IR 05000423/1985045

Exam Rept 50-423/85-45 on 851030-31.Exam Results:One Reactor Operator & Seven Senior Reactor Operator Candidates Passed

ML20137R653
Person / Time
Site:	Millstone
Issue date:	01/22/1986
From:	Keller R, Kister H NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137R621	List: IR 05000423/1985045 ML20137R615
References
50-423-85-45, NUDOCS 8602130350
Download: ML20137R653 (3)

Text

{_

.

.. ..

U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION'I OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATION REPORT EXAMINATION REPORT NO. 85-45 (OL) @*

FACILITY DOCKET NO. 50-423 FACILITY LICENSE NO. CPPR-113 LICENSEE: Northeast Nuclear Energy C P.O. Box 270 Hartford, Connecticut 06141 FACILITY: Millstone Point Unit 3 EXAMINATION' DATES: October 30-31, 1985 CHIEF EXAMINER: //2.f /g6 -

Robert M. Keller, Chief, Projects Section 1C Date REVIEWED BY: I /[7/ [6 Robert M. Ke V r,' Chief, Projects Section 1C Date APPROVED BY: /2 FI H41rry B.' K%ter, Chief, Projects Branch No. 1 D4te /

SUMMARY: Simulator and oral examinations were given to one (1) R0 and seven 1 (7) SRO candidates during the period of' October 30-31, 1985. All candidates passed the examinations and were issued license "

8602130350 860130 PDR ADOCK 05000423 V PDR I

s sum.--___________---._u

. - -

,

w .

9

, . -

t[ " <

REPORT DETAILS TYPE OF EXAMS: -Replacement

'

EXAM RESULTS:

I- .

R0 l SR0 I 1 - Pass / Fail _ ' I Pass / Fail I I I I I I I I I Written Exam 1 -/ I ./ I I I I I I I I I I Oral Exam I / I 1/1 1 I I ~l 1

~

I .

1 I 'l -

lSimulator Exam I 1/1 1 7/7 l-1 I l i I -l .

I verall I 1/1 1 7/7 I I I I i

' ' CHIEF EXAMINER AT SITE: R. M.-Keller, USNRC Region 1 :0THER EXAMINER: D. Ruscitto (RI)

W. Hemming (EGG)

L. Defferding (PNL)

R.Schreiber(PNL)

~ Personnel Present at Exit Interview:

NRC Personnel R. Keller Facility Personnel H. Haynes R. Stotts Summary of NRC Comments made at exit interview:

.

All-examiners noted significant improvement in the use of the new Emergency Response Guidelines, in communication between operators and in teamwork of'the candidates. Examiners also observed'several instances of inconsistency between procedures and instrumentation on the simulato (

L_

fL*!.

.

.

3 Summary of facility comments and commitments made at exit intervie Facility representatives noted that a program was in place and scheduled for implementation for verifying procedures and instrum.antation using the simalator. The facility also has started a simulator upgrade program to improve its capabilities as well as update the simulator to the plant as-

-built conditio ,

a

,

1 i:

!

<

.

.-