Suggested That Scope of the Hearing Should Be Limited & That Control Bldg Sheer Walls Are of Strength to W/Stand Earthquake.Cert of Svc Encl
1998-11-04
[Table view]
Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20195E9011998-11-0404 November 1998
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule Re Reporting Requirements in 10CFR72.Concurs with NRC Conclusion That Test Rept & Subsequent Holding Period,Unnecessary
ML20195B3551998-11-0303 November 1998
Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 140 Re Financial Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20198Q6311998-01-13013 January 1998
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 & 70 Re Criticality Accident Requirements. Trojan Staff Recommends Proposed Rule Be Revised to Clarify Applicability for Plants That Received NRC Staff Actions
ML20198Q4531998-01-13013 January 1998
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 140 Re Financial Protection Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20246K1221989-07-0505 July 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. NRC Guidance on Subj of Procurement Would Be More Appropriate than New Regulations
ML20235S5401989-02-24024 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Questions Ability of Proposed Rule to Achieve Objective
ML20235R6861989-02-21021 February 1989
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Rule Should Not Be Implemented Until Realistic Determination of Impact of Rule on Industry Has Been Made
ML20206M8271988-11-21021 November 1988
Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Numarc Recommendation That Proposed 300% Sample Size Excessive & That 100% Annual Sample Size Will Be Sufficient Supported
ML20195E8711988-10-31031 October 1988
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Disposal of Waste Oil by Inceneration.Urges Commission to Finalize Rulemaking in Present Form & Ensure That Limited Capacity of Low Level Waste Disposal Sites Be Used Efficiently
ML20150A9001988-07-0404 July 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology.Further Use of Subj Technology for ECCS Would Reduce Safety Assurances & Safety Benefits.Experience Shows That pipe-thinning Progresses Faster than Expected
ML20150F1391988-07-0202 July 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Expansion of Applicability of Leak Before Break Technology to Functional & Performance Requirements for ECCS & Environ Qualification
ML20150A9051988-06-30030 June 1988
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology for safety-related Equipment.Nrc Reliance on leak-before-break Is Irrational Response to Very Real Safety Problem.Nrc Should Implement Mandatory Piping Insp
1998-11-04
[Table view] |
Text
00CKETED
..o, USNRC January 13,1998 Trojan Nuclear O Plant gg{j. j Docket 50 344 ADJUDC/M5 L4F License NPF-1 i
Secretary, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff DOCKET NLMER ,y, gq 0 Washington, DC 20555-0001 PROPOSED RUl.E ,
be AFA 6F69o)
Dear Sirs:
i 3
Pronosed Rule Channe issues Tlu: following are current rulemaking issues that may have an impact on the Trojan Nuclear Plant operations, procedures, and insurance requirements:
MN3150-4 F79 (FR Vol 62, No. 210, Page 5800, dated October 30,1997)
" Financial Protection Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors" Comment: The Trojan Nuclear Plant is in " Configuration 2" described in the proposed rule.
Spent nuclear fuel is currently in storage in the spent fuel pool, and this fuel has decayed sufficient to preclude any potential clad oxidation events. PGE has received a site specific exemption to the financial protection requirements of the rule (10 CFR 140.11), by letter dated November 2,1995 and an Amendment to Indemnity Agreement No. B-78, dated January 3,1996 as well as an exe:nption to 10 CFR 50.54(w) by letter dated November 17,1993. The NRC Staff concluded that $100 mPlion primary financial protection was all that was needed and that participation in the ind ury retrospective rating plan (secondary level financial protection) was no longer required. The specific spent fuel cladding temperature criteria of the proposed rule was not explicitly stated in the PGE exemption, though both PGE and the NRC Staff concluded that zirconium fuel cladding fires are no longer a concern since the fuel has cooled for more than 3 years. Even thov.-,e s w .
