ML20132C867
| ML20132C867 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Marble Hill |
| Issue date: | 09/04/1981 |
| From: | Kiper K Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20132B505 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-84-293 NUDOCS 8109180191 | |
| Download: ML20132C867 (5) | |
Text
g "*c sg, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION gh? h
- 7,
{.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 SIP 4 1981 Docket Nos.:
STN 50-546 and STN 50-547 11EMORANDUM FOR:
Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director, Division of Licensing, NRR 7
THRU:
Robert L. Tedesco, Assistant Director fqr icensing, DL B. J. Youngblood, Chief, Licensing Branjc
- o. 1, DL FR0!1:
K. L. Kiper, Project Manager, Licensing Branch No. 1. DL
SUBJECT:
SALP - CYCLE 2 FOR g Enclosed is the SALP information from NRR for Marble Hill, Units 1 and 2.
Kenneth L. Xiper, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated
/
\\
r'PP m
l a=
NiA-3'l-283 1
6b
ykF Utility:
Public Service of Indiana Facility: Marble Hill, Units 1 and 2 Appraisal Period: July 1, 1980 to June 30, 1981 Project Manager:
Kenneth L. Kiper 1.
Performance Elements a.
Quality of Response and Submittals Insufficient information to make a judgement.
b.
Efforts Required to Obtain an Acceptable Response or Submittal Insufficient information.
c.
Working Knowledge of Regulations, Guides. Standards and Generic Issues Average.
d.
Technical Competence Average.
e.
Conduct of Meetings with NRR NotApplicable.
f.
Long Standing Open Items None.
g.
Organizational and Management Capabilities Insufficient information.
h.
Results of Operator Licensing Examinations Conducted During the Appraisal Period Not Applicable.
i.
Performanca on Specific Issues c.
l We have been working with the applicant on tne mitigation of aa l
archeological find.
The applicant was knowledgeable as how to l
proceed with the various steps to accomplish this and submitted l
adequate documentation.
t l
l
l
'efF.3 e
2.
Observed Trends in Performance Insufficient data 3.
Notable Strengths and Weaknesses Insufficient data to make a judgement.
4.
Overall Summary Since Marble Hill is in the post-CP stage, the contact with NRR is minimal. The applicant has been cooperative and responsive when observed.
Kenneth L. Kiper, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing 9
l 1
i i
i r
l
.r I
/
94 2
2r C<u i S %
i L. i
' Vffk r L i qc } nYitj J
it A / 0 A E fr 6 J 3If kpael{erED0$ Cec.w;gan bri k 3 a S
- l. gt y
84 sal A i+ p 4 ps rA l
I.
Operating Facilities II.
Facilities Under Construction 1.
Arkansas 1&2 2.
Beaver Valley 1 Catawba 3.
Browns Ferry 1, 2&3 O
Marble Hill 182 4
Brunswick 1&2 T. Midland 182 5.
Crystal River 3 4.
South Texas 182
~-
5.
WNP-2 patrj 6
Watts Bar 1&2 8
Indian Point 2 Zimer 9.
Nine Mile Point 1 10.
Dyster Creek 11.
Palisades 12.
Pilgrim 13.
Rancho Seco 14 Salem 1&2 15 Surry 182 h.
K/56 i
l
'A' :
e r
MARBLE HILL Evaluation Period: 7/1/79 - 6/30/80 I
GENERAL During the SALP-1 appraisal period the licensee has developed and implemented a formal program specifically designed to improve the regulatory performance.
These included staffing and organizational changes, quality assurance program development, and the identifica-tion and resolution of problems. -Incremental resumption of srfety-related construction, subject to the approval of the NRC, commenced subsequent to the evaluation period as described below.
The Director of IE authorized the following activities:
PSIs resumption of receipt inspection.
07-07-80 PSIs contractors, Cherne Contracting Corp.
11-13-80 (CCC) and Commonwealth-Lord J. V. (CLJV) to resume receipt inspection.
CCC end CLJV to resume mechancial, piping 12-05-80 and electrical work.
Resumption of all safety-related work in-03-27-81 cluding concrete placement.
The Order remains in place.
II SPECIFIC A.
CONTENTION:
"The licensee's activities prior to and during the early part of the evaluation period displayed evidence of Project Engineering, Quality Assurance, and Construction Management weaknesses."
1.
Basis During inspections conducted in April 3-6 IE Inspection Reports and April 30-May 3, 1979, problems were No. 50-546 and identified relative to the placement and 547/79-03, 79-04, repair of concrete.
A Management meeting 79-05, 79-08 with PSI was held on May 15, 1979, to discuss these findings.
On June 12, 1979, the NRC received information that a former worker of the Marbl6 Hill site had alleged improper repairs of honeycomb areas in con-crete.
The allegations were contained in a sworn statements submitted to the office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations (NRR) through an attorney representing an Indiana"in-tervener group.
Subsequently, Region III received a copy and initiated an inves-tigation on June 22, 1979.