ML20126D357

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Ofc of General Counsel 840530 Memo Re Order Which Amended License.Plant Should Be Shut Down Until Regulations Can Be Met,Adequacy of Plant License Determined & Health & Safety of Public Assured
ML20126D357
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf, 05000000
Issue date: 05/31/1984
From: Gilinsky V
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To:
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML19263A614 List:
References
FOIA-84-459 COMVG-84-11, NUDOCS 8506150045
Download: ML20126D357 (2)


Text

p If [

.. UNITED.ST ATES.. ; -'

4 1

4 g ~y, g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

,f p

.r WASHINGTON, 0.C. 20353 i--

(g-ho

,f g

jr g

COMVG-84-11 OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER May 31, 1984 I

(VV to yd MEMORANDUM FOR THE COMMISSIONERS A

SUBJECT:

' GRAND GULF LOW POWER OPERATION It is clear from the May 30, 1984, OGC memorandum that the staf f's Grand Gulf Order which amended the plant license is illegal insofar as it relaxed the requirements for emergency power.

The Commission must act immediately to rescind that element of the Order.

The plant should be shut down until the regulations can be met, the adequacy of the plant license process determined, and the health and safety of the public assured.

To do otherwise would be a countenance flagrant violation of the Commission's regulations.

Let me remind you that the' staff stated in its May 24, 1984, memorandum to the Conmission that the plant does not meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50 General Design Criterion 17.

Nor do I think it meets the requirements of the several additional GDC's, each of which refers to the availability of emergency power.

GDC-33 Reactor Coolant Make-up GDC-34 Residual Heat Removal GDC-34 Emergency Core Cooling GDC-37 Testing of the Emergency Cor.e Cooling System GDC-38 Containment Heat Removal GDC-41 Containment Atmospheric Cleanup GDC-44 Cooling Water Let me also stress that the plant's internal safety review process has been recognized.to be inadequate and not.in compliance with the regulations.

Nor has NRC's review been satisfactory.

The Director of Licensing referred' to the license review process as inadequate.

The NRC' approved at least nine Technical Specifications and amendments for l'

' non-existent equipment.

Moreover, substantial numbers of documents which underwent safety review by MP&L's management and which were submitted to the NRC under oath have been found to be false.

Over 300 Technical Specifications and.

over 5600 pages of the Final Safety Analysis Report have i

8506150045 950205 1

PDR FOIA PDR BELLB4-459 1

6.

11 i

t

r-

?

w a~

requ. ired correction after they were submitted.

The causes for the massive managem'ent review breakdowns has not yet been determined by the staff nor so far as I know have actions been taken that would prevent recurrence.

SECY please track responses by c.o.b. today.

f

~

f Victor Gilinsky cc:

SICY OPE OGC O

4 0

1 1

l m.

., _ _ _ _