ML20137L092

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to JPN-PSL-SENP-95-027, Engineering Evaluation,Final Safety Analysis Rept Amend 14 (PCM Implemented from 930618- 941201)
ML20137L092
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/25/1995
From:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20137K821 List:
References
FOIA-96-485 JPN-PSL-SENP-95, JPN-PSL-SENP-95-027, JPN-PSL-SENP-95-27, NUDOCS 9704070153
Download: ML20137L092 (6)


Text

_ . . . _ , _ . _ _ . _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

1 i l-c 'k DT ^

l i

n yLORIDA POWER & LIGET CO 1

i l

l ENGINE 28 MG ETALUATION l

i f -

FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT f AMENDMENT 14 4

l (PCM's implemented from 6/18/93 to 12/1/94)

I 3T LUCIE 3 6 ,' PLANT i

i l

l UNIT 1 i

j yyN-PSL-SEEP-95-027 RETISIM 8 ...,.m..< .,

,, ,. >. .y_, - . . . a, "

, l;d. .c M nro.n % j.m ,-g s:r. w y .e.c W :-
f;f.,,L';.6%ds.

M 9704070153 970402 PDR FOIA BINDER 96-485 PDR

s ,

l l

JPN-PSL-SENP-95-027.

I REVISION 0  ;

1 PAGE 2 OF 6 i i

1 4

J i REVIEW AND APPROVAL RECORD u .

WIT I PLANT ST. LUCIE' i

i TITLE FINAL 5AFETY ANALYSIS REPORT. AMEM) MENT 14. fer.;d4 Jeolamented between

_jl8/93 ,12/2/94 LEAD DISCIPLINE LICENSING l

i

. ENGINEERING ORGAM12AT10N PRODUU10N ENGINEERING GROUP.

a REVIEW / APPROVAL:

?

INTERFAct TYPE APPROtG FPL APPEDWfD*

PREPARG VII!FID GROUP 19mff AtV!!V R/A M M' '

'MMMM' _d9fM a/A mtcM x

_ $ t/A

[Litt Inc I

I

~

h h- a/A X

! > R/A CIVIL LIC' I ( WM Nh '

U If I t/ A _ _ _

gy 2

($1 x

kVd s E/A suc rutt s/A 3

RAA&"*

  • For Centracter tvals Aa Deteswined By Projects ** Sovies Interfees As A Nte th All 10CFtSt.58 twels and PLAs
      • Reltahtitty & tisk Assesseent Group J

DATE: 8 i

I FPL PR0JECTS APPROVAL:

iA '~>W m.k... . '"W w u 3.,.s.m C: g:'"2 ,,7,yg &Mg.1;g. .

OTHER INTERFACES e

e e a 6 _ m ___.___ -

d b '

l< r ,

l JPN-PSL-SEMP-95-027

^

REVISION O PAGE 3 OF 6 TABLE OF C0iffENTS I

1 sECTION TITLE PAfal 1 -- Cover 1 l'

! -- Table of contents 3

! -- Abstract 4 i

1 5

4 1.0 'Puri..:se 2.0 Scope 5 5 3.0 Verification Summary 6 l

4 l Attachments:

i 3 a PCM Log: Unit 1 PCM's implemented 6/18/93 through 12/1/94 a

2.0 St. Lucie Unit-1 drawings - Amendment 14 _

p(r M St. Tracie Unit J UFSAR - Amendment No.~14 (6/95) #

! Tl~LTN5 5%" A bl% b "

g' pmw hywew 4 NO. N 0%

YCheTtW tt

  • *i - ..< v. .; a <- T

.. - 4 &&]qS.;., . .

!i l.

}

l JPN-PSL-SENP-95-027 REVISION 0 i PAGE 4 OF 6 1RaTaicT1 f

Pursuant to Title 10 Code of Federal Regulation Part 50.71, Amendment l

14 of the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) for St. Lucie j Unit 1 is required to be submitted with replacement pages as i identified in the FILING INSTRUCTIONS of the document. The update is j based on changes made to the facility from 6/18/93 through 12/1/94.

The issue date is June 1, 1995 which brings the UFSAR up to e u as of i December 1, 1994.

i j Revisions have been yenerated as a result of documentation reviews.

The list of effective pages reflects changes made to the F AR. Each i revised and new page bears the notation Amendment No. 14, (6/95) at the right-hand bottom corner of the page. Vertical bars have been

{ used in the margin of existing pages, as applicable, to indicate the i location of the revision (s) on that page or for the insertion of a new

! page. Changes identified for incorporation in this amendaant are part I of original Plant Change modifications (PCMs), Safety Evaluations i (SEs) or User Comments (UCs). All PCMs e,nd SEs have been previously

reviewed, independently vertfied, and.have been accepted as part of
the initial quality documentation. Engineering Quality Procedures i have been used to issue the above documents and the FSAR change in sach document has been reviewed and verified. No changes have been made to the original FSAR change packages as originally verified. By j detinition, UC incorporate only administrative changes into the FSAR.

All UC have been reviewed to the extent that they qualify as

" administrative changes", therefore, UCs incorporated in amendment 14 of the ""'t do not change the technical content of any passage in the l text.

i

This evaluation is not safety related and no "10 CFR 50.59" determination 1
required since al'. FSAR changes incorporated ~by this i document have been previously assessed for "10 CFR 50.59"
considerations. This document is issued to administratively document i j the sources of FSAR changes to Amendment 14 to the St. Lucie Unit 1 l d FSAR. ,

i l

. w .m'y m w4%fszkrisexhym .. .. ~u m c.w .

e

~

_ ___mm .. ._._-_ __.___ _. _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _

f

.7PM-PSL-SENP-95-027

! RavISION O l PAGE 5 OF 6 1.0 Purnome

! This engineering evaluation documents the input to the FSAR update for l Amendment 14. The documentation is necessary to insure inputs to the

! FSAR update procese are captured as a qua.lity record for future

reference. This documents serves no safety function.

} 2.0 SCOPE j 2.1 General l

l The licensing requir.mente for submitting the FSAR is found in

! 10CFR50. 71(e) . The code requires that Amendments be submitcod within l

six months of the day the unit is placed on line fros its refueling j outage. Placing the uni * "on-line", for purposes of this evaluation,-

, is the day the breaker from the unit's main electrical generator is i closed to the grid. By definition the last day of the refueling 1 outage for purposes of this update is December 1, 1994, therefore, l submittal to the NRC is required prior to June 2, 1995.

l 2.2 Specific Pursuant to the above requirements, inputs to Amendment 14 associated

] with physical changes to the St. Lucie Plant implemented between

. 3/18/93 and 12/1/95 have been revieved, verified and included into f

this FSAR amendment. These inputs include Plant Change Modifications (PCMs), plant drawings, 10 CFR 50.59 Safety Evaluations, proposed license amendments (PLAs) that have been approved by the NRC, and User Comme- W on the above inputs a total of 76 independent records have best. venerated that may effect the FSAR.

Attachment-1, is the log of PC3ts implemented during the above time frame. The mainframe PCM log data'.aase was used as the source database for attachment 1. Per Engineering Quality Instructions, all engineering documents that may modify the plant are archived in the PCM log database. All Engineering Packages, in attachment 1, have been reviewed. As a result of that review the following PCM's have FSAR changes and are included in Amendment 14:

ITEM PCM # ITEM PCM#

1 228-193 15 341-192 2 228-193 16 128-194 3 124-194 17 u54-194 4 122-194 18 199-191 5 123-194 19 005-190 6 064-194 20 .~ 252-191 .

7 '~081-993 21 '

285-192 M * " M W s% % - -

8 147-193 22 341-192 9 339-192 23 210-193 10 096-194 24 122-194 11 016-394 25 029-193 12 035 194 26 214-193 13 007-193 27 149-193 14 069-194 28 336-189

_-q I

i J

2 i

JPN-PSL-SEMP-95-027 l REVISION O PAGE 6 OF 6 Yne following safety evaluations are included in Amendment 14
ITEM EVALUATION ITEM EVALUATION

! 1 JPN-PSL-SECP-92-048 9 JPN-PSL-SESP-93-047 l 2 JPN-PSL-SEFJ-94-022 10 JPN-PSL-SENS-94-025 1 3 JPN-PSL-SENP-93-046 11 JPN-PSL-SEFJ-92-009

! 4 JPN-PSL-SEMS-94-014 12 JPN-PSL-SEFJ-94-021 5 JPN-PSL-SEMS-94-019 13 JPN-PSL-SENP-93-008 6 JPN-PSL-SENP-94-005 14 JPN-PSL-SENP-94-044

) 7 JPH-PSL-SENP-94-044 15 JPN-PSL-SENS-94-015 8 JPN-PSL-SEFJ-93-0~3 Attachment 2 to this evaluation includes a list of plant drawings i which affect FSAR, figures end are part of Amendment 14. A total of ,

! 125 FSAR figures have been updated, 105 FSAR figures were updated l based on corresponding revisions to engineering drawing by PCMs listed l 1 in attachment 1, 19 FSAR figures were updated based on new sketches  !

! provided in PCMs not associated with engineering drawing revisions and j one figure was included (no change to the figure was made) that j involved an administrative change. ,

1 i A Plant License Amendsent (PLA) that involves transfer of reactor j protection system response times from the Technical Specifications to

the FSAR (CAR-N-94-791), has been included as part of Amendment 14.

J

) In addition to the above inputs, a total of 24 " user comments" have

been reviewed and dispositioned. Of this total 20 have been
1. incorporr' 4 nto this amendment. User comments are usually l administra6 ., changes (i.e., alaspelled words, missing words, j incorrect page numbers, etc.). However, some are changes to correct, i or clarify technical content such as design information that (1) does
not affect the licensing basis of the. plant and (2) has been verified.

j with approved design documents.

i Attachment 3 is Amendment 14 to the St. Lucie unit 1 FSAR for

submittal to the NRC.

3.0 verification a - ev i Tha scope of this verification was to review the FSAR update package

! for administrative completeness, !neluding the filing instructions, LOEPs, figures and tables. The input records for inclusion in this amendment were reviewed for completeness by the respective disciplines. All of the FCPs included in the update were previously

verified and approved by the appropriate discipline. The verifier concurs with the Quality Related classification of this evaluation.

u .-. m s,, w :.-

i I

i 4

, . _ _ _ . , . __