IR 05000483/1997009

Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-483/97-09 on 970422-25.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Implementation of Land Vehicle Control Measures Implemented IAW 10CFR73, Physical Protection of Plants & Matl

ML20141B816
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	05/09/1997
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20141B785	List: IR 05000483/1997009 ML20141B780
References
50-483-97-09, 50-483-97-9, NUDOCS 9705160037
Download: ML20141B816 (3)

Text

> . DOCUMENT. CONTAINS ENCLOSURE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

Docket No.: 50-483

-

License No.: NPF-30

-

Report No.: 50-483/97-09 r Licensee: Union Electric Company -

( s.

Facility

Callaway Plant i

Location: Junction Highcicy CC and Highway O d Fulton, Missouri

{ Dates: April 22-25,1997

,

inspector: D. W. Schaefer, Security Specialist, Plant Support Branch Approved By: Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch Division of Reactor Safety ATTACHMENT: Supplemental information

a {DR ADOCK 05000483 u; DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS once oc nernmTnnii FD

, , i-2 DOCUMENT CONTAINS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Callaway Plant NRC Inspection Report 50-483/97-09 This was a special, announced, inspection of the licensee's implementation of the land vehicle control measures implemented in accordance with 10 CFR Part 73, " Physical Protection of Plants and Materials," utilizing Temporary Instruction 2515/132, " Malevolent Use of Vehicles at Nuclear Power Plants," dated January 18,1996. Additi(nally, the inspection included partial review of the security system power supply andf eyiew of previous inspection finding r Plant Supoort

• The installed vehicle barrier system was consistent with the summary description previously submitted to the NRC, encompassed all vital areas of the facility, and was accurately described in the security plan (Section S1.1).

• The installed vehicle barrier system met the rule guidance for protecting required plant vital equipment from a vehicle bomb blast. The bomb blast analysis was consistent with the summary description previously submitted to the NR Distances between the vehicle barrier system and vital equipment exceeded the minimum standoff distance (Section S1.2).

• The licensee's procedures adequately addressed security surveillance, maintenance, and compensatc.y sawritv measures. Additionally, proper procedures had been implemented for access control measures for vehicles, and other rarocedures addressing vehicle access control and the safe shutdown of the plant '

(Section S1.3).

• An inspection followup item was identified involving the licensee's system for conducting periodic tests of the security diesel generator (Section S2.1).

DOCUMENT CONTAINS ENCLOSURE CONTAINS UPON SEPARATION THIS nar c se ner'nMTRnli FD