Proposed Tech Specs 3.5/4.5.C of TS Bases Describing Min RHR & RHRSW Pump Requirements for Post Accident Containment Heat Removal & Submit Update to Design Basis Accident Containment Temp & Pressure ResponseML20149M728 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Monticello |
---|
Issue date: |
01/23/1997 |
---|
From: |
NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20149M719 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 9701270125 |
Download: ML20149M728 (5) |
|
|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217C6321999-09-30030 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.17.B, Control Room Emergency Filtration Sys, Eliminating Unnecessary in-place Testing of HEPA & Activated Charcoal Filters Based on Sys Operating Time ML20203B3191999-01-28028 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Page 60d,incorporating Approved Amend 103 Changes for Use by NRC in Issuing SER ML20206P1331998-12-31031 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising pressure-temp Limit Curves Contained in Figures 3.6.1,3.6.2,3.6.3 & 3.6.4,deleting Completed RPV Sample SRs & Requirement to Withdraw Specimen at Next Refueling Outage & Removing Redundant SR for SLCS ML20154L9551998-10-12012 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev of Statement on Normal Shift Length & Other Misc Changes ML20154L9041998-10-0909 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Proposed Changes Re Surveillance Test Interval/Aot Extension Program ML20153F0191998-09-25025 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Condensate Storage Tank Low Level Hpci/Rcic Suction Transfer ML20236P5421998-07-0101 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 30,50 & 53 Containing Administrative Changes Re Power Rerate Program ML20249C5121998-06-19019 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Rev 2 to 960726 LAR to License DPR-22,to Establish TS Requirements That Are Consistent W/Analysis Inputs Used for Evaluation of Radiological Consequences of MSLB Accident ML20247K6341998-05-12012 May 1998 Proposed Reprinted Tech Specs Bases Pages,Containing Spelling & Grammatical Corrections ML20216D0021998-03-19019 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Consistent Wording Throughout TS & Providing Sound Basis for Frequency of Actions Required Each Shift ML20248L2001998-03-13013 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR ML20248L4101998-03-0606 March 1998 Revised Page 39 to Proposed TS Change ML20202H7061997-12-0404 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Plant Max Power Level from 1670 Mwt to 1775 Mwt ML20203A9771997-11-25025 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Condensate Storage Tank Low Level Hpci/Rcic Suction Transfer ML20211J9801997-09-29029 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Page 249b & Cleaned Typed Page 249b, Adding Footnote to Topical Rept NEDE-24011-P-A Stating That Topical Rept Is Approved for Cycle 18 Only ML20210Q2971997-08-21021 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Safety Limit Min Critical Power Ratio ML20141B9181997-06-19019 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Update of Design Basis Accident Containment Temp & Pressure Response ML20137W2201997-04-11011 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.6.C Re Coolant Chemistry & TS 3/4.17B Re Control Room Emergency Filtration Sys ML20149M7281997-01-23023 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.5/4.5.C of TS Bases Describing Min RHR & RHRSW Pump Requirements for Post Accident Containment Heat Removal & Submit Update to Design Basis Accident Containment Temp & Pressure Response ML20132C6531996-11-25025 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Sections 2.1.A Re SLMCPR & 3.11.C Re Olmcpr.Changes Revise SLMCPR Values & Deletes Sentence Re OLMCPR Limit Penalty for Single Recirculation Loop Operation ML20117A1551996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Revision to TS Administrative Controls Section 6.1.F.1 Stating That Either 8 or 12 H Shifts Will Be Considered Normal & 40 H Will Be Considered Nominal ML20116G8951996-07-26026 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Max Power Level by 6.3% to 1,775 from 1,670 Mwt.Summary of Plant Mods for Power Rerate Implementation & Power Rerate Environ Evaluation Encl ML20116D8361996-07-26026 July 1996 Proposed TS Sections 3.6.C & 3/4.17.B Re Reactor Coolant Equivalent Radioiodine Concentration & CR Habitability ML20100Q3861996-03-0101 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Periodic Replacement of Containment Purge & Vent Valve Seat Seal ML20095J4341995-12-20020 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Main Steam Isolation & App J Leak Rate Test Requirements ML20095E7121995-12-11011 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Removing TS SR 4.7.D.4 & Replaces Seat Seals for Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge & Vent Valves Every Five Yrs ML20094M1981995-11-14014 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Requirements of Option B, Section Iii.A for Type a Testing (Primary Containment ILRT) ML20091K6821995-08-18018 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7/4.7 SGTS ML20087J4251995-08-15015 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Max Individual MSIV Leak Rate Acceptance Criteria of 11.5 Scfh to Overall Criteria That Encompasses Four Main Steam Lines Into One Limit of 46 Scfh ML20086D8011995-07-0505 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Extending Surveillance Test Intervals & Allowable out-of-svc Times for Selected Instrumentation ML20085N0991995-06-22022 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Supporting Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20082N8711995-04-20020 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re SBGTS & Secondary Containment ML20069J1061994-06-0808 June 1994 Proposed TS Re SGTS & Secondary Containment ML20065B6691994-03-28028 March 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Approved Analytical Methods for Developing Core Operating Limits Rept ML20065B6991994-03-28028 March 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Standby Gas Treatment Sys Initiation Instumentation ML20063C9941994-01-26026 January 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Requiring Valves to Be Tested at Pressure Greater than or Equal to Calculated Peak Containment Internal Pressure Re Design Basis LOCA ML20062N8731994-01-0404 January 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 3.11, Reactor Fuel Assemblies & Bases Re Methodology for MCPR ML20059E6041994-01-0303 January 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Surveillance Requirement 4.6.E.1.a to Require Valves to Be Tested Per Section XI Inservice Testing Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code ML1132102881993-11-30030 November 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Re Removal of Chlorine Detection Requirements & Changes to Control Room Ventilation Sys Requirements ML20056E1081993-08-10010 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Providing Clarification of Sampling & Analysis Requirements,Updating Liquid Effluent Sampling & Requirements & Correcting Typographical Errors in TS Section ML20045G6091993-07-0707 July 1993 Proposed TS 4.0.d Re Recording Unidentified & Identified Leakage Rates & 3/6/4.6 Re Analyzing Grad Samples of Primary Containment Atmosphere Once Per 12 H ML20128M7191993-02-12012 February 1993 Proposed TS Increasing Minimum Core Spray Pump Flow to More Conservatively Account for ECCS Bypass Leakage Paths ML20237G2081987-08-14014 August 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Eliminating Certain Requirements for Plant Mgt & Support Staff to Hold Current Senior Reactor Operator Licenses ML20065E2121982-09-24024 September 1982 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance,Reactor Protection Monitoring Sys,Jet Pump Surveillance,Organization & Steam Line Area Temp Switch Deviation ML1129708531982-07-0202 July 1982 Proposed Tech Spec Changes Allowing Plant to Remain at Substantial Power Level W/One Recirculation Pump in Operation & Equalizer Valve Closed ML1129708181981-03-19019 March 1981 Proposed Revisions to Tech Specs,App A,Pages 26,89-90 & 213-14 for Reactor Protection Sys ML20024G6491978-08-16016 August 1978 Proposed Tech Specs Raising Permissible Setpoint of Eight Safety/Relief Valves Installed at Plant to 1,108 Psig ML20127H2171978-08-10010 August 1978 Proposed Tech Specs to Authorize Use of Partial Drilled Model of Fuel Type for Plant Future Use ML20024G7051978-03-21021 March 1978 Proposed Tech Specs Re Application of Partial Drilled Model for Analyzing Retrofit Fuel Design Scheduled to Be Installed in Plant Reactor in Fall 1978 Refueling Outage ML20024G7031978-03-20020 March 1978 Proposed Tech Specs Clarifying Certain Sections of Interim Radioactive Effluent Tech Specs 1999-09-30
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217C6321999-09-30030 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.17.B, Control Room Emergency Filtration Sys, Eliminating Unnecessary in-place Testing of HEPA & Activated Charcoal Filters Based on Sys Operating Time ML20211G0391999-02-10010 February 1999 Revised ODCM, Including Revs to Revised ODCM Index,Odcm 01.01 Page 2 Paragraph 1,ODCM 02.01 Page 2 Section 1.0,ODCM 05.01 Page 2 Sections 1.0,2.0 & 3.0 & ODCM 13.05 Page 2 ML20203B3191999-01-28028 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Page 60d,incorporating Approved Amend 103 Changes for Use by NRC in Issuing SER ML20206P1331998-12-31031 December 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising pressure-temp Limit Curves Contained in Figures 3.6.1,3.6.2,3.6.3 & 3.6.4,deleting Completed RPV Sample SRs & Requirement to Withdraw Specimen at Next Refueling Outage & Removing Redundant SR for SLCS ML20154L9551998-10-12012 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev of Statement on Normal Shift Length & Other Misc Changes ML20154L9041998-10-0909 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Proposed Changes Re Surveillance Test Interval/Aot Extension Program ML20153F0191998-09-25025 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Condensate Storage Tank Low Level Hpci/Rcic Suction Transfer ML20237E9771998-08-20020 August 1998 Rev 4 to EWI-09.04.01, Inservice Testing Program ML20236P5421998-07-0101 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 30,50 & 53 Containing Administrative Changes Re Power Rerate Program ML20249C5121998-06-19019 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Rev 2 to 960726 LAR to License DPR-22,to Establish TS Requirements That Are Consistent W/Analysis Inputs Used for Evaluation of Radiological Consequences of MSLB Accident ML20247K6341998-05-12012 May 1998 Proposed Reprinted Tech Specs Bases Pages,Containing Spelling & Grammatical Corrections ML20216D0021998-03-19019 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Consistent Wording Throughout TS & Providing Sound Basis for Frequency of Actions Required Each Shift ML20248L2001998-03-13013 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SLMCPR B210059, Rev 1 to GE-NE-B2100594-1, Radiological Analyses of Design Basis Accidents1998-03-0909 March 1998 Rev 1 to GE-NE-B2100594-1, Radiological Analyses of Design Basis Accidents ML20248L4101998-03-0606 March 1998 Revised Page 39 to Proposed TS Change ML20202H7061997-12-0404 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Plant Max Power Level from 1670 Mwt to 1775 Mwt ML20203A9771997-11-25025 November 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Condensate Storage Tank Low Level Hpci/Rcic Suction Transfer ML20199H5281997-11-0606 November 1997 Software Requirement Specification (SRS) ERDS-SRS-1-3, Process Computer Sys - Emergency Response Data Sys (ERDS) - Data Point Library ML20211J9801997-09-29029 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Page 249b & Cleaned Typed Page 249b, Adding Footnote to Topical Rept NEDE-24011-P-A Stating That Topical Rept Is Approved for Cycle 18 Only ML20210Q2971997-08-21021 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Safety Limit Min Critical Power Ratio ML20141B9181997-06-19019 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Update of Design Basis Accident Containment Temp & Pressure Response ML20137W2201997-04-11011 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.6.C Re Coolant Chemistry & TS 3/4.17B Re Control Room Emergency Filtration Sys ML20137B5081997-03-12012 March 1997 Rev 2 to Inservice Insp Exam Plan ML20149M7281997-01-23023 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.5/4.5.C of TS Bases Describing Min RHR & RHRSW Pump Requirements for Post Accident Containment Heat Removal & Submit Update to Design Basis Accident Containment Temp & Pressure Response ML20132C6531996-11-25025 November 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Sections 2.1.A Re SLMCPR & 3.11.C Re Olmcpr.Changes Revise SLMCPR Values & Deletes Sentence Re OLMCPR Limit Penalty for Single Recirculation Loop Operation ML20117A1551996-08-15015 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Revision to TS Administrative Controls Section 6.1.F.1 Stating That Either 8 or 12 H Shifts Will Be Considered Normal & 40 H Will Be Considered Nominal ML20116G8951996-07-26026 July 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Max Power Level by 6.3% to 1,775 from 1,670 Mwt.Summary of Plant Mods for Power Rerate Implementation & Power Rerate Environ Evaluation Encl ML20116D8361996-07-26026 July 1996 Proposed TS Sections 3.6.C & 3/4.17.B Re Reactor Coolant Equivalent Radioiodine Concentration & CR Habitability ML20115D8621996-06-28028 June 1996 Rev 3 to Engineering Work Instruction (Ewi) EWI-09.04.01, Inservice Testing Program ML20100Q3861996-03-0101 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Periodic Replacement of Containment Purge & Vent Valve Seat Seal ML20095J4341995-12-20020 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Main Steam Isolation & App J Leak Rate Test Requirements ML20095E7121995-12-11011 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Removing TS SR 4.7.D.4 & Replaces Seat Seals for Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge & Vent Valves Every Five Yrs ML20094M1981995-11-14014 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating Requirements of Option B, Section Iii.A for Type a Testing (Primary Containment ILRT) ML20100M4821995-08-29029 August 1995 Revised Sections to Odcm,Including Rev 1 to ODCM-03.01,Rev 1 to ODCM-12.05 & Rev 1 to ODCM-13.05.5 ML20091K6821995-08-18018 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Section 3.7/4.7 SGTS ML20087J4251995-08-15015 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Max Individual MSIV Leak Rate Acceptance Criteria of 11.5 Scfh to Overall Criteria That Encompasses Four Main Steam Lines Into One Limit of 46 Scfh ML20086D8011995-07-0505 July 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Extending Surveillance Test Intervals & Allowable out-of-svc Times for Selected Instrumentation ML20085N0991995-06-22022 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Supporting Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20083Q8411995-05-18018 May 1995 Rewrite of Rev 2 to Engineering Work Instruction (Ewi) EWI-09.04.01, Inservice Testing Program ML20082N8711995-04-20020 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re SBGTS & Secondary Containment ML20077S4551995-01-0909 January 1995 Startup Physics Testing Rept,Cycle 17 ML20069J1061994-06-0808 June 1994 Proposed TS Re SGTS & Secondary Containment ML20072P8011994-05-17017 May 1994 Rev 8 to Process Control Program, Installed Atcor Solidification Sys ML20065B6691994-03-28028 March 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Approved Analytical Methods for Developing Core Operating Limits Rept ML20065B6991994-03-28028 March 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Standby Gas Treatment Sys Initiation Instumentation ML20072P8101994-02-22022 February 1994 Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Rev 0 ML20063C9941994-01-26026 January 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Requiring Valves to Be Tested at Pressure Greater than or Equal to Calculated Peak Containment Internal Pressure Re Design Basis LOCA ML20062N8731994-01-0404 January 1994 Proposed Tech Specs 3.11, Reactor Fuel Assemblies & Bases Re Methodology for MCPR ML20059E6041994-01-0303 January 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Surveillance Requirement 4.6.E.1.a to Require Valves to Be Tested Per Section XI Inservice Testing Requirements of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code ML1132102881993-11-30030 November 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Re Removal of Chlorine Detection Requirements & Changes to Control Room Ventilation Sys Requirements 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
. . _ _ - _ _ . . _ . . _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ . . . _ - _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._._..._.__ __
3 Exhibit B Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant License Amendment Reauest Dated January 23,1997 Technical Specification Pages Marked Up With Proposed Working Changes Exhibit B consists of the existing Technical Specification pages marked up with the proposed changes. Existing pages affected by this change are listed below:
Paaes j 112 l 113 l
i i
l l
J B-1
~
9701270125 970123 PDR ADOCK 05000263 P PDR l- . _ _- _ -.
~
i I
~
Bases 3.5/4.5 Continued:
automatically controls three selected safety-relief valves although the safety analysis only takes credit for two valves. It '- *'- 7 days ;
without materially t
B. RilR Interti' Two containment spray / cooling subsystems of the RHR system are provided to remove heat i I energy from the containment and control torus and drywell pressure in the event of a loss of An intertie 1 l c olant accident. A containment spray / cooling subsystem consists of 2 RHR service water j pumps, a RHR heat exchanger, 2 RHR pumps, and valves and piping necessary fcr Torus Cooling '
four-inch lin and Drywell Spray. Torus Spray is not considered part of a containment spray / cooling al r I
for water ham subsystem. Placing a containment spray / cooling subsystem into operation following a loss of i
recirculatior coolant accident is a manual operation.
he L RilR injection The most degraded condition for long term containment heat removal following the design allow the ope basis loss of coolant accident results from the loss of one diesel generator. Under these ,
receive a cle conditions, only one RHR pump and one RHR service water pump in the redundant division can .
be used for containment spray / cooling. The containment temperature and pressare have been there is a p analyzed under these conditions assuming service water and initial suppression pool !
accident. S temperature are both 90"F. Acceptable margins to containment design coaditions have been demonstrated and the containment long term pressure is limited to less than 5 psig.
isolation val I Therefore the containment spray / cooling system is more than ample to provide the required ' ole t valve is close- heat removal capability. Refer to USAR Sections 5.2.3.3, 6.2.3.2.3, and 8.4.1.3. .alR :
intertie line i small change in jet pu ,
j C. Containment Spray / Cooling Systems Re. ace Two containment spray /cco ig subsystems of the RilR system are vided to remove heat energy from the containment and control toru and drywell pressure in the eve of a loss of coolant accident. A ,
containment spray / cooling subs tem consists of 2 RilR Serv e Water Pumps, a lleat Exchanger, 2 RllR Pumps, j and valves and piping necessary i Torus Cooling and D well Spray. Torus Spray is not considered part of a containment spray / cooling subsyste For the flow pecified, the containment long term pressure is ;
1imited to less than 5 psig and, there re, is mo than ample to provide the required heat removal [
capability. Reference Section 6.2.3.2.3 USAR. !
Either subsystem is capable of performing e containment spray / cooling function. Loss of one RilR service water pump does not seriously jeopardize he co ainment spray / cooling capability as two of the remaining i three pumps can satisfy the cooling r uirements. Since there is some redundancy left, a 30 day repair period is adequate. Loss of I cont nment spray /co ing subsystem leaves one remaining system to perform ;
the containment spray / cooling fut -ion. <
3.5/4.5 Bases 112 REV i
r
Bases 3.5/4.5 Continued:
The RilR service water system provides c- 1- or the RilR heat exchangers and can thus maintain the suppression pool water within limits. Vi t low specified, the pool temperature limits are maintained as specified in Specification 3.7.A.
D. RCIC The RCIC system is provided to supply continuous makeup water to the reactor core when the reactor isolated from the turbine and when the feedwater system is not available. The pumping capacity of the RCIC system is sufficient to m- -'-- Tr the water level in rts.
The system me The llPCI s' During normal plant operation, the containment spray / cooling system provides cooling of the 1 feedwater suppression 3 7 A 1-pool water to maintain temperature within the limits specified in Specification system sho, The system surveillance requirements will be operable provide adequate assurance that the containment spray / cooling when required.
The survel The head and flow requirements specified for the RHR service water pumps provide assurance that the minimum required service water flow can be re9utred. supplied to the RHR heat exchangera. sgg 1 a test loop i ..smme r damage and -
E. Cold Shutd, The purpose of Specification J.a.c. in w ammum enac sutticient core cooling equipment is availablo at all times. It is during refueling outages that major maintenance is performed and during such time that all core and contal:unent spray / cooling subsystems may be out of service. This specification allows all core and containment spray / cooling subsystems to be inoperable provided no work is being done which has the potential for draining the reactor vessel. Thus events requiring core cooling are precluded.
Specification 3.5.E.2 recognizes that concurrent with control rod drive maintenance during the refueling outage, it may by necessary to drain the suppression chamber for maintenance or for the inspection required by Specification 4.7.A.I. In this situation, a sufficient inventory of water is maintained to assure adequate core cooling in the unlikely event of loss of control rod drive housing or instrument thimble seal integrity.
3.5/4.5 Bases 113 Rev
~
t Bases 3.5/4.5 Continued:
automatically controls three selected safety-relief valves although the safety analysis only takes credit for two valves. It is therefore appropriate to permit one valve to be out-of-service for up to 7 days without materially reducing system reliability.
B. RHR Intertie Line An intertie line is provided to connect the RHR suction line with the two RHR loop return lines. This four-inch line is equipped with three isolation valves. The purpose of this line is to reduce the potential for water hammer in the recirculation and RHR system when required to cooldown with an
. isolated or idle recirculation system. The isolation valves are opened during a cooldown to ensure a f
uniform cooldown of the RHR injection piping. If one recirculation loop is isolated or idle, these valves and associated piping allow the operating loop to cool the isolated or idle loop. The RHR loop return line isolation valves receive a closure signal on LPCI initiation. In the event of an inoperable return line isolation valve, there is a potential for some of the LPCI flow to be diverted to the broken loop during a loss of coolant accident. Surveillance requirements have been established to periodically cycle the RHR intertie line isolation valves. In the event of an inoperable RHR loop return line isolation valve, either the inoperable valve is closed or the other two isolation valves are closed to prevent diversion of LPCI flow. The RHR intertie line flow is not permitted in the Run ,
Mode to eliminate 1) the need to compensate for the small change in jet pump drive flow or 2) a reduction in core flow during a loss of coolant accident.
C. Containment Spray / Cooling Systems ,
Two containment spray / cooling subsystems of the RHR system are provided to remove heat energy from the containment and control torus and drywell pressure in the event of a loss of coolant accident. A
- containment spray / cooling subsystem consists of 2 RHR service water pumps, a RHR heat exchanger, 2 RHR pumps, and valves and piping necessary for Torus Cooling and Drywell Spray. Torus Spray is not <
considered part of a containment spray / cooling subsystem. Placing a containment spray / cooling i subsystem into operation following a loss of coolant accident is a manual operation.
The most degraded condition for long term containment heat removal following the design basis loss of i coolant accident results from the loss of one diesel generator. Under these conditions, only one RHR ,
pump end one RHR service water pump in the redundant division can be used for containment i spray / cooling. The containment temperature and pressure have been analyzed under these conditions assuming service water and initial suppression pool temperature are both 90 F. Acceptable margins to containment design conditions have been demonstrated and the containment long term pressure is limited to less than 5 psig. Therefore the containment spray / cooling system is more than ample to provide the required heat removal capability. Refer to USAR Sections 5.2.3.3, 6.2.3.2.3, and 8.4.1.3. t 3.5/4.5 112 REV t
- _ _ _ - --. _ _ - - - _ _ _ - _ _ .- _~ -- -. .
Bases 3.5/4.5 Continued:
During normal plant operation, the containment spray / cooling system provides cooling of the suppression pool water to maintain temperature within the limits specified in Specification 3.7.A.1.
The surveillance requirements provide adequate assurance that the containment spray / cooling system ;
will be operable when required. The head and flow requirements specified for the RHR service water !
pumps provide assurance that the minimum required service water flow can be supplied to the RHR heat i exchangers.
D. RCIC !
The RCIC system is provided to supply continuous makeup water to the reactor core when the reactor '
isolated from the turbine and when the feedwater system is not available. The pumping capacity of the RCIC system is sufficient to maintain the water level above the core without any other water system in operation. If the water level in the reactor vessel decreases to the RCIC initiation level, the system automatically starts. The system may also be manually initiated at any time.
The HPCI system provides an alternate method of supplying makeup water to the reactor should the normal feedwater become unavailable. Therefore, the specification calls for an operability check of the HPCI system should the RCIC system be found to be inoperable.
The surveillance requirements provide adequate assurance that the RCIC system will be operable when ,
required. All active components are testable and full flow can be denonstrated by recirculation ,
through a test loop during reactor operation. The pump discharge piping is maintained full to prevent !
water hammer damage and to provide cooling at the earliest moment.
E. Cold Shutdown and Refueling Requirements l The purpose of Specification 3.5.E is to assure that sufficient core cooling equipment is available at all times. It is during refueling outages that major maintenance is performed and during such time that all core and containment spray / cooling subsystems may be out of service. This specification allows all core and containment spray / cooling subsystems to be inoperable provided no work is being ;
done which has the potential for draining the reactor vessel. Thus events requiring core cooling are precluded.
i Specification 3.5.E.2 recognizes that concurrent with control rod drive maintenance during the i refueling outage, it may by necessary to drain the suppression chamber for maintenance or for the inspection required by Specification 4.7.A.1. In this situation, a sufficient inventory of water is maintained to ascure adequate core cooling in the unlikely event of loss of control rod drive housing or instrument thimble seal integrity.
3.5/4.5 113 REV i l
_ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _- ___ __ ___ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _