ML20107H526

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-219/75-13 on 750505-07.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Facility Requirements for Fire Stops on safety-related Cables & Penetration Seals
ML20107H526
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 05/20/1975
From: Haynes R, Plumlee K
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML18039A986 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-95-258 50-219-75-13, NUDOCS 9604240154
Download: ML20107H526 (9)


See also: IR 05000219/1975013

Text

. = . .

.

,

,

,

o

IE I Ybre 12

(Jan 75) (Rev)

U. S. NUCLEAR REGUIATORY CCHMISSION

-

gh

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION I

f

IE Inspection Report No:

50-219/75-13

Docket No: J0-219

Licensee: Jersey Central Power and Light Company

License No: DPR-16

Madison Avenue at Punch Bowl Road

Priority:

-

Morristown, New Jersey

07960

Category:

C

Safeguards

-

7,

Group:

em

Location: Oyster Creek, Forked River, New Jersey

{$

Type of Licensee:

1930 MWt, BWR

Type of Inspection:

Special, Announced

Dates of Inspection: May 5-7,

1975

g

Dates of Previous Inspection:

April 28-May 1,

1975

d[/J '

Reporting Inspector:

w'- ""

d'

K.

W. Plumlee, React'or' Inspector

' DATE

Accompanying Inspectors:

None

DATE

DATE

,

DATE

@ther Accompanying Personnel:

None

DATE

Reviewed By:

M.

L [&)

f/20[75'

DATE

Hayn/s,Sc'niorleac' tor Inspector

R.

C.

9604240154 960213

~

PDR

FOIA

DEKOK95-250

PDR

- .

-

,

.

.

.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

l -:;'

Enforcement Accion

A.

Items of Noncompliance

None

B.

Deviations

None

Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Items

Not applicable

Design Changes

None Identified

Unusual Occurrences

None Identified

YErd

Other Significant Findings

A.

Current Findings

1.

Acceptable Areas

Correlation Between the Facility's Requirements and the As-Built

Status of Fire Stops on Safety-Related Electrical Cables and

Penetration Seals

A visual examination was performed of fire barriers and com-

partment boundary penetration seals for safety-related elec-

trical cables. The observed construction of these items cor-

related with the documented requirements for this facility.

(Details, Paragraph 3)

2.

Unresolved Items

a.

Invokement of Facility Requirements for Fire Stops on

Electrical Safety-Related Cables and Penetration Seals in

Maintenance and Modification Procedures

An examination was made of the licensee's documented ,

policies and procedures for maintenance and modification

.

-.

_-

-

__

l

' *;

,

.

.

.

-2-

of fire stops on safety-related electrical cables and

penetration seals. The licensee is currently reviewing

44

these and will inform IE:I by June 1, 1975 of the results

(/fl

of current efforts.

(Details, Paragraph 5)

b.

Specific Areas of Concern re: Penetration Sealing

The following items are unresolved *:

(1) Cable routing

(2) Combustible seal material

(3) Fire retardant coating

(4) Battery room cable run

(5) Fire stops, seals and closures of penetrations in

.q

turbine building, equipment building, and reactor

~

building interior walls and floors.

B.

Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items

.

-

Not inspected

Management Interview

At the conclusion of the inspection the inspector held a meeting at the

i

site with the following personnel to discuss the inspection findings-

-

o

Jersey Central Power & Light Company

D. A. RossAs Manager Generating Stations - Nuclear

J. T. Carroll, Station Superintendent

D. L. Reeves, Chief Engineer

E. I. Riggle, Maintenance Supervisor

The following items were discussed and the inspector's findings were

acknowledged by the licensee:

A.

Purpose of the Inspection

The inspector stated that the purpose of this inspection was to

examine the documented facility requirements for fire stops on

safety-related cables and penetration seals, to visually inspect

these items for conformance with the requirements, to examine the

licensee's provisions for invoking the requirements during maintenance

and modification work and to determine the status of the licensee's

efforts with respect to the actions listed in IE Bulletins 75-04

and 75-04A.

.

.

  • Details, Paragraph 4
    • Participated by telephone conference circuit

. _ . -

.

.

.

-

.

.

- . . . -

.. -

. --

l-

'

<-

.

,.

3

, s l, '

.

-3-

.

I

B..

Current Fit _d!.ngs: Acceptable Areas

jg,Q

1.

Corre}ntion Between' the Facility's Requirements and As-Built Status

for Fire Stops on Electrical Safety-Related Cables and Penetrati.on

,"i

ly

. Seals

1

A visual examination was performed of fire barriers and compart-

ment boundary penetration seals for safety-related electrical

"

cables. The observed construction of these items correlated

with the documented requirements for this facility.- (Details,

Paragraph 3)

.

C.

Unresolved Items

1.

Invokement of Facility Requirements for Fire Stops on Electrical

Safety-Related Cables and Penetration Seals in Maintenance and

Modification Procedures

1,

An examination was made or .ne licensee's documented policies

!

i~

and maintenance and modification procedures for fire stops on

safety-related electrical cables and penetration seals. The

,

i

licensee is currently reviewing these matters and will inform

IE:I by June 1, 1975 of the results of current efforts.

(Details,

Paragraph 5)

f

2.

Specific Areas of' Concern re Penetration-Sealing

The following items are unresolved *:

a.

Cable routing

,

b.

Combustible seal material

c.

Fire retardant coating

d.

Battery room cable run

Fire stops, seals and closures of penetrations in turbine

e.

building, equipment building, and reactor building interior

)

'

walls and floors.

D.

Status of Licensee's Efforts re IE Bulletins 75-04 and 75-04A

s

The licensee's follow-up to IE Bulletins 75-04 and 75-04A includes

the development of procedure preparation guidelines and certain pro-

cedures and possibly the installation of a fire suppression system.

(Details, Paragraph 6)

  • Details,. Paragraph 4
'

-

o

i

l

.

_

_

.

.

.

. .

o

.

.

.

DETAILS

,

1.

Persons Contacted

,.

, - ,

Jersey Central Power & Light Company

J. T. Carroll, Station Superintendent

D. Reeves, Chief Engineer

W. Riggle, Maintenance Supervisor

D. VanNortwick, Plant Electrician B

2.

General

a.

Plant Status

-

.

The plant was in a refueling outage during this inspection.

b.

Purpose of Inspection

The purpose of this inspection was to examine the documented

facility requirements for fire stops on safety-related cables

and penetration seals, to visually inspect these items for

conformance with the requirements, to examine the licensee's

provisions for invoking the requirements during maintenance

and modification work and to determine the status of the

.,

    • "'

licensee's efforts with respect to the actions listed in

IE Bulletins 75-04 and 75-04A.

3.

Correlation Between the Facility's Requirements and As-Built Status

for Fire Stops on Safety-Related Electrical Cables and Penetration

Seals

a.

Requirements on Cables and Penetrations

(1) FSAR and Technical Specification Requirements

Scaled penetrations are required for containment integrity

in the reactor building (secondary containment) walls.

Isolation required for 4160 volt dual emergency circuits

includes a firewall between the switchgear; physical

separation of bus sections, feeders, power centers and motor

control centers; and enclosure of feeders to vital equipment

in rigid steel conduit.

,

$

- . .

.

-

-

. .

-

.__

.

. _ .

.-

. ..

.-

t

'

4

~S-

'

(2) Other Requirements

7

,

Insulation on power cables and control cables was stated-

u.

di

to be self-extinguishing material (either GE VULKENE or

FLAMINOL' brand).

>

b.

Observations

-(1) Acceptable Areas

>

.

Visual examination of the electrical cable trays, conduits

and penetration seals. verified the correlation between as-

built construction and the above requirements, as follows:

l-

--

Control room floor penetrations were examined, and 769*

appeared to be sealed. Two others were found not sealed

-

and the licensee sealed them before the completion of the

inspection.

,

The licensee stated that nine others, that could not be

examined because of physical location, were sealed.

'

Except for a few unused thimbles closed off by steel discs

and plastic bushings, the control room penetrations

appeared to be sealed by a (dry) mineral wool ** packing

~g

material.

.,

<

i

l

Reactor building (secondary containment) wall and roof

penetrations were examined. All 167*** ciectrical cable.

trays, conduits and spare thimble penetrations identified

'

,

appeared to be sealed (described below).

The licensee

j

stated that a typical cable trayrpenetration seal was:

(a)

(Original application) two injections were made

.

(inner and outer seal) of pourable Kaowool which

hardened in place.

(b) Periodic leak testing and resealing resulted in the

4

additional application of one or more of:

Pourable Kaowool or similar material

Dry packed Kaowool or similar mineral wool

Duxseal

Isofoam

Inspector's count.

    • Knowool, manufactured by Babcock & Wilcox
      • Inspector's count

'

.

4

e

i

l

.. ,

.-

__

,.

,

.

_

._..

. . .

1

.

.

-6-

Inspection of t'ne 4160 volt ducts and switchgear verified

that isolation was provided as described by paragraph 3.'a. (1).

Inspection of the emergency diesel generator rooms and

cables verified that isolation was provided and there was

a concrete wall between the diesel generators and between

the two control panels.

Fire-fighting equipment was visible.

As an example a fire

hose and portable fire extinguishers were available near

the entrance to the cable room.

The lower bays of the turbine building were equipped with

automatic overhead sprinklers.

Insulation on power cables and control cables was examined

on a sampling basis and was identified as either GE VULKENE

or FLAMINOL, on e

.h sample.

4.

Specific Areas of Concern re Penetration Sealing

a.

Cable Routing

The inspector examined a combination storage / cable pulling room

containing 25 cable trays, 67 rigid conduits and 14 non-rigid *

F#

conduits. Areas connecting ** to this room included:

Main cable room (openings 5XS and 5X3 ft)

Pipe tunnel (opening 4X4 f t)

460 volt distribution room (opening 2X4 ft)

DC battery room (tunnel SX6 ft)

The main cable room also has openings to an equipment room above

>

the control room (a pipe chase opening, 2X10 ft, partly filled

by ventilation ducts, conduits,' pipes, etc.) and to the turbine

building (nine cable trays through a corridor).

The inspector found that there were no cable-penetration fire

stc~

The licensee stated there was no requirement to provide

cable fire stops, or to close up or seal the above openings.

b.

Combustible Seal Material

The licensee's review of fire stops and seals following issuance

of IE Bulletins 75-04 and 75-04A apparently identified Isofoam

,

  • Greenfield type

e

    • Estimated sizes of openings follow

1

. . _ _ .

_ _,

-

_

__

.__ . _ - . _

_

. __

___

-.

. - . _

_ . . _

'

.

.

.

.

i.

.

'

.

,

-7-

.

r

1

1

as combustible. The licensee removed a piece of Isofoam from

-

,

an electrical penetration seal.

It was ignited and burned

,

completely.

,

1 Ta .

.

~e 9 '

The licensee stated that the Isofoam was at most only-an inch

'

l

or two thick and did.not extend from one side of the seal to

the other; thus propagation of fire through a seal was stated

to be unlikely,

t

4

No test data were available that would substantiate the licensee's

.

'

position on flame resistance of seals. The licensee stated that

there was no requirement to remove or coat over the Isofoam.

<-

c.

Fire Retardant Coating

.:

No fire retardant coating was evident and the licensee did not

,

commit to apply such coatings to electrical cables or penetration

seals.

'

i

d.

Battery Room Cable Run

l

All electrical cables supplied from battery room DC distribution

j;

panels A and B are collected into a single cable tray.

j-

The licensee stated that the specifications do not require

isolation of these cables.

}ggg

,

!

e.

Fire Stops. Seals and Closures of Penetrations in Turbine Building,

Equipment Building, and-Reactor ~ Building Interior Walls and Floors

.

-Turbine building,-equipment building and reactor building interior

wall and floor penetrations were examined where electrical cable

-

trays, conduits and spare thimbles pass through. Typically, no

seal or closure of these penetrations was evident.

(No requirement

,

i.

was identified to seal or close the openings identified.)

!

The above items a through e are considered to be unresolved pending

completion of the licensee's follow-up on IE Bulletin No.75-04A and a

,

j

subsequent review of their actions by an NRC inspector.

~

5.

Invokement'of Facility Requirements for Fire Stops on Electrical

j

' Safety-Related Cables and Penetration Seals in Maintenance and

~

Modification Procedures

'

Job orders are used to initiate work on cables, fire stops and

penetration seals. The licensee's supervision controls the work to_

.

$

.

..

-

, .

.-

-.

.

--

.

-

-

- ]

.

.

.

,

-8-

,

be done, states what procedures are to be used, supervises work as

it progresses, and accepts the completed job.

However, no maintenance

or modification procedures for penetration seals were provided by the

,

licensee.

,

This item is considered to be unresolved pending completion of the

licensee's review of their procedures as a part of the licensee's

response to IE Bulletin No.75-04A (Details, Paragraph 6) and sub-

sequent review of their findings and actions by an NRC inspector.

6.

Status of Licensee's Efforts re IE Bulletins 75-04 and 75-04A

The licensee's reply * to IE Bulletins 75-04 and 75-04A described

their efforts on procedure preparation guidelines that specifically

address the concerns of Item 3, parts a through e of IE Bulletin 75-04A. This is scheduled for completion by June 1, 1975.

4iiii%

  • Licensee's letter to IE:I dated April 24, 1975

,

$