IR 05000295/1997004

Partially Withheld Insp Repts 50-295/97-04 & 50-304/97-04 on 970203-07.No Violations Noted.Details Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)

ML20136E047
Person / Time
Site:	Zion  File:ZionSolutions icon.png
Issue date:	03/06/1997
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20136E009	List: IR 05000295/1997004 ML20136E004
References
50-295-97-04, 50-295-97-4, 50-304-97-04, 50-304-97-4, NUDOCS 9703130097
Download: ML20136E047 (2)

Text

. . - - - - . . .. - . . .. . . - - . . . . . -. ~ - - _ - . - - . - . . . -

'

-

.I ,

,

..

.

'*

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i REGION III l

Docket Nos: 50-295; 50-304

,

Licenses No: DPR-39; DPR-48

. Reports No:

50-295/97004(DRS); 50-304/97004(DRS)

l Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company Facility: Zion Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Location: 101 Shiloh Blv Zion, IL 60099 l Dates: February 3-7, 1997 i

Inspector:

J. L. Belanger, Senior Physical Security q Inspector Approved by: James R. Creed, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety 9703130097 970306 PDR G

ADOCK 05000295 3 $3$" a

,

PDR Upon trolled

- .-- . .- . . - - - - . . _ . . . - I

'

.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I

Zion Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 NRC Inspection Reports 50-295/97004; 50-304/97004 This was a routine, announced, security inspection covering the areas of Vital I l

Area Access Control of Personnel and Vehicles; Alarm Stations and  !

i Communications; Testing, Maintenance and Compensatory Measures; Security Organization, and Followup on Previous Inspection Findings. Overall, the security program was adequate to protect public health and safety. No violations of HRC requirements were identifie e

.

The conduct of security operations was good, with continued improvements in the organization's professionalism and

connunications. (Section S6.2),

e

Security contract staff shortages in the nuclear security officer and access control inspector positions were eliminated, resulting j in a reduction response in the use of overtime and an increase in tactical drills conducte (Sections 8.1)

i e

!

Station and corporate maintenance support for the security system was a strength. (Section S2.1)

{ e 4 Generally, contract security force performance was goo Personnel errors were few and moderate in significance. (Section l SS.1)

e A review of security related problem identification forms (PIF)

,

'

!

indicated a continuing need to promote worker personal accountability in the areas of badge control and vital area door control. (Section S5.2)

Good corporate support, in the form of guidance and personnel assistance, continue *

A security drill to evaluate performance in the conduct of warehouse package searches showed a lack of worker understanding of basic expectations. (Section S5.3)

Enclosure C

ton This

Is Decontrolled