ML20133M451
Text
,'
Rsv. 9 Supersedes Rev. 8 dated 6/8/79 PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATION OF SURRY UNIT NO. 1 DYNAMIC PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS J.O. No. 12846.22 To be used in conjunction with Logic for Pipe Stress Study - Surry Unit No.1 (attached).
THE ONLY FORMS ACCEPTABLE FOR DOCUMENTATION ARE FORMS LISTED IN THE ENCLOSED TABLE OF CONTENTS.
FORMS MAY BE REVISED ONLY BY REVISING THIS PROCEDURE.
ISSUANCE OF NEW OR REVISED FORMS DOES NOT REQUIRE BACKFITTING UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED.
APPROVED ENGINEERING ASSURAN
' PROJECT ENGINEER" lW DATV s
8500130130 050703 PDR FOIA HERRMAN85-301 PDR i
i
~. -
e PROCEDURE FOR EVALUATION OF SURRY UNIT 1 DYNAMIC PIPE STRESS ANALYSIS '
J.O. No. 12846.22 Table of Contents Section Title Pages I
Procedure Text I-n II Procedure for Processing Information Requests 73 i
A.
Attachment I 10 B.
Attachment II 11 C.
Attachment III 1:
D.
Attachment IV 13 III Procedure for Confirmation of Input Data NUPIPE Work Sheet Field Verification IV Plan for Interim Start-up Pipe Support Design Criteria 16-17 V
Plan for Interim Start-up Pipe Stress 19 Fo rm No.
Revision No.
Title Pa g. s Form A.
Rev. 4 Complete Documentation Package' 19 Form 1 Rev. 2 Comparison of NUPIPE Input and Field Verified Work Sketch 20 Form 2, Rev. 3 Review of NUPIPE Runs 21 Fo rm 4, Rev. 1 Equipment / Penetration Loading Summary 2:
Form 6 Rev. '
Revising Pipe Model f or NUPIPE Runs 23 Fo rm 7 Rev. 1 Pipe Support Review Sheet 24 Form 5, Re v. 1 Original ARS Total Design Load Tabulation Sheet 25 Fo rm 5 A, Rev. O Total Design Load Tabulation Sheet Loading Case I 26 Form 5B, Rev. O Total Design Load Tabulation Sheet Loading Case II 27 Form SC, Rev. O Total Design Load Tabulation sheet Loading Case III 28 Form 7A, Rev.1 Pipe Support Analysis Summary Sheet 29 Form 8 Rev. 2 Pipe Stress and Supports Overstress Condition Repcrt 30 Form 9 Rev. O Valve Information Request 31 Form 10, Rev. 0 Equipment Information Request 3
Form ll, Rev. O Soil Structure Interation, Bumped Stress Calculations 33 Form 12, Rev. O Request for Generation of Hardware Modifications (s)/
Detailed Evaluation 34 Form Z, Rev. I Final Review 35
t i..
Page 1.
l
?
SECTION I l
PROCEDURE TEXT F
4' I.
CENERAL When a form is completed, this shall be noted on Fora A.
When a problem 4
i package is completed, Fora Z shall be completed.
II.
STRESS ANALYSIS REVIEW 1.
Compile a list of dynamically analyzed systems. This shall be done i
as follows:
A.
Compile the list of dynamically analyzed systems. On that list, identify all problems that were -analyzed by:
o SHOCK 0/I e
SHOCK II e
Other - Manual, NUPIPE, SHOCK III B.
Obtain a legible copy of each MSK for the listed systems, and add the problem identification.
C.
Compare the list of systems and problems with the problems recorded on cassettes.
D.
Ensure the entire line has been analyzed by color coding the Pipe Arrangement Drawings (FP's) vs. MSK's.
E.
Ensure the entire system has been analyzed by color coding the Flow Diagrams vs. FP's.
2.
Compile a list of all systems which have swing check valves for which an incorrect weight may have been used in the original analysis in accordance with NRC Bulletin IE 79-04.
Identify the specific location and the correct weight to be used in the current analysis.
3.
Compile a list of all supports, including type and function.
4.
Compile a list of all equipment connections.
5.
Compile a list of all penetrations.
NOTE:
The completed lists, Nos.1-5 above, shall be signed by the preparer and signed and dated by the Project Engineer or designee.
Signature of the Project Engineer indicates the list is complete and accurate.
6.
Prepare a Work Sketch from the latest copy of the Piping Fabrication Drawing (FP) and any available Field Data. All inputs, including the FP and Field Data, shall be referenced on the work sketch. The Analyst (preparer) shall sign the sketch when completed.
J
_=
i 2.
s 7.
Check the Work Sketch. An engineer competent in the concerned discipline shall be assigned to check the sketch to ensure it is complete and accurate. When this check is complete, he shall sign the sketch.
NOTE:
Work Sketches shall be field verified in accordance with Section 3.
Before the Stress Analysis can be documented as being complete, the field-verified work sketch shall be compared to the work sketch used as input to the NUPIPE If there are no changes, complete Form 1.
If the run.
NUPIPE run accuracy is affected by any changes noted on the field-verified work sketch, complete Form 6 and rerun the problem with the revised input.
8.
Code the input date into NUPIPE, and run the problem with the original ARS.
Ensure that branch lines on the as-built NKS have been modelled into the run in accordance with EMD-79-15, and that stress Intensification Factors from EMD-79-11 are applied to these branch connections which have been modelled into the run.
NOTE:
The development of the NUPIPE run constitutes a new calculation. As such, it must meet the requirements of EA P-5.3.
Particular attention should be paid to complete documentation and referencing of sources of inputs and summarizing results.
Forms 9 and 10 shall be used for documentation of telecons with Vendors.
Completed forms shall be included in the final calculation package.
9.
If the results of this run show stresses to be within allowables go i
to Step 11; if not rerun the problem with SSI ARS and go to Step 10.
f
?
Review Section V entitled " Plan Interim Start-up Pipe Stress" to determine the correct procedure for combining pipe stresses.
10.
If the SSI ARS was used in the analysis, the preparer shall complete Form 11 prior to Form 2.
Form 11 provides for the inertial portion I
of the DBE stress at the point of maximum total. stress and at the point of highest DBE inertial stress to be bumped by 1.5 times the NUPIPE SSI ARS generated DBEI stress. The following steps shall be performed when completing Form 11:
t l
(a) Per the NRC letter of May 25, 1979, the Surry 1 Project is required to
" bump" (magnify) the seismic inertial stresses in the DBE case by a i
e factor of 1.5.
This is equivalent to the equation:
[
t l
g
O l
3 Sh=ST + 0.5 SDBEI Where ST is the total stress from the NUPIP run S
II' DBEI Sh is the new total stress af ter bumping It is necessary to find the point at which S is a maximum. This T
may occur at the point where S is a maximum (maximum t tal stress)
T
~
or where S DBEI T may also occur at other points, which must be examined.
(b) Designating the point at which the NUPIPE total stress is a maximum as Point 1, enter the values under maximum total stress point on Form 11.
(c) Designating the point at which the seismic inertial stress is a maximum as Point 2, enter the coresponding values under the maximum inertial stress point on Form 11.
(d) If the point of maximum total stress coincides with the point of highest DBE inertial stress, enter on Form 2 the bumped stress from this point (For DBE condition).
(e)
If the point of maximum total stress does not correspond with the point of highest inertial stress, the preparer must compare the bumped stress from all other applicable points per the following criteria:
(1) If the bumped stress at the point of maximum total stress is greater than or equal to the bumped stress at the point of highest inertial stress, btmp the stresses at all points where S
is higher than the S at the point of maximum IIEffkalstress.
Total (2) If the bumped stress at the point of maximum total stress is less than or equal to the bumped stress at the point of highest inertial stress, bump the stress at the point of highest inertial stress. Bump the stresses at all points where the S DBEI 1arger than the S at the point of maximum total stress.
ThelargestbumpekgNressattheseotherpointsshallbeentered on Form 11 under "Other Points".
(f) The largest of the bumped stresses on Form 11 shall be entered on Form 2.
(3) The preparer and checker shall sign and date Form 11.
Peg 2 4 4
11.
The preparer of the calculation (step 8 or 10) shall complete Form 2 and sign it.
l 12.
Review and check the calculation (steps 8 or 10) in acordance with EAP-5.3.
Upon completion of the review, the reviewer shall sign and date Form 2.
NOTE:
Engineering Assurance shall audit some of the calculations to applicable procedures.
13.
If the results of the NUPIPE run indicate that the line is not overstressed, proceed with Support, Nozzle, and Penetration load Verification.
14.
If the results of the NUPIPE run indicate that the line is overstressed, complete Form 8 and transmit the form plus attachments to the Options Review Committee in accordance with Engineering Mechanics Procedure END-79-06.
If the need for hardware modifi-cations / additions is evident, the project will complete Form 8, indicating their modification under " Project Suggested Solutions."
i Option Review Committee shall concur that hardware modifications /-
additions are necessary, or recommend other solutions under Options l
Review Committee Recommendations. Any differences between the Project and ORC will be resolved by the Senior Engineering Manager sponsor for i
the Engineering Mechanics Division.
- 15. The problem shall then be rerun with a model reflecting the hardware 1
addition / modification and the results documented as specified previously in this section.
16.
Following Engineering Assurance audit of the Pipe Stress Analysis results and satisfactory resolution of any EA findings, the Pipe Stress Engineer shall forward Form 12 to the Project Engineer.
If hardware modifications are required, Form 12 " Request for Generation of Hardware Modifications"/ Detailed Modification"shall be completed and shall, if required, have a marked-up NKS attached to show the physical location of the hardware to be modified.
Form 12 shall be signed and dated by the preparer and checker. A copy of Form 12 shall be a part of the documentation package prior to the completion of Form Z.
Form 12 is the document which will track the design and or detailed analysis.
l III REVIEW OF NUPIPE SUPPORT LOADS f
1.
Upon completion of the NUPIPE Stress Analysis in Section II, all new loads shall be transmitted to the Supports Review Group by completing the NUPIPE section of Form 7.
Also, the NUPIPE Support Summary pages from the computer run shall be sent with Form 7.
. ~
~
P:g2 5 2.
If the problem was run on the Soil Structure Interaction ARS, all DBEI inertial forces and moments shall be increased by 1.5 times the values listed on the computer run. The Stress Engineer shall " bump" these forces and moments by 1.5 and enter the " bumped" values on Form 7.
Evaluation shall be made using these bumped salues.
3.
The Support Review Group shall complete the SHOCK II section of Form 7, using the original MSK.
Review by the group 6 hall be in accord-ance with EMD Procedure 79-04.
EMD 79-04 shall te used in conjunction with with Section IV of this procedure entitled " Plan for Interim Start-up Pipe Support Design Criteria".
4.
If the new loads are acceptable, the Supports Review Group shall complete the " accept" block of Form 7 by signing and dating the block.
5.
Upon completion of the pipe suppport recalculation, fill out Form 7A, summarizing the results of the calculation.
6.
If after further examination the support is acceptable, the Supports Review Group shall complete the RECALC ACCEPTED block of Form 7 by showing the calculation number and signing the block.
7.
If after further examination the support is not acceptable, the Supports Review Group shall complete Form 8 and note in the COMMENT block of Form 7 the date the support was sent to the Options Review Commit te e.
Recommended hardware modifications / additions shall be stated under Project Suggested Solutions on Form 8.
Options Review Committee shall concur that hardware modifications / additions are necessary, or recommend other solutions under Options Review Committee Recomme nd ations. Any difference between the Project and ORC will be resolved by the Senior Engineering Manager sponsor for the Engineering Mechanics Division. Final proposed hardware modifications /addi-tions resulting from steps 14 or this step shall be transmitted to parties responsible for performing work through the Operations Services Division via Form 12.
IV.
N0ZZLE LCAD AND PENETRATION EVALUATION 1.
Upon completion of the NUPIPE Stress Analysis in Section II, the PSAS Section shall complete Form 4 in accordance with EMD Procedures 79-03 and 79-05. They shall also fill in the old loads using the original calculations.
If the original calculations are not available, the information shall be obtained by the Project. Review of the form shall be in accordance with the above procedures.
2.
If the Soil Structure Interaction ARS was used, all DBEI loads shall be increased by 1.5 times the NUPIPE loads prior to being entered on Form 4.
3.
If loads have increased, Form 4 shall be sent to EMD Structural Mechanics Engineer for Hot Penetrations in accordance with EMD Procedure 79-02, or to EMD Mechanical Cection in accordance with EMD Procedure 79-05. Their review shall be in accordance with these procedures.
4 Pcg2 6 V.
CRITERIA FOR USE OF SSI ARS The use of the new SSI ARS will be only when authorized by Project Engineer or designee. Generally, it will be used in those cases where NUPIPE results based on the original licensed ARS for Surry produce:
Pipe Stress over Code allowable.
o Support loads increased over Design o
Nozzle reaction loads increased ovr Design allowable.
o VI.
KARDWARE MODIFICATIONS / DETAILED EVALUATIONS The Project shall maintain a log of Form 12's generated as a result of this Pipe Stress reanalysis program.
i e
i
Pagt 7.
l Section II l
l-Procedure for Processing Infomation Recuests 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE This procedure establishes an administrative system for processing information requests between SW Project Headquarters and SW personnel at Surry Power Station.
2.0 M Personnel with questions concerning Field originated information
_ from Surry shan prepare a " Field Informatice Request" fom (Attach-ment I) for documenting both the specific problem and the Field resolution.
l Personnel requiring details of existing pipe supports shall prepare l
a " Support Information Request" form (Attachment III) for documenting both the specific request and the Field response.
2.1 Field Information Recuest Fom Prenaration and Processire 2.1.1 Field Infomation Requests (FIR's) shall be used only fer questions pertaining to Field as-built drawings (MKS series) used in the preparation of NUPIPE Stress runs.
Questions which could in any way change infomation shown l
on IOCS drawings (i.e., geometry, support type, nomencla-l ture) shan be addressed to SW Surry Site personnel on Field Infomation Requests.
i I
2.1.2 The FIR shall be forwarded to the Project Engineer (or his I
designee) for transmitting to the Surry Site.
I 2.1.3 The Project Engineer (or his designee) shan log each FIR according to the instruction established in paragraph 2.2 and transmit the FIR to the Responsible Engineer at the Surry Site for resolution.
l 2.1.k Ccapleted FIR's returned from the Surry Site shan be logged in as returned, reviewed by the Project Engineer (or his designee) and forwarded to the preparer.
2.1 5 The Project Engineer (or designee) shan determine whether the new information requires a drawing change and shau note that it does/does not on the FIR.
i l
t I
i
~ -
Pag 2 8.
2.2 FIR Loaring Instructions 2.2.1 When received, the Project Engineer (or his designee) shall log in each FIR, prior to transmittal, using the Attachment II.
2.2.2 Each entry shall consist of the log number, probism number, preparer's name, date of tra.smittal to the Responsible Engineer at the site, an.1 date returned from the site.
2.2.3 The FIR's shall be sequentially numbered. This log number shall also appear in the appropriate space on each FIR.
2.2.k The determination by the Project Engineer (or his designee) of whether a drawing change is required after receipt of information shall be noted in the log. All information shall be incorporated by revising the affected document.
2.3 Sunnort Information Recuest Form Prenaration and Processina 2.3.1 Support Information Requests (SIR's) shall be used only for questions pertaining to missing information or clarification of information necessary to analyze the support. This includes requests for as-builts, dimensions, member sizes.
Support Information Requests shall not be used to request information which could change MKS, drawings such as hanger-type verification.
One SIR shall be prepared per problem, if possible.
2.3.2 The SIR shall be forwarded to the Project Engineer (or his designee) for transmitting to the Surry Site.
2.3.3 The Project Engineer (or his designee) shall log each SIR according to instructions in paragraph 2.4 and transmit the SIR to the Responsible Engineer at the Surry Site for response.
2.3.h All dispositioned SIR's shall be received by the Engineering Mechanics Division Engineer at the Surry Site for completeness.
235 Completed SIR's returned from the Surry Site shall be logged in, reviewed by the Project Engineer / Designee, then forwarded to the Design Supervisor / Designee. The Design Supervisor /
Designee shall review dispositioned SIR's for completeness before returning it to the originator. If a dispositioned SIR results in a change to the MS drawing (i.e., changes hanger type, adds or deletes supports), the Project Engineer /
Design Supervisor /Designes shall prepara a Field Infor-nation Request, forwarding one copy to the Lead Stress Engineer immediately.
Pqe 9.
2.h SIR Legring Instructions 2.h.1 The Project Engineer (or his designee) shall log in each SIR prior to transmittal to the site, using Attachment IV.
2.h.2 Each entry shall consist of the log number, the problem number, the applicable MKS number (s), the preparer's name and date, the date transmitted to the site, the date returned from the site, and the date reviewed by the Project Engineer (or his designee).
25 Filing Instructions 251 The Project Engineer (or his designee) shall maintain a file of all FIR's and SIR's transmitted to and returned from the site with Field resolution.
2.6 SIR Indecendent Review 2.6.1 Surry Quality Control vill independently review all answered SIR forms.
30 A?rACHMENTS 3.1 Field Infomation Request (FIR) - Attachment I 3.2 FIR Log Sheet - Attachment II 3.3 Support Information Request (SIR) - Attachment III 3.k SIR Los Sheet - Attachment IV ed 0
ej Page 10, Attachrient I i
FIELD INFORMATION REQUEST j
Surry Units 1 & 2 i
Date:
Log #
Problem #
MKS Rev.
J.0 No.
[
t System Information Request:
l Preparer Ext.
d Project Engineer Date:
Answer:
Drawing Change Required Preparer (surry)
Yes No Reviewed by Project Engineer (Boston)
Pcg2 11.
Attachment II f
FIELD INFORMATION REQUEST 8
J.O.No.
Surry Units 1 & 2 Pinge of Log Number
- HKS/ Problem Number i Preparer i
Date Date ikg. Change l
l i
Transmitted Returned Yes/No I
Comunents
.i l
+
e I
l i
l i
8 e
9 i
i l
i 9
i i,
i l
9
Page 12 Attachment III Support Information Request Surry Units 1 & 2 PROBLEM f APPLICABLE MKS DWG REV SYSTEM SUPPORTS FOR WHICH INFORMATION IS REQUESTED *
- Attach Marked Up MKS For Clarification If Necessary INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR SUPPORTS LIST ABOVE (Check Applicable Boxes)
Complete As-Built Details
((I Member Dimensions and Sizes
/[]
Welded Attachment Details
/[]I Other (
)
O
/
Preparer Date
/
Project Engineer Date RESPONSE ( Attach Additional Pages As Required)
/
Preparer (Surry)
Date
/
Reviewed by Date Project Engineer (Boston)
~
vDnO Hh s
a
(
~
r o
1..
i o
N.
e O.
g Y.
a BR J
P G
DN EE W
E.
IJ VO ER RP DENR EU TT AE DR
- i t
v err I
H ES TN t
AA s
DR u..
T e
qe R
V n2 I
o i&
t t
n a1 E
e ni T
m rs A
h ot D
e c
fi a
nn t
IU tA t y rr E
or M
pu A
pS N
u S
l Is '
li SK M
E)
LS B(
!-l ER LE BB OM RU PN i
RE B
GM OU I
I F l
l l
ll.
1 1
Page 14 4
Section III SURRY l
PROCEDURE FOR CONFIRMATION OF INPUT DATA NUPIPE WORK SHEET FIELD VERIFICATION PURPOSE: To provide a detailed piping isometric of computer analyzed piping showing hanger locations and type.
PROCEDURE:
1.
Obtain latest issue of work sketch.
2.
Priority lines will be walked in accordance with Surry I Pipe Stress / Pipe Support / Equipment Bar Chart.
3.
Locate pipe in field - confirm by checking with FP or equipment connections.
4.
Confira dimensions or add dimensions to work sketches.
-Location of valves
-Pipe lengths
-Centerline of Pipe Supports i
Note: Tolerances shall be as accurate as possible and will be within 16 inches unless otherwise noted. Indicate on work sketch if dimension tolerance can not be met.
5.
Working point dimensions shall be indicated to column lines where possible, particularly in the case of annulus piping. As a guide-line: every 50 feet should be dimensioned to a column.
6.
Check for addition or removal of supports and locate on work sheet.
7.
Show all additional branch piping (excluding those vent and drain lines which have no pipe supports and all instrumentatim lines) to a point where ONE of the following criteria is met:
(a) Branch connections should be shown for a miniemm total of 5 feet of piping in each of two directions. Annular piping should be shown for a distance of 15 feet. Rigid hangers on this pipe should be located and identified.
(b) Branch piping should be shown up to the first constraint for each of the I,Y,Z directions.
l (c) Branch piping should be shown up to the first anchor.
Page 15 PROCEDURES (cont'd) 8.
Confirm type and orientation of all supports.
All supports shall be identified on work sketch with one of the following classifications:
Type Abbreviation ANCHOR ANC RIGID LATERAL RESTRAINT LAT AXIAL RESTRAINT AXIAL VERTICAL RESTRAINT VERT SPRING HANGER S.H.
ROD HANGER R.H.
SLIDING SUPPORT S.S.
MONO BALL MONO-BALL LATERAL SHOCK SUPPRESSOR LSS AXIAL SHOCK SUPPRESSOR ASS VERTICAL SHOCK SUPPRESSOR VSS VERTICAL SUPPORT VS Hanger combinations should be shown, i.e.
VERT-LAT.
Piping orientation will be determined later from piping drawings, and therefore, need not be shown by the field.
These symbols represent hanger function only.
Multiple snubber arrangements sharing a commom line of action may be represented as a single snubber.
Similarly, trapeze type spring hanger arrangements may be represented as a single spring.
9.
The field verified Work Sketch shall be assigned a unique drawing number.
10.
The Work Sketch shall be signed and dated by the Project.
11.
The Field working copy of the work sketch and FIR shall be signed and dated by the Surry Engineer or his designee.
12.
Surry Quality Control will independently review the final revision of MKS prints.
Page 16 SECTION IV PLAN FOR INTERIM START-UP PIPE SUPPORT DESIGN CRITERIA (REFERENCE EMD-79-04) 1.
Support structure loading conditions and allowable stress.
(1) DL + THER I Allowable * (Form SB)
' (2) DL + (SSEI x BA ) + SSEA 11.33 allowable * (Form SC) 2.
Integral welded attachments (similar to Option 1. EMD-79-04.)
(1) Press + Sustained Load + (DEEI X B A + DBEA) +
DL + (DBEI X BA + DBEA) I*
Any new supports added or modifications to existing supports will be required to meet DBE conditions but in addition will be chechdto ensure that they also meet the following OBE conditions.
The applicable equations for pipe supports then become:
3.
Support structure - add the following condition to ikesn 4 Ab&4C 1.
DL + THER + SRSS [(OBEI X B A + OBEA), OCCU) i 1.33 allowable * (Form SA) 4.
Integral Welded Attachments (similar to Option 1, EMD-79-04)
(1) Press + Sustained Load + SRSS [(OBEI X B A + OBEA), OCCU) +
+ OBEA), OCCU] I*
DL + SRSS [(OBEI X BA (2)
Press + Sustained Load + (DBEI X B A + DBEA) +
+ DBEA)I
- DL+(DBEIXB A (3) Press + Sustained Load + (OBEI X BA + OBEA) + THER +
DL + (OBEI X B A
+ OBEA) + THER I*
Page 17 1
3 Allowable = basic allowable as applicable per EMD-79-04 4
A B = Factor = 1.5 when using SSI-ARS
= 1.0 when using original ARS f
Option II as outlined in EMD 79-04 can only be used with the Project Engineer's written approval.
l l
+
4 l
l I
i
Ctd 1 PLAN FOR INTERIM START-UP PIPE STRESS Per direction of VEPCO on 1 June 1979, stress and load calculations for pipe and supports will include the ef fects of support displacements.
The requirement for mod-ification will be based on the DBE Case only. The applicable equations for pipe stress are:
S
+SDW + B SDBEI * 'DBEA h
J i
' l.25 S, + 0.25 S S TH h
where S
= Longitudinal Pressure Stress p
5
= Dead Load Stress 9y S
= Seismic Inertial Stress, Design Basis Earthquake DBE1 S
= Seismic Stress Due to Anchor Mc,vements, Design Basis Earthquake DBEA Sh = Allowable stress at maximum (hot) t' e
S = Allowable stress at minimum (cold) t(.ps
..re C
S
= Thermal Stress TH 5 = 1.5 when using SSI ARS; 1.0 when using original ARS 4
i l
r
,-,,y-
,v-.,,
.,,-,---y,,.
-_.-,-------.r
,w.,...,-_,_.,,.--,,,,-,--
,--,,,,-------------,-,-.-,t
SURRY Form A 12846.22 Rev. 4 Page 19 COMPLETE DOCUMENT PACKAGE PROBLEM MSK Rev.
FIELD VERIFIED WORK SKETCH Included in the package are:
Checked and Field Verified Work Sketch Checked Stress Analysis Calc.
(Nupipe Run)
Form No.
Form 1 COMPARISON OF NUPIPE & FIELD VERIFIED WORK SKETCH Form 2 REVIEW OF NUPIPE RUNS Form 4 EQUIPMENT / PENETRATION LOADING
SUMMARY
Form 6 REVISING PIPE MODEL FOR NUPIPE RUNS Form 7 PIPE SUPPORT REVIEW SHEET Form 5 TOTAL DESIGN LD TAB SHEET Form 7A PIPE SUPPORT ANALYSIS
SUMMARY
SHEET Form 8 PIPE STRESS & SUPPORTS OVERSTRESS CONDITION REPORT Form 9 VALVE INFORMATION REQUEST Form 10 EQUIPMENT INFORMATION REQUEST Formik SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION
" BUMPED STRESS CALCULATION" Form 12 REQUEST FOR GENERATION OF HARDWARE MODIFICATIONS / DETAILED EVALUATION Form Z FINAL REVIEW The above package has been reviewed for completeness and accuracy and meets the requirements of the Task Procedure for the Evaluation of the Surry Unit 1 Dynamic Pipe Analysis.
Revision No.
Date REVIEWER PROJECT ENGINEER DATE
SURRY Form 1 12846.22 Rev. 2 Page 20 COMPARISON OF NUPIPE INPUT AND FIELD VERIFIED WORK SKETCH FROBLEM NO.
ORIGINAL MSK/REV FIELD VERIFIED
. WORK SKETCH MKS NO/ Rey PIPE STRESS A!!ALYSIS WORK SKETCH NO./REV Statement of Review:
Review of the Nuptpe input and the Field Verified Work Sketch shows satisfactory similarity to assure the accuracy of the Nupipe stresses and loads.
REVIEWER SUPERVISOR OATE 4
y --., - -
4
,.--,m
-.-,---+---+--.v,,
9 m
SURIE Form 2 128!.6.22 Rev 3 Page 21 REVIEW OF NUPIPE RUES ej PROBLEM 2
?
l P.S.A.
Fork sketch No./Rev
~
4 A review of the Nuptpe output for the above problem for the points with the largest combined stresses shows that; A. The.line is stressed to a point over the allowables B. The line is within allowable a
i l
ALLOWABLE (PSI)
MAX CALCULATED (PSI)
PT. NO.
f M.2S Sg+SDL
- 300E h
i].8S Sy+SDL
- 300E h
m.t 5 a
I REVI EWER SUPERYISOR DATE d
4 9
.n..,-
.,,,, - --,,..,-.,---,,.n.,
l l
CLIENT J.O. 12846.22 SUILU Form 4 MSK PROBLEM SYSTEM FP NO.
Page 22 DISPOSITION: ACCEPT REV I EWER FURTHER EVALUATION SUPERVISOR (EMD)
DATE THE LOCAL SYSTEM 15 DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
LOCAL COORDINATE AXES
(+ X) IS ALONG THE AXIS OF THE PIPE, d +F OUTWARD FROM EQUIPMENT 7
+M
- 3+M Y
(+ Y) IN THE PLANE OF THE LOCAL g
X-AXIS AND THE GLOBAL +Y-AXIS
/bh O
- F UNLESS THE LOCAL X-AXIS IS U {i -
~
ALIGNED WITH THE GLOBAL Y-AXIS, THEN THE LOCAL Y-AXIS WILL BE
+r
,y PARALLEL TO THE GLOBAL X-AXIS I
I
(+ Z) ACCORDING TO RIGHT HAND RULE EQUIPMENT / PENETRATION LOADING
SUMMARY
' POINT NO.
EQUIPMENT / PENETRATION NO.
(fill in rows as applicable)
CALCULATED FORCES (LB)
CALCULAT ED MCvENTS (FT.L95. )
LOADING CON 0lTION FX FY FZ MX f#
MZ MAX.
g THERMAL 1 E
l OEADLOAD a
N OBET 3
1 6
DBET i
MAX.
THERMAL D$
m DEAOLOAD
$w OBET 00ET ALLOWABLE LOADS CONDITION FX FY FZ PtX MV
'C I
1 l
l a
Pag 2 23 SURRY Torm 6 12246.2 Rev. E REVISING PIPE MODEL FOR NUPIPE RUNS RF.ASON FOR REYISION:
- 1. Latest Nupipe run is not in satisfactory agreement with Field Verified Work Sketch.
- 2. Other -
Release to Re-run STRESS EMGDTEEE SUPERVISOR DATE
ha g
4 81 F
t O
e m
s E
a c
C e
A h
P 5.
0 ees N
trae T
C cr L
ec E
A sc F
E C
a I H M
.S RYK OER FRO W
A..
P Y
s y y, U
L.
R 5
g R
8 N
I.
f,
og g T
S D g,
_ l F
E g N g s
y
, E Cg M
)
E g H
g C g g
M i
E F
g O.
P1 P
N U
M S
O R
y P
P B
5 L
a T
g g
E F
g E
P H
5 g
5 g
E g W
R g E
B N
I A g V
L.
P g E
O p T
R g R
.4r 8
P g-T i
R 3
M p
s y
B A g P
Mg O
Tg,
y 1
g 1
p P
G U
5 W
M py D
g 0F C
0 g
E M
I g,
P P
s PI F
1 1
g C
K O
F S
H y
~
F E
S L
~
s
. ~
g I
Y Il P
~
S N
O E
I A
R.
L-L L
L L
T N
D A
D A
D D
D D
L D
A C
L L A LA A
LA L
LA A
LA N
R A
K GO A
N LA M
N A OTi I
e A,T N
A OTT0 OTT N
A 5
NI A OTT0A OTTO A OT A OTT O
T S
e MLEE0 M LEE 8 MLEE M
M LE 0
M L Et I S
D M
I T M
MLEE E
LEEl N
R DBRS R DBO1 R DSG RDB 9
R Dta5 DI R
4 R
l R DB9 E
A EAOD A EAOD A EAOD 0
EAO A
EAOD A E
A D -
L AD DSO A E AO0 f
AODC HE C
HE C
HE C
HE n
HE C
HE i
A ON H
C R
O
+T I
LO E
nC TD AC TD MC T D N
T h
f TD C
TD dC G
L k C TD C
D e O O
a s
I O
O O
O N
H
'5. D G
E R
I C
W O
O ll 1
L E
mD
. W LlD I-5 E
OpL 0
M PAA E
1 EOT rB T 8
HLO E
TCT eD T
D r= S P
I D B
NM D
E OlL S
D lO M
L DE
=E:
O ES2 DS TS S S
O A E D R A
D L
B A
E O
B:
T CfL R
DSL NSl O.
ADc RA a
- AN PO tai PM PO S
I l
M ELD RIr4 E
Sl R
EEO EE E
TST K PP s
A WW CI U
IEE oPPI M
C M
M DMM HUU E
t lNl)
SNN T
s I2 5
a 8
T L
S j
\\
l' 2
Forn 5 Rev.
ORIGINAI.
Aas Page pO*AL OPSIC" ID AD
- APtiL3"In" SITE" SYSTE" rALF, "O.
I.I'!E ';O, ven. :n.
/
P,it"DOP.T ? 0,
"'YPr 4 F. CSS FI. :.0.
qpppng-
!!Fl:/RE" _
D*,/nFV
- )L LOAp TYPE rX(LD)
FY (J.D)
P ". ( LB )
P'X (PT LD)
M2 (TT 1 i
- 1
- GCC
!XtCF.T"' +
+
+
+
+
+
+
,' 'i, P
!.APGnr." -
I?
r' AD."!n t:Ar.f: (LAP.GES"
+
+
+
+
1 1
VALuE OPET OR D3E")
.roL 1l2.
COL 3l1~'A
~
i l
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
- ) '. -
..LU lcnr.:l1 l COL 3
+
{-
"" V)?.O.'i D i
I l
"Or.T DOSITIVE ALCT!inA IC AI.I."
l I
- t'E P." ' !.
"Os-
- EqA Ivr,'
i 3 7.cn".n.s T c A r.r,"
+ (CCLS) + (COL 6) + (COLB) !
l
'St1PPORT Dr. sigil L6nh
~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~
LCOL9 f.10 FO" PARED)
..OTE :
Check hvdro load anainst design load Preparer Date CHEKED BY Date
Ton: SA i
SSI ARS sev, o DES 1614 LOAb TAsut ATto N SHEET CASE I kok_ows C ASE 3 ; bTERM&5ESS @cef_I.X B'4cBkOCCLL]
(..
)
SYSTEtt CALC...
LI!!E 'lo, sp ot.. Ec.
5!?PPoP.T fro, T.* Pr STRESS FT. NO.
a;t PPO'*
u,'-,f m, seer sumaar
% wo ( exTe-col IAAD TYPE rx(La) rY (LD) 7:(La)
Mx(n
)
n(r Ls)
M2'rT e I*
i Cccu 1Anr.Est +
+
+
+
+
+
i i
2
'1Anats -
3 ta'tw av^kg-t t
t t
(ofbEI X,9+0BEA) t M3\\
4 +
COL 1
+
+
+
+
+
+
i' _.
+.h3 n.
l COL 2, s,
5 l-s nEAntoAn MOST POSITIVE I
ALGEBRAICALLY THE W.AL MOST ITEGATIVE l
8 ALfIE9RATCALLY i
t 9,
~
I 10 o(COL 5) + (COL 6)+ (cola) 1 i
~
~
12 5UPPORT DESIGN LOAD __.,
LcOLSE10 E MPAREg) l NTE: C. heck hucl.*o load asninst des s3 n IM Prepa rer Date CHI:: KID BY Date
(
SSI ARS rm so 1
gev. o b1E S% N Lo AD Tt.SutLTioN SHEET 3
touow., t%e 2 : OL + 7HER Page 27
\\
SYSEtt CALC,!?O.
l LI!!t !!O, sy ne, so, SUPPORT !!O, _
TiPC 53I55 M. No, c;pppon-SPnT so*4mmav
%sae4o 4,DATE D1N RTV COL IDAD TYPE FX(LB)
TY(LD)
TZ (LR)
MX (TT LE)
MY (TT LB)
." ; ( T T ' i 1
2 l
3 s
4 i
i 5
I
~
6 CEADLOAD 1
t MOST POSITIVE 7
ALCEDRAICALLY THERMAL 5905T litGAIVE 8
ALCE9RATCALLV i
p
+ (COL 6) + (COLB )
i 12 SUPPORT DE5IQ4 LOAD _
i (COLSL10..Nf2ARED) 4
',, NOTE:
Check hydro load against design load Preparer Date CHI:: KID BY Date I
i
- /
0 l
I.
337 gag Ten SC OtSIGN LOAI) TAEULATIOM SHggy CASE III Rev. o tomowe, cwt 3: bt. + ( CBiI x B +DBE A) p,3;: e 28 SYSTIf1 CALC, "O.
LI!C '30, se nt.. t;o.
StfPPORT !!O, 711 :.
sTuss Fr. No.
seer umuay gpppo.
em no 4 wrc D,G/ RA, COL M AD TYPE TX (LB) rY(LD)
P2(LB)
MX (P* LL)
W (F7 L3)
F:(PT :-
1 2
3 EARTffoUAKE 1
i i
1 2
d>bEI% 6 + bbE Ad a
+Co'3
!+
+
+
+
+
+
5
- col 3 i
l-
.6 CEADLoAD I.
4 9
R i
9
+ (COLS) + (COL 6) 12 5UPPORT DESIGN LOAN-(COL 9 &10 COMPAP.ED)
NOTE : ched h Are leaA agensT desgn \\ed 3
Preparer Date i
CE:: KID BY Date 4
l
Fe.
"' A d
Rev,
- Pese 20 CALC NO PROB NO SUPPCRT N0 J.C.
NO VEPCO sun 9V MIPC SUPPOttT A*! ALYC f r
- U""A7v 3up.j-SYSTEtt SPRT SveM ARY Ruw No ( MTE POTNT tJO F.11 D PO R*
P.S.A W9 K S VETCH LINE NC DWG/Rl'V N U3 E R TYPE r.:
l'y r.:
t.
OLD TOTAL DESIG1 I,0AD NE:w TcTM...DE54N LOAD
(%'20%v*EE7A* EON *$58'E*==T)
!!ANUAL CALC O STDt'DI,
't:1'I 'JO D7 7' MAX MEttDER STRESS tin rtp u.
c31,r A;.f.CW SHEAR CA!.c A I. * "'"
WELf)S cAtr A LLn' t
,j VEliDOR QUALIFI!'D ITEt'S CALC AI.:.n'c INTEGRAL ATTACIIFFflTS S
PI LUr, O PI TPtl."T RUN NO D AT E._
MAX STRESS c att Au.cw COP 9tEtCS :
DISPOSITIO: or st:PPonT ACCEPT REJECT - USE roem 8 PREPARER CATE QECitED BY DATE5 e
t
Form 8 Rev. 2 Page 30 PIPE SUPPORT MODIFICATION OR ADDITION REVIEW SURRY NO. 1 PROBLEM NO.
SYSTEM MKS NO.
DETAIL OF PROBLEM PROJECT SUGGEST SOLUTIONS I
SUBMITTED BY:
Principal Engineer OPTION REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENTATION 4
b AGREED UPON RESOLUTION RESOLUTION BY SR. ENG. MANAGER (IF REQUIRED) i 7
l Sr. Eng. Manager I
Option Review Committee Date Project Engineer
P ge 31 J.O./ CALCULATION NO.
Rev.
Paga of Form 9Surry Rev 0 12846.22 VALVE INFORMATION REQUEST PROBLEM NO.
VALVE NO.
MSK NO.
VENDOR SYSTEM NAME LINE NO.
ANALYST INFORMATION REQUESTED:
INFORMATION FROM VENDOR to be filled out by Project i
VENDOR CCNTACT j
i l
S&W RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER & DATE l
l l
l i
I
W Me 32 J.O./ CALCULATION NO.
Rev.
Paga of Form 10 Surry Rev 0 12846.22 EQUIPMENT INFORMATION REQUEST PROBLEM NO.
VALVE NO.
MSK NO.
VENOCR SYSTEM NAME LINE NO.
ANALYST INFORMATION REQUESTED:
l i
INFORMATION FROM VENDOR - to be filled out by Project I
VENDOR CONTACT i
d I
i S&W RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER & CATE l
1 i
9 I
9 9
t I
I I
I
Surry Unit 1 J.O. No. 12846.22 Form 11 Page 33 SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION BUMPED STRESS CALCULATION PROBLEM NO.
MSK NO.
Run No.
Run No.
Allowable Stress = 1.8 SH 1.
Maximum Tool Stress Point Point S
S (max) +(.5) S DBEI ST (max)
T DBEI No.
W 2.
Maximdm Inertial Stress Point Point S
8 DBEI (max)
T (DBEI, max)
T (DEBI, max. )*
- DBEI No.
3.
Other Points (Per Section I Item 10)
Point SDBEI TOTAL STOTAL
- DBEI No.
4.
Report Maximum of 1,2, or 3 on Form 2 (For DBE Condition)
Preparer Date Checked By Date l
l
)
Pr6 ject Surry Unit 1 Log Number J.O. No. 12846.22 Form 12 Page 34 REQUEST FOR GENERATION OF HARDWARE MODIFICATION ( U/ DETAILED EVALUATION Problem No.
MKS No.
Rev. No.
System Date Description of Hardware Modification (s)
Include:
Line No.
Type of Support Reason for Modification Listing of Design Loads (If Applicable)
Preparer Date Checked By Date
Surry J.O. No. 12846.22 Form Z Rev. 1 Page 35 FINAL REVIEW Problem Original MSK/REV.
P.S.A. Work Sketch NO. / REV.
STATEMENT OF INTENT:
To review consistently for all problems and systems the approach, development, and adequacy of documentation for the review of seismically designed piping at Surry.
Requests for hardware modification (s)/ detailed analysis as listed below have been transmitted to Operations Services Division.
These requests are not part of the pipe stress reanalysis effort.
JOINT REVIEW COMMITTEE Engineering Mechanics Date Engineering Assurance Date Project Management Date f
.