ML20136B369

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Rationale for Consideration of Independent Sampling of QA Programs
ML20136B369
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon, 05000000
Issue date: 08/31/1982
From: Bishop T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Crews J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
Shared Package
ML20136B092 List:
References
FOIA-84-293 NUDOCS 8601020565
Download: ML20136B369 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _

s':. ,

!t ls  % * ,

AUG 31 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR:

J. L. Crews, Director, Division of Resident, Reactor Projects and Engineering Programs FROM:

T. W. Bishop, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch No. 2 SUNE4T:

--INDEPENDENT VERIFICATION OF DIABLO CANYON CONSTRUCTION

-- QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS

REFERENCE:

(1) Memorandum R. H. Engelken to H. R. Denton, -

dated March 29, 1982 ,

(2), Memorandum R. H. Engelken to D. Eisenhut, dated July 30, 1982 (3) Memorandum R. H. Engelken to D. Eisenhut, dated August 20, 1982 As referenced above, the RV staff has recommended that consideration be given to an independent sampling of quality assurance programs applied 1 to Diablo Canyon construction.

below. Rationale for this consideration is provided Initial NRC and R. F. Reedy QA Findings The initial R. F. Reedy findings (regarding PG&E's QA program prior to June of October 1978)1981.

were generally consistent with the RV incoection finriiny ..

While neither the Reedy Mr the RV findings identified specmc concerns outside the area of seimic design, these findings Jdid ra_i_sf sLuestions (implicitly at least) ab.qut PG&E management's abili to assuTe an arnetia aerall- QA program. In referenc M constr ,

ion qMwhile the Region y construction inspe,ctior, program results i indicated that construction was accomplished in accordance with the  :

requisite QA requirements, we must remember that our program was a .'

sam wi le of the QA controls applied. Therefore it is difficult tn < + 2* e ,

out exception) that QA weaknesses found in the seismic design area j did not exist elsewhere. Inis cnougnt aads some support to consiaeration oT an independent sampling of construction QA. I 8601020565 PDR 851125 ' Fo / A-N-293 FOIA I LEIGHTOB4-293 PDR ST

,g,,,,,,,,,,,,

mc4 . . . .RV,,,p,,,, , , , , , , , J, P4 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

.0.Mo.rd.i.1.:.P. . . 9.F,K,i, r,s c,h,,,,,

,,,TWB,1,s hgp , ,,,

,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,, ,, ,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,, , ,hl,7,fg,g.,,,,,

L4 8(....(82 ,.. , ,,, agf/,82 ,,,,, ,,8g82 .,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

FC3M 318 810< 80) NRCM C240 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,

OFFICIAL RECORD COF'Y

. . - . , - ~ - - - - - - - - - - "o ' * " '

- - - - ~ ~ ~

' = ~ = {

l

,, . i l J. L. Crews -

2-1 Loss of Public Confidence f IThe failure of the licensee,to adequately control seismic design activities as ' evidenced by the large number of findings to date, has resulted in a significant loss of.public confidence in the licensee's and the NRC's credibility and ability to assure the safety of the Diablo Canyon plant.

The added assurance provided by an independent review of the construction j ,, QA controls may restore some confidence in this area. --.

/(Js ~  %

T. W. Bishop, Chief Reactor Projects Branch No. 2 cc: R. H. Engelken B. H. Faulkenberry C

9 4

t

  • e 4

P O

d 0

e

, , - , - -r_.%-.

- -- *- -- = , --e + --a-- - -