ML20133M771

Discusses Denton Testimony Re Seismic Hazard at Facility. Prepared Testimony Not Up to Date.Ltrs Should Be Sent to Congress & Committees W/Updated Info.Draft Should Be Modified to Remove Defensiveness

ML20133M771
Person / Time
Site:	Maine Yankee, 05000000
Issue date:	05/31/1979
From:	Denise R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Rolonda Jackson NRC
Shared Package
ML20133M133	List: IA-85-301, Forwards Draft Temporary Instruction Providing Guidance for Inspecting & Evaluating Licensee & CP Holder Responses to IE Bulletin 79-14, Seismic Analysis for As-Built.... Comments Requested by 790723.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20133M130 ML20133M162 ML20133M174 ML20133M190 ML20133M211 ML20133M223 ML20133M232 ML20133M247 ML20133M261 ML20133M289 ML20133M293 ML20133M428 ML20133M451 ML20133M483 ML20133M505 ML20133M523 ML20133M555 ML20133M563 ML20133M575 ML20133M607 ML20133M621 ML20133M635 ML20133M646 ML20133M662 ML20133M685 ML20133M699 ML20133M722 ML20133M737 ML20133M743 ML20133M752 ML20133M757 ML20133M771 ML20133M786 ML20133M842 ML20133M853 ML20133M873 ML20133M891 ML20133M896 ML20133M908 ML20133M919 ML20133M959 ML20133M973 ML20133M996 ML20133N121 ML20133N130 ML20133N148 ML20133N166 ML20133N203 ML20133N381 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-301 NUDOCS 8508130255
Download: ML20133M771 (1)

Text

/b es_

,s su%

M -( 'm z s

[

1. o, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g

4 E

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

. p#

May 31, 1979

,Cogo c 1

NOTE TO:

R. Jackson

SUBJECT:

TESTIMONY ON EARTHQUAKE PROBABILITY In our discussions with H. Denton regarding seismic hazard at Maine Yankee, the question was raised on whether Mr. Denton's previous testimony should be revised. To me, the question is one of comoleteness rather than correction.

I do not see anything substantially incorrect in the prepared testimony, but it is not up to date with present infoma-tien. There is also the question of whether the newer information gives a different perspective such that the old testimony is now misleading.

I do not feel that it is misleading, but agree that it now could be read that way.

3 Bill Russell feels that letters should be sent to the Congress and Committees with updated infomatiori.

I agree that this is a good approach.

A copy of Bill's note to Eisenhut dated May 10th is enclosed.

Insofar as your draft is concerned, I suggest that it be modified to re-move the GSB " defensiveness" so that paragraphs can be included in a letter as Bill Russell suggests.

It then should state the straight forward facts as they are now understood. When the paragraphs are prepared, i suggest that they be sent to BillMussell.

$1 Yt1^,,

Richard P. Denise, Assistant Director for Site Technology Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis cc:

J. Knight W. Russell l

8508130255 850703 PDR FOIA HERRMAN85-301 PDR 1

.