Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20134C9181996-10-0808 October 1996 Notification of 961031 Meeting W/Util in Waterford,Ct to Discuss Status of Plant Concrete Erosion Testing Program & to Gather Info Relative to Basemat Erosion Issue to Assist Staff in Performing Operability Assessment Project stage: Meeting ML20129H5611996-10-0808 October 1996 Notification of Cancelled 961031 Meeting W/Neut in Waterford,Ct to Discuss Status of Plant Concrete Erosion Testing Program & to Gather Info Re Basemat Erosion Issue to Assist Staff Project stage: Meeting ML20129D8281996-10-18018 October 1996 Requests Additional Info Re Erosion of Cement from Underlying Porous Concrete Drainage Sys at Facility.Plan to Discuss Info Requested During 961031 Meeting & Provide Written Response within 30 Days of Meeting Project stage: Meeting ML20129D8221996-10-18018 October 1996 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Erosion of Cement from Underlying Porous Concrete Drainage Sys,At Plant Unit 3 Project stage: RAI ML20137U0631997-04-11011 April 1997 Requests Addl Info on Erosion of Cement from Underlying Porous Concrete Drainage Sys Project stage: Other 05000245/LER-1997-004, :on 970127,RBCCW Containment Isolation Valve May Not Close within Specified Time.Caused by Failure to Adequately Establish Design Basis.Plant Is in Cold Shutdown W/Reactor Defueled1997-04-30030 April 1997
- on 970127,RBCCW Containment Isolation Valve May Not Close within Specified Time.Caused by Failure to Adequately Establish Design Basis.Plant Is in Cold Shutdown W/Reactor Defueled
Project stage: Request ML20148L8001997-06-16016 June 1997 Forwards RAI to Complete Review of Licensee Submittal Re Erosion of Cement from Porous Concrete Subfoundations at Plant Project stage: RAI ML20203G3241998-02-24024 February 1998 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Erosion of Cement from Underlying Porous Concrete Drainage Sys at Millstone Unit 3 Project stage: RAI B17131, Informs NRC of Revised Commitment Re Erosion of Cement from Underlying Porous Concrete Drainage Sys.Commitments Made within Ltr,Encl1998-03-30030 March 1998 Informs NRC of Revised Commitment Re Erosion of Cement from Underlying Porous Concrete Drainage Sys.Commitments Made within Ltr,Encl Project stage: Other B17187, Submits Revised Commitment Re Erosion of Cement from Underlying Porous Concrete Drainage Sys.Util Commitments Associated W/Ltr Provided in Attachment 11998-04-10010 April 1998 Submits Revised Commitment Re Erosion of Cement from Underlying Porous Concrete Drainage Sys.Util Commitments Associated W/Ltr Provided in Attachment 1 Project stage: Other 1997-04-30
[Table View] |
:on 970127,RBCCW Containment Isolation Valve May Not Close within Specified Time.Caused by Failure to Adequately Establish Design Basis.Plant Is in Cold Shutdown W/Reactor Defueled| ML20138G503 |
| Person / Time |
|---|
| Site: |
Millstone  |
|---|
| Issue date: |
04/30/1997 |
|---|
| From: |
Robert Walpole NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO. |
|---|
| To: |
|
|---|
| Shared Package |
|---|
| ML20138G480 |
List: |
|---|
| References |
|---|
| LER-97-004, LER-97-4, NUDOCS 9705060315 |
| Download: ML20138G503 (4) |
|
text
.-
- - _ = _ -
_ _ _. - ~.
,e NRC EORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BV OMB NO. 3160-0104 (4-95)
EXPIRES 04/30/98 EO ATSO COL 5ECTION REQUEST 60 RS E O TED L
'a^c""'?o^"402"! "^;'ane TJ!a".l"fa'a 'N!
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) lSm^"uT"2ctl2"",YOT.%"'E?Ss"s'o"~^"n'=M" &
i
!?RA%teleI#la"E"I "A%3"oi"8tM&'"*
i 1
(See reverse for required number of
]
digits / characters for each block)
FACIUTY NAME m DOCKET NUMBER (2)
PAGE (3)
Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000245 1 of 4 TITLE (4)
RBCCW Containment isolation Valve May Not Close Within Specified Time J
EVENT DATE (5)
LER NUMBER (6)
REPORT DATE (7)
OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (B) i MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION MONTH DAY YEAR FACIUTY NAME DOCKET NUMBER j
NUMBER
"' " *^"'
00 00 96 97 004 01 04 30 97 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR 5: (Check one or more) (11)
I MODE (9)
N j
20.2201(D) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50.73(aH2)(viii)
POWER LEVEL (10) 000 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a)(3Hi>
X 50.73(a)(2Hiii 50.73(aH2)(xi 20.2203ta)(2)W 20.2203(a)(3Hii) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 73.71 j
20.2203(aH2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(4) 50.73(aH2)(iv)
OTHER 20.22031aH2Hiii) 50.36(cH1) 50.73(a)(2)(v)
Specify in Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A 1
20.2203(a)(2Hav) 50.36(cH2) 50.73(aH2)(vii)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)
NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER linclude Area Codel Robert W. Walpole, MP1 Nuclear Licensing Manager (860)440-2191 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUF ACTURER REPORTABLE
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUF ACTURER REPORTABLE l
To NPRDS TO NPRDS i
i SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR YES SUBMISSION
[ NO (If yes. complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
l ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)
On January 27,1997, at 1200 hours0.0139 days <br />0.333 hours <br />0.00198 weeks <br />4.566e-4 months <br />, with the plant in COLD SHUTDOWN, a single failure vulnerability of Reactor i
Building Closed Cooling Water System (RBCCW) was identified. Containment Isolation Valve 1-RC-206 has an allowable closure time of 35 seconds per Technical Requirements Manual. The valve is powered from MCC-E3 which is connected to the Gas Turbine (GT) for its emergency power source. Following a Loss of Normal Power (LNP) event, AC power will not be restored to MCC-E3 for a maximum Technical Specification limit of 48 seconds. A time limit of 60 seconds is assumed in the offsite dose calculations to establish primary containment integrity. On a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) with a LNP, a failure of DC operated valve 1-RC-207 will result in penetration X-24 taking longer than the assumed 60 seconds to completely isolate. Any post-LOCA gas escaping from primary containment through this penetration would be released into secondary containment. This leakage would be in
)
eddition to the 300.3 SCF per hour Appendix J leakage from the Drywell assumed in the off site dose calculations.
Thus, this condition could exceed the existing calculated site boundary dose limits. The cause of this condition was the failure to adequately establish a design basis for RBCCW containment isolation. An engineering evaluation was performed that determined that the leakage from containment would be an additional volume of approximately 25.1 SCF from the post-LOCA containment atmosphere. The radiological impact of this additional leakage has been dststmined to be an unacceptable potential safety consequence due to limited margin to the design basis limits in areas related to control room habitability and EEQ integrated radiation doses.
9705060315 970430 PDR ADOCK 05000245 B
PDR
l NRC F,ORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-99 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION I
Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000245 NUMBER NUMBER 2 of 4 97 004 01 TEXT (It more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) 117) 1.
Description of Event
On January 27,1997, at 1200 hours0.0139 days <br />0.333 hours <br />0.00198 weeks <br />4.566e-4 months <br />, with the plant in COLD SHUTDOWN and the reactor defueled, a condition was discovered that affects the calculated offsite dose. The offsite dose analysis assumes that containment integrity is established not greater than 60 seconds following a containment isolation signal, j
RBCCW Containment Isolation Valve 1-RC-206 is an AC motor operated valve and has an allowable closure t
stroke time of 35 seconds per Millstone Unit No.1 Technical Requirements Manual, Table 3.7.D. A design basis event, a LOCA with a concurrent LNP will remove power from the bus supplying the valve until the emergency power source is available. The emergency power source for this bus is the GT. The GT is required to be able to accept emergency load within 48 seconds in accordance with Technical Specification j
4.9.
The maximum total closure time for 1 RC-206 is 48 seconds to restore power to the bus plus 35 seconds to stroke the valve closed. This yields a total closure time of 83 seconds. A single failure of DC i
powered valve 1-RC-207 to close, along with the LOCA/LNP design basis event, will result in the penetration X-24 failing to isolate within the 60 seconds assumed in the offsite dose analysis.
The requirement to isolate primary containment within 60 seconds is assumed by the Millstone Unit No.1 radiological analysis following the initiation of a large-break LOCA. This is based on an interpretation of NUREG-0800, " Containment Isolation," Section lit, Page 6.2.4-9.
For this penetration, the release from primary containment is through the RBCCW surge tank vent located in secondary containment, assuming failure of the RBCCW piping within the Drywell. This event was immediately reported pursuant to 10CFR50.72(b)(2)(i) as being in an unanalyzed condition that significantly compromises plant safety.
The original design of the unit considered the RBCCW system within containment to be a closed loop. Two isolation valves were installed in the system as part of the original system design, a check valve on the supply piping and a remotely operated motor operated valve on the return piping. However, the effects of a high energy line break on the RBCCW system within containment was not considered. This deficiency and challenge to containment integrity was reported in LER 89-003-00. A commitment was made in response to LER 89-003-00 to upgrade the containment isolation capability of the RBCCW to meet 10CFR50, Appendix A, General Design Criteria 54 and 57 and Appendix J.
These criteria were met but no consideration was given to the offsite dose calculations which assumed containment isolation within 60 seconds.
l The upgrade of the containment isolation capability included the installation of two remote actuated valves in series on both the RBCCW inlet and outlet lines outside the containment penetrations. Plant procedures instructed the operator to close these valves when containment pressure reached 5 psig. The containment isolation design requiied a maximum valve stroke time of 35 seconds, and the valves were powered from redundant and diverse power supplies to assure isolation. The design did not factor the consequences of a LNP event and the delay in restoring power from the GT into the total closure time. The effect on the offsite dose calculations was not considered.
The containment isolation capability was later modified to add an automatic closure feature when containment pressure reached 5 psig. The modification automated the operator function to close the RBCCW isolation valves when containment pressure reached 5 psig. Again, the effect on the offsite dose calculations was not considered.
_ - - ~. - - - -
- - ~. _., - - - -
I e
n NRC F.ORM 306A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
(4-95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3)
YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000245 NUMBER NUM9ER 3 of 4 l 97 004 01 TENT fit more space is required, use additional copies of NRC form 366A) (11)
11. Cause of Event
The cause of this condition was the failure to adequately establish a design basis for RBCCW containment isolation. There was a failure to properly address the downgrading of the RBCCW piping in the drywell with respect to the radiological offsite dose assessment.
111. Analysis of Event An engineering evaluation concluded that the total valve closure time of 83 seconds exceeded the allowable closure time of 60 seconds and the plant was in an unanalyzed condition. This condition could result in an increase in the calculated offsite dose in that containment isolation does not occur within the assumed time period. This report is pursuant to 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), an unanalyzed condition that significantly compromised plant safety.
The piping inside primary containment is not qualified and is assumed to fail at the start of the event. The release path from this penetration would be through the failed RBCCW piping to the RBCCW surge tank. At the start of the event, RBCCW system pressure would be above primary containment pressure and no leakage from the primary containment would be possible. As RBCCW system pressure decreases due to RBCCW pump coastdown and loss of inventory through the failed piping, primary containment pressure will be increasing due to the LOCA. A leakage path from primary containment to secondary containment will be established once the primary containment pressure is greater than the pressure in the RBCCW piping.
Engineering evaluations were performed to quantify the release path and flow rates from containment due to the failure of 1-RC-206 to isolate within 60 seconds. This evaluation concluded that an additional leakage of approximately 25.1 SFC of post-LOCA atmosphere would be released from primary containment due to the delay in isolating penetration X-24. The radiological impact of this scenario has been determined to be unacceptable due to limited margin to the design basis limits in areas related to control room habitability and EEQ integrated radiation doses. There were no actual safety consequences from this event because the unit has not had a LOCA with concurrent LNP and the unit is currently shutdowis with the reactor defueled.
Twelve additional containment isolat. ion valves were identified as being supplied emergency power from the GT. The function and arrangement of the valves were reviewed and it was determined that these valves were not adversely impacted by the delay required to have power from the GT available, in addition, the function and arrangement of remaining containment isolation valves powered from the Diesel Generator were reviewed and it was determined that these valves would not be adversely impacted by the delay required to have power from the Diesel Generator available.
IV. Corrective Action
No immediate corrective actions are required since the plant is in COLD SHUTDOWN with the reactor defueled.___ _ -,,
._m-___--. _. _ ~ -
e_
NRC F, OHM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95)
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)
DOCKET NUMBER (2)
LER NUMBER (6)
PAGE (3) l YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION Millstone Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 05000245 NUMBER NUMBER 4 of 4 97 004 01 TEXT uf more space is required. use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (11) in order to meet the radiological release assumptions for the design basis LOCA, containment isolation valve 1-RC-206 will be required to close in 60 seconds to assure that the leakage remains within allowable limits.
NNECO is evaluating a potential design modification of the existing valve to decrease closure time, i
replacement of the valve with a new design, or a change in power source to minimize the time delay associated with startup of the GT. The required corrective actions to close 1-RC-206 within 60 seconds will be completed prior to primary containment being required for operating Cycle 16.
i In LER 96-061-00, Commitment No. 816078-2 has committed to the review of the systems to address the containment isolation function. This review is required prior to startup for operating Cycle 16 as part of the j
ongoing 10CFR50.54(f) effort.
V.
Additional Information
Similar Events I
LER 96-050-00, LOCA Concurrent with LNP, and Loss of DC Power Prevents Closure of LPCI Torus Test Return Valves.
LER 96-061-00, Failure of Containment Isolation Function in a Design Basis Accident Concurrent with a Loss of One Train of DC System.
Manufacturer Data Not Applicable i
<
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000245/LER-1997-001-02, :on 970110,liquid Radwaste Effluent Radiation Monitor Declared Inoperable Due to Leaking Automatic Isolation Valves.Valves Repaired |
- on 970110,liquid Radwaste Effluent Radiation Monitor Declared Inoperable Due to Leaking Automatic Isolation Valves.Valves Repaired
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000245/LER-1997-001, Forwards LER 97-001-00,documenting Event That Occurred at Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 on 970110.Util Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | Forwards LER 97-001-00,documenting Event That Occurred at Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 on 970110.Util Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000423/LER-1997-001, Submits Commitments Re LER 97-001-00,documenting Condition Determined at Plant on 970104 | Submits Commitments Re LER 97-001-00,documenting Condition Determined at Plant on 970104 | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000423/LER-1997-001-01, :on 970104,discovered Lack of Verbatim Compliance W/Ts SRs for 125 Volt Batteries & Battery Chargers.Caused by Misconception That Performing Surveillances Was Acceptable.Revised Procedures |
- on 970104,discovered Lack of Verbatim Compliance W/Ts SRs for 125 Volt Batteries & Battery Chargers.Caused by Misconception That Performing Surveillances Was Acceptable.Revised Procedures
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) | | 05000423/LER-1997-002, :on 970108,torquing of Battery Connections Not Performed as Part of Connection Tightness Checks Occurred. Caused by Lack of Effective Verification & Validation of Maint Procedure.Procedure Revised |
- on 970108,torquing of Battery Connections Not Performed as Part of Connection Tightness Checks Occurred. Caused by Lack of Effective Verification & Validation of Maint Procedure.Procedure Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000245/LER-1997-002, Forwards LER 97-002-00 Which Documents an Event That Occurred at Mnps,Unit 1 on 970114,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv). Commitments Made,Listed | Forwards LER 97-002-00 Which Documents an Event That Occurred at Mnps,Unit 1 on 970114,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv). Commitments Made,Listed | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000245/LER-1997-002-02, :on 970114,inadvertent Shutdown Cooling Isolation Occurred During Sys Removal from Svc for Maint. Caused by Inadequacy in Preparation of Clearance Required to Perform Maint.Individuals Involved Have Been Counseled |
- on 970114,inadvertent Shutdown Cooling Isolation Occurred During Sys Removal from Svc for Maint. Caused by Inadequacy in Preparation of Clearance Required to Perform Maint.Individuals Involved Have Been Counseled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1997-002, Forwards LER 97-002-00 Which Documents an Event That Occurred on 970108,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii).Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | Forwards LER 97-002-00 Which Documents an Event That Occurred on 970108,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii).Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000336/LER-1997-002-01, :on 970108,damper 2-HV-210 Could Not Be Manually Operated within Ten Minutes as Required in Accident Analysis.Caused by Inadequate Evaluation of Mechanical Binding.Damper Was Placed in Fail Open Position |
- on 970108,damper 2-HV-210 Could Not Be Manually Operated within Ten Minutes as Required in Accident Analysis.Caused by Inadequate Evaluation of Mechanical Binding.Damper Was Placed in Fail Open Position
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1997-003, Forwards LER 97-003-00 Which Documents Condition That Was Determined at Mnps,Unit 3 on 970113,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii) (B).List of Commitments,Encl | Forwards LER 97-003-00 Which Documents Condition That Was Determined at Mnps,Unit 3 on 970113,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii) (B).List of Commitments,Encl | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1997-003-01, :on 970113,potential for Recirculation Spray Sys Piping Failure Occurred Due to RSS Pump Stopping & Restarting During Accident Conditions.Performed Evaluation of RSS Water Column Separation Issue |
- on 970113,potential for Recirculation Spray Sys Piping Failure Occurred Due to RSS Pump Stopping & Restarting During Accident Conditions.Performed Evaluation of RSS Water Column Separation Issue
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000336/LER-1997-003-01, Corrected Page One to LER 97-003-01:on 961216,discovered Discrepancy in Plant Procedure Utilized to Perform Periodic Insp of Fire Protection Sys Smoke Detectors.Caused by Failure to Properly Incorporate Ts.Ts Partially Revis | Corrected Page One to LER 97-003-01:on 961216,discovered Discrepancy in Plant Procedure Utilized to Perform Periodic Insp of Fire Protection Sys Smoke Detectors.Caused by Failure to Properly Incorporate Ts.Ts Partially Revised | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000245/LER-1997-003, Forwards LER 97-003-00 Which Documents an Event That Occurred at Mnps,Unit 1 on 970306,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i). Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | Forwards LER 97-003-00 Which Documents an Event That Occurred at Mnps,Unit 1 on 970306,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i). Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000245/LER-1997-003-02, :on 970306,svc Water Effluent Was Not Monitored Per Requirements of Ts.Caused by Inadequate Design Change Package.Procedures to Ensure That SW Effluent from Reactor Bldg Operated within Design Basis Revised |
- on 970306,svc Water Effluent Was Not Monitored Per Requirements of Ts.Caused by Inadequate Design Change Package.Procedures to Ensure That SW Effluent from Reactor Bldg Operated within Design Basis Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1997-004-01, :on 970123,violation of TS 3.1.2.3 Requirement for Number of High Pressure Safety Injection Pumps Capable of Injecting Into RCS Occurred.Caused by Personnel Error. HPSI Pumps Have Been Revised |
- on 970123,violation of TS 3.1.2.3 Requirement for Number of High Pressure Safety Injection Pumps Capable of Injecting Into RCS Occurred.Caused by Personnel Error. HPSI Pumps Have Been Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000245/LER-1997-004-01, Forwards LER 97-004-01,documenting Closure of Commitment B16213-1.Includes Commitments Made within This Ltr | Forwards LER 97-004-01,documenting Closure of Commitment B16213-1.Includes Commitments Made within This Ltr | 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000245/LER-1997-004-02, :on 970127,RBCCW Containment Isolation Sys Single Failure Vulnerability Occurred.Caused by Failure to Adequately Establish Design Basis.No Immediate CA Are Required |
- on 970127,RBCCW Containment Isolation Sys Single Failure Vulnerability Occurred.Caused by Failure to Adequately Establish Design Basis.No Immediate CA Are Required
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000245/LER-1997-004, :on 970127,RBCCW Containment Isolation Valve May Not Close within Specified Time.Caused by Failure to Adequately Establish Design Basis.Plant Is in Cold Shutdown W/Reactor Defueled |
- on 970127,RBCCW Containment Isolation Valve May Not Close within Specified Time.Caused by Failure to Adequately Establish Design Basis.Plant Is in Cold Shutdown W/Reactor Defueled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(A), Seriously Degraded 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) | | 05000423/LER-1997-004, :on 970114,lack of Verbatim Compliance with TS Surveillance Requirements for Molded Case Circuit Breakers Occurred.Caused by Addl Lack of Verbatim Compliance. Corrected 18 Month Surveillances Will Be Performed |
- on 970114,lack of Verbatim Compliance with TS Surveillance Requirements for Molded Case Circuit Breakers Occurred.Caused by Addl Lack of Verbatim Compliance. Corrected 18 Month Surveillances Will Be Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) | | 05000245/LER-1997-005-01, Forwards LER 97-005-01,documenting Closure of Commitment B16236-2 & B16236-3,including Commitments Made within Ltr | Forwards LER 97-005-01,documenting Closure of Commitment B16236-2 & B16236-3,including Commitments Made within Ltr | 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000245/LER-1997-005, :on 970115,discovered That Radwaste Storage Bldg Vent Exhaust Fan HVE-14 Discharges Directly to Atmosphere.Caused by Inadequate Design Review.Operation of Exhaust Fan HVE-14 Was Prevented Immediately |
- on 970115,discovered That Radwaste Storage Bldg Vent Exhaust Fan HVE-14 Discharges Directly to Atmosphere.Caused by Inadequate Design Review.Operation of Exhaust Fan HVE-14 Was Prevented Immediately
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000336/LER-1997-005-02, :on 970204,inservice Test Instrumentation Did Not Meet Ansi/Asme Chapter XI Requirements.Caused by Inadequate Administrative Structure for IST Program. Procedure to Administer IST Program Was Implemented |
- on 970204,inservice Test Instrumentation Did Not Meet Ansi/Asme Chapter XI Requirements.Caused by Inadequate Administrative Structure for IST Program. Procedure to Administer IST Program Was Implemented
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000336/LER-1997-005, Forwards LER 97-005-00 Which Documents Event That Occurred at Mnps,Unit 2 on 970204.Commitments Made,Listed | Forwards LER 97-005-00 Which Documents Event That Occurred at Mnps,Unit 2 on 970204.Commitments Made,Listed | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000423/LER-1997-005, Corrects Numbering Inconsistency in Commitments Addressing LER 97-005-00 | Corrects Numbering Inconsistency in Commitments Addressing LER 97-005-00 | | | 05000245/LER-1997-006-01, :on 970131,failure to Exert Best Efforts to Restore Radwaste Effluent Line Radiation Monitor to Operable Status Occurred.Caused by Failure to Provide Clear Management Expectations.Management Will Be Provided |
- on 970131,failure to Exert Best Efforts to Restore Radwaste Effluent Line Radiation Monitor to Operable Status Occurred.Caused by Failure to Provide Clear Management Expectations.Management Will Be Provided
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000423/LER-1997-006, :on 970117,RHR Suction Isolation Valves Open But Not Under Administrative Control as Required in Mode 4 by TS SR 4.6.1.1.a.Caused by Failure to Identify Conflict Between Requirements.Rhr Required Position Determined |
- on 970117,RHR Suction Isolation Valves Open But Not Under Administrative Control as Required in Mode 4 by TS SR 4.6.1.1.a.Caused by Failure to Identify Conflict Between Requirements.Rhr Required Position Determined
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1997-006-01, Forwards LER 97-006-01 Per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Util Commitments in Response to 970117 Event Contained within Attachment 1 | Forwards LER 97-006-01 Per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Util Commitments in Response to 970117 Event Contained within Attachment 1 | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000336/LER-1997-006-02, :on 970211,main Steam Line Break Inside Containment Event Could Result in Exceeding Design Pressure of Primary Containment During Certain Scenarios.Caused by Inadequate Evaluation.Ca Will Be Implemented |
- on 970211,main Steam Line Break Inside Containment Event Could Result in Exceeding Design Pressure of Primary Containment During Certain Scenarios.Caused by Inadequate Evaluation.Ca Will Be Implemented
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000245/LER-1997-006, Forwards LER 97-006-00,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Millstone Nuclear Station,Unit 1 on 970131, Per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Util Commitments Made within Ltr, Listed | Forwards LER 97-006-00,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Millstone Nuclear Station,Unit 1 on 970131, Per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Util Commitments Made within Ltr, Listed | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000336/LER-1997-006, Forwards LER 97-006-00 Which Documents an Event That Occurred on 970211.Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | Forwards LER 97-006-00 Which Documents an Event That Occurred on 970211.Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000245/LER-1997-007, Forwards LER 97-007-00,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 on 970131,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i) & 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii). Util Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | Forwards LER 97-007-00,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 on 970131,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i) & 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii). Util Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000336/LER-1997-007-02, :on 970308,inadequate Surveillance Procedure Used for Verifying Operability of RCS Vents.Caused by Failure to Incorporate TS SRs Into Plant Surveillance Procedures.Revised Surveillance Procedure |
- on 970308,inadequate Surveillance Procedure Used for Verifying Operability of RCS Vents.Caused by Failure to Incorporate TS SRs Into Plant Surveillance Procedures.Revised Surveillance Procedure
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1997-007, Provides List of Commitments for LER 97-007-00 Re Event That Occurred on 970308 | Provides List of Commitments for LER 97-007-00 Re Event That Occurred on 970308 | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000423/LER-1997-007, :on 970123,non-conservative Assumptions Used in TSs Shutdown Margin Curve Identified.Caused by Lack of Procedures for Generation & Documentation of Reactor Operational Info.Engineering Procedure Will Be Revised |
- on 970123,non-conservative Assumptions Used in TSs Shutdown Margin Curve Identified.Caused by Lack of Procedures for Generation & Documentation of Reactor Operational Info.Engineering Procedure Will Be Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000245/LER-1997-008, Forwards LER 97-008-00,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 on 970203,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii).Util Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | Forwards LER 97-008-00,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 on 970203,per 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii).Util Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000423/LER-1997-008, :on 970124,TS 3.0.3 Action Statement for MSIV Closure Was Entered Due to TS Being Inconsistent W/Msiv Safety Function & Design.Submitted Proposed License Amend Request Ptscr 3-13-95 |
- on 970124,TS 3.0.3 Action Statement for MSIV Closure Was Entered Due to TS Being Inconsistent W/Msiv Safety Function & Design.Submitted Proposed License Amend Request Ptscr 3-13-95
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000336/LER-1997-008, Forwards LER 97-008-00,documenting Event Occurred at Unit 2 on 970310.Commitments Made within Ltr Listed as Submitted | Forwards LER 97-008-00,documenting Event Occurred at Unit 2 on 970310.Commitments Made within Ltr Listed as Submitted | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000336/LER-1997-008-02, :on 970310,repts Review Facility Compliance W/ GL 96-01 for Reactor Protective Sys Received.Caused by Inadequate Program to Ensure Surveillance Procedures Fully Implement TS Requirements.Procedures Revised |
- on 970310,repts Review Facility Compliance W/ GL 96-01 for Reactor Protective Sys Received.Caused by Inadequate Program to Ensure Surveillance Procedures Fully Implement TS Requirements.Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000245/LER-1997-008-01, :on 970203,discovered Starting Air Sys Operating Outside Design Basis.Caused by Failure to Properly Identify & Verify Design Basis.Design Basis Established & Documented in FSAR |
- on 970203,discovered Starting Air Sys Operating Outside Design Basis.Caused by Failure to Properly Identify & Verify Design Basis.Design Basis Established & Documented in FSAR
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1997-009, Forwards LER 97-009-00,which Documents an Event That Occurred on 970325.Commitments Made within Ltr,Submitted | Forwards LER 97-009-00,which Documents an Event That Occurred on 970325.Commitments Made within Ltr,Submitted | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000336/LER-1997-009-02, :on 970325,insufficient ESFAS Surveillance Testing,Per GL 96-01 Review Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Program to Ensure Surveillance Procedures Fully Implement TS Requirements.Procedures Will Be Revised |
- on 970325,insufficient ESFAS Surveillance Testing,Per GL 96-01 Review Occurred.Caused by Inadequate Program to Ensure Surveillance Procedures Fully Implement TS Requirements.Procedures Will Be Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000245/LER-1997-009-01, :on 970212,reactor low-low Level ECCS & Primary Containment Initiation Setpoints Were Not Conservative. Caused by Deficient Setpoint Methodology.Calculations Will Be Revised & TS Change Initiated |
- on 970212,reactor low-low Level ECCS & Primary Containment Initiation Setpoints Were Not Conservative. Caused by Deficient Setpoint Methodology.Calculations Will Be Revised & TS Change Initiated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) | | 05000245/LER-1997-009, Forwards LER 97-009-00,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 on 970212.Util Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | Forwards LER 97-009-00,documenting Condition That Was Discovered at Millstone Nuclear Power Station,Unit 1 on 970212.Util Commitments Made within Ltr,Listed | 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000336/LER-1997-009-01, :on 970325,insufficient ESFAS Surveillance Testing,Per GL 96-01,noted.Caused by Inadequate Program to Ensure Sps Fully Implement TS Requirements.Operational Surveillances Will Be Revised |
- on 970325,insufficient ESFAS Surveillance Testing,Per GL 96-01,noted.Caused by Inadequate Program to Ensure Sps Fully Implement TS Requirements.Operational Surveillances Will Be Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000423/LER-1997-009-01, Forwards LER 97-009-01,documenting Condition Originally Determined Reportable at Unit 3 on 970123.Util Commitments in Response to Event Contained within Attachment 1 to Ltr | Forwards LER 97-009-01,documenting Condition Originally Determined Reportable at Unit 3 on 970123.Util Commitments in Response to Event Contained within Attachment 1 to Ltr | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000336/LER-1997-010, Forwards LER 97-010-00,documenting Event Occurred at Unit 2 on 970112.Commitments Made within Ltr Listed | Forwards LER 97-010-00,documenting Event Occurred at Unit 2 on 970112.Commitments Made within Ltr Listed | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000423/LER-1997-010, :on 970129,electrical Calculation Discrepancies Identified in Min Voltage Analysis for Class 1E Electrical Sys.Caused by Lack of Configuration Mgt for Comprehensive Calculation Program.Program Being Revised |
- on 970129,electrical Calculation Discrepancies Identified in Min Voltage Analysis for Class 1E Electrical Sys.Caused by Lack of Configuration Mgt for Comprehensive Calculation Program.Program Being Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000245/LER-1997-010-01, :on 970214,determined LLRT Pressure Being Used May Be Less than Accident Pressure.Caused by Weakness in Mgt Commitment to App J Program.Llrts Modified |
- on 970214,determined LLRT Pressure Being Used May Be Less than Accident Pressure.Caused by Weakness in Mgt Commitment to App J Program.Llrts Modified
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000245/LER-1997-010, Forwards LER 97-010-00,documenting Event Occurred at Unit 1 on 970214.Commitments Made within Ltr Submitted as Listed | Forwards LER 97-010-00,documenting Event Occurred at Unit 1 on 970214.Commitments Made within Ltr Submitted as Listed | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000336/LER-1997-010-02, :on 970112,heavy Dummy Fuel Assembly & Handling Tool Weight Exceeded TS Limit Occurred.Caused by Weight of Handling Tool Never Considered to Be Part of Load.Temporary Measure & Appropriate Procedures Revised |
- on 970112,heavy Dummy Fuel Assembly & Handling Tool Weight Exceeded TS Limit Occurred.Caused by Weight of Handling Tool Never Considered to Be Part of Load.Temporary Measure & Appropriate Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) |
|